Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes1 1 ~ ~ - ~ o ,. .. , ., r,~ MINUTES ... CITY OF C~LLEGESTATION TEKAS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION April 19, 1990 7.00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Sawtelle. Members Colson and Esmond. MEMBERS ABSENT: vice Chairman Dresser, Membe rs Gentry, Davis, and Michel. -STAFF PRESENT: -Senior Planner Kee; Assi tar t Flann~~r Kuenzel, Asst, to City Engin eer Mor~~an-,: Asst. City At orney Banks, evelopm~nt Coordinator ~lolk, and Planni ng Tech. Rosier. Assistant City At orney Bank read sections fr om Robe,rt's (Rules of Order regarding lack o`f a quorum. S e explained hat any action taken tough will: be voidabl . The Planning and Zoning Commi son must ratify an actions at- the next meeting which must be conducted befo ethe item is considered by Council. She explained that an one wising to speak 'in favor of or in opposition to these ems could speak to-night and not ,have to return for the ext meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO.. 1: Approval of minutes - mee ing of April. 5, 190. Esmond made a motion to apprave:,the minuted c ntingent upon the correction of a typographical error on th first page , Mr Colson seconded-the motion whch'carred nanimously. f3-0} AGENDA ITEM N0. 2: 90-?01: A public hearing to consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Da Care facility ~ to be located at 1104 Hawk Tree. Applicant Donna Myrick. Assistant Planner Kuenzel presented the,~staff report. She mentioned t~.at the proposed acaton is ~ lot away from Rio :Grande B3vd. -She'~oresented slides of th e sub eot pra.perty She painted out that the lot is: ap~~ra.~i.' ate? y 145 feet deep ...,..,not 8~ feet ~s mentioned in the staff re port. Ms. Kuenzel stated that the applicant w ould b the sole employee and that the children would b~ kept n the h©use er in the back~~ard 1 ~- ~.~,~ ~, ~a A ,, ~ I f 4. - .. - ,.: 4'. .. ' i ~ ' .. ~~ _ Assistant to City Engineer Margan presented t e staff report. She explained: that this is a f final p at which bypassed the preliminary .:plat stage.:: She~sa that the developer desires to subdivide the property to 2 Large tracts to allow for' different ownerships. Ho ever, she ointed out that the develoer has agreed to p rovide shared easements between the properties for utiltie and access: . .. ~ Mr .Margan said that the pleat..as submitted d es locate all public easements with the e~ceptian of the ex sting . easements for electrical transmission guys, ~ . nt access :easement between the properties, and the widt desgn.atian of the right-of -way 'along Holleman . She said that the above . ~ are proposed to be handled by an "as bui l t,,' p at to b-e f~i l ed prior to being issued a Certificate of Occupy cy. Ms; Morgan 'hen summarized the information in the impact studies. Ms Morgan said that the P&Z must::conside.r th signage allowed on `the property. She stated that the Zoning Ordinance a-lbws one freestanding sign per bu lding ~~ of . A building plot is defined as ail landwithin a p~aject whether it be 1 or more lots. She further ex lamed that the determination of boundaries of a building plot shall be made as the 1st step in the site .:plan review nless made at the time,.. of lot a raval previously _ p _ p~ MorgarQ stated t that P&Z has the authority to determine that these 2 lots com o e 1 buil~in lot for urpo es o~ sgna p g p p ge. Qnee a ~ a ~ determination ~.s made,.. Ms . N~organ sold :,that a y requEsst far a ariance would be: heard by the Zoning Beard of Adj~stment._ Mr Esmond questioned the drainage aspects of the projects. He asked if staff satisfied that :drainage can be provided ~_ far L'et 1 on this plat. Mrs. Margan answered yes.: `~ aid that he is ~?ncarnfortable _with~ Mr Esmon s future dedications on plat. He said that he was re ~e~rng to the "width unknown" on Ho l l e~nan Mrs . ~.orc-an said that the Graf f is Engin~, ee~: ~~?~ worked. an the t.raff~c'i~:act stud: contacted the City Engn eer's office, She said that the discussions were an e ffort o resolve same:.:, alignment problems at that corner.. in c~ aperat ia'n with the city's Holleman Street project. Margan state that phis proposed solution h'ad been dropped to somE e~ te'nt because it uid nc3t appear to be economically fEasib{~. She pointed t~11S ~?'t~ ter; ~ fie r~dS41~ far ~~.lQwing It t0 ~e ..~ '~ t,L?nk~own" . ~, .n--~,. ,~ ,~.,,y„ .,~,,~ .~,: ~~ i .City Council Workshop.~ieeting ;, Page 4 Wrc~nesd<.3y, May 9 1990 enda~ item No. b - ~~cussion aid 'a royal of B.V.S.W.M.A. ~w c~~t__ ~r ~b~._~n~e o~.~~fsoal__~" M~°.~_~d~' September 30,E .1.990. ~~.r~get I3irector Schroeder e~pl~ihed this item. ~'~~~.~~~cil.man Birdwell ~,nqured a'~o~.~t the transporta ion ~..°~~~~~.~~~:~:~~ement ex~;~en~.. of $2 0 , 8 ~ ~~ . ~~r . Schroeder repel led that It ~~ ~~e :~.~tent .~_n tie . v S . W m .~~#.. T aF.~~ ~~~~~nt to reimburse the city ~~ ' ~° drive ~~g ~~n ~ ~~~~gest c~ ~ ~, ., n,~, ,.~ the l,andf i l 1:. "Sta f f ,...~~ ~ ~ ~n~.~~~d to~i.:oc~t~ ~~e clause- a,.~~: t~~e ~~greement. Councl~an'Birdwell moved approval of ~:.he BvS.W.M.A. budget ~~~. ' ect to cl~arif icaton on the transportation reimbursement epensem The motion was seconded by Councilman Haddox. dud et Director Schroeder indicated that the item was originally g `~..c~~ he agreement but at some point it was deleted and intended to be handled each year a's a budgetary item. Councilman Haddox wit4~j~. ~.:~ew his' second. to Councilman ,Birdwell ° s motion. No second was made to the motion. Councilman Haddax moved to approve the. budget for B.VS.W.M.A. the motion was seconded by Councilman Brown, which carried by a Y~a~~~e of 5~1. Councilman Birdwell voted against the motion. ~^~e.~d~ item No. 7 - Discussion az~d approval of amendment to the ...~ `~~ ~. ~.° ~ ~ ~ .~scal :.:Year 1 90 Budget • Mr. Schroeder pointed out that: 100 signatures .have not. been ~;~~tfied at .this time. He requestedthat..this ite~ be placed on ~~~.e a enda for the .next regularly scheduled council~meetng in g tiro weeks . ~~nda item No. ~ -Consideration o~ a: Final Plat - Ka chinsk ~~ ~~°20~ . (lann~ng and _~~recommended approval, 3-01 . ~~~-~©nica Morgan, Project Engineer described the subject tract. '~.. ~~ ~l~,rmning ~.nd ` Zon~.~g Commi~.~ ~~~n recommended approval of the :~' _~_:~~a:~.. ` Peat pending ratif catio~~~ ~~Y ~: quorum at the Nay 3 , 1990 . ~''y~J~ ~~p~ ~.ined th~.t tie P&Z Co~~~i:~. ~sic~h expressed concern about the :. .::._~. ~~.~,,~~~~1 inre~s a~~d egress ~ ~~1.;~ each development. Ms. Morgan ;.,~.:~:~n~,ed out that, the developer ~~<~ , ~gr~ed to dedicate the. ~f~:dit~io~~l right tur~~~ ~.ane on ~-I~ ~le~lan which will be constructed ~,~ part of the city's Holleman ~T~re~at project. ~"~~~nclman~Gardner asked if the chid lane southbound on Texas. .+~~~~,.~~ ~;~~11 s~,:<~y the v~~me. M::; ~~'~~~~r~°~~~~ ~4~plled that this was f _i _ -i 1., City Council Workshop Meeting Page 5 Wednesday, May 9, 190 -addressed in he traffic impact study, and t e engineers concluded that this lane will not be a pr®bl m. Discussion wa held on the..-.right-of-way on H ghway ~~ at the` third ~. ~~~e a~ ~ acent to the property :fir . Roy :.Hamm ns of Culpepper ~ ~..~~~~::,~~.~.~es `and fir. John Hudson o~ Tr_ a f_ f lc En , sneer :~ Incorporated ~. ~, ,~ ~dd:~ es,.w,~d 'the ~aunci:~ ~~uncilman Sc~.neider pointed o~~t a concern r gardinc~ the curb cute ~~~etwAen Park~ray Plaza and ...the development. Mr gammons mentioned that he has nfot met w h the owners of ~~~r?~~.U `Plaza to consider the option. of acce s on the southeast ~:.~~z~~.~r f the property. He has r~o obj-ection to the request ~rc~vded that no problems: arise .with the pla ement of the ~~L~ildings p councilman Birdwell asked why the developer` id not provide a ~r.~.lminary plat. Mr. Hammons repl~.ed that he time constraint .~. ~~ .x ~~ dine ~o the sale and purchase of: .he pr®pe ty. He also stated -~~_~~t the owner has agreed to dedca~.e the 16 ft. right-of-way. for the rig.~:t turn lane along the length of the roperty. Councilman Brown moved approval: of the final plat with two ~~°~:~.:p~l~.~.ions, 1} the Final "As-~~uilt" plat b filed for record ',~~efore the `issuance of the Certificate of Oc upancy, and 2 } ~~~uest thee `developers work with st~.f f and t e developers ~of ~~~~-~ay Plaza to provide access et~=;~,a~e~n the wo developments. .:_~~, t~~.at h~ ~ ight-~-of-way far ~~:.he ~~=i_~~~~t to n lane indicate the ~d~:~~~al ~aidth on the final plat. ~:..~~.ncilman Schneider seconded the mc~t_lc~n wh h carried ~~~~~r~imo~.~ ly, ~-l~ C.ouncilman Gardne~° ~r~tng gainst the motion. ~.~~a :hem ~ 9 - C~hs-derat~.o off: ~n~.nut~ order from the Dartmnt of 1~.~ays Pu~ 1 ~LL~..z ~'~am ortati®n ,~r~ nm~~.n T~a~ Avenue as Business R~~ute 6. Councilman Birdwell moved approval of the m ute order. The ,~~~~ ion ~~~as seconded by Councilman Gardner wh ' ch was approved ur~anlmously, 6-0