HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes~I~~E~
~~ ~ ~ ~.
M~
y..
~, ~
Mr. More asked what s~rill happen to the road pravidin~ access to. the ~it~r's
Wastewater treatment plant. ~< Galla~a~T replied that eventually it :411 be el~~ed
pith the timing being closely coordinated with the de~le~.oper, t~~ith fut~.re access to
be taken via .~ppomattex Drive. Mr. Dresser asked if it gill remain 'a drive to which
Mr. Callaway replied that it is an easement ~o~,~. Mr. Dresser then asked if ~.
anticipated that it will. become mother exit ar e~res~ to this subdivision to ~~hieh
Mrs Calla~~ay replied that is not anti~igated. Mr. Dresser explained that he has
asked this question because he is acaare of si~ilar problems ~f an unim roved ~r~.~Te
p
bei~~' used for access t~ asubdivision, and he could like to het that question
resol~~ed prior to Final Platting of this phase of Emerald Forest subdivisi€n.
Mr. Colson asked how it is possible to p-tat ene--half of a street ta,whieh Mr.
Call~~~Ta~.r replied -that ataff is ati~.l carr~7in~ on rese~;rch re ardn that rd cs~al as
~ b p p ~
staff ir.3 net entirely certain that it complies with ordinance requirements.
Mr dresser said he is troubled with the possibility of future propert owners
thinkin t~.e r ~~~ill be able to take access t ~ ~ ~ j
~ 3 o the~.r;; l~~s v~.a this unzmpro,~ed
accessway,_and he would like for these same people to know. up front, before a
purchase is made, that access ~~ this subdivsidn ~~~.1.1 ~ be taken on~.~.r free pp~mattax
give. He went on to say that if curb cuts are ~oia~ to be made along ~ rin creek
F ~
road, there is no doubt that even a dirt road will be used as access.
fir. i~ells of Municipal De~~elopm~nt Croup, regresent3n~ the de~TelQper came forward and
stated that although ghat particu?ar street is shorn as a collector street in the
Comprehensive Plan, it cannot be used as such ~a~ntil(it is up~'raded. Mr. Dresser
stated that it will be used as '~.an~ as it is accessible, and he wants the record to
show .that that read is not planed for access to this phase of the subdivision, Mr.
dells said there is anl~r one land ewner ~~o must take access via'that road, because
the property, the;~apchinski lid, is landlocked w~.thout it.
Mr. Cols~r made a motion to approve this preli:~inary plat with p~esu~mss~n
conference conditions and the add.-~tional ~onditi~n that: the question re~ar~~i~ access
via Se~~er dap Road be resoled ri~r to appreva~ of an r final lets bf the area which
~ F
include ang~7 p€~rtian of that road. Mr Dresser seconded the motion and e~p~.'ained that
~ his concern is' really the p~obabilt~.= of Font ~.nu~d use of en un~groved rc~d fey
access t~ this subdivision. ~~otes were cast on the motion with listed cond'itionN
and the motion carried una~li~ou.s1 f b-
~_ ~ ~~•
A~Ei~D~: ITEM ~o. ~: Other b~~i~ess
Mr. ~al~a~~ay informed the ~er~riss~.ners that the pl~.t o':f Southwood galley section 24
~~hich the~,= had consa.dered aid p:~.rt~.all~ at tie last meet~.n~, had else been determined
by Council _that the area alcn~ the feature' extension of !~elsh ..Street should be tabled `
and directed staff to prnvie additional inf~rmatior~ at tie first meeti~~ ~.~; ~ ril
p
re~ardn ghat question.
fir. Moore asked about a tour of the Centrdid Panch end fir. Callawa = stated ~:~.at the
~oissloners can form ~~ous ~f three, and set ~~ a tour dre~tl~F ~~ith the de~Telo er
P a
or he would. be hapP~' to ~er~~e :~~ coord~.nator ~1` theT so desired.
P~ Mia~ates ~-.~ c~
.~~-~ Pale 2