Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc. amp parking ~::) t r" E:' E! t. II (, P l~" .'1. 1 :;:: Cj>, 1. 9 t3 ~:} ''I'' e) ~: Fll (i:\nn inq arlci ~3lJ b j ~:~~ c '1:;, It t.\J (:~~ i:':c. I'" f?!! (j 1"', ~5 ..... ~.:5 ..... El E~ '-t rnC)ri f:~Y 1 :.i.. '1::. t. :I. f:?! 8. a I'" €-? a 1.;:( 1. i \/ f:?' ., ChJ ,.... pLt Y" r)t1~}e E', '1::. t:, ,.... E:\ c: t. i \,/ E'~ !I f:?! Y if:? 1/'..1 h i c: "'j i~^J f.':~ t h i n I...: lJ-J E:~ 1.... ~:::;. "T' Et q ~J f::.' It- :i. ~:\ " if1 to i:1nd C CHn in Ltrl i. t y E<c\ t~ (::\n d t.~J E~ ~o\; ill .r2{ 1 S ('J r::r t.... () \/ .i din q f.:i IE::" n t Y' 0 'f area by p€"~QP 1 e u 131..l t. ',"\f E? of E~ E~ ], '1::. hE-: c. ()~:; t:. ~:~~ t .€:t '1::. r::? d p Lt fl" P C) ~5 f~ tt1at .t '''1 €~ VJe .:':';1. roo F:: !.::\ It t1.J h ''/ i:':1I.... f.? ~"'J f.~t t.\J E.:' t::J 1 .:::f. n 'f C) f.... 5 y e eit 'I"" IJ'y E~n d I::; CJ '.J. n d V")/ .i::J\l ~3l);: 1 V " l)c;1'") {in ~::. [)Pt / yo, r- " A: B. c. o. E. F. G. H. I . !1- fop Hi rjr---- hI [II j;: I ,i i ! r -- rn '...,1' ::'......1.. I' - '1';:.' !:i j' III ,. .......~......... > ' ~ j j !Ii ill I! I l-+ ~ _ __ .___ __ . ____J__. ._. _. ....... .... ._.. __... (fil.. .~q~. ~-:(.n.... ........ >,~ ....... ...........:.~~~~# i - ~ .__.n._..~rc_~ .. ..~l~t~~~--~ . . - . -^ .. - -..- - . .-. --.- .. ~^ ., --~--~ . ............r!~.. ..........-. .~ 1V~9~ --- '~. ~. / .-yl'o;i). cL'Me."'~.. .~ ~ ^.s i \ .... .. .. ' 'f{~'.c-~ .ot'N\€#\ ~;Ol\~ --vrkrO^+ ~ jLOJ-- r~'LJ~-~Gor~~ ~i~ C..-J\ 5~ ,.- ~.JL t~~ LOLc L o.r;~l., .p^ ~\Je..-. ~cC er}.' ~ i ^ . l e, Nt oS. ~ ~ l:z..c..... ~ L. \ -C e lo<-~0 lof ...'-'-Lbo{- ~ C-I L~J>c.~ GlM~cXN\.Wti-k ~ l~~6-> ~ i ~~ {tv'\. ~ Jt:..... -- o/ov.l.cH~'^ ..'i\.B-wOt ~k00 ~..a..~ lot 7-Z L I. ", LAJ.. -, J+iti'.J.; ~~ Jf,UY- eh- f- . ! .. · -r $E\ .~....~.... ~~.P~ ~ ...~ p, I:) J/" :i.], ~;2 f.3 '.! :1. <1 f.:$ f~i M ~ M 0 RAN DUM 'r (] :: t"1 f71 i:~ I Pi t\j 1'\11::: . r-:r ,!.;l t'~J i< f3 'J f~f ~:3 ~::) I ~:3'r (.:~i i\j 'r C~ I "r'v (,-'1 'T' ''1'' (] F~ t'J E:: ''p/ F:'I::;~ (] j'll ;: JANE Rn KEE,SENIOR PLANNER j::;~ E:: ~ C-NG ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND APPEAL PROCESS These notes reflect my understanding of our conversation this inC)Y" n i I"t i] ~ lu When reviewing a project in the C-NG zone anything required :L n ~:;) (::..~ (:: .t7. i (j I"l ~:;) ..... F' P. F;~ i< I 1\1 C:'1 :i ~5 -:::\ t: t ;'1 E' <:j :i s=:. c: I/"~? t i CJ 1"1 C) of: t 1-, !::.~, I::' # p~ n C: # ''I'' j"l i ~::; i r", c: .1. Ll d f!.~ 5:; j"'i \J rH b (,:.:! I'" ~:::. C:) 'f ~m. f.) ii:t C (:::~ ~m. J] :i. ~:::.1 \~il n d ~::; ,} ~T:. t: Y" i ~:r i n ~:.I, ~:; \J r" .{': (::\ c i r't i.;,l, f.~~ t. c: /I It.. \:\1 C) tJ], cl rl C) t :i. r', c llJ cl f.~'~ ,::) i~\ i/" k j, f"i ~;.i ~:::. ~:) ~-a (:(~~ (j i in e 1'1 S i. C) f'l (C;.: X ~,;~ () .:) i.i i::; t h :1. ~::~ 15 also referenced by definition in Section 12 -- LANDSCAPING" ~" Landscaping is required in all zoning districts including C-NG" Thereisno appeal or variance procedure" If this was not the intent of theC-NG zone then an amendment is necessary" If we amend C~NG to not impose Section 12 - LANDSCAPING then parking space dimensions would also be at P"RnCn IS discretion in C-NG" 3" In districts other thanC-NG anything in Section 9 - PARKING 1 'E5 ~'::\ II". (.~~ q Lt :i. . r' (~::-in f.~ n t. n f2i I:) f:) Eo? .r.:\ ], :i. ~:; t.. Cj . Z 1:3. (=~I .~:: CJ Y" 'VI a F" i ~t r~ i::: f:::" E!;{ Cf.7:' t::) t 't: t.} a t. i::~],], i j"', ~~:; (::.:.. C t. i C) fi <;:; 'I ~:;:: :: :0" ..... ~:) tJ F;~ f::":) C: I I\J Ei . ,f. ,::t], ].~::. Lt ri c:i {:J!: r' t I'", f:i! C:: i t, '}l E:: r"f ~J i r'~ f.~~ t":!! ir' " Marking of spaces is tied in with surfacing as per Section 9u2"D and is to be determined along with curbing by the City Engineer" So if gravel is allowed then striping would automatically be f!!! 1 i rn:i. n i:ii. t, f.~':' <::1 iiit s:; . {;it f"' (-Y:.' <::1 Ll i i'" f':? rn f:,!! fU, t ;: {':-:, P P f:.~ ,::i. J. Cf .f ':.i ., ~:2 n 1) i ~s. t Ci F' g.! Z It I t, i ~:::. not clear at this point whether further appeal to Council would b f.::" Ell:::! ~:f ru Cf~:> s.... i iiii. t. f.~~ u 4" Screen fencing 1S anordinancerequir~ment except in the c:: (z:\ ~::; (7.~ C) .~:: ~:, (~ lJ F' n (..'1 ~~~ a ri .. C) t- d i f'l ~::\ I-I t:: €-.~ . YO' f.~q Lt i r" (:.? f n (~~ t t .t. j"} (:::~ II" (~ i. S 1"1 C) i::\ f.j f:J f.o? i~-\ 1 # r:::' c! f"' c:: tJ ;:::' S::. ~m. c: Y" ff.~ f:~~ r"i i. rl C] is::. ... \::\ · d i $:. c: r' f.::: t :i, C) r", ,::\ f" '''I i t E~ In 1l\I t.) (':':~ r'i i t i ~::; 1"1 c. 1:.: c ], f/:~ i:':\ f"" \",1 1"1. (~~ t. .'"'' f:~f J/" 1':. f"} \'f.~ . C:: L! F':i.~:; t: C) i'n in ::.~ t- c: i i~~ 1 Cll~" i n d Ll1i:;. t t." i i::i. 1 C) Y" {'::i ,:) i::\ i.... i: in E'~ n 17. ( i::\ ~::; :i. r~ the case of a church)" This would first be decided by PnR.,C., and then appealed to P&Zn ~::r II f.3:i. <;;} f] ... ..... r' E! q Lt i J'7' :1.~ C) n :1.. r"if;.:J <:1 i ~E:. t I.... :i. c:: t II ts are appealed to ZBA no matter what the .i J. ill iI1 Specifically for theAnz projectl :.~;.:~ " to ZBA for sign varianceu 1" No appeal to screen fence requirementu ,. 'L (..:, PI:) lE' i:i . ::::; n If,~ p P f.~':: ot::\ ], t. c:! F'f::1. Z I::'" I={ II (~" : 1:::, r..1 f:"!! C :i. ~::; i () r", ~:. t'" fE' (;J 2\ t'" d i fl \:;.1 C Lt 10"' b :i. r', (;1 '} in J.::t r' k :i. 1'-, (;;J and surfacing requirements" .J.:I. II L, <':":\ n <::1 ~:; C ii!. P i 1"1 9 l/;J i 1], I::) €.:~I t j/" E: J.i:\ t: f.~ c:i iiiE. s::. :i.. fl P itiE. 1::; t '1 1"1 CJ t. i=\ S;; i::\ 1'" e q \.i i l'"I::l1' men t;. ~ I F U t,Ll 1''' e p 1''' !:) j e c b, \.-'J i 11 b ere q I.l i no? d 1. m n d s C~ a pin ~.~ Ol"'i:.ii nc:lnce i; amended cW' appe;~ml procedure i s created. i / L\ n 1 (~? s;. S!; 1~ ('1 ~ +-~ .j,. ~~l- \.-~ t..r- " J ~ c. '^' ~ '" ~~<2- v~1 ~\\",,-J {u\\ ,r '4 7 ...J , "J- '.. II ('- S - \~ L<ZJ (V'- f b - r- <..-A,. ~ ~ \-\--- .1::: REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS SU MIT APPLICATION AND THIS LI T CHECKED-OFF WITH 10 COPIES.. OF SITE . PLAN FOR REVI EW OR 5 COPIES & FILM-POSITIVE ~ Sheet size - 24"x 3611 ./ Title block to include: a) Project name, location and legal description b) Name, address and telephone number of applicant c) Name, address and telephone number of developer/owner d) Name, address and telephone number of architect/en9ineer ) Date of submi tta 1 ~.,...... Ownership a(nd current zoning of all)abutting parcels. ~J A key map not necessa rllyt6 scal e . . ~) Scale should be largest standardengTneering scale possible on sheet. ~ Orient plan with north d i recti on to upper left hand corner of sheet. i/r! Topography and final grading plan, .and other pertinent drainage information. V81 All existing s.treets, drives, buildings, and water courses on or adJacent to the proposed project sIte. - 9) Locate 100 year floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site. ~ Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. ~'Proposed location, type and size of the following: '~. Buildings and structures ~!' Streets, drives and curb cuts Ver Off-street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated and dimensioned. ~ S idewal ks A Landscape information as required' in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (Ord.No.1638). ~Common open space sites ~S i tes for so lidwastecontai ners ~roposed s.ignage ~'14 The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed proj ects ite. v,,'14l The total.nu.mbe.r Of..... be.d.ro.oms..incl....ud...ed. .in.....the propo.sed. p.roJ..ect. A..!tt) The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. ~ The gross square footage of all Quildingsand the proposed use of each building. ....~ The total site area and percent of building coverage of site. i)PK/15.... ..).",. ...0. e. s. Ig. n.a. t. e... .nu... mb.er Of. ..pa. r.k.lng. ...spac. es requi red by ordinance and provided by proposal. 1 Show dimensions to slzeand locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands and setbacks. THE FOLLOWING ARE TYPICAL STANDARDS FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE OR POLICY: 1) Building separatlon.isamlnimumof15 feet. 2) Building setbacksareoutlinedlnOrdinance1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec.7,pg 30) 3) M i n i mum park ifngspace ls9' x201,oronaperlmeter row, 91x181wi tha 2' overhang. 4) Minimum drlvewidthis 23Lwlthhead-lnparkingor 201 without parking. 5) Landscaped islands of".61' raised curb are located at both ends of each parking row. 6) Landscaped islands are al,so located every 15 spaces on interior rows and every 20 spaces on perimeterrow-s. 7)A 6"ra ised curb is required around all edges of all parts of a 11 paved areas wi thout exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curbdetai 1 to be apJ:)rovedby City Engineer. No except ions wi 11 be made for areas des i gna ted as II rese rved for; fut u repa r k i ngll. Standards for Plan Development (Continued) page 2 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) Wheelstops~ay be required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations. Sidewalks area minimum 4 ft. wide on site; 6ft. wi.de adjacent to parking spaces. Director of Public Services determines number, size and approves location of. dumpsters. Pa rking island sare9 Ix20 1;.or180squa r-e fee t. Healthy, native trees over 611callpershouldbe retained whenever possible. Curb cuts are determined by City Engineer. Standards are one curb cut fora site with 125 feet street frontage and two cuts for 250 feet frontage. An addltional 500 feet of frontage Is needed for each additional cut. In general, keep cuts at least 200 feet fromimajor intersections. See Ordinance 1638 Section 11 .:f()r landscaping requirements. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20f~Eat .inwidthwith a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be establishedli:~anystructure of any type is more than 150 feet from a publicstreetcl1iihighway. Any structure in any zoning dis';urtict other than R-1 ,R-1A or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant asm~~~ured along a public street or highway. Fire hydrants must belocated~ffl<the same side of a. majorJstreet as a project, and shall beio alocationappr<?ved by the Fire Marshal IS offlce and the Super- intendent of Water and Sewer. Office or business faci1itiesirl>'excessof 5,000 sq. ft. must furnish parking spaces (minimum size 121x 20 ,)i;desi gnated for use byhandi capped persons on 1 y, with ramps with no greater gra~jientthan 1:12 and a minimum width of 4 feet. SEE SECTION 508 OF THESTANDARD,,;aUILDING CODE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) A v.Je. project... We e ~.~ce ~J t: ir.Jr1s : SLlbl11itting a revised parking pl~-\nfQrthe "Old City. Hall" wi 11 ,nee.t fLlllcocnplience, wi ththe following reqLtested 1. ReqLlest to.e~.~clLldeparking islands at the end of 'each interior p('arkin~l .row.,..to>al.low ,..more..........Llse.... .c.1f......the available.... .space ,.. and. toa 110w ease .of ,intrance and eHitoffq>Wel1 born Rd This is especial.1y'trLle,..,for18 wheel del ivery and dLtmpster trLlcks. :2. ReqLl~stto nr.Jtirlstall fLlll CLtrC) B'1d ~Jl.\'tter on 'the n(JI"'th/C:Lll"'ved blacktop .driveway E~dge>n Ratl'ler, for ,thepl'''esentticne"the LtSe. of wheel stops (J~'.R uties) witr} 1 ~w ~JroLtndcover" vJi thin an 18mon th period, the remainder of tile. lot wil.I be >paved, with CLlrb and gLttter aroLlnd the ft.lll pet- imeter. Wearesl.lbinittin~~ a preliminary drainage Pt-oposa 1. When a fina Isi te plan isapprovsd, we>wirl~get<bidsfrom paving contractors tbdo the work. 'fhe ofirlTl,getting tt'\ebic.1 .will'l:h€-'~nhave trlsirin-hoLtSeengineer drawLtp a 'f inale leva tionand c1raina.qe. p1e-\l1acceptabl e to the city . 'rtlis wi 11 fo llo~' OLlr .. basic' proposal .(WesttoWeWl born, and SOLlt.l, to e}{isting drain bO'H at ChLlrchand lAJel1born Sts).. ,- .1 ..t AU City of College tation POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS /77840-0960 June 15, 1988 MEMORANDUM TO: Don & Cheryl Anz, 709 Park Place, College Station, TX Bill O)Brien, 1917 "~aysid.e Dr,lve, Bry"an, TX 77802 FRorvl: to H. a v t:; tl ~3:f Dut a,nd ~111'd h a :,~ s t ;?lnda rds as d i react ed by t he P 1 ann i ng and Zon ing; C OI81n is s ion ;;ol'f t e t' considerat,ion of the appetr,1 hea~'d on i\'la~l 5, 198B., The fol1o'f<Jing ::"equirements ~~{ere .1.iste(l by staff and tIle P.R~C. v Ji1urnish electric load data :cc~luireJnents to L:b.e' Electr"ic D e par t III e n t ass 00 n a f; po S sib 1 e . I f ex i s ti l~ g S e r vie e i s II sed, the met e ro' d. 0 e s not h f1 'vet 0 'b e c h a Xl iJ e d ; i f t !1 € f~ C r'v :i, C (~ IUllst be upg:caded~ coordinate changin~:r t;he l{)catiol1 of tliE: service and meter with Ray Havens~ r/" A.' ,~.-. v(~ 3 h {) }../ a 11 e x 1. B tin gut i 1. i t -:l P G :1 e S \"111 i c h, . are l 0 (; ate d.;) n '~~ n ~~~ pl'ope:cty. The :c e i f:-~ 8. 5 t r e e t I i g~ .t.t tat t 11 f3' Xl 0 1- t ;1 ~~:! est cor 11 e r 0 f t h i ;5 U ~5 e i s con t .i n u e d; _ it,,,, i 1. 1. b eon Y=" in 0 11 t h 1 y the d (:; -';l e 1. 0 p e- r ~v i J 1 r e c ~.:-; l ~) C In 0 n t~ !~ 3. ",\' b i I 1 s * [>}:'opertY<l ren-;::Hl If its and .~~ \i '\ ~ L-' ....~ ~ tJ"' " -AJD -I ~ P.R~Cg Rev.88~406 6-15-88 Page 2 " <t\1f . to of" a he P a g f->; :3 of Gollege Station 'ff:Xi\S j-\\T,ENUE 77$14,0..,.09,60 June 1 6, 1 9 8 8 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: HE: Lce P.LANN LNG&: Z9N1 NG (}O~MISS 19N,j JANE KE E, SEi'i I 0 RP LA N N E R (} ~ REVISED PARKING LOTPLAN,{j, OLD CITY HALIJ " . # t. .. the meeting of _'May ;5:'~':19B8 \vhere the",C,om~~ssion ,de'ni"ed the appeal of the Anz' s. to'prov'ideless than 'a G-l..Ii?{andar'd. parking lot, ~the applicant ha;'s r:edrai~n,the planandP.R.C. has, rev,i:~~ed .i,t 8 gai n,.. The app 1 i can't 'hasprovtded an: all wea,~t~her, s:urface lot with curbiI\g and islan.ds'that II!_e'.et. ordinance r.~~q:ui~~,em.~~nts \vi th t \'\1 0 e X/'C e p t i on s : ' .J. There is. no .curh. 81. on&. the,northe," r.n.. bounqar.y of th~ ., lot 2. 6~:rdo~~1~ur;i:riQp~,~'1,~ parking does / not meet the 360 S..F. standar,d. ~e P.ILC. I)dvisedthe applicant that ith~d no probr~m \\lith these two exceptions but, thatthefullCoJlpDissionwouldhave to revie\~ their position. Please refer to item~r 12. . and 18. o':f,' the P.J~.C: report. Note that the P.R.C.recomIt1ende.~ that a time ~.. ~ri o.d.O.......fS....~ ..m.. onth~b.e4El k.owAe;...J:~I.a.f.t,... er ~..,hi..Chfu.ll,CUrbjng wi 11 be 1 n s tal 1 e d. 1 JlVf~' L./W'1Nhv .~ IihvrJlD -' ~ther j tems of theP .R.C.reportare minortltlngs that can' be handled 'prior t()building permit and consist of locating utility lines andeaseme"nts, sholAJing dumpster dimensions and<cor.recting minor' dimensionaler'rors . Other.! terns- -inv..olve.:coordi'n'at~ug' fire hyd rantr e q u irenl ents, .d r a ina ge p 1 ans.~.. and,.t elep.hon e ,gas rand electrical requirement~ \vith appropr,.iate p.ersonnel.. PErth ~~~,~~ r0~~tr .~.~ at OW ~ July 13, 1988 MEMO,RANDUM To: Bill O'Brien, 1917 Wayside Dr., Bryan Tx. DonP& Cheryl Anz, 709 Park Place, College Station, Tx. From: Project Review ComJDi ttee: ~'-- .rim GaTlaway, Director.of Planning'f David Pullen, City Engineer ..'\ Nancy Sawtelle, Planning and Zoning Commission Randy Michelle, Planning and Zoning Commission Subject: Re\,ised project plan, Old City Hall. The Project Review Commi t,tee met on this date to review an amendment to the approved site plan of the above referenced project. The Committee approved the proposed addition of patio overheads with the following-conditions: 1. A setback oflO feet from the front property line (along Church St.) muit be observed. 2. Development of this type, adjacent to.a side street right- of-way, would set a poor precedent for development in the Northgat-e district. Due to th.e, particular condi t ions in this case there are problems associated with the proposal. Approval in this case should not be interpreted as approval for similar proposals (esp.setbacks) at other corners in the district. 3. If the addition brings the total area under cover to 5000 square feet or more building sprinkler requirements mus_t be met. 4. Coordinate with Phil San Angelo to insure that there or no conflicts with existing utilities. tation POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS '77840-0960 April 21, 1988 MEMORANDUM To.: PRO staff. From: Subjeot: ~.. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P. O. BOX 9960 1101TEXASAVENUE COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS77B42~0960 (409) 764- 3500 Mr. DO)l An z 709 ..ParkPlace College Station, Texas HANDICAP PARKING AT CAFE ECCEL Dear Don: Ihad...the.opportunity...tphavelunch.at your. .new place toiday. ....... The food and . service was excellent, . not to mention thepleasant...atmosphere+. ....Itts...nice. .tobe.....outdoo.rs .in this kind of weather and to hear and<.see the . ,trains go by. I would like to ask that you do what you can to place the ..twohandicap parking-spaces<alongChu,rch .that are reflectedon<your. approvedsit.eplanfattached.i sa copy showing the location. of the>handicapspaces). I was there, t:oclaYYJith someone who is disable.danditwas. not very accessible to parkinthe:rear,andwalkalltl1ewayaround.. However, your staff wasveryniyeinopeni.ng the emergency exit> for us. In fact when youheardtlle alarm go off - that was us. Thank you for taking care of thip+I<hopetoeatth~re agairl soon and hopet.hat the restaurant does well. Jane .....Kee Senior Planner Home of Texas Ai &MUniversity It;< ~ . POS'f OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE S~ATION9 TEXAS 77840...0960 April 27, 1988 MEMORANDUM TO: Don & Cheryl Anz, 709 Park TX FROM: The following requirements were listed by staff and the P.R.C.: 1. Furnish electric load data requirements to the Electric Department as soon as possible. If existing service is used, th~ meter. does not have to be changed; if the service must be upgraded, coordinate changing the location of the service and meter with Ray Havens. 2. Show all existing utility poles which are located on the property. 3. There is a street light at the northwest corner of this property. If its use is continqed, it will be on a monthly 4. 5 . 6. 7 . services for this facility 8. 9. 10. 11. the provided to issuance of a 17. 18. PRe 88-406 4-27-88 Page 2 .. a. -. b. c. 19. 20. 21. The as an PRe 88-406 4-27-88 Page 3 .. City .of College . tat Ion POST OFFICE BOX.9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840-0960 M E M O.R AND U M TO: Project Review Committee FROM: David J. Pullen, City Engine~ DATE: May 3, 1988 RE: OLD AND I have not of 1 . 2. ways to be The ist::neinitial appeal body if 3. Storm Drainage. .All projects must comply with the City of College Station Stormwater Management Ordinance. The DESIGN POLICY AND DESIGN STANDARDS portion of that ordinance can be purchased at the City Engineer's Office. The reports a'nd documentation of these compliances need not .be submitted for review until a building permit is applied for. However, all requirements must be met be~orea permit will be issued. 4. Plantings In Public Right-oi-ways. In order to determine the relationships it is necessary When appropriate the project and applicant. information is provided my office will review provide all customary assistance to the DJP/vw (6) Permits Any property owner desiring a driveway approach shall rnakeapplication, in writing, and designating the contractor who will do the work, to the city engineer or the building supervisor, accompanied by a sketch or drawing showing clearly the driveway, parking area, or doorway to be connected (see definition of driveway approach). The city engineer will prescribe the construction procedure to be followed. (See the building code for contractor's bond and permit requir~ments, for work on public property. ) (7) Building Division Cooperation Any plans subrnittedtothebuilding supervisor for approval which include or in~olve driveway approaches shall be referred to the city engineer for his approval and issuance ofa driveway approach permit before the building permit is issued. K . PL&~TING ON STREET RIGHT-OF-tiAY (1) There will be no restrictions on planting and care of grass on unpaved areas, and no permit shall be required.. (2) Obstructions !t shall be unlawful to plant flowers, shrubs, or trees to obstruct the view of or access to fire hydrants,mailboxes,traffic'contrel devices, police or fire call boxes. (3) PermitRequirernents Other planting will be permitted only if an applica- tion,. together with a plan of planting, has been filed with the city engineer a,nd he in turn has issued a permit fer such plant-ing. COrdinanceNo.608of January 27, 1969) 107 ._\ -- -- .. .'~l N. DESIGN STANDARDS All engineering design of streets, sidewalks, driveway approaches,> drainage structures, and utilities within street right-of-way shall conform to city engineering standards. O. UNUSUAL CONDITIONS The city engineer is hereby authorized to grant in writing, variances from the strict application of the principles ofthissubsectioniprovided that he first determines that the following. conditions are. present: (1) The exception or variance desired arises from peculiar conditions not ordinarily existing. in similar districts in the city, or due to the nature of the business or operation on the abutting property. e (2) That the exception or variance desired is notaqainst the public interest , particularly safety, convenience-, and general welfare. (3) That the granting of the permit for the exception or variance will not adversely affect the rights of adjacent property owners or tenants. (4) That the strict application of the terms of this section will not work unnecessary hardship on the property owner or. tenant. P. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMEtlT (1) City Engineer Designated as Enforcement Official; Powers and-Duties (a) The city .engineer is designated as the adminis- trativeofficialofthecity,to administer the provisions of this section. -- (b) If the city engineer shall find, or if any person files with him a complaint inwritinq alleging that any of .'.theprovisions of this section are being violated, he shallinunediately investigate and when necessary, give written notice to the person responsible to cease such violations, forthwith. 110 April 27, 1988 MEMORANDUM FROM: Don & Cheryl Anz, 709 Park Place, College Station, TX Bill O'Brie,n, 1917 Wayside Drive, Bryan, TX 77802 Project Review Committee: ~~ ~~:i~a~~ti:::git;C::~iri:e:lanning" Lynn Colson,P&Z Representative TO: others attending: Coy Perry, Building Official LaVern Akin, GTE Kean Register, Lone star Gas Kim Johnson, Planning Assistant Harry Davis, Fire Marshal Jim Smith, Landfill Superintendent Shirley Yolk, Plannillg Technician Ray Havens, Electrical Superintendent and Bill Riley, Water-& Sewer Design Inspection Supervisor were unable to attend the meeting, but reviewed the plans and submitted comments which are ,included in this report. SUBJECT: Parking Lot Plan - O.ld City Hall -renovations and addition of a parking lot for a restaurant at 101 Church Street. (88-406) The P.R.C. met on this date to review the above project, and has approved th~ proposed use afthis building, but-advised the applicant that it cannot approve the site plan for the project as proposed, and that the applicant has the option of appealing the decision of the P.R.C. to the Planning and Zoning Commission within 5 days of this decision. The following requirements were listed bysta~f and theP.R.C.: 1. Furnish electric load data requirements to the Electric Department as soon as possible. If existing service is used, the meter does not have to bie changed; if the service must be upgraded, coordinate changing the location of the service and meter with Ray Havens. 2. Show all existing utility poles which are located on the property. 3. There is a street light at the northwest corner of this property. If its use is continued, it will be on a monthly rental basis, and the developer will receive monthly bills. Coordinate all electrical requirements with Ray Ha.vens. 4. If lighting istobe located in the parking lot, indicate to Mr. Havens ifit istohavea.separatemeter, or if it will be metered off the building. 5. \ Show the location of all existing utility easements and existing utilities which are located on this property. There lsan easement on the eastern property line which covers an existing utility, (water line). More specific information can be obtained from the Water & Sewer Department. 6. Show the location of the property line(s) for this property. There is a,possib i 1 i tythat some of the proposed additions along the western property line may be in the state right- of-way. 7. Coordinate any water or sewer services for this facility with .BillRiley. 8. Fire Marshal Davis asked that the exact location of the fire hydrant be identified on the site plan, including the size of the water main which serves this property and hydrant. 9. Indicate square footage of the building on the site plan. 10. Coordinate natural gas requirements with Kean Register of Lone Star Gas Company. 11. Coordinate telephone servi.ce requirements wi th LaVern Akin of GTE. 12. Indicate the dimensions of the fenced area where dumpster(s) will be located. Mr. Brown stated that the City's preference is that no gates are included on this screening fence, : but if the developer includes gates, he shoul.d be aware that they are a high maintenance item, and will be his responsibility. 13. 4 parking spaces for the handicapped are required for the total number of parking spaces being proposed. 14. City Engineer Pull.e.n pointed out-t-his plan does not include many of the dimensions necessary to make a complete review of this plan, but a dimension which will be required i.s the exact location of'the proposed driveway access to this property. 15. Standard a,ll-weather (paved) surface and permanent curbing is required on t,his parking: lot. 16. Drainage Plan Submittal Requirements have been provided to the applicant; compliance is required prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 17. Exact location of the property line must be shown as it relates to the right-of-way for Wellborn Road. If any of the plantings for this project are located in the right-of- way, the applicant is advised that permission for inclusion of those plantings must be obtained from the Resident Engineer of the State Department of Highways & Public Transportation in Bryan. If the proposedplantings are within the property lines for this property, Traffic Engineer John Black will review for sight distance. 18. Director of Planning Callaway pointed out that because this project is located within the Commercial-Northgate zoning district, theP.R.C. is charged by ordinance to approve several things, including PRC 88-406 4-27-88 Page 2 8. Proposed use - approved b. Parking.requirement - proposed number of spaces provided approve.d;ho,wever, width of driving aisle can be reduced to 23 ,feet thus. providing .addi tional area within the property lines to .containlandscapin'g if it is determined that the proposed landscaping falls inside the state's right-of-way for Wellborn Road. c. Landscaping - fullc>ompliance with C-1 regulations required; i.nclq,ding,a legen.d on the site plan, et ther hose b i.bs or an iI'ri~a,tion:sys tem and i.~lands as .set forth in the landscape < section of the zoning ordina-nce. 19. Director oflP1anning Cal~a,way:a1so pointed()u~ t~at freestanding signs are not, allowed in the Northgate zoning district, apd any signagemust be designed for attaching to th-e bui Iding. 20. Fire Marshal Davis advised that because this is to be used as a restaurant, an adequate number properly marked exits mus.t be. provided. Coordinate with his office. 21. The Zoning Ordinance requires erection of a 6i foot solid screening fence betwee-nany commercial and resident ial uses. The exis:ting cyclone fence does not meet that requirement. The applicant was advised that appeal(s) to any of the requirements can be made; certain items must be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission and others to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Zoning Official Jane Kee will coordinate with the applicant upon request. Submit 10 copies of the revised site plan to the Planning Division for approval, or for inclusion on the P&Z agenda as an appeal to the P.R,C. decision. If the appeal is to be on the agenda for theP&Z on 5-5-88, revised site plans must be received in the Planning office before 5 P.M. on Friday, April 29th. PRe 88-406 4-27-88 Page 3 June 16, 1988 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: HE: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSIJ~N.J JANE KEE, SENIOR PLANNER(}kJF REVISED PARKING LOT PLAN(f OLD CITY HALL Since the meeting of May 5, 1988 where the Commission denied the appeal of the Anz's to provide less than a C-lstandard parking lot, the applicant has redrawn.... the plan and P.R.C. has reviewed it again. The applicant has provided an all weather surface lot with curbing and islands that meet ordinance.. requirements with two exceptions: 1. There is no curb along the northern boundary of the lot where it curves. 2. One double island on the interior row of parking does not meet the 360 S.F. standard. The P.R.C.advised the applicant that it had no problem with these two exceptions but that the. full Commission would have to review their position. Please refer to items 12. and 18. of the P.R.C. report. Note that the P.R.C. recommended that a time period of 18 months be allowed, after which full curbing wi-II be installed. Other items of theP.R.C. report are minor things that can be handled prior to building permit and consist of locating utility lines and easements, showing dumpster dimensions and correcting millor dimensional errors. Other item,s involve coordinating fire hydrant requirements, drainage plans and telephone;" gas and electrical requirements with appropriate personnel. June 15,1988 MEMORANDUM TO: Don & Cheryl Anz, 70,9 Park Place, College Stati.on, TX Bill O'Brien, 1917 Wayside Drive, Bryan, TX 77,802 FROM: Project .Review Commi ttee.: JaneR. Kee, Seni.or Planne' David Pullen , City Engin.eer Steve Stewart, P&Z Represen ative (reviewed prior to meeting and left comments) Others attendin.g: LaVern Akin, GTE Kean. Regis ter, Lone Star Gas Harry Davis, Fire Marshal Bennie Luedke, Water & Sewer Superintendent Shirley Yolk, Planning Technician Jim Smith, Solid Waste Supervisor, and Ray Havens, Electrical Superintendent were unable to attend the meeting, but reviewed the plans and submitted comments which are included in this report. SUBJECT: Revised Parking Lot Plan -Old City Hall - renovations and addition. of aparking.lot for a restaurant 8,t 101 Church Street. (88-406) The P.R~C. metoD this date to review the above project, and has approved the proposed use of this building, but advised the applicant that it cannot approve the site plan for the project as proposed because it still does not fully comply with C-l standards as directed by the Planning and Zoning Commission after consideration of the appeal heard on May 5, 1988. The followin,g requirements were listed by staff and the P.R.C.: 1. Furnish electric load data requirements to the Electric Departmen-t as soon as possible. If existing service is used, the meter does not have to be changed; if the service must be upgraded, coordinate changing the location of the service and meter with Ray Havens. 2. Show all existing utility poles which are located on the property. 3. There is a street light at the nort.hwest corner of this property. If its use is continued, it will be on a monthly rental basis, and the developer will receive monthly bills. Coordinate.sllelectrical requirements with Ray Havens. 4. If lighting is tobe.located, in the parking lot, indicate to Mr. Havens if it is t,o have s separate meter, or if i t wi 11 be metered off the building. 5. Show the location of all. existing utili ty easements and existing utilities, which are located on this property. There is an. es-sementon the eastern property line which covers an existing utility (waterline). More specific information can be obtained from the Water & Se'wer D epa.rtment . 6. Coordinate any water or sewer services for this facility with Bill Riley. Existing services must be upgraded to comply wi thcurrent sitandards. 7. Fire Marshal Davis asked that the exact location of the fire hydrant be identified on the site plan, including the size of the water main which serves this property and hydrant. Allparts of the building must be wi thin 3.00 feet of a fire hydrant. Coordinate with Bennie Luedke regarding providing adequate coverage for this property. If an addition to an existing line is required, it must be 8u in size. The developer is required to provide adequate coverage. Water lines must be designed by a professional engineer and plans submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division and Water & Sewer Department prior to issuance of a Building Permit. If the applicant desires to make an appeal to this requirement, coordinate with Fire Marshal Davis at the Central Fire Station on Texas Avenue. 8. Coordinate natural gas requirements with Kean Register of Lone Star Gas Company. 9. Coordinate telephone service requirements with LaVern Akin of GTE. 10. Indicate the dimensions of the area where dumpster will be located. Mr. Brown stated that the City's preference is that no gates are included on this screening fence,butif the developer includes gates, he should be aware that they are a high maintenance item, and will be his responsibility. 11. City Engineer Pullen pointed out that the proposed raised deck walkway at the southwest corner of this project is partially located ou.tside the property lines. Any request for an encroachment may be made to the City Council. Mr. 0' Brien_, the applicant ' s representative indicated this encroachment will be corrected. 12. Standard all-weather (paved) surface and permanent curbing is required on this parking lot. The P.R.C. expressed its agreement to the applicant's proposal for deleting the curbing along the northern portion of this project for a period of time not to exceed 18months, afterwhich, the applicant will have to be in full compliance whi.chincludes curbing around the entire perimeter of the project. Show exact location of proposed curbing. The Planning and Zoning Commission will make the final ruling. P.R.C. Rev.88-406 6-15-88 Page 2 13. D-rainageP1an Submi tta1 Requirements have been provided to the applicant; compliance is required prior to issuance of a Bui 1ding.Permi t.. 14. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 6 foot solid screening fence between any commercial and residential uses, in this case from the northern corner of Lot 6 to the southern corner of Lots 2 & 21. The existing cyclone fence does not meet that requirement. 15. City Engineer Pullen advised that the driveway on Wellborn Road does not comply with Citypo1icy, which would require a 300 foot setback from the intersection of Church & Wellborn. He< stated that he would address.. this discrepancy after he makes a study of the relevance of turning movements on Church Street. 16. Show the dimension between the property line and the curbing along Wellborn Road. AnS foot setback is required. 17. Recheck the radius on some of the islands. As shown, those radii do not correspond with the dimensions of the islands. 18. The island dimension at the end of the double row of parking is. not adequate to fully comply with ordinance requirements. The P.R.C. recommends approval of this island as proposed, but the Planning and Zoning Commission will make the final ruling. 19. The existing parking on Lots 1 & 22 does not comply with ' requirements, but will not be addressed during this review. Striping and signage on the spaces provided for the handicapped will be required in this area. The applicant was advised that his appeal will be taken to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration on June 16, 1988. When the applicant has prepared his final revised site plan, he should submit 12 copies to theP1anning Division for approval prior to continuing with step II of the Building Permit Process. P.R.C. Rev.88-406 6-15-88 Page 3 City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE , COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840-0960 M-E,MO I'O F I L E Planning File No. 88~406 Old City Hall Restaurant' RE: DRIVEWAYENTRANGE ON WELLBORN ROAD- 1~ li.~i("CITY OFC()LLEGESTATION .lIi ... PLANNING DIVISION ............ ... ............. PostOfficeBox9960 ..1101 Texas Avenue Co lIege .'Sta tion, Te xa-s .7-7842-09:60 (409) .76-4-3570 July To: B i 11 .. O'Brien, ... 1917 Wayside Dr. ,BryanTx. Don &<Oheryl Anz, 709 Park Place, College Station, Tx. From: Project Review Committee: ~L J,.............i.......m. ...........<............0................... a..............1............1. a... w. a. ....y........... '..........................D... ...........i..............r......... e.............c......'...........t.......,......o.................r. ... ....'... ..O.....f.. .. ..P.l an..n. i D. .,g\\.....~.. ..'. d David Pullen., City Engineer .....~ NancySawte ll.e ,PI ann ingan d":Z on in g C omm is s ion - .. ----Rann y----~ric]i-el-l-er----Pl-a.nni--rifl---a :rid,ch'ZoIl- 1'n g - . - Com miss ion Subject: Revlsedprojectplan, Old City Hall. The Project Review Committee met on this date to re.view an amendment to the approved site ,plan of the above referenced project.. The Committee approved the proposed addition of patio overheads with the following conditions: 1. A setback of 10 feet from the front property line (along Church St.) must be observed. 2. Development of this type, adjacent to a side stre-et right- Northgate..district. Due to the particular conditions in this case there are problems associa.tedwith the proposal. Approval in this case should not be i"nterpreted as approval for similar proposals (esp.setbacks) at other corners in the district. ::';<:,;":':.(/r"'".,,, "'I 3. If the addition brings the total area under cover to 5000 -'-s"qlfat'e "fe-et"-o"r-,wnfo'r'e -bul'ldi~ng-spr'i-rfkler -requirements W-mus t -b'e met. 4. Coordinate with Phil San Angelo to insure that there or no conflicts wi t h .....e x is tin g utilities.