HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes`\
'i
,~
' oes not dsa ree with Mr Jones in that at some point in time,
He said- that he g
' will be consolidated into such ownership patterns that re-development
this area
into:.' another style will be appropriate.
t want this to ha en a arcel at a time. In the meantime,
Mr, Dresser does no pp p
he would like for it to stay single family residential which does not necessarily
mean owner occupied.
J"'~ ' .~r1t++~~ Qy(. aid that Mr. ones comments in regard to crime and
~,L,Iaii L., Mrr DrV.J~Vi ~ j. .. a. a
deterioration are valid but unrelated to the rezoning :question,
. ~ at she would not feel comfortable voting fore this rezoning_
Ms. Davis said th
based on the comments made at this meeting. Plus, she mentioned. concern
"Hunt" house and the fact that 240 Montclair has a shopping center as
over the
a nei hbor does not increase its desirability as R-1 single family in her opinion.
g
and reco nized that this property.. was probablX one of the most
Mr. Esm _ g
controversial subjects which has come before. the. Commission. And even
h the comments of nei hborng residences should be considered, Mr.
thong g
Esmond believes that the owner's investment should be considered as well..
d asked Senior Plannex Kee for her thoughts on R-4 zoning o keep..
Mr. Esmon
the roe more consistent :with. the neighborhood..
p p~
said .that the nei hborhood is zoned R-I single family. She said that R-4
..She g ,
would ensure a lower density. However, she pointed out that the tract s small
size would: robabl preclude R-6 density anyway. (The parking would.. not be
p y .
~~ ode note. She said that R-4 would allow the: rooming house anal the present
q
use would .still: be conforming.
~,
Mr Esmond alto believed that the fact that nearly half of this lot is a parking lot,
~ necessitates special consideration. He said that the Commission contributed to
? allowin the arkin lot.
this dilemma by g p g
Mr Dresser summarized the discussion as the following: whn it .came before
~ the' Commission in the past, most believed that .multiple uses such as a b_o_arding
house or fraternity house...were inappropriate for the site:..
He su eaed that if the Commission has changed its opinion than dote to :..leave
gg
thee: current zoning. If .they still feel that certain uses' are inappropriate, Grote to
rezone.
Ms. Davis made a motion to disapprove this rezoning. Mr. Gentry seconded the
:motion which carded in a 3-2 vote. Dresser and Colson apposed the motion.)
i
1~~END~ I~L'E NCB, 4: 9~-201: ~ina~ P~~t {~e~1at) Southwest ~""iila~~~~ Applicant
is an~e ~. C~uto~a for C~-iony gaga dank.
J
Fissistant to Ci En ineer Morgan presented so '~ e background information on
g ~ .
this plat. She explained the plat's location as being he intersection of
Southwest Parkwa and Medina. She stated that this is the site of an existing
apai:~tment -complex. She stated that he purpose of :this replat s to resolve
' several distance discrepancies on the original plat and to~ place existing City
utilities in dedc~~.ted public utility easeents She stated that An the
P&~ minutes March I a, 19.90 page S
P&Z minutes March 15, 1994 page-