Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z MINUTES: AHEHDA ITEM H0. 3: 89-102: A public hearing on the question of rezoning an 18.55 acre tract of land locate d an the east side of State Hgh~a~ Ha 6 Bast Bypass, a roximatel 1.600 feet south of F.~.60 fr - FP ~ as R 1 Sngle`Family Residential-to C-2 Com~ercial Industrial. Agg: icant is Munci al Develo went P g Group for owner, HCHB-Texas Ha ianal Bank. Mr. Moore arrived prior to s off presentation. -Mr Callawa ex la' Y p .fined the request and showed slides of the area while describing the location and h sical features P Y of ,the tract, urea zoning and land uses,..•and the-:land use plan which gas amended b Council in 19~b ta..reflect the recommendat-ions of th y e "East B~-Pais Land Use Study" completed in March of that year which desi~,mated this area to be industri al. Mr. Callaway expanded his explanation by po-intro out that in 19 ~ 84, the P8~ considered aY1d recommended denial of a request fora Orton of this l F and to be rezoned: from R-1 to C-l. The configuration of the subject tract at-that time was long and hallow, and the denial was made because of the shallow de th and the land P use non-compliance. (Land -Use Plan reflected the area as` A-P . } Following that request the intens~.ve stud~r be~'an c~ith the results being a recommendation fore.. that area to be M-Y, and the Council acted on that recommendation by approve it and g amending the Land Use Plan to reflect the area as industrial. Following the background update., Mr. Callawa referred the Go ' Y ~nnissloners to the next agenda item covering `a preliminary plat for the tract of land which is t ' he subject of this item. He pointed out that: staff has identified several ' items concerning this request., and they are as follows: -~1}The request complies with the land use plan amendment to .the extent Ghat C-2 allows industrial uses as we l as commercial uses ~2}The request provides adequate depth and area for commercial or industrial development based on development policies; and, ~3}The requested zonin ~vill eat create conflicts with an`. current or g Y planned land uses... in .this area.- Mr. Michel asked if staff had received any in cries from area . ,q landowners and Mr. Callaway replied that he had received inquiries only from re resentative P (s} of the i~indwood subdivision, with no opinions ex ressed P The public hearing was opened... Deborah Leslie of Munici fo pal Development Group came rward and explained the reasons for requestin~'C-2 rather than the recommended M-1 as implied by ;the designated "Industrial" develo menu include P don the ..amended. Land Use Flan. Mr. Dresser asked if the uses proposed for this ro ert are M-1 P P Y in nature.. Ms. Leslie replied that the wo which have been identified to-date. are. She 1' fisted Lone Star Gas and U.P.S. as the proposed users of 2 of the 4 tracts'. Mr. Dresser aimed -out .there are stil 2 other lots to be develo ed ands P p , fated he Would .not like to see a stringy' of commercial sites developed on -those lots: and remnde d everyonethat every use in a C-l General Commercial zoning district would also be allowed as a permitted use in the G-2 zoning district. Larry Wells.. of M.D.G. came forward and stated that with a 11 the activities these 2 pecfic companies have, it appears that C-2 would better suit t hose..uses than.M-1, adding that he thinks the other 2 lots wil be self- imtin as far as us ~ es are ,concerned because of the location; :.that is they are located quite a distance awa Y i .from an~r major intersection which is the normal locatio - n for G l uses. Mr. Dresser :.asked Mr. Wells`ifthe other 2 lots will be devel© ed as sin le ' P g use..sltes, to which Mr. Wel-1s replied that to the best of his knowledge, the will be. Y Staff Report Case 89-1D2 a e 3 P g r