HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc.
April 23, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Exxon Company, U.S.A.
Bob Bigham, Buchanan/Soil Mechanics, Inc.
FROM:
Project R.evie.w......... Commi t tee (. Po RoC olJJ.' j
Al Mayo, Dir.ector of Planning r
David Pullen, City Engineer
George Dresser, P&Z Representative
others attending:
Kim Johnson, Assistant Zoning Official
Carol Elmore, Assistant City Attorney
Lavern Dube, GTE
Bill Riley, Water. & Sewer Department
Jimmy McCord, McCord Engineering, Inc.
Bob Epps,Assistant Director of Public Services
Joe Guidry, Electrical Superintendent
Jane Kee, Zoning Official
Harry Davis, Fire Marshal
John Black, Traffic Engineer
Rick Ploeger, City Forester
Shirley Yolk, Planning Technician
SUBJECT: Parking Lot Plan - Exxon Shop located on 0.839 acres at
the intersection of S.H.30& S.B.6 Frontage Road (Lot 3
Reserve E Plantation Oaks Section I subdivision) 86-405
The P.R.C. met on this date to review the above mentioned project
and recommends approval with the following conditions*:
1) The curbing of the island on the north side of this project
should extend as far as the length of the parking space.
2) Service entrance requirements should be coordinated with the
Electric Department as soon as possible.
3) The 10 foot utility easement shown at the back of the right-
of-way is adequate.
4) Show the dimensions of the dumpster pad. One 3-yard dumpster
will be the mininlum required for this project; inside pad
dimensions must be a minimum of 12' x 12'.
5) Submit letter requesting underground utility service if
desired to Electric Department.
6) Utility construction plans must include plans for the sewer
line extension as a condition of issuance of a permit.
7) Coordinate telephone requirements with GTE. .
8) Include a conditional note on the site plan regarding the
1
PRe 86-405
page 2
condition of closing of the existing drive with the construction
of this new drive on the Frontage Road. Provide a copy of the
joint access agreement to the City Legal department. If this
agreenlent had not yet been finalized, provide a letter from
Plantation Oaks which indicates they agree to the cl-osing. Either
a copy of the agreement or a letter.of agreement is required as a
condition of the issuance of a permit for this project.
9) Process for permit from State Highway Department for drives
into this project must be underway as an additional requirement
for the issuance of a permit.
10) Compliance with the P.R.C. drainage statement is required.
II) Compliance with the City's Erosion Control ordinance is
required.
12) Show location of fire hydrants. A hydrant must be located
wi thill 300 feet of all parts ofallbui ldings (as the hose la~rs).
If installation of an additional hydrant is planned, identify the
proposed hydrant on the site plan. Approval of construction plans
(plan & profile) for these lines is required prior to issuance of
a permit.
*Any changes to an approved plan must be cleared through the
office of the Director of Planning.
SUBMIT 10 COPIES OF REVISED SITE PLAN TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR
APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH STEP II OF THE BUILDING PERMIT
PROCESS.
2
Buchanan/Soil. Mechanics, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Bryan, Texas
206 North Sims,. 77803/P.0. Box 672, 77806/(409) 822-3767
Spencer J. Buchanan, P.E. (1903-1982)
Edsel J. Burkhart, P.E.
May 1, 1987
City of Col lege Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77840
Attention: Zoning Official
Reference: SH 30 & SH 6 Exxon Shop: Latest revised Site Plan
B/SMI Project No. 385103
Gentlemen:
Twenty copies of Sheet 1 (General PI.an) of the latest revised Site Plan
for the referenced project are enclosed for your revieyv. One copy of Sheet
2 (Driveway Detai led Plan) is also enclosed for your info1mation.
I
This revised plan is different than the latest antec~dent version in that
grading and drainage are addressed in greater detai I on tlhis plan than before,
and the sewer has been revised after the comments cbf the Brazos County
Health Department and College Station's Sewer Department. 1
I
Pleaserevie.w the revised plan,and, if you approve, sign the twenty copies,
keep as many as you need, and return the others to me.
I
I
I
T h a n k you for you r ass i s tan c e i nth ism a t t e r . I f you 'TIe e d mo rei n for mat ion
II
or any c.1 ar if i ca t ion, p I ease ca I I . !
Sincerely,
BUCHANANI SO I L MECHAN I CS, I NC.
Robert E. Bigham
RES/kc
Enclosure
Copy to: Exxon Company, U.S.A. (received only the letter)
Attention: Steve Elzy
P. O. Box 4415
Houston, Texas 77210
November 26,......1986
B.UChanan. ISC).iIMeC.oha.niCS, Inc.~(~.. l~,
Consulting Engineers f1J\.j
Bryan, Texas () J . l{11
206 North Sims, 77803/P.0. Box 672,778061 (409) 822-3767 '() If} ~
& ~/tfo
Mr. D a v i d J. P u I I en
City Engineer
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
Col lege Station, Texas 77840
Reference: SH 30 & SH 6 Exxon Shop
8/SMI Project No. 385103
'Dear/v'r.' Pu I I en :
Thank you for meeting wi thme on November 24, 1986 , regarding the proposed revised
access for the referenced Exxon Shop. Thank you also for the copy of Col lege
Station's Driveway Access Pol icy (Last Update 6/86).
The proposed Exxon Shop has an approved Site Plan, your file number 86-405, wherein
the driveways into the site are located in part on easements on adjoining property.
It is now proposed to locate the driveways on the site, and to not locate them
on the easements.
A copy of the revised site plan which we discussed is enclosed.
understand that you have agreed with parties interested in development of the
site as an Exxon Shop that you wi II approve either the driveway arrangement as
shown on the approved Site Plan, or driveway proposals conforming to the minimum
standards in the Access Policy, if the policy will permit a driveway located closer
to the intersection of SH 6 Bypass West Frontage Road andSH 30 than the arrangement
shown on the approved Site PLan.
I understand that the dr i veway bes i de SH 6 shown on the rev i sed Site PI an may
be considered to conform to the minimum standards in the Pol icy. The governing
criterion is 160 ft from the center of SH 30 to the center of the driveway. I
understa'nd that you suggest the driveway be shifted a few feet toward SH 30 to
avoid possible inadvertent encroachment onto the adjoining property. A secondary
cri.terion, namely 160 ft .center spacing.. between, .driveways on t.he same sideof the
road, a I so app lies in th is case, but need not be adhered to str i ct I y. Th is means
that the existing nearby driveway into the apartment parking lot need not be closed
when the proposed driveway to this sit~ is opened.
I understand that the driveway beside SH 30 shown on the revised plan does not
comply with the minimum standards in the Driveway Access Policy, in that it is
closer than the requi.red 275 feet from the .center .of the proposed driveway to
the center of the SH 6 Bypass West Frontage Road. This means that you feel that
you cannot approve the proposed. driveway, but must require that the original arrange-
ment, i. e., I ocat i ng the dri veway bes i de SH 30 in part on easement on the adjo in i ng
property, as shown on the approved Site Plan, be used. The original arrangement
does not itself comply with the minimum standards in the Driveway Access Policy,
and represents a variance or simi lar.
Page 2
November 26, 1986
Mr. Pu I I en
understand that the District Office of the State Department of Highways and
Public Transportation has the ultimate appr.oval authority for both driveways,
even though the City of Col.legeStation administers driveway requests. I shall,
now submit the revisedproposa I . to them, and inform them of our meeting by copy
'of this letter.
Thank you again for your patient consideration 'of this project, gnd your willJng~
ness to.meet wit me .and 'explain the regul'afions and criteria appLying to this
sit u a t i on .,
Sincerely,
BUCHANAN/SOIL MECHANICS, INC.
~rC
Robert E. Bigham
kc/RES
Enclosure
cc: State Departmenl.of Highways and Public Transportation
Attention: Mr. B.G. Bockmon, Managing Resident Engineer
E x x an . U . S.. A., A t ten t. i. 0 n : E. L. Cur r y
SPENCER J.BUCHANAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
206 NORTH SIMS - BRYAN, TEXAS
AREA CODE. 409 .822-3767
MAILING ADDRESS:
P. O. BOX 672
BRYAN, TEXAS 77806-0672
SPENCER J.BUCHANAN, P.E/(1903-1982)
EDSEL J. BURKHART, P.E.
May 14, 1986
City of ColTegeStation, Texas
Project Review Committe~
Col lege Station, Texas 77840
Reference: Site/Grading/Landscape Plan -.ExxonShop
SH 6 & SH 30, Col lege Station, Texas
8/SMI Project No. 385-103
Gentlemen:
The revised site/grading/landscape plan for the referenced project
is enclosed. The plan is revised following your memorandum dated
April 23, 1986 . Specific responses to each item of your memorandum are
as follows:
1. Customer service bui Iding.moved southeast to accomplish curbing
extending as far as ther length of the parking space.
4. Dumpster pad is dimensioned and of such a size as to allow
far 12' by 12' clear inside screening fence.
5. Electric service wi II be overhead to meter pole, and owned by
Exxon from meter pole to bui IdingE
6. Approved sewer plans are on fIle with College Station Engineering
Department; additional copies can be furnished as may be required.
7. Telephoneserv i ce wi II be overhead to same po I eas in 5. above;
Exxon wi II provide underground conduit from pole to building.
8. Note regarding closing of existing drive is on revised site
plan. Authority for closing this drive, and for construction of new
drives in positions shown on SH 6 and on SH 30 is contained in that certain
EaSement Agreement recorded in Volume 624, Page 275, Deed Records of
Brazos County. A copy of the Easement Agreement is enclosed. Exxon
Company, U.S.A. will be successor in interest to Munzel, upon closure
on the property.
9. Design of driveways an"d preparation of construction plans is
in progress, and will be submitted when finished, taallowforapplication
for permi t from State Hi ghway Department. Prellmi nary contacts have
been made, and the plan view furnished the State Highway Department.
4t-~
the
be
REB:ar
Enclosure:
cc: Exxon Company, U.S.A.,
Attention: SharenSeversen,
&wr
IN REPLY REFER TO
FILE NO.
:Buchanan/Soil Mechanics, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Bryan, Texas
206 North Sims, 77803/P.0. Box 672, 77806/ (409) 822-3767
July 11,1986
Mr. AI Mayo
C i t Y 0 f Co I leg eSt a t i on
1101 Texas Avenue
Col lege Station, Texas 77840
Reference: SH 30 & SH 6 Exxon Shop
8/5MI Project No. 385 103
Site'Plan 86-405
Dear Mr. Mayo:
I r m enc I os i ng a 1 in. == 20 f t sca I ed over I ay on canary trac i ng paper wh i ch
shows changes that Exxon may want to make on the referenced project.
The changes amount to e Ii mi nat i I1g
use the separate restroom mainly along
"We have a lot of restroom traff ic,,"),
to contain the restrooms.
the separate restroom bui Iding (They
Interstate Highways, where they say
and enlarg i ng the Conven i ence Store
S P e c i f i c a I I Y , the possible c h a n 9 e sa r e as f 0 I lows:
1. EI iminate separate restroom building; put parking places where bui Iding
was.
2. Change total number of parking places from
t y pic a I par kin 9 p I ace t en f t by t we n t y f tin I ie u of
nine
nine
to eleven; make
ft by twenty ft.
3. Enlarge Convenience Store from 24 ft by 41 ft (984 sf) to 24 ft by
46 ft (1,104 sf)"
4. Enlarge canopy from 48 ft by 104 ft to 53 ft by 104 ft.
Our client has asked what would be required in the way of processing
and approvals by CoJlege Station, should Exxon decide that they want to make
these changes on their approved site plan.
Please consider this question and let me know what you decide.
need rnore information, let me know and I will get it for you..
If you,
Mr. AI Mayo
City ofCol1ege Station
July 11, 1986
Page Two
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
~ 2.CHANIC~, ~.
Robert E. Bigham
REB:ar
Enclosure
Copy w/encl: Exxon Company, U. S. AD
16945 Northchase Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77060
Attn: Mr. E. L. Curry
ffb-fJ14
.(l'. · ~ }~/... ~'.'~)(C)f~J~~~'
,~ . Jr~. If "
;., c;;.~
'. .. ..30
1P1
COMMISSION
STATE DEPARTMENTOFIDGHWAYS
AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
P. O. Box 3249
Bryan, Texas 77805
December 10,.1986
ENGINEER-DIRECTOR
R. E. STOTZER, JR.
ROSERTC. LANIER, CHAIRMAN
ROBERT M. BASS
RAY STOKER, JR.
IN REPLY REFER TO
Control. 49-12
SH 6 andSH3CJ Interchange
Brazos County
Mr ..Robert E. Bigham
Buchanan/Soil Mechanics, Inc.
P.o. Box 672
Bryan, Texas 17806
Dear Mr. Bigham:
I have reviewed your revised site plan for a proposed Exxon Station
located at the northwest corner of the above lnterchange.
As previously indicated, we will vlewfavorably an access drive from
the SH 6 West 'FrontageRoad to your cligntsproperty\~ith right turn
in and right turnout features. We would note two exceptions to your
layout:
1. The drive must be at least Sf from the north
property line.
2. A maximum radius of 30' should be used instead of 65'.
Your design has been discussed with Mr. David Pullen of the City of
College Station and the City may bave some additional revisions.
Isuggesttbatyou contact Mr. Pullen relative to any revisions he may
require.and.revlse.yourlayoutaccordlngly. You.should.submit your
application for acces.s (Form 1058 -Rev. 8-86) in triplicate and for
.approval..by both the City and State.
~~,~nCer~~lY .... .~ . /'
".,.,'....../ . ..'
~~~.~/~./~.:.~.~.:....~~----
/ jiB. ~~ockmon
Marlaging Resident 'Engineer
BGB :.j-sf
cc: Mr. David<Pullen
D,istrlct ...F11e
Mr. ..Delmar L... .Smit.h
//
f \
RE : ( 1 )
(2)
FROM:
I.
I.
impact, requiring
onlyaspee~ change (:rear-end'accldent potential), a
and a turn
may causeen~r,oachment on an
Left turns cause moteconfllcts and require a
or
demerge, and the
spacing provides enough roadway for vehIcles
drives such that acceleration - deceleration
movements do not overlap. Accident potential
spacing decreases to
begin to overlap for
3.) Ensure proper geometric design to promote traffic safety and enhanCE
the capacity of the intersection.
j .
of the City Engineer and can be ammended by
at
uses
th isdr iveway access polIcy first fInd the street class:l f lca t i on for
the access desired, then apply the appropriate guldelities. Any street
not listed by this classification is defined as a LOCAL street and these
driveway guidelines do not apply_
SH 6)
Barron Road
College Ave. ~ SH 308
'Dartmouth St. (from
E. TarrowSt.
Emerald Parkway
Finfeather Road
GreenPra,i r i e Road
Harvey iRoad - 5H30
Jersey.jst;........- FM....234.1
Rock .Pralrte Road
Southweist Parkway
Tarrow.st. (from north
University Dr. - FM60
to University Drive)
6 to FM 158)
University Dr. to Lincoln st.)
Oaks Blvd.
(from Rock prair ie Rd. to Holleman. Dr. )
~
I
->1
<20ft. or >200
= <10ft. or >300
IV.
----I
I
1-----------------------1
I I
I--
I
I
-adj-acent drive spacing - ---)c- -
=300ft min. I
SPACING BETWEEN A PROPOSED DRIVE ANOAN INTERSECTING ARTERIAL STREET
I I URB,AN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL I I
, J I I
---I
. I
1-~---~-----7---~----1
I I
I-~---------------~-----I
t I
I
-~------>c
I
I
adjacent spacing --------)c
=300ft min. I
or >300f
or >400f
I--
I
I-~
I
Raised medians providing left-turn channelization on the arterial street
can be used to prohibit left turns exiting a drive and thus correct
inadequatedrive~y spacing. Charinelization at the drive providing only
right-turn in and right-turn out :movements will also be considered when
the proposed drive does not confo'rmto these spacing requirements.
v · :;r'AC1NGRa{JIJI'li~M~~;'~~.F;~~{:J~aliliMrNOR. ARTER I ALS
'tn.uU'tffff~I""n."u"uf'ff"flu:""tf,ft"f""fntlnnff nft.,nun.."., tf "ft." n ff ft"
-,' " " -"" ..." '. ." ,;,,~ -""',,, .. . > - -: - '
~-.::.' ...~...._',,;'.' :-,.-;..J; '. ._~,'
SE~.EN PRtVE's:.ANO<LOCAL STREETS
t)RBAN MINOR ARTERIALS
----I
I
1 ... .API>9~f~~'?iCl,~~'l'e opposite drive 1
c<-upst:r,(;a~~..~~ii.~ing-> 1<-- downstream spacing ,-) I
I <20~ft. Q~ :>150'ft. C no turn lane = <20ft . or
I continuous It. turn = <10ft. or
I
1--..;..----,---"-----:-....-..;..) proposed 1------____________,_----1
I I driveway I I
I 1 I
c<-adj~centdrlvespacing->c<-,--adjacent drive spacing --->c
I =225ftmiri. I =225ft min. I
>175f
>250f
I--
I
SPACING BETWEEN A PROPOSED DRIVE AND AN INTERSECTING ARTERIAL STREET
I I URBANMI NOR ARTER I AL I I
I I I I
1 ...... .,.()ppq~~~(;a:;~tre~t opposite street I
c<~up~tr~ii.~;SI>fJ.Ciin.g->I<--,- dpwnstream spacing -) I
I <20ft.or.>200ft. c no turn lan~ - <20ft. or >250f
I continuous It turn ='(lOft. or >350f
I
---I 1------------7----......;..-"--1 proposed 1-------~-------'""7-------1 I__
I I " I dr iveway I I I
I I I
c (-ad j.ac:ent ~~r.ee'12 .spaci ng- > c< - -- ad j a cen tspa c in 9 - - 7"" - - - - - > c
I :;i;3QOft .1Il1n. I ==225 f t m.a.n. I
, 'i . ~ -. , - ,., I
' . ,- :. - ~,:' ,".:: - '-.: ',:;,. "- : : , "
BETWEEN Pi. PR()J#9~~D bRlVEAND AN INTERSECTINGqOL~ECTOR STREET
I I .. URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL II i
, I i I I
I op.p()si~estireet opposite street i I
c<""upst;.*~amf);~CJF 11'1g-> I < - - downs tx eams pac i ngl -?I
I <20ft.or.>175ft · c notLlrn laJle[ = 1(20ft. or )200f
I continuous It turnl =1<10ft. or >300f
I ' . i
prQpds'ed 1-- -- - - -...;. --...;. -...;.-- - -r- - +-~ - -I I --
driveway I I I
I I
c(-adjacent street spacing->c<--- adjacent spacing --------)c
=275ftmin. I =225ft min. f
Raised medians providing left-turn channelization on the arterial street
can be used to prohibit left turns exiting a drive and thus correct
inadequate. driveway spacing. Channelization at the drive pr.oviding only
right-turn in andright..;..turn out movements will also be considered when
the proPQsed drivedpes not conform to these spacing requirements.
or >1501
Qr >2001
----I
I
I--
I
I
adjacent drive spacing ---)c
=16.0ftmln. I.
SPACING
STREET
I
~>I
<20ft. or >200f
= <10ft. or >300f
I--
I
or >175f"
or >250f
I--
I
I
---------)c
I
Raised medians providing left~turn channelization on the coll.ector street
will not be considered to prohibit turning movements and correct
inadequate drIveway spacing. Channelization ~t thed~ive providing only
right-turn in and right-turn out movementswJll be c~nsidered when
the proposed drive does not conform to theseispaclngrequirements.
VII. SPACI NG REQUIREMENTS FOR SH6 ~ EAST BYPASS FRONTAGE ROAI)S
SH 6 East Bypass is the only facility in College Station having
co.ntro.lled access. Driveway access lo.catio.no.n the frontage ro.ads,
near entrance and exit ramps iscrltical. Driveways sho.uld not be
lo.cated closer than 225 ft. from an exit ramp as measured from the
go.re of the exi tramp to. the centerline o.f the dr i ve ..DriVieways sho.uld
no.t be located clo.ser than 100 ft. fro.m an entrance ramp~s measured
fro.mthe centerline o.f the drive to. the go.reo.f the entrance r<iimp.
Refeu' to. figure 1 for definition o.f these driveway spa<j:lngs.
These guide 1 ines apply to. future interchanges at South~est:: Parkway,
Emerald Parkway (Dartmouth St.l, Rack Prairie Rd., Barro.n :~d.,iand
Greens Prair ieRd. whIch will be in operatio.n by 1990. At that! itime
the east fro.ntage ro.ad from Rack Prairie Rd. no.rth wil~ be: o.neiiway
,. , : I
and from Rack Prairie Ro.ad south two.-way. The west fro.~t:ag~ ro~d fro.m
!i
** **Besides. the.> ramp .~pacin~ desc:rlbeq . above, drlveY(aYi~~~icatea Ton
fro.ntage ro.adsmust also. fOllo.wthepolicy set for co.llecte:r stireets.
j- I
".GEOMf1Tr~IC ....'....iIJES..I ..GN
1. Curbretutn ra,d.1U5'=25f t.minlmum
3. Profile grades
2. Ml'nlmum drl"e'\ia.yopening =30 ft.
F'uncttonal Class
of 'street
't , ..,. ,. t. ,. f , f f ,. ,.., . , ,
Maximum change in grade
Desirable Absolute
t 't t If , , ,
, If " , , ,
Principal Arterial
Minor ArterIal
Urban Collector
2%
3%
3%
4%
6%
8%
4. Right turn deceleration lane warrant - see figure 2
CDesignof r,ight~turndecelerationlaneshould follow
the AASHTO<green b.ook onAux illaryLanes,p.8 74)
5. Use o.fchannelization islands is discauraged except where
t'urning movements must. be excluded.
(Design shaJ-lld fallaw the AASHTOgreen baak an Islands, p. 752)
6. DrivewaYs shauld intersect at a right a.ngle with the ra~dway.
AnYE!xc~ptions<shOUldf.o l1.ow the. .AAS HTOgreen. ba.ok
OI'l,;()JJ:l.~qu~~~~llgle ..Turnp. ....With,Corner I~.lands.,...... .p.767)
, ". -. ;", _: :;-:' ;,' ,.' .-' .' ,',' ,~':: <,':.; - - '-: - ". '- ,-". - .' - ':. - ',".', ' "', ',' " " .
T~ A.de'gu~\t::esi9htd15~ance .~n()'lldbepr avlded fora passe nger
veh191.erna'kln9~left .o.r .righ-texit at<the drive.
"
(CaseIII-B and Case III-.Cfram the AASI-ttt'O greenbook,.p.774).
As.. ....a.generalrule,if at leiast 400 it ..Qf~ightdistance is
pravic;led at30mphar600<ft.at 45mph,<the.pnacheqks need be
p~rf.ormed.Use.a3.5 ft.~yel'ieightandre~e:l:'ence<thedri ver 12 ft
b7 hi nq.the ..backof .... Ptlrp · int~rsecti1'lQWltp~l1.e.. drj"eWay.
Be.~~l:'etac.onshlervertiCCll<alLignJ'nentlf<H; affects 5 i ght
distance att,h~proposeddrive.
8. Driveways .natmeeting the spacing guidelines described abave
shall be designed far limited access by adding median .or
channelization impravements ta the abuting street or by including
channelizatian in the driveway design. An example of limiting
access ta right-turn in right-turn out is pravided in figure 3.
9. Multiple exit lanes may be required if capacity is limited at the
drive exit. Use the "Trip Generation" manual ta estimate traffic
valumeand the "1985 Highway Capacity Manual" ta analyze
turning mavementcapacities. Bath references are published by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers.
.
ct:
W
0-
--l
<r
z
o
f--
U
Ww
CLZ
O<r
.- .-.J
>.
IW
0---1
>-(9
~.~
IT:
<.:)
I
, i
I
i ..
I
. i . , .
I
. !
, .,
!
i
I .
600r-. . q . . .. t" ..
I
, .
t . .
500~......,
.. L.
. '. . . .. ,. . .. ..
I
. I.
.. _.. . . . . . . -. -.. . . . .. ill,. . _. ..
'" ,
.. ... f ,. . I . . .
.; ... :., , ,
40Or~':. .
I
l
I. .
3O.Qhi.... ....'." '.....
. -, ... . . . . .. -"
I - . ~. . '. t .
100- .. .:.- ;
0'"
5
VOLUME WARRANTS FOR RIGHT-TURN DECELERATION LANES
FIGURE a
City of. collegeStati()1l
lliJE l1V [[00 @ fFvOO ~ ~ ~G00 0 1f1r b~~JL
the following items:
o Specifications
7:?E!"
..~~ .'"...~