HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes~'
,;
~''
At this time, Mr Callaway and Assistant City Attorney Danko had a brief, pr:'~:vate
di cuss~iari, with Mr. Callaway informing the Commission that staff is not awa~:•e of any..
reasons why this cannot be'done, but taff doee not know definitely if it oar be
;- lone, either.
Mr. Dresser said that if this type of conditional waiver can be done, he wou~.d be in
favor of this plat. •.: Mr. Gardner asked if this ype of subdivision requires ~~arkland
dedication and Mrs. kee replied that it does nat.
Mr.: Callaway stated he city has never waived sidewalk requirements with thi~:>
condition, but the Legal Department and Planning Dvisan'are not aware of a~~y reason
not to do' a.t but a.f it is done lease state the cond~.tion in the mot
~ ~ P ~ ion.
Mre. Sawtelle and Mr. Mche agreed with Mr.` Dresser's statements and concerns. Mr.
Callaway then painted out that this is a'prelimnary plat:, and action an the sidewal~fi
~rar~iance request ~i~ht be delayed until 'the Final Plat' is submitted.:
Mr. Colss~n said that without any specific rules saying this Commissoncanno~ waive
sidewalks :with the condition stated by Mr. Dresser, he thinks it can. 'Mr. Dresser
again reputed that he does'nat think:-these users need sidewalks for their p~,ans, but
he xs st;~l concerned with-what might go an the ether two lots.
Mr. Esmanc~ stated emphatically that he thinks the Subdivision Regulations should
address the requirement `of sidewalks on residential streets. He painted otat that is
`not_now a requirement, and he would definitely like to have that section reviewed,
and would be in favor of chan~n~ it to provide a wafer glace for pedestrian, both
children :and adults, traffic.
Mr. Moore stated that although he doee.not think the city should get into the
business of telling an applicant how to develop his land, he wondered if cluster
parking with sidewalks to both businesses has been considered. Mr. Wells stated that
is .not passible in this instance fox these .awe businesses for several reasons
including he security required.
Mr. Dresser then made a motion to approve the prat as submitted with Mr. Colson
seconding 'the mat ion.
-Mr. Colson then made a motion to amend the motion to include the condition hat "if
this subdivision is ever replotted, the variance far sidewalks is nullified and must
be recansa:dered at the time of replotting," Mr. Moore seconded the motion ' o amend.
:Yates were cast on the motion to amend which carried unanmausly:~~`Q~. Motes: were
then cast on the motion as amended with the results being 6-0 in fever of the amended
-motion.
AGEHDA' ITEM ISO. 5: ~9-3~1: ; ~Be~ised) Master Preliminary Plat
Southwood galley Section 26.:
Mr. Callaway ekplained the plat, located .the object tracts and seated staff
recommends approval with Presubmissian Conference condi ions. ~Additionall he told
Y
the Commissioners hat the depth of the C-N tract is not one to be addressed_at this
time, but rather will be addressed by another bady~ if it becomes necessar . He
y
informed the Commission that zoning rcal,i~nment requests will be forthcomin' for this
area with. minor adjustments which must be made.
Camp~tibilty of tlx~ C_N zonin -with the loo ran a lan was '
. ~ ~ g p da.scu~sed, wa.th Mr.
Callaway ~xplaining.that:.the C-N gone is a special Neighborhood-Commercial district
.~
P&Z Minutes ~ 2-16-=$9 .Page
1 ... '.
which is ~m~eant, far small commercial eatablshmcnts to serve a small area.
P&Z Minutes ~-1~-~9 Pabe 5
.r M