HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report.STAFF REPaRT
NO.: 9~-102 APPLICANT: CITY INITIF~TED
CASE
RE VEST: Rezone from R-6 to R-1A
OCATION: 200 Montclair Block 8, Lot 14 west Park
L
PHYSICAL FEATURES:
Area: 0.5 Acres
Dimensions: 79' ~ 269...
Frontage: 79'
Depth: 2~9'
AFEA ZONING:
North: C-1 General Commercial
East: R-1 Single Family
South. R-1
V~'est: R- I
LAND USE: Sin le famil rental and commercial parking lot
EXISTING g' Y
NDING LAND USE : Commercial, law density residential,
SURRCU
u kexes for detailed locations, see Figure 1 of the "Analysis", July 1989}
dp ~
D USE PLAN: Low densi residential (refer to "Analysis,
IRAN tY
page 3}
ENGINEERING: refer to Analysis, page 3}
MATER: Ade uate for low densi residential; more intensive uses
q tY
may cause problems.
SE~tER: Adequate far this area
STREETS: Street ca aci is adequate. The alley to the north has
p tY
been seal coated and si ned for .one-way flowing from Montclair to
g
~ighlar~d.
ACCESS: Access and arkin are adequate for low density
p g
residential ma be a `roblem fog higher intensity zoning
I y p
classifications.
FLC~ODPLAIN: Referenced lot is .located in the Bee Creek
V~tatershed however no ortion of the lot. lien .within the 100 year
p
flaadplain.
DRi~INAGE: Runoff from the parlang lot flows westerly down the
ublic alle .Runoff from the remainder of the lot (existing:. house}
p y
runs easterly down the public alley. Recent regrading: of the alley
has im raved drains a roblerns; however, infrequent flooding still
p g p
occurs within the alle and on the backside of the commercial
y
develo meets on the opposite side of the alley.
p
N~TIFICA~TION
Le al Notice Publications} : OZ-2$-90
~'
advertised Commission Hearing Dates}: 03-15-90
advertised Council Hearing Dates:: Q4-12-90
Number of Notices .Mailed to Property Owners Within 204': 22
Res onse Received: Two inquiries as of 03-07-90
p
ST,A.FF CC~N~VlENTS:
Ail staff comments are included in the "Analysis of the Zoning on the
Pro ert at 204 Montclair", dated July 1989. It concluded that the present
p Y
__
.zone is
- isolated
- unrelated to_the area
- not in compliance With..: the land use map
-not feasible for use as a buffer.. between existing-low density
residential and commercial uses due to its small size.
The "Anal sis..." re ort su ested that sin le family zoning would conflict
Y p ~g _ g
wsth develo meet policies which strive to buffer low density residential
p
uses from hi h intensit land uses.; However this situation exists now as
g y
the ro ert is developed. A. change to single family zoning would
p p y
reserve the character of the area, comply with the land use map and
p
eliminate the isolated spot zone.
i
i
i
~ -