HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication
j....~iiIJI.I Fa ~
.D~ .,.J..€$ .. CI/co ~
J1/~tq Fote
1fJJ Foe
f'
9/lq
10/;.3
DATE RECEIVED
::.... --=
APP llCAT I ON FORJ1
,REZON l'NG
=-~
-
. ..,. ", ." ." ,-.' . ,
MJN:JnJJM 'REQiJI REMENTS :
1), ,Appllcatio".',completedin full. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
2)l.lst (fr~.PlChy Tax O'fice) of property owners within 200 feet of subject property.
(AL.J..OW4$i~~,~tJ!aS.FORr~x OFFICE TO PREPARE L I S1) .
3) Receipt f~fPiliyment i~ the am.ount of $50.00 pius $4.00 for. each person on above
list. '.-(F~e,'p~:~arbleCl.t C i t:y Tax Office)
_4J:~', :;FuJly' .~.tpJens~.t();~ed -map: (on 24xJ6 paper) showing:
a) "Land--..~ffe~;ted ~
b) leg.al,':'(Jes'e'-r-lpt i en I, of a rea of proposed change.
. e).:'P..re$er.l!t';~~~ln9 I
.,~,,,~.".~~,),,~~,,}t~:jj,Jn~':~:'~1.a;~,5':,lff catJon of a 1'1 abutt "Mg' .1,and ,
e~ All .p.l;I:blfc& priv~te rights-of-way and easements bot.indrhg~-'ciJ~clint:ersecting
, sub j ec: t land ~ '
AI30;\lEI"fEM-$ tiU.'$i~'!E JUECEIVED IN PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 20 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNING
AN.D"Z6NINfSCOMMil$;SIQN MEEtING. REGULAR COMMISSION MEETINGS ARE HELD THE FIRST AND
THIRD THURSPAYS ..Of-' EACH MONTH ..
If .~. p~t:ftiOntQI"I"'~~OAin~is dented by elt:hel";L,theCommiss"i6nor;:,~heCoij~cll, ~l1other
ilip,pl fc.at:lCi)Af~jr~~~~nln~~hal1 not be filed withina perlocLof".'180 ch:rys~rgm.:t:.hedate
of <Jefl1ili,l, ~~~ept\l!tf~h.th~ ~ermls s t on of the Commission or.~Po";::inl tJa tlgg bya....e City.
i
"7. '
-~' i'
a...."I(",~",mil=::
="'~~.
AP.P'L"JCANT' S..-"J(ell ey Broa1ch
:ADDRESS
3Q6 Nj Roberts:on
OWNER Same
(Attach additional sheet ifn,ecess.ary)
ADDRESS
Bryan, Texas I
PHONE
i
409"'696...4540 JfQff i ce )
ii
PHONE " 823-0157 {Home)
This !?1"Ci)perty W'ii$c~nveye~ to owner by deed dated July 5. -1985
'and recorded in
Va J ume .' 805 Pa.ge 185 of the Brazos County Deed Records,.
OEseR I PTI ON OF PROPERTY : I ~Jt' 18, 19 B lock Subd Iv i s ion Regency Square
PLAT RiEC:ORDED IN Vol ume 77'1
Page ~ of the Deed Records of Brazos County.
Existing Zoning:
C-N
I
Requested Zoning:
C-l
Present Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed use of Property: Conveni ence Store, Ca r Wash, Fa~t Food
g,aaa Square ~bt Shopping Cente~
Continued on Page 2
.;
REZONING APPLICATION
P'AGE 2
p&Z Case No.lf--I"
SUPPORTING. INFORMATION
Ordinance No. 850 (the Zoning Ordinance) requires theappl icant to furnish the
following information:
(1) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which
make thIs zone change necessary..
SEE ATTACHED
(2) Ind icatewhether or not this zone change i si naccordance with the Comprehensive
Plan. Ifitis not, exp 1 ainwhy the Plan is incorrect.
SEE ATTACHED
(3)
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
/
SEE ATTACHED
The appl.icant,'has
herein and exhibits
that the facts stated
~.--I b -g-S---
Date .,
owner or agent
",h'd" F APPLI CAII ON JS Fl LEO BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, ,h',,',~',
APPLI CATI ON MUST BE ACCOf1PANJED BY A pnWJ:R()J:" IlTTf\Dtdr=v r-T'^-rr-u.r-...._ ___
I
.
(1) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City
which makethi s zonecha nge necessa rYe
A. The city has recognized .aneed for C-l at this intersection
by rezoning the Northeast corner. of Holleman and Well born
from R-5 toC--l. The proposed use of this property is
\lirtuall ythe same as s ubj ectproperty.
B. Even though subject property is zoned C-N, the approved uses
of the property signify C-:-l zoning. For example, fast food
restaurant, car wash, convenience store anda.gasoline fueling
facility. According to Mr. Mayo, lithe gasoline facility will have
the greatest capacity of anycohvehi ence store in the city.
This. will represent the potential for generating more traffic than
the typical convenience store. II
C. The property is more suited for<G..l due to high traffic volume
of 18,000 vehicles per day on Wellborn Road. One reason .for this
increased traffi cvolume is the continuous growth of Southwood Valley.
Also traffic volume will increase when the railroad grade crossing
i's completed at Holleman & Wellborn.
(2) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan. If it isnot~ explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The proposed. change is not in accordance with the comprehensive
plan. The subject property was originally zoned R-5and was
rezonedC-Nin December 1983. The comprehensive plan is not
necessarily incorrect because a plan merely provides general
direction to meet defined goals. In this case, the direction
needs to be ammended to meet the changing conditions at this
intersection.
(3) List any other reasons to support this zone change.
A. Because of signage restriction in>C-N, Broach Oil Company will
be adversely affected since the same type of business is to be
located on the newly rezonedC-ltract across the street.
Broach .Oilmustbe able to compete on an even basis or the value
of our property will advers 1 ey be affected .
B. C-l was hot requested in the original zoning application because
of a 4001 depth requirement. Since the city waived the 4001
foot requirement for .theadjacent · corner. we ask to be given
the same consideration since the two, properties are almost identical
in size and since virtually the same' land use is planned.
d's-.II~