HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc...__
~,
~/ ~'v~o~
T - ~
he following concerns have been identified with res act
com~ercal zonin p to
gat this location:
'The requested zonin is riot in com li '
g p ante ~~th the land use
flan.
N °
~ The sub
.Jest tract has a depth that ~ar~esfrom a ma~~mum of
190 feet (kith -the exeepti®n of a anhandle area 1oc
.aloe ..the so ~ p ated
g uthern p®rtion of the ~ra.ct) . A depth of 4Oa'
is recom~ended for commercial tracts along arterials.
The proposed comm~rcia.l area
s located_ at an lntersect~.on~~
the -tract configuration (de th v, front ~~
c®mmercial" p aged is strip
n nature.
v ~
.~ ~
e .~.~
~ ~°~
~~ ~
4
~~
4,
..®
~i~~A~ '[~~~1~(~TI~ENT
~os~ ®f fice Box 996 ~ ~ Q~ Texas Avenue
:College Station, fiexa$ 1784~T~960
(4Q~~ ~G4-3507
,~: MEMORAN:DUM
r e r~s.:si s~~ ate: ~~ ~~ i.
~~~
T0: David Pullen, city Engineer
FROM; Cathy Locke, City Attorney
~,
DATE: October' 28, 1988
RE: Disan~exati0n Request cif
Robert Taler - P'rc~bable Litga.tic~n
As we discussed can .the Tc~1er and Futrell tracts, I need a cc~ cif
pY
the ser ice plan that went with the annexation cn these pr~p~
erties- and a diagram Of the prc~pert~ies, I also need tc~ -know:
-~ What ti it' s area ser icing these tracts cu rer~- ly,
~~ ,~
,~
-- What _ut l l ity ex;tens ions ave been made tc~ the area., i f
any o ~ ,
-- whether ~~t ~ac~uld be pc~s`sible tc~ get utilities tc~ the
~.
area . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1
~aa.a...r ~.m.,,,
-~- ViThat cur ordinance requirements can ut i l i Y e~~ ens ions
w0u ld be . ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~*
,~
-_ DO ire have an wr i t~n re ue c n
y g ~ i le hewing t at
extens ions have een requested.
'~
cads
. ~ .. 8 I
~' ~~~
w ~. ~ ,~
~~ R~" ~
~ r~ , ~
~~
~~~ ~~{
~~~
~`:~~
~f d. s. F
,, ~
'~ z
~~.
~'
~~ ~:
ENGINEERING __.._
i
J
Case Number
Location: 4S
. f
~. ~'
,~°
~~
R e q u e s t:
_ --~.
,~..
/~
~,
~,~
Water;
Sewer:
Street Capacity.
_-
-- ~_
,._.
.~~~
i
......~
Access:
i
y
Drainage: ~~
~`
Flood Plain; ~
w
~ --
Special Features: ~~
~~
ti
~-
O t h e r _____ _....~.~._.
,: