Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesca". ~,a sted that the 'note addressin maintenance of the drainage easement located Mr. Esmond sugge g_ een lots three and :four be clarified to state that the homeowner will maintain the.. surface betty The Hate addressing drama a onl and the pity will maintain any underground improvements. g Y . f he :drama a easement located .between `lots ix and even should be clarified to maintenance a t . g • ass cover will be maintained b the ~ state that the rip rap will be mamtarned by the Ci~y and the gr Y homeowner. ,, '' ved to recommend a royal of he final lot ~ of ~lenhaven Estates. Phase :VIII Mr. Marlon mo pp Gated at the intersection of Glenhaven and Brazoswoad D'~rive with the additional notations la ' outlined b Mr, Esmond. Mr Esmond seconded the motion which passed unopposed (5 -:0). Y ~~~ '~ AGENDA T~['EM N0.3: Consideration of a final plat for' located::on the not -- Avenue and Millers Lane) 91-221 Teas of -comer ~ ~ ' the Ci En ineer Mor an resented the staff: re ort and stated that he proposed plat Assistant to tY g g p P ~~ coin lies with the coin rehensive lan and the thoroughfare plan. The applicant has. included ail ~, p p p of the affected ro ernes on the lot as re uired by. the Project Review Committee.. The ownersh p p p P q a licant has re uested that the ublic infrastructure (sewerlne) requirement to serve the Stanley pP q p . 'Investment .::lot be waved. They do not wish to construct or (guarantee the improvement at this ' e. The a licant has rovded construction drawings and a 20' utility casement for this tim PP P infrastructure. The a licant is not sure of the future use of the~~ property or what size sewerline will Pp be needed. Aceordn to the Subdivision. Regulations, the subdivider must either pr©ceed with the g '' :before the Iat is recorded with construction: of the improvements or ....guarantee .the improvements p the Coun . Staff recommends a royal of the. p at with the condition that .the., sanitary sewer. ,, ~' pp improvements either be constructed or guaranteed. Fain: Mc Du ai re resentative of the a licant, a coached the ~, Commission and requested that the ;, g ~ p pp PP sewerline to serve the Stanle Investment of be waived. Stanle ~ Investment Group has no desire to y ~' develop heir lot' at this time. TAC Realty wants to develop its Iot into First American. Bank. They _ have no control over the other two tracts on the ...plat.. The infrastructure .requirements to serve Lot 1B are not desired by anyone. I - is not fair to require TAC Realty to provide infrastructure to a lot that the do not own.. The two Tots on the plat not owned by TAC Realty are .required to a .. Y ... s:. TAC Realt is bein re uired to participate in the .:plat by the City s Subdi~~slan Regulation y g q correct :previous property owner mistakes. ` Assistant to the Ci En ineer Mar an ex lamed., that the subject land was illegally subdivided by g g p metes and bounds descriptions instead of by plat as required by :ordinance. The current ownership l boundaries have changed since the original plat. '-Mr. Esmond stated hat excludin a lot is not desirable but the City has came across it before in ~. . Southwood Malley. The boundaries of the :.other two lots would be fixed even if .they were not :included in 'this plat. The' lots could even be referenced on 'thee. plat by metes and bounds descri bons. Then, when Stanley Investment Croup decides to develop, they can install the. sanitary P sewer .line using the 20' utility easement provided by TAC Realty: Assistant to `the Cit En ineer Morgan explained that the intent of the ordinance is not to burden Y ~ . TAC Realty. Stanley Investments will have to be a party to he plat either way. The only .way the City can guarantee u ilites to the Stanley Investment lot is through this plat. Mr. Hawthorne stated that by; requiring TAC Realty o guarantee: the sanitary sewer, we are assuming -that Stanley Investment Group has an agreement .with TAC Realty..to post these ,_ guarantees. P Z Minutes March l4, 1~2 Page 2 ~ - i Mr. Pullen preen#ed slides. Cour~eilman McIlhane asked Mr Pulier~ to describe the locaton of the Counc~lrna,n Schneider seconded the motion