The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscellaneous Property Management Commercial · Residential A.tEXA.NDER ryrcperlies Real Estate Sales · Leasing March 1'8 ,1991 Sabine Kuenzel Planning Assistant City of College Station PoO. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-0690 Re: Landscaping at Homestead Place {aka Shiloh Place)renovatic:,n. Dear Sabine: I app~eciate the information and co[yof the site plan. I have marked on the plan 'where we planted the trees. As you can see, two of them (1 and 2) are not where originally shown on the plan. One was planted in the first locationl but didn't do well. I ca.n only specul ate it was because it was shaded by the Post Oak trees to~~ering above it. The other one was not planted wh~re indicated because it would have been directly in front of a tenant'~ sign and it too, would have been in the shade for much of the day because of the building. I feel both trees are in. better locations now. The other two ~ weren' tpl anted because we didn't finish that par~~ of the parking 1 at until early NOVelTtber . I decided to wait until after winter to plant those two. Thanks for the reminder - I had them planted last week. Please call, if there are any questions. Sincerely, ~r\~~ David Alexander Owner's Agent P.o. Box 5445 · Bryan, TX 77805 · (409) 846-9087 "'P^~ttt,~,p~ MR\ri ., It f{tM~ Mr. David Alexander P.O. Box 5445 Bryan, TX77805 March 4, 1990 RE: Landscaping at Shiloh Place renovation Dear David: Pursuant to our phone conversation last week , I..ran a copy of the site and landscape plan. To avoid confusion, I have summarized the requirements as they relate to your site as follows: - 500 additional points were, required at the time of the revised site plan - Half of these points, or at least 250, need to be in canopy trees, the rest of the points ,may be canopy or non-canopy trees, or shrubs - One canopy tree is worth 75 points - Four trees would meet the canopy tree requirement, for a..totalof 300 points - Only one tree was counted at the time of' inspection, three more are needed If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. Sincerely, Sabine Kuenzel Planning Assistant Mr. David Alexander P.o. Box 5445 Bryan,TX 77805 March 22, 1990 RE: Landscaping at Shiloh Plade renovation Dear David: I received your letter regarding, the trees you planted ort the subject property.' I inspected the site yesterday and found it to be incompliance with the landscaping requirements. Thank you for working with us on thismatte:r and for you timely response. If you have any questions regarding this or any other matter, please let me know. Thank you. Sincerely, Sabine Kuenzel Planning Assistant _I 11 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING. DIVISION Post Office Box 9960 11 01 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842-0960 (409) 764-3570 October1l, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: David Alexander, P.O. Box 5445, Bryan, Texas 77805 Larry Wells, P .0. Box 9249, College 'station, Te~{as FROM: Project> Review Committee: Jane Kee/SeniorPlanner Mark Smith, P.E., Assistant city Engineer Lynn COlson/P&ZRepresentative others attending: Bill Riley, Opera,tionsManager - WIS Division Ray Havens, Electrical Superintendent Coy Perry,. Building Official D~borahWilliams,Administrative Secretary SUBJECT: Revised parking~otplan - Additionof2pneumatic driVe-through stations in an existing driveway c:\nd adriye-throughinthe existing building in Shiloh Place Shopping Center Phase I (89-410) The P.R.C. met on this date to review the subject proposal, and made the decision.to approve the project with the following ...recommendations.: BUILDING DIVISION: The canopy need to be ofanon~ combustible material. ELECTRICAL DIVISION: The power pole located at the southwest corner of the building needs to be at least 10 feet from the building. when relocated which . will put it out in .. the church's parking lot. An easement will be needed from the church to relocate the .. pole. The estimate for the city to relocatethepoleis$3,256~ WATER & SEWER DIVISION: No problem with the installation of the fire hydrant as shown. Final location is subject to the Fire Marshall's approval. PLANNING &.ZONING:One half of the 500 minimum points for landscaping. needs to. be.. canopy trees. G.T.E.:Noproblems identified. >4 ", .. ENGINEERING: No problems were identified. PUBLIC SERVICES: No problems were identified. The applicant indicated that aplat.willbeprepared granting the access easement and any utility easements. In order to allow remodel ingto beginitwassuggestedtha t (:in interior remodeling permit be applied for. Then once utility construction plans are accepted & the ,plat is fil.~d, a permit for the remainder of the project may be applied for. SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF A REVISED PLAN OR PROPOSAL TO THE PLANNING... DIVISION.. AGENDA CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Proj ect . Rev ie~\fCommit t ee Wednesday, Octob'er 11, 1989 10:00 a.m. PARKING LOT PLAN - Consideratio,n ofarevisedsitejparking lot plan for the addition of 2 pneumatic drive through stations to be located in the Shiloh PlaceShoppingCenterC89-410) J il~i) ~f~f _. ~H l~'+~ \@L~4 (~ ) j-'" j _ ~__ ..~."___~ .~_. _.. ~ ',n_ . ..,_ ~~.Cliifl"" .. . '~j-II."'. 'r.~.. ........_.._.... .., rU I: \ 111.,"/ . i! I .. ....-.. ........... ... '.' ... .......;;.. ..........~=/(;?~~.....~ .. ./:ID=........................_...._..............(.~.._-=...-;. / . . . - . -~ ...~ .._..-::rAqJ~n~_n. '.. III ........I[t!-~~...~~...~.....~...~.... ill .iil H., -~~2' ~..~-.'.n~ . --<-/i2~.,..~.~" . .......- . ... .111_ ...................-.... . _ ,/,.~ . .~--d~..~.._....n.~.;:: __.' ~~...... . - .nfd._~~.-'.Yf1P#--.~-- III ! II (fiil -. .. I I r r ! ! I Ill!' . -..... ~ J fd'--- . :~jj~_.. 'i i, l ~ t ! 11 i-H-- .........Iin.~................n .....~..._~.....~ .t"....I.I!",.n. ............ .... /, .....~....~.-.'~......'f-o._...~-..~~l0j-.... Iii '4-{). ~ ' 1...1'1:. ..... ..n ....,.......... .'. ....~...... ... : f Llt-..n..n . ! : j III --~I~---- --" ..- . c/.. ~~__ tJ,G . Ii 'I' hzu..__.~H-..H " "~"~"'''\'l. ." ~~".,,,~~, .., ~"--~-..~~,.....,..".. -\\\.......-..---- .. ./1~a~~~ ill _/~( ... "-'Hf- ' 111- . , ~ A~ ~ '._ _Hi 'I} ~~.._,~, - ... --Ill-- ........ ............ ... ---- - . \i I ...... .. .lII......... t f ~ ! I ~ lll.... . . III - .llt.... i\I-~......'..-.~..'." 7.....~.. / .'.- - A/ ./ .I ~ , 11 ~~..,.,~ '1\1- 'Tn- li i ; ; \ 1:1 ,.~. .......,!'!-t" \ \ I --I \ \ .. .. ,..J.1-1, ,,..- ill 1 \ I IIj "1-ll' ! i ill i i I \-Il ! II ~ ! I ...."'1\ I 1, ; I : t ,. __ .. HI. - ........ .. -I II .. .. .... ..... .-... .il -W--'H 1 tJ"......-........,.......... ...,,,~,, . "~ .....,., ..--- -." ..~~. ~ .. "~"~I --' (L_ .... ..] , 'J \ 1 i ' , I 't I .' 11 ,.....~. ~~_.._.. .. ______- .... ... ..~/H-- --.w._"....,.,~....., .._/22~~..,. -~~ +-~ ~-~~ ~ . /-u-L ,......... - ..~ ~ -~ .~...~~................ /1/ >__. / ~_ ~....."...,......._.,.. ~.~ 4 ~ Iii i j I ~~~~-~~~Z:~~~~ ~........... III ,"_~_...~Jl.lw ! II 'i 1\ -itl. .... Ii l _L.L~~ ~ . III ') ! __LLL ,---____ - Ii j III ; II ill "+11- lll'l -.. ..1.1 1\ ' I'll II ill i -nf .. It! IU III .UI -Ill -.\~I j II Il[ Li! r \ 1 : II ... III.. I. j I. ! I i i ,411 II, !1I : I! 'p! ill Ut III i i '--j1- --. '..- i 11 i I [ ; II ; Ii J,lj,- ill III .~t. , i! ,. ; I _.++~.. I! J~ ' ~ 1 kd ~<__ ,._ ... ....,__~_.. .._',.'",",_ __ '.." m __".~._ ~t c.. 2: .,,- ....__ ...... ... ......... .... __~~w._ ............~ ... ... ........ . --~. ...........-.. ................. ............~........~.. q_____ .... _ ... ~~_~_~;i~ . --- ..1;. ~tJ?~~ .........Yd ( ~. sh~ )~ applicant developer/owner architect/englneer site. proposed project site. drawn,tabulated and dimensioned. 11 'of the Zoni-ngOrdinance (Ord.No.l'638) 0 12) and units tooecanstructed on the proposed ~ach"~:':bu i 1 ding. 16) 17) 1 :8) THE bulldi'ng coverage of site. r~quiredby ordinance and provided by proposal. all structures, parking spaces, ,drives, curb cuts, , ' 1 ) 2) J) 4) 5) 6) 7) A (Sec.],pg 30) 2 I ' overhang. \' ],1 Standards for Plan Development (Contin.ued) page 2 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) Wheelstops~ayberequlredoninteriorrows 1 ongerthan ,10 spaces ori n specialsi tuations. Slclewalksareamlnimum4ft'. wldeon si'te; 6ft. wide adJacent to parking spaces. D'l'>rect(lfofPublic$erv lee? determlnesnumber, sIze and approves ] ocat i on of dumpsters.. Parking isJands are 9'x20 ';~r180 squar.efe.et. Healthy~nativet]:.ees D~er 6"~allper should beretaJned whenever ppss ible. C~rbcuts.aredeteirmJned bY.iCl~yEngineer. Standards. are one. clJrb cut fora siite., wlth125.....feet..street...frQnta.ge and .two...cuts for ..25:0 feet ...frQntage. An a~ditiona150() feet offr~ntagT,J:needed fOf'eachadditiDnal cut. In general, k~TPcut$at least 200 feet. fir~major . lnte rsect iDns . See .......Ordfmance.. .1638 .S,eeti"onlJ',}'f(:)r .la'ndsc8pingrequ irements. Fire<lan~sofamlnimumof20:~eet inwldth with a minimum height clearance of14feett'nust.peestabl ist:te~tfiany structure of any type is more than lSO..feetf:r~m 8 flub 1 lc..street,'prh ighway. Anyst~uqt!ureinanyzonin9dii~~rlct other than R"1, R-1Aor R-2 must be within 30,Ofeeto'f.a fi rehydrant . aSi~ersuredal on9 apubl ic.. street. or highway. FI:r~hyd"'9,flt~ must beilocate~, ~ry thesames ide ofamajor street as, a project, an~shallbejna location aPPfoved by the Fire .Marsha 1 · s Dffice and the Super- inteflde~~.{)f Water and Sewer .. ()fflce:?,..:t>~slnes s. facilities:.:ln'excess ..... of 5,000 sq ~ ft. must. furn i.sh pa rk i n9 sP~ices(~inlmum $ize12'x~Oi'~designated for use by.handicapped persons only, ~l~tlrql11JL1.s:wit.n .no~"r.(!atere~ia~ientthan 1:12 and a mlnlmum wldthof 4 feet. S'E;~,SECJIJON '.508 OF .' THE 'SIANDA;RIJ 'BlJI [0 lNGCOOEF'ORADDIT l'ONAL INFORMA TION . 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) September 6, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: David Alexander, P.O. Box 5445, Bryan,TX 77805 FROM: Project Review Committee: Jane Kee, Senior Planne Mark Smith, Assistant C. Lynn Colson,P&Z Represe Others attending: Bill Riley, Operations Manager - W/S Division Ray Havens, Electrical Superintendent Alan Colley, GTE (prior review) Harry Davis, Fire Marshal Kean Register, Lone Star Gas Coy Perry, Building Official Jim Smith, Sanitation Supervisor (prior review) Marianne Banks, Assistant City Attorney Shirley Volk, Pla:pning Technician SUBJECT: Parking Lot Plan-Addition of2 pneumatic drive-' through stations in an existing driveway and a drive- through window in the existing building in Shilohl Place Shopping Center Phase I (89-410) The P.R.C. met on this date to review the subject proposal, and made the decision that approval of the project could not be' recommended due to the following concerns which were identified: ~!l!!!!!!Ng!!!Y:!~!QN: The structure cannot extend into the bu.ilding setback or into an easement. ~~~. g~~Rg~IN~~I!yg: The southernmost driveway, which is proposed to share access wi th the church adjacent to this project, mlust continue to provide 2-way access' to provide access to the church. The stacking of traffic on this lot which will be running parallel to Texas Avenue would tend to create a distraction, and therefore becomes traffic hazard. ~1~gI~lg!1: There isa power pole located at the southeast corner of the building. If this pole is moved, any costs involved in relocating it must be the responsibility of the developer. If the pole is relocated to the point shown on the plan reviewed (Plan E), it will have to be guyed on the adjacent property (the church). A written agreement to this from the adjacent property owner must be submitted before this can l::.e approved. E!Rg M~R~!!~!!!! ~ !!~:r~R ~ ~~!!~R ~!Y!~!Q~: A fire hydrant mus,t be located within 300 feet of all parts of all buildings as thLe hose lay. The church on the adjacent lot is provided coverage f~r.om the fire hydrant at the northwest corner of the building. If the hydrant is moved to the location proposed on Plan E, and tile driving lanes. are.develope.d with 3 lanes of traffic circulslting thr-ough 2 pneumatic stations and a drive-through window on the weste.nd of the building,. fire emergency equipment would no~ lo~ger; have. access from the hydrant to the church, and an additional hydrant to provide coverage for the church w.ouldl be required. Before adding or moving a fire hydrant, construction documents must be approved by the City Engineer's office. INq!NI~R!Bg: Redraw any revised plan to scale. Show the exact location of the 20 foot utility easement which runs parallel to Texas Avenue. Neither the structure nor the pneumatic stations can be located in a utility easement. Concern with the proposed 3 lanes of traffic was expressed. The amount of space for stacking vehicles it too short. Circulation to/from and within the parking lot will be bloc:ked. ~!!~N~!~@Lg,QN!~q: Any landscaping destroyed must be replace:d somewhere on the site tomaintainatandards existing at the time of approval of the shopping center. Zoning Board of Adjustment action will be required if the canopy or cover ext-ends into the front setback. Concern was expressed with the proposed shared access. An acknowledgment from or agreement with the church must be supplied by the applicant. ~!J~11g ~E.RY1~~~: No problems identified. g~I~I~: Coordinate service requirements with LaVern Akin or Alan Colley of the Company. No problems identified. 1Q~~ ~IAB gA~: No problems identified. SUBMIT -10 COPIES OF. A REVISED PLAN OR PROPOSAL TO THE PLANN'ING DIVISION BY NOON ON ANY FRIDAY TO BE HE-SCHEDULED FOR REVIEW BY THE P.R.C. AND ALL TECHNICAL DIVISIONS ON THE FOLLOWING WEDNESDAY. PRC89-4'J;'/~)rf 9-6-89 Page 2 ~.A"CITY Of=COLLEGE STATION ".~.. . .. .. . PI-ANNlNG DIVISI()N .. .... ... · ... Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842-0960. (409) 764-3570 October 11,.1989 MEMORANDUM TO: David Alexander, P.O. Box 5445, . Bryan, Texas 77805 Larry Wells, P.O. Box 9249, College station, Texas FROM: project Review Committee: Jane Kee, Senior Planner Mark Smith, P.E., Assistant city Engineer Lynn Colson, P&Z Representative others attendinq: Bill Riley, Operations Manager -WjSDivision Ray Havens, Electrical Superintendent Coy Perry, Building Official Deborah Williams, Administrative Secretary SUBJECT: Revised parking lot plan - Addition of 2 pneumatic drive-through statio.ns in an existing driveway and adrive-throughin.the existing building in Shiloh Place Shopping Center Phase I (89-41.0) The P.R.C.meton this date to review the subject proposal, and made the decision to approve the project with the following.recommendations: BUILDING DIVISION: The canopy need to be of a non- combustible material. ELECTRICAL DIVISION: The power pole located at the southwest corner of the building needs to be at least 10 feet from. the building when relocated which will put it out in the church's parking lot. An easement will be needed from the church to relocate the pole. The estimate for the city to relocate the pole is $3,256. WATER & SEWER DIVISION: No problem with the installation. of the fire hydrant as shown. Final location is subject tOI the Fire Marshall's approval. PLANNING & ZONING: One half of the 500 minimum points fOlr landscaping needs to be canopy trees. G.T.E.: No problems identified. ENGINEERING: No problems were identified. " PUBLIC SERVICES: No problems were identified. The applicant indicated that a plat will be prepared granti'ng the access easement and any utility easements. In order to allow remodeling to'begin it was. suggested that an interior. remodeling. permit be applied for. Then once utility construction plans are accepted & the plat is filed, a permit for the remainder of the project may be applied for. THE ,~>t;::':1~;:~'~~,;~"'~_~k~-,~~,; ,'~:[ )r(f<~ZjJS: ..}2,}~~ 1~ ." tJcl- 4/tJ MEMORANDUM DATE .3ltdl9o / . . . I TO: ,,' ""~'~"'. DATE 2>/d,b .8!~ PUBLIC .SERVI CES SANITATION h-0 c5f~} 3~ l 6?. .... ................ . .... ...... ..... . '.' ..,.... /. '-". .~. . ~t- ~ , alz6Fg;~. ..~~ Sf-23... .. IV---- - ~....-~ iB/S>-2>k~'-f~ ~/t;l~ .~~~ _ APPROVA.L...............O..F..................B...U......I...I.DTNGPLANSFOR: ..~. '.1.':.)',,~ '. ". ;.... '~-k.. . U~(j #:qtJCJZJ..BbJl<... .. oJ/~~/ PROJECT :)-/()/I7c67eAD6AWItJ<516. I J 511/LL'/ /r/ ;:::'~/9 Cc TSSUEDTO"7j:d/) urt/ .~rJeL.l::)j~h6'~r WATER SEWER ELECTRIC BUILDING PLEASE REVIEW THE ENCLOSED PLANS AND NOTE <YOUR ACCEPTANCE :BY INITIALING. AND DATING THIS MEMORANDUMINYOlJR AREA OF EXPERTISE 41 IFYOUH.A.VE '.ANYQUESTIONS I . .THECgNTRACTORMA.YBE . REA CHED.A T THE PHONE NUMBER OR ". ADDRESS,,' ABOVE. PLEASE CALL SHIRLEY VOLK AT EXT. 458 WHEN THEY HAVE MET >YOlJRAPPROYALOR TO ADVISE ANY PROBLEMS THAT MAY NEED SPECIAL ATTENTION. Property Management Commercial · Residential ALEXANDER ryroperlies Real Estate Sales · Leasing May 24, 1990 Jane R. Kee Senior Planner City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College station, Texas 77842 Re: Homestead Place (aka Shiloh Place) construction. Dear Jane: All of the site improvements to the above referenced property have been completed except for the modifications necessary to the parking area toward the back of the property. The balance of the work will be completed no later than August 31, 1990. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ~~ f\~ David Alexander P.o. Box 5445 · Bryan, TX 77805 · (409) 846-9087 MEMORANDUM TO. FILE FROM: DATE: RE: Cathy Locke, city Attdrney November 21, 1989 Shiloh Place - David Alexander On November 20, 1989 , lspokewith Mark smith in order te) get some background prior to my meeting with David Alexander. It seems that David is in charge of pursuing site plan approval for Homestead SavingsatShilph Place. The property is currentlY plated with an unfiled plat. The propertysharesj oiD.taccess wi ththe neighboring Baptist: Church. Most of the driveway is across. the Church tract.. David has submitted a site plan which changes the Stat\lS quo with regard to the. Church property. It effectively.m~kes two-thirds of the driveway into a one way exit for jthr.drive through teller positions. This is the Church's OI1liY access. David Alexander was not required tohavetheChurchi.listed as a joint applicant. He was asked to provide the ~i~y with a copy of the joint .access agreement. It seems that nonE~ of the parties can find the agreement and that a proce~s ofne- gotiation is now going on between the Church andHo~estead. David carne .in toindic.atethat he was not very happy rwitll the requirernentthathei get permission from the .Chu:rch tC) change the use of part of the drive. I indicated to him that Mark Smi thwas really being pretty lenient on him' bE~- cause Mark could have imposed the requirement that .thie Church be a joint applicant since the change involves the Church. In response to his complaint thatMarkcouldha'/e just ignored the Church, I told him thati t would b'e unrE~a- sonable where a change is being made with regard.totheuse of someone'spropertyto do so without notifying them. He agreed, although not wholeheartedly. I ~lso told him that it would not beunreasopabl~ .for the Church to be complain- ing about the staff to the Council if wedidapprov~the modification wi thoutthe Church 'spermission. I thinkh~~ went away with a better understanding that the staff 'is l:1ot trying to give him a difficult time. CL:sr cc: Tom Brymer Mark smith Ron .Ragland