Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReportSTAFF. REPQRT rase No 90-110 Applicant: Edward Froehling Request: Rezone lot 82, Block b of Southwood Terrace Second 3=C from R-1 Single Family to R-1A :Single Family. Loca~on: On the south side of Ponderosa approximately 300 feet, east of the intersection. of Ponderosa. and Rio Grande. Physical Features: Area: Approx. 2 and 1/2 acres Frontage: - Approx. 400' on Ponderosa Depth: Approx. 300' Atea Zoning: Subject lot and surrounding properties are zoned R-1 Single Family F~xisting Land Use: Subject lot is .vacant;:. single family-residences are to the east, south and west; ark. and single.. family residences to the north across Pon erosa Land Use Plan: Area is reflected as low density residential Engineering• Water# 12" line along,. Ponderosa:. /Adequate /Need to extend Sewer:. 8" line along Ponderosa and the eastern most and western most boundary /Adequate Streets: Adequate' Flood Plain: NA Drainage: Flow is from the :end of the proposed eul-de-sac to the NW- corner of lot 6 which has a drainage structure in the utili easement. It carries water under .Ponderosa through Brot ` ers Park Other: No access cane be taken from Ponderosa from individual lots Notification: Le al Notice Publication s) 1U-31-90 A vertsed Commission caring Date(s):: 11-15-90 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 12-13-90 Number of Notices Mailed to Pro erty .Owners within 200': 39 Response Received: one inquiry No opposition Staff Comments: The request is in compliance with the land use plan and is necessary to ..avoid haven to seek a variance as the confi uration of the pro erty farces 2 of the lots to have sh _tly less than the minimum dept required in the -1 zone. The R-1A zone-does not ave minimum width or depth requirements and allows more flexibility in of design. The applicant-has looked at several different designs and all result in lots with inadequate depth far compliance with the requirements of the R-1 zone...:. Rather than seek a variance the staff recommended that because there is a zoning district available hat solves the problem, this would be the :preferable solution. All lots will exceed the minimum lot area required in both the R-1 and R-1A zones.