HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes. ~ ~~
i
u
erved
s
ve
a
h
a
oul
ew
c
alread con ested area. The tutoring serve p
Y g -Thirt_ -two ro ert
to 250 students du-ring the eveninghours. y p p y
owners within 200' of the subject property were notified with .one
inquiry.
Chair erson Sawtelle opened the public hearing.
p
Re resentative Oscar Parulan of 2606 Pernales:,approached the
P 'ton would salve .the
Commission and explained that. the new loca
arkin -concerns expressed in the previous meeting. Several
p ~`
ad acent property owners. have given their authorization t:o allow
7
parking on their lots after business hours.
~~
fll
A licant. Bill Varvel of 1600 Southwest Parkway informed the
pp in the Universit Plaza
Commission that of the 130 available:,spaces y
II Sho in Center, 114 spaces would be available :after-5:00 pm.
pp '~
The Southwest Savings lot will provide 20 additional spaces, First
American Bank 45 spaces, and the Mudlot 3OO spaces. The facility
' e more than ade ate arkin and should be grunted a
will hav qu p g
conditional use permit to_allow a tutoring service.
f
~,
~~ Chairperson Sawtelle closed thee..public hearing.-
,;
,;
I• ~.
~' Mr. Esmond stated that .the use will. be an asset to the area and
utilize `an existing vacant lease space. He moved to_ grant a
conditional use permit to allow a tutoring service` tQ be located at
~~ 725-B University Drive in the University Plaza II Shopping Center.
Mr. Michel seconded the motion which passed unopposed t~ - 0}
~~
AGENDA ITEM N0. 6: Public hearing to consider an amendment: t~ the
Zoning Ordinance to require a etback of 40~ where cammer+cial
Industrial development abuts residential development. X91-8~9)
Staff Planner Kuenzel presented the ordinance amendment which was
drafted in response to Council's concern regarding areas in the
City where C-2 uses, such as C C. Creations, abut residential
develo menus. In -June of this year, Council approved a rezoning
P ,
request that will allow fora, the expansion of C. C. Creations. one
of the lots that was rezoned to C-2 is adjacent to Duplex
devela ment and abuts Single Family in the rear, The City's
p
Comprehensive Phan states. that comercial-Industrial development
~ should not be located on land that adjoins residential development.
In ca es where such a_stuatian is impossible to avoid, the poYcy
should be to require that the uses face away from each other.
Council would like to take this policy a step further and require
that. C-2 uses maintain a 4 0' setback when they are- either adj ace~nt
to or behind single Family or Duplex zoning or development. The
proposed 40' setback would provide a softening of the. impact cf the
building.
Mr. Hall ex lainedthat a height requirement should be considered inn
P ° °
`order to adequately buffer the impact of a commercial Indus ra
use. The separation wou d not help buffer taller buildings. He
1
~,
P & Z Minutes July 18, 1991. Page.4
,:~
,i
~~
,~