HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous
or
\~) .
j4J/
(5)
(6)
tM1 ~~7)
~ (8)
J21
(10 )
City of College Station
POST OFFICE BOX .9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840- 2499
August 8, 1984
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Bank-O-Property, ATTN: Ed Bravenec,2600 Citadel, Suitce 645, Houston
MerlFss & Jones AlA, 5010 Dincans, Houston, TX
TlmChlnn, Kling Engineering, P.O.. Box 4234, Bryan, TX
Project Review Committee:. ;',^, ~~('\. .. /
JIm Ca llaway, Ass' t. Director of PI ann i ng ~
Mar~,S.l11ith, Ass't. C1 tyEng in~erq ....'<.. '
Ste'veHansen &Ce 1 ia Stalllngs, PS.Z Representat i ves
FROM:
Other Staff :
Harry Davis, Fire Marshal
Joe Guidry, Electrical Superintendent
Bob Epps, Ass't. Director of Public Services
John Dennison, Elec. Power Engrs.
Dav fdRi 1 ey, GTE
Rick Ploeger, City Forester
Jane Kee, Zoning Official
ShIrley Yolk, PlannIng Technician
SUBJECT: Site Plan Permit - Fountain Court Apartments -84-504
The P.R.C. met an thfsdate to review the abovementioned project, and recommends
approval w.iththe following conditions:*
jl)
(2)
Include a note on the site plan indicating the second stories of buildings
are connected with the breezeway on the ground floor level only.
Site, grading and drafnageplans must be included in the set of plans sub-
mi ttedwithappllcation for but lding permit. P.R.C~' Ora (nage Statement
provIded; complt~nce .required,
Fire hydrants must be located within 300 feet of all parts of all buildings
as the hose Jays. Locations of any additIonal hydrants and/or easements to
be determined by the City Engineer (David Pullen) and shown on the final site
plan. FJrehydrants must be operable prior to anyco,nstruction of any com-
bustIble materials.
Showa11 setback d'men~lons. All members of P.R.C.have agreed that rear
,setbacks must be a mln'mum of 1,5 feet from the property 1 i ne.
Maintain a minImum of a 15 foot setback from the centerline of power lines
to any building line.
Blanket easements are required for underground utility service.
Interior, drive curbing must be marked as Fire Lanes.
Furnish electrical10ad analysis to Electrical Department in construction
documents. . ·
Submit an accurate landscape plan showing all species, sizes and accurate
point totals with the revised site plans. Compl iance with the Landscape
OrdInance (Ord. 1505) is required. Show the location of sprinklers or hose
bibs on site/landscaping plans.
Re: Dumpsters
(a)At least 4- 6 yard dumpsters are required for this project.
Continued 9n page 2
P.R. C. (84-504)
8-8-84
page 2
(b)Spaces fordumps.ters mus,tbe a 12'x 20' minimum.
(c)Angle dumpster locations as directed by the Assistant DIrector of
Public Services maintaining a 50 foot clear radius in front of the
dumpsters.
(11) Showdlmensionsofdrive accesswaysand the radii.
(12) All Islands must bea minimum of9 feet in width; show dimensions of all
Islands. .
(.t J) Anyidens i ty above 24dweliJng units per acre is subject. to. appr<:)~<llby
th-:.CJ ~~ Counc I.l.~ .J1P9rl..receipt of. re,vis~d.!apPl"ov:ed 'sJ.te arid "l~o(:Js-ca'p'fng
"'''::}'~<'~p':l'ansi.,~,',g.ame'"w.fl:l':::be'"::forwa rded' 't'o""'C l:'t'y-:':'Co~UMc i 1 ' for act ion.
SUBMIT 8COPlESOF REVISEDS1TE/lANOSCAPING PLANS rOPlANNING DEPARTMENT FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL. tHESE PLANS Will BE FORWARDED rOCITY COUNCIL FOR ACTION
REGARDING DENSITY. AFTER APPROVAL, STEP II OF THE BUilDING PERMIT PROCESS CAN
BEGIN.
*Any changes to an approved site pJanmust be cleared through the Office of
the DIrector of Planning.
sjv
CitY~fiC()llege. Statl<>n
POST.OFFlcE BOX 9960 1101TEXI\S AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840.2499
August 27, 1984
Mr. Ed Bravenec
Bank-a-Property
2600..c i tadel
Suite 645
Houston, Texas
RE: Dens l ty Approva'l - Founta i nC'ourt Apartments - 84-'504
Dear Mr. .Bravenec:
This is to inform you that the proposed density of the Fountain
Oaks Apartments (Case No. 84-504)wasa.pproved by. the ,City Council
at theregu 1 a rmeetin'gon August 23,1984.
Your approved site p lansare i. n the Planning Department. Youmay
pick them up at your convenience to begin the next step in the
Building Permit Process.
Sincerely,
~
Shirley J. olk
Planning Technician
f,t/-~;;
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
for
FOlJNTAIN.OAKSAPARTMENTS
Co]T~,ge... Stati(ln" Texas
"':;'J, uly, '.. ....."...984
SUMMARY' & ,RECOMMENDATIONS
The Fountain Oaks Apartment site consists of 3.54 acres of
1 and and is ~ituated in Co 11 ege Station between Domini k Drive and
Uni versityOaksDr; ve. This tract contributes storm runoff into
two Watersheds: Aand.B (.W-SA andWSB),asshown on the Drainage
Area Map. The runoff from a 5 year rainfallisexpected to in-
crease from 7.9 c.fs (pre-developed). toT3.Hefs (post-developed)
forvJSA and from 7 .2'cfsto13.8 cfsforWSB.,
It can be seen "that Point X' in University Oaks Boulevard is
experiencing some localized and temporaryfloddingbecause of the
flat slope of the roadway at that point. The capacity (to the
top of the curb) is. 7.9 cfs and the Q at that point is also 7.9
cfs. In order 'not to aggravate the s?tuation, it is recommended
that the post-deve loped runoff; ntol~SA bel imi ted to {or 1 ess
than) the pre-developed rate of 7.9 cfs. This will require a
detention of approxima tel y 5.1 cfs for th is side of the project
's,-ite.
Point Yon University Oaks Boulevard has a capacity of14A
ers, whichwilleasi.ly accommodate the runoff from .the post-
developed site. . A closer examination, however, reveals that
there is only one 51 wide curb inlet on each side of. the street
at the sag' poi'ntinUniversityO,aksBoulevard. This low point
is .lotatedappro)(.imately 800 feet northeast of the project site
and" is expected to' be inn'undated ,duri n9 most ra; nfallevents.~
For this reason, it is recomrnendedthat th~ post-developed rate
of runoff into HSB be al so limited to .the pre-developed rate of
7.8 cfs.. Sinc~ the expectedQS from thepost-developedcondi-
tionis,13.8 cfs,.6.0 'cfs' wi 11 . need to be detained on....s ite for
th ;sW,SB.] Therefore, ,the total rate of runoff to be deta i ned
shallbell.lcfs. These detentionfaciTitiesshallbe in the
form or large, shallow ponds in the parking areas. The size of
the pon<:lsshalli~~determined at.Q. .:i~~terdateandfina.lapproval
bythepit)'ofColl egeStation autnorjtyshould be contingent on
theadequacYi'ofthi s desi.g'n.
1. Prior to the Final Approval, the. construction of addi,tional
inletsmay.be offeredQs a viable alternative in lieu of de-
tention forWSB runoff.
Kling Engineering & Surveying
PRE-DEVELOPMENT ....F[O\~S:
General:
= 10minutes
IS = 6.06fn/hr
5.4A"creApartment. Si te
Q' = (0.35)(6.06)(3.54 Acres)
5
=
QS = (O.3S)(6.06)(3.7l)
- 7.9 cfs@ Point-X"
ofwhi:ChIl.A.l and D.A.3areflowing onto Village
GreenA'p'artments :
Watershed"B: '(D.A.'s2& 5)
Q5 = (0.35)( 6.06)(3.40)
= 7. 2c.fs
being put into University Oaks Boulevard
Kling Engineering & Surveying
,POST-DEVELOPMENT .FlOWS :
O. 90. for ';mpervi ousareas
IS = 6.06 injhr
5.4 Acre Apartment Site '
05 = (0.90)(6.06)(3.54)
Ceff
= (0.35)(2.17) +(0.90)(031 + 0.83)
3.71. Acres
= 0.58
05 = ( 0 · 58)( 6 . 06 )( 3 . 71 ) = 1 3 · 0 c f s
,rJatershedB:
,< ' " .
(0. 35){1.40)...+ .....{O.~.9'O}(2. 00)
3.40 Acres'
0,.67.
05 =. (0.67)(6.06)(3.40)
13.8cfs
KI iug Engineer ing & Surveying
.-.
CAPACITY OF UNIVERSITY OAKS BOULEVARD
o.so
Universi tyOaksBoulevard X-,$ection
N.T.S.
Q =1. 49 AR2/3 S l/2
n
where: A = 4.75 Square Feet
WP = 19.01 Feet
A
R = WP= 0.250
s= O.2%toS.W., 0.67% toN.E.
n =0.016 (asphalt)
Qcapadty of 1/2 street to the S. ~~. = 7.9 cfs
Qcapadty of 1/2 street to the N.E. = 14.4 cfs
Kling Engine>e rin:g & Survey ing