HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesMJTES
Mr. Dresser asked if the duplexes ~n that area received notification of the
request.
Ms. Kee said that one of the responses was from an owner. of several duplexes.
Mr. Dresser opened the public hearing.
Steve Hansen came forward to speak on behalf of the applicant. He said that
he concurred with staff and believed the: proposed uses provide su~ic%ent
buffering.
No one else carne forward to speak in favor: of or in opposition to this. item. The
public hearing vas closed.
Mr. Colson asked the proper zoning for a hospital.
Ms. Kee said that hospitals :are permitted in C-l: However,.. they are allowed as
conditional uses in any other zone..
Ms. Davis: moved for approval of .this request for rezoning. Mr. Gent
, rY
seconded the mot2on which carved unanimously. -~5-0).
AGENDA I7~EM No. 3: 90-10~: A public hearing on the question of rezonin
. g
the follcn~nng :properly:
ZOO lUlontclair (Vest Park, Block 8, Lot 14~ from R-6 Ap~rhrnent~~Ii h
,,
Density to R-lA S~ng~IB Family Resident. Rezoning reques# ~s City ~ut~azted.
Senior Planner Kee explained the reques and the location of-.the subject
property. She mentioned the physical features of the lot including. frontage and
depth. She pointed out that the area north of the subject property is zoned C-1
General Commercial while others surrounding 200 Montclair are zoned R-1
Single Family.
Ms. Kee listed the surrounding land use as commercial; law densi residential
tY
and duplexes.
She stated that the sewer system. and streets.. in this area are ode irate. She
q
pv~nted out that water and access to this area are adequate fora low density.
residential however, more intensive uses may cause.: problems.
Ms. Kee stated that this request was initiated by the P&~ last summed Then
she explained the history behind the ..request. She said that in April of 1989- a
conditional use permit request came before the commission for a fraterni to be
~Y
located ~n the .::house at 200 Montclair. She pointed out that the request was
denied due to the strong opposition by its neighborhood residents, At the
request of the Commission, sfiaff prepared a ,report entitled, "Ar- Anal ss of the
y
Zoning on the Property at 20~ Montclair", dated July 198.
She summarized the report by saying that the resent R-6 zone at this locatia '
p n is
isolated and unrelated to he :area's zoning districts and existing Land uses. She
stated that it is not in :compliance with the uses shown an the Land Use Plan nc~r
is it a feasible buffer between the- existing law dens residential and the
. ,:
commercial uses m Southgate.
PAZ minutes lUlarch 15, 1990 page 2