HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
,/'
"
,'~ p&Z Minutes
9-6-84
page 5
(
MrsHansenpointed out that the buffering Mr. Kaiser is requesting is not a require-
ment. Di'scussion followed concerning the reasons the land was purchased,the number of
acres of C.;..lat this intersection both on this side and the west side of Texas Avenue,
and howe-ffecti ve roadslstreetsare as Duffers . M'r . MacGil vray then made a motion to
rezone th.is tract from R-l t()C~l as requested with Mr. Brochu seconding the motion.
Motlon failed by a vote of 3-3.
Brochu seconding. Motion
of grant lng
Applicatlo,n is
Randy Wimpee,
stated Chatna
is pla,nning to use exlstingfaclt iti:esfor.thatpurpose.
option on the adjacentlandwhlch wlllcomeupuonJ.anuary 6th and the church plans to
exercise that option. He went on toexplaintnat this will be adaycarecenter licensed
by the. State, and It isnotlnoperatlon at this time.
been included in the request for the
to again come befo.re the CO~l1mission. Mr.
plans were ever considered
the da.ycarecenter at this
operation for members first,
and then be open for others; and t'hat an elementary ,school is not now' being requested, nor
planned by the church,howev~r, another entity has been lnquiringintothat type use in
the future~ Mrs. Tongco asked if there is any barrier or buffer to separate this from
adj acentres ident i alproperty,to whTchMr.Wimpreansweredthattheadj acent land is
vacant now. and thedlstanceisapproximately 100-150 feet to the street. Mr. MacGi lvray
asked staff if this permit would al1owascho01forK-5 to whIch Mr. Callaway replied that
this permit would 'a.uthorize'onlywhat is being requested unless clarification is in the
rec0rd. t4r.Martyn stated that the letter which accompanies the appli~ation in' the packet"s
~i
~:~.... .JI P&l M i n ute s
9-6-84
page 6
a small
have a
Mr..Ka'i:ser made a motion to approve a Conditional Use ,Permit fo'r a daycare center for a
1 i'mit of 2 years for not more -than]2children to operate 2 morntngsa week,hours not
extendfngbeyond 1 p.m.; days of the week to be left to the discretion of the applicant.
(He added that basically his motion covers the first paragraph of the applicant's letter
~hi'ch accompanied the application.) Mr. Martyn seconded this motion which carried unani-
mous 1 Y' (6-0) .