Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutess Dan Sears stated that the easement could be included but was excluded because it is not part of -this plat. Mr. Colson moved to approve the final plats of Pebble Creek Phase 1A (90-21:1} with the conditan that the..: plat reflects the 20 foot off site easement on the east side, iB (90-212}, 1C (90-213}. The .motion was seconded by Mr Esmond; the Commission carried the motion unanimously: A~GENYaA ITEM NO: 6: 90-212: Final Plat-Pebble Greek Phase I B. See agenda item number 5. AGENDA IT£M N0. ?. 90-213: Final Plat-Pebble Creek Phase 1 C, See .agenda-item: number 5. AGENDA ITEM N0.8: 9Q-41 Z: Parking Lot Plan -Addition to the .Taco Bell restaurant on Harvey Road. This project is in the V~'olf Pen Creek .Zoning District... Ms. Kee presented -the project to the Commission and stated :that :Taco Bell requested to .partially enclose the front patio to~ provide additional interior seating by adding a glass atrium t~#he~ront of the: building, and to replace a storage building with an addition to the rear of the building. The Design Review- Board met an Juy 5, 1990 and recommended approval with requests to -improve ~ahdscaping once the atrium is built so shrubs will be visible from Harvey Road.: She .:added that additional parking would not be necessary and the exterior design will match the rest of the building. Lynn Colson made a motion to approve the Parking Lot Plan at 310 Harvey. The motion was seconded by Mr. Gentry and carried unanimously. I, AGENDA ITEM N0. 9: Consideration of renewal of a Development Agreement between the City of College Station, Skipper Hams and the owner of the property known as-.the "Mudlot", a commercial parking lot located at Church and-Nagle Streets. Mr: Kee presented the case to the Commission..: On April 20, 1989 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed development agreement bu$ to include a waiver of items #5 and #9f (requiring the installation of additional :gravel and the removal of all construction debris} until, after June i 1989, but to require compliance to all other conditions immediately. 0n April 27, 1989, .Council authorized a development agreement for one year from June 1989, including the recommendations mentioned above and also requiring the installation of railroad tie wheelstops, after June 1, 1989. At present all conditions of the development agreement are being met. Chairperson Sawtelle favored the extension of the current agreement through -the end of 1990. Mr. Hall expressed concern as to the continuance of a temporary: paring lot: Other parking lots in he area are required to .maintain their property according to the City Standards and these `standards. should apply to the Mudlot. The initial temporary nature of the parking lot has become permanent.. Mr. Esmond agreed with Mr. Hall- and suggested that Chairperson Sawtelle's idea be considered and only extend- the agreement through the end of 1990. Thee. main concern is .;that the: lot not :become vacant: and create a public nuisance. Mr, Colson suggested that. a hard surface be .placed on the lot within a given .amount of time. By setting :.the deadline on January 1, 1991, NIr. Harris would have adequate time to comply. and better knowledge of his .future plans. He then .made a motion to `renew the development agreement but to make a recommendation to Council stating that Mr. Harris be required to apply a hard surface t6 the parking area and comply with all other City Standards by January 1, 1991. Mr. Gentry asked to amend the motion to extend the deadline to :June. 2, 199I because it may be difficult to resurface he parking lot during he winter months due to weather conditions. Mr. Hall said he would like to require the applicant to work. towards an ::improved surface in the meantime.