HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc.
October 28, 1987
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Joe Blaschke, Bill Purcell, Repres'entat i ves from
Church, c I oW a 1 tOll &A s s oc i at e s, 17 22 B r 0 a dm 0 0 r
Ste220, Bryan
Charles Graham, Architect, P. o. BIOX 2738, C.S.
Project .Review committee' ~~
Jim Callaway, Director of Planning~
David Pullen, City Engineer
Steve Stewart (absent)
TO:
Others attending:
Laverne Dube, GTE
Kim Johnson, Planning Assistallt
Jane Kee, Zoning Official
Kean Register, Lone Star Gas
Shirley Volk, Planning Technician
SUBJECT: Revised Site Plan for Grace Bible Churclh new faciliti.es
to be located in the 700 Block of Anderson on thel west side of
Anderson and adjacent to Anderson Park (87-703)
The P. R.C. met on this date to review the subjecti proposal and
voted to approve the project with the followingconditions*:
1. Ray Havens, Electr,ical Superintendent forwarded thefoll,owing
information: :
8. Electrical service will be fed from the e~isting overhead
servi,ce oD.thewest side of the property. Service can be
either overhead or underground. If underground service is
required, furnish a letter requesting underground servi.ce
well in advance.
b. Metering will beat one location.
c. Furnish electric load data requirements to Electric
Department as soon as possible.
2. Harry Davis, Fire Marshal forwarded information that the
proposed site plan meets with all requirements of his office.
3. Bill Riley, Water & Sewer division forwarded information that
requiremen.ts should be coordinated wi th both the Water & Sewer and
Engineering Divisions.
4. GTE representative indicated she has no problems with this
proposal; coordinate requirements wi th Laverne Dube of GTE..
5. Tino Ocon of the Public Serv.ices Department has approved the
location of the dumpster.
6. Director of Planning Callaway reminded the applicant that the
Commission had previously addressed screening along the
southernmost side of the property, and may possi~ly address that
issue again at the P&Z meeting on November 5th.
7. City Engineer Pullen referred to the P.R.C. ~eport from the
previous review of the original proposal, and infiormed the
applicant that all requirements and comments fro_that report are
still applicable. Heprov ided a copy of the P. R .Ie. drainage
statement and informed the applicant that compliance is required.
8. City Engineer. Pullen then pointed out that the fire hydrant
shown at. the most southerly part of the lot appears to be outside
the utility easement, and reminded the applicant that the required
utility easements can be handled by Separate Instrument.
9. Planning Assistant Johnson informed the applicant that if 110se
bibs are.to be used, the locations must be shown on the site pIan,
and those locations must be within 150 feet of any landscaping.
10. Kean Register of Lone Star Gas indicated he has no problems
with the proposed plan, and the applicant should coordinate
requirements with him.
SUBMIT 10 COPIES OF REVISED SITE PLANS TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO NOONONFRIDAY,.OCTOBER 30TH TO BE INCLUDED ON AGENDA FOR
P&Z MEETING NOVEMBER 5TH.
*Any changes to an approved site plan must be cleared through the
Planning Division.
PRC87-703 revised
IO-28-87
Page 2
I '
,. ... "'f':' -.-\
; ,
(.:
I'
-... . Ii", . - -"
I; i
IIic
II t
ill c .. . cc ...c. ...... ...-. ..c.... ........ _. ... c
... ..lll... ...~ec(flg~LJ .....~c. .~(QA...i5-1Ok==.c.~,.. ....'V..A~ ..
1\1-..-.---
in
I ~ i
~O lil-
.llf. ..
Iljm/ Uv .
II I . ..
1{12:>.. Il}tftr.~......--~ ~/'~,.....#Ocx",~
I!I~~~~
I! I
ltl d.()[).n'tlWllh@'1f~ _~$CU')!3l1. '.. . y
Ii.,.,\. .......~/r~~~ ....;t-6i-.~~OA?)
1;1~0
Id
. --Tn' .,
lq
dl
I!! ....
iiI
r;'r . ,.
~ ~' '~
Lc
. ..1-:)
!. :
I !:
I :1'
~ ~ ~- --..".("'-------'.'.---
,".'- ".'- '-.".. .' ,..',.".",..'...,'.,.,... ,"'.' ','. -'. .'.' .....' "" .' '. . ',.. "'. ,.,.,... - ~'..~"~.....'.~-'-,'......'.'...-...,..,...-...'.-._.-" ,.".,'...,"". -,."..,..:~. .... ".' "'.' ',',..--,.., ~ ---','. .,.-, . . .,..,', . " .' " ",.' '..,., ." ..-.....,
<. - - ~ -
....
c... n .,'~..........c-.. . . ..... ... '... .... . ..
~ ..,,,,,,,,-,-,, "--"'~.,., '--""-""""" .,_.._,-, -- '''.'''--, "..',--,_.,..,,-
. ...-.... .t.' --'. """."'--""-".'" '"........-.-. "....'..,'.'. ',., .-..'.'.,..'."',....,,'.'.-..,.,'.'.......-.... .'.',..,.....,..,'.'...... '..'. . ".' " .", '.' . ," . . . ......'. ' '. .
'_""_'_'__~' ,._, .,._.c.__.,,_c_,___..__.. -'~-'-'- .,
M.. -., ......... .~.. ..,....
.............',.......,.,..,.............,.',...,...,..,..','.,'.....,.,.,.....,.,..,'.-....,...,-.........,',.....,....,.". ...,.Nf?.....-,,--, ,',' ','''-'''-' ','" ".' , ""_."_"""', MA..".,..'......"..'.....,..a.4,..".__,.""".,.,.".,.,.." _..,.................. ...... ..~. ..... .'-''''''''''''''''.'- ..,,_,1),... "'.. . .....
.. n. ..- .-'] ,--..-t-ZY':-'--:;.
--- ~;I) ...
JULY 1, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Charles Graham - Grace Bible Church Representative
Project Revi.ew committee~. ~
Jim cal...l...away, Direct. or of Planning.
David Pullen, City Engineer ... .-
David Brochu & Doug Moore, P&Z Representatives
FROM:
others ..At tending:
Bland Ellen, Assistant Fire Marshall
Coy Perry , Building Offi c i.al
Bob Epps, Assistant Director of Public Services
Tino Ocoina,Public Services Department
Ray Have!ns ,Electrical Superintendent
Laverne Dube, GTE
Jane Kee, Zoning Official
SUBJECT:' Conditional Use Permit- Grace Bible Church new
facilities to be located in the. 700 block of Anderson on th.e west
side of Anderson Street and adjacent to Anderson Park - (87--703)
The P. R. C.only has .the authority to approve site plans if all
ordinance requirements are met. The P.R.C. m~t on this date to
review the abovementioned };>roject and recomm,nds approval with
the following conditions: .1
(1) Mr. Ellen made the following comments:
A. He indicated that all structures will need to be
sprinklered and the calculations for the church's water
requirements should take this into account . A.llplans
must be approved by the State Board of Insurance and if
the siamese connection is located on the building the
project may lose lor 2 parking spaces
B. Due to the distance of the structures from the street,
fire lanes will need to marked throughout the ,project. A copy of
a new ordinance regulating fire lanes was given to Mr. Graham.
C. The fire hydrant in the southwest corner of the project
needs to be moved easterly to the edge of the 'island to make it
more accessible for fire trucks.
(2) Mr. Perry made the following comments:
A. He will need to discuss the type of construction
required for the buildings with the Archit.ect since all 3
buildings are considered one building connected by walkways.
B. The covered walkway must meet the 25 foot building
setback line. This is a zoning ordinance requirement.
(3) Mr. Epps recomme.nded a 6 y&rd dumps ter to take ca.J;'e of
projected growth. of. the church facility with a minimum 12' X 12'
pad although the pad shown in.excess of that is fine. Pad
should be at same elevation as driveway. Trucks will traverse
the entire parking area to reach the dumpster since they are
rear loading vehicles, so the pavement should be adequate to
handle this activity 6 days a week.
(4) Mr. Pullen made the following comments:
A. Theproposed.crosswalk in Anderson Street may have to
be 'approved by ordinance. Traffic Engineer John' B lack should be
consulted.
B. The north drive opening should be shifted slightly to
the south so that the curb return radius does.not encroach the
extension of the property line.
c. The 8 foot setback from the right-of-way line to the
parking area is an ordinance requirement. The are 2 additional
feet in the 25 foot .circulation aisles.that can be used for the
setback area. Minimum circulation aisles are only required to be
23f.eet wide. The entire project could also be<shifted to the
re;af"'of the property. The site plan does not have to be redrawn
to scale but these corrections can be shown simply as dimensions.
D. The fact that the 30 foot wide drive openings might not
be adequate to handle two-way traffic was obs~rved by Mr. Pullen,
but it was emphasized that this is not a requi1rement, only a
recommendation.
E. ThePRC drainage statement must be observed and it must
be indicated to the City Engineer how the drainage onto Anderson
Street will be handled. The drainage capacity .of Anderson~7ill
need to be considered. All calculations are required prior to
the Building permit. (A copy of theP.R.C. drainage statement
was provided.)
F. The waterline to the fire hydrant, must be in an
easement andean be dedicated by separate instrument or,
if several easements are involved in the- proj ect, an
easement plat maybe .filed. All easements must be 20 feet
and legal descriptions submittedtotl1.e Engineering
Office. He also pointed out that a blanket easement will
be required for the. initialelectricalpowerw:i th a
permanent easement granted later for the final.power.
G. As a matter of concern Mr. Pullen suggested that a
close look be given to the adequacy of the 6 inch waterline to
ensure that it will have adequate pressure due to the existence
of.other fire hydrants on that line, the necessity of a sprinkler
system for the buildings and the elevation of the property.
(5) The existing. underground line is not adequate to handle this
project. An application for underground service was given to Mr.
Graham. If the applicant desires 2 meters, they must both be
placed in the same location.
(6) Mrs. Dubehanded a site plan to 'Mr. Graham indicating pole
location. She pointed out that the telephone connection must be
within 20 fewer of the electrical termination and it will be
necessary to use conduit to tie all buildings together.
Teilephone and electrical may be placed in the same ditch as long
as:there is a minimum of 2 feet of separation.
(7) Mr. Callaway pointed out that the parking space dimensions
shown are minimums and that any space taken for the 8 foot
setback should not be taken from the parking spaces.
(8) Mrs. Kee made the following comments:
A. The pla,n must indicate either an irrigation system for
landscaping. or the 10catioIlof hose bibs. All landscape areas must
be within 150 feet ofa hose bib.
B. Dimension should be indicated for the detached sign
shown on the>plan. The sign must meet alO foot setback form the
right-of-way line.
(9) Mr. Brochu made the following comments:
A. He indicated that he would request screening along the
single family lots to the west that might conerist of something
other that a wooden fence but that should be eonsistent.The
P&Z will.make the ultimate decision concernin~ this and the
applicant should be prepared to address this issue at the
meeting. . I
B. He expressed concern over erosion control and silting
and the applicant was advised that grass bottom detention ponds
have a tendency to silt up, and th.emaintenance is the
responsibility.of the property owner. Mr. Brochu was concerned
with possible negative impacts of erosion and silting onto
Anderson Park.
(10) Mr. Moore was concerned wi th the peak usa.ge of the faci 1 i t y
and questioned the amount of parking provided. The site plan as
shown indicates parking to meet. ordinance requirements. His
concern was that. parking not overflow onto And.erson Street.
ANY CHANGES TO AN .APPROVED SITE PLAN MUST BE CLEARED THROUGH THE
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OFP.LANNING.