HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReportSTAFF` REPaRT
DATE: Aprzl ~~ i~9
- _ APPLICANTa Skipper Hargis
owNER ~ Boye ~t t
REQIJESTs Extend development agreement ill .
owzng contznued
oper~t~n of the "IUD" lot.
LoCAT~oN~ Corker of Church and Naglea
PHYSICAL FEATURES.
...Area.; App_~oximately ~.$ acre sits ~3~~
.acres developed
as gravel paring l~t~
Access. From ~~~le with emerger~c exit o
y nto Church
AREA ZoNIN~ AND LAND USES
Subject Tract: C-~ general Com~ercial
No~th~ R-~i developed as apartments
East ~~~ developed ~s retail commercial
South: ~$ developed a~ af~ce com~nerciaz
westti R-2 across Nagle developed as church
LAND CTS'E FLAN
Subject tract and areas to the south and east are reflected
as
c~mmerci~l on the land use plan, T~ the north is .
shown as hzgh
density residential an,d to the wept as medium denst
reside~.tialf y
STAFF CoI~~IENTS a
In 1985 approval gas given to "kipper Harris for the o era
whit .has eo~ne to be called the P taon of
Mu:d Lots Thies is the parking lot
located in Northg~te at the comer of Church and
Nag 1 e.
The lot wad o~°ginally a large vacant trac
t of land that students
used for parking -They did sc~ illegally by trespassin on th
g e
property. The city contacted the o~ner becaz~se the tract was
being used as a parking lat without site. 1
p an revaew and
approvalp fihe owllerf George Boyetts was also ver eoncer
because cars were tree ass~,n Y ned
p g and .there was no control aver the
site. M~. Hargis then ofBred to control
o erah-e a l the Purkzng and to
p of on a temporary basing He received a two year
lease from the ow.~er. Because of the chart term nat
lease I~rs Harris did not wa ure of the
nt to put a lot of money into
imp.~a~vem~ents x
Ultimately the P~' arl~ SBA granted vari
auk approvals and
variances to allow' the lot to operate without i ,. .
and with a ravel s elands or st~.zpzng
g urfaceP Landscaping waS originally postponed
~..W---__ _ -_ _ _ _ I _ __
until theseoahd dear of ~peratian and has
subsequently. been
instilled. The eit~ entered inhc~ a d~velo men.t .
~~$5 sp+e~ifyin, the cohd ° ~ agreement ~.n
g ~ta.ons of operation o~ the project.,
This agreement was to be renewed annually.
A chronr~lc~gical ~i~tir~g of events is iven bel .
g ow,
$°°~~-$5 _P&~ approved a eal to l . ,
pp andscap~.ng and island
req~ire~ents for two ye~~s fat this time P~~ h
ad
at~thc~rity to gra~~t these va~riances~
~°'~~°°$~5 SBA granted a variance to s '
tr~.ping .for Phase I
~~-5-$5 ZBA granted a variance to
str~.p~.ng for Phase II
~~-~-$5 Development ag~eem~nt ~i ne '
g d and ~.ssued for one
year
F~l l ~ ~~$~ ~eve~op~ent agree~ent e~t+ended
one year.
9-~-$7 PPC reviewed and ~e~ommended .
.approval w~.th the
condition that the development agreement be
ren~weds It way signed ~y all e~ept a
represent tide of the estate of one owner who had
died,
~-~9°$$ SBA gr~n~ed a variance to
~.sland requ~.rement:s for
ane year ordinance had changed requiring variance
,from ZBA rather than P~~~
Ih is tine to renew both the. dev~lo meat
p agreement and the
variance to the island req~,ireehts, The PRC °
rev~.ewed th~.s
pr'c~~ ect on 4°~-$9, Attached is their report, ~'he .
staff zs
asking the ~om~nission. for revie~ end comment relative to
the
development agreement. This agreement will then be forwar
the City ~c~uncil for their ded to
cons~.derat~.on. The honing Board of
Adjustment will ha~~e to consider the island variance re
quest.