HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReportSTAFF REPORT
C~~SE No. 90-10g APPLICANT: Buchaanar~ISoi1 Mechanics, Inc. for
T.A.C. Realty.......
RE t]EST: Rezone the lake ro erties and an undeveloped ..portion of
_Q p p
A-a zoned ro ert in the V~oodcreek Subdivision o R-1 Single Family
p p y
}
PHYSICAL FEATURES:
DIMENSIONS; The A-O tract is a 15.?? acre tract located just. north
and ad'acent to the exstin subdivision.: The R-3 lake tracts consist of 2
g
lakes totalling ?.27 acres.
AREA ZoN]NG:
Nar~h ~-o
East: ~-o
South: R-
West: C-1
~XIST]NG Tyi~ND USE: These three tracts are currently vacant. as are
surroundin ad'acent properties. To the east is a developed park. _ The
g ]
develo ed art of the subdivision is currently single family residential With
p p
some atio home development in ahe existing Planned Unit .Development.
p
LAND USE ~ PI~~iNf Reflected on the land use plan as .low. density-
residential.
ENGIl1tEER~1l'~:
STREET ~AP~CITY: Adequate
ACCESS: Will be to Woodcreek but will have to be extended through
the recently ..rezoned 11.3 acre tract.
FLC~ODPLi1t: No official limits of :the floadplain in thin area haver been
des nat~ed, Further analysis for .areas outside the normal limits. of study
g
are needed.
VStATER Provided through a 12" line along V~'oodcreek and .another 12"
line aloe Foxfire, Supply is adequate -to meet the needs of this rezoning.
g
Lines 1 have to be extended.
SE"U~ER; Provided throe h a 12" line thaf: runs along the crest edge of
g
the 2 lake tracts. Lines gill have to be extended to service the areas
being xezaned.
9 ..
NoTIFTC~TION:
Le al Notice Publications): 3-2-90 & 7-12-90
g
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates} 5-17-90
Advertised Council Hearing Dates::. 7-26-90
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Ov~mers V~ithin 200':12
Res onse Received: {one as of ?-16-gp
ST~-FF CoMClV1ENTS
This re nest ores no conflict with either the land use plan.: or the
q p
develo merit policies. At the 4-26-94 Council meeting where the Council
p
rezoned. a lar onion of the undeveloped subdivision to R-1 Single
g p
Famil the Ci Council re ested that ` he lake properties be. rezoned to
Y~ tY ~
single family as well.
There has been adequate.:.parkland dedication in the past to allow for the
develo merit of the ~-0 portion of this request into R- l single family.
p
i
~~
r