Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous or \~) . j4J/ (5) (6) tM1 ~~7) ~ (8) J21 (10 ) City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX .9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840- 2499 August 8, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: Bank-O-Property, ATTN: Ed Bravenec,2600 Citadel, Suitce 645, Houston MerlFss & Jones AlA, 5010 Dincans, Houston, TX TlmChlnn, Kling Engineering, P.O.. Box 4234, Bryan, TX Project Review Committee:. ;',^, ~~('\. .. / JIm Ca llaway, Ass' t. Director of PI ann i ng ~ Mar~,S.l11ith, Ass't. C1 tyEng in~erq ....'<.. ' Ste'veHansen &Ce 1 ia Stalllngs, PS.Z Representat i ves FROM: Other Staff : Harry Davis, Fire Marshal Joe Guidry, Electrical Superintendent Bob Epps, Ass't. Director of Public Services John Dennison, Elec. Power Engrs. Dav fdRi 1 ey, GTE Rick Ploeger, City Forester Jane Kee, Zoning Official ShIrley Yolk, PlannIng Technician SUBJECT: Site Plan Permit - Fountain Court Apartments -84-504 The P.R.C. met an thfsdate to review the abovementioned project, and recommends approval w.iththe following conditions:* jl) (2) Include a note on the site plan indicating the second stories of buildings are connected with the breezeway on the ground floor level only. Site, grading and drafnageplans must be included in the set of plans sub- mi ttedwithappllcation for but lding permit. P.R.C~' Ora (nage Statement provIded; complt~nce .required, Fire hydrants must be located within 300 feet of all parts of all buildings as the hose Jays. Locations of any additIonal hydrants and/or easements to be determined by the City Engineer (David Pullen) and shown on the final site plan. FJrehydrants must be operable prior to anyco,nstruction of any com- bustIble materials. Showa11 setback d'men~lons. All members of P.R.C.have agreed that rear ,setbacks must be a mln'mum of 1,5 feet from the property 1 i ne. Maintain a minImum of a 15 foot setback from the centerline of power lines to any building line. Blanket easements are required for underground utility service. Interior, drive curbing must be marked as Fire Lanes. Furnish electrical10ad analysis to Electrical Department in construction documents. . · Submit an accurate landscape plan showing all species, sizes and accurate point totals with the revised site plans. Compl iance with the Landscape OrdInance (Ord. 1505) is required. Show the location of sprinklers or hose bibs on site/landscaping plans. Re: Dumpsters (a)At least 4- 6 yard dumpsters are required for this project. Continued 9n page 2 P.R. C. (84-504) 8-8-84 page 2 (b)Spaces fordumps.ters mus,tbe a 12'x 20' minimum. (c)Angle dumpster locations as directed by the Assistant DIrector of Public Services maintaining a 50 foot clear radius in front of the dumpsters. (11) Showdlmensionsofdrive accesswaysand the radii. (12) All Islands must bea minimum of9 feet in width; show dimensions of all Islands. . (.t J) Anyidens i ty above 24dweliJng units per acre is subject. to. appr<:)~<llby th-:.CJ ~~ Counc I.l.~ .J1P9rl..receipt of. re,vis~d.!apPl"ov:ed 'sJ.te arid "l~o(:Js-ca'p'fng "'''::}'~<'~p':l'ansi.,~,',g.ame'"w.fl:l':::be'"::forwa rded' 't'o""'C l:'t'y-:':'Co~UMc i 1 ' for act ion. SUBMIT 8COPlESOF REVISEDS1TE/lANOSCAPING PLANS rOPlANNING DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. tHESE PLANS Will BE FORWARDED rOCITY COUNCIL FOR ACTION REGARDING DENSITY. AFTER APPROVAL, STEP II OF THE BUilDING PERMIT PROCESS CAN BEGIN. *Any changes to an approved site pJanmust be cleared through the Office of the DIrector of Planning. sjv CitY~fiC()llege. Statl<>n POST.OFFlcE BOX 9960 1101TEXI\S AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840.2499 August 27, 1984 Mr. Ed Bravenec Bank-a-Property 2600..c i tadel Suite 645 Houston, Texas RE: Dens l ty Approva'l - Founta i nC'ourt Apartments - 84-'504 Dear Mr. .Bravenec: This is to inform you that the proposed density of the Fountain Oaks Apartments (Case No. 84-504)wasa.pproved by. the ,City Council at theregu 1 a rmeetin'gon August 23,1984. Your approved site p lansare i. n the Planning Department. Youmay pick them up at your convenience to begin the next step in the Building Permit Process. Sincerely, ~ Shirley J. olk Planning Technician f,t/-~;; PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS for FOlJNTAIN.OAKSAPARTMENTS Co]T~,ge... Stati(ln" Texas "':;'J, uly, '.. ....."...984 SUMMARY' & ,RECOMMENDATIONS The Fountain Oaks Apartment site consists of 3.54 acres of 1 and and is ~ituated in Co 11 ege Station between Domini k Drive and Uni versityOaksDr; ve. This tract contributes storm runoff into two Watersheds: Aand.B (.W-SA andWSB),asshown on the Drainage Area Map. The runoff from a 5 year rainfallisexpected to in- crease from 7.9 c.fs (pre-developed). toT3.Hefs (post-developed) forvJSA and from 7 .2'cfsto13.8 cfsforWSB., It can be seen "that Point X' in University Oaks Boulevard is experiencing some localized and temporaryfloddingbecause of the flat slope of the roadway at that point. The capacity (to the top of the curb) is. 7.9 cfs and the Q at that point is also 7.9 cfs. In order 'not to aggravate the s?tuation, it is recommended that the post-deve loped runoff; ntol~SA bel imi ted to {or 1 ess than) the pre-developed rate of 7.9 cfs. This will require a detention of approxima tel y 5.1 cfs for th is side of the project 's,-ite. Point Yon University Oaks Boulevard has a capacity of14A ers, whichwilleasi.ly accommodate the runoff from .the post- developed site. . A closer examination, however, reveals that there is only one 51 wide curb inlet on each side of. the street at the sag' poi'ntinUniversityO,aksBoulevard. This low point is .lotatedappro)(.imately 800 feet northeast of the project site and" is expected to' be inn'undated ,duri n9 most ra; nfallevents.~ For this reason, it is recomrnendedthat th~ post-developed rate of runoff into HSB be al so limited to .the pre-developed rate of 7.8 cfs.. Sinc~ the expectedQS from thepost-developedcondi- tionis,13.8 cfs,.6.0 'cfs' wi 11 . need to be detained on....s ite for th ;sW,SB.] Therefore, ,the total rate of runoff to be deta i ned shallbell.lcfs. These detentionfaciTitiesshallbe in the form or large, shallow ponds in the parking areas. The size of the pon<:lsshalli~~determined at.Q. .:i~~terdateandfina.lapproval bythepit)'ofColl egeStation autnorjtyshould be contingent on theadequacYi'ofthi s desi.g'n. 1. Prior to the Final Approval, the. construction of addi,tional inletsmay.be offeredQs a viable alternative in lieu of de- tention forWSB runoff. Kling Engineering & Surveying PRE-DEVELOPMENT ....F[O\~S: General: = 10minutes IS = 6.06fn/hr 5.4A"creApartment. Si te Q' = (0.35)(6.06)(3.54 Acres) 5 = QS = (O.3S)(6.06)(3.7l) - 7.9 cfs@ Point-X" ofwhi:ChIl.A.l and D.A.3areflowing onto Village GreenA'p'artments : Watershed"B: '(D.A.'s2& 5) Q5 = (0.35)( 6.06)(3.40) = 7. 2c.fs being put into University Oaks Boulevard Kling Engineering & Surveying ,POST-DEVELOPMENT .FlOWS : O. 90. for ';mpervi ousareas IS = 6.06 injhr 5.4 Acre Apartment Site ' 05 = (0.90)(6.06)(3.54) Ceff = (0.35)(2.17) +(0.90)(031 + 0.83) 3.71. Acres = 0.58 05 = ( 0 · 58)( 6 . 06 )( 3 . 71 ) = 1 3 · 0 c f s ,rJatershedB: ,< ' " . (0. 35){1.40)...+ .....{O.~.9'O}(2. 00) 3.40 Acres' 0,.67. 05 =. (0.67)(6.06)(3.40) 13.8cfs KI iug Engineer ing & Surveying .-. CAPACITY OF UNIVERSITY OAKS BOULEVARD o.so Universi tyOaksBoulevard X-,$ection N.T.S. Q =1. 49 AR2/3 S l/2 n where: A = 4.75 Square Feet WP = 19.01 Feet A R = WP= 0.250 s= O.2%toS.W., 0.67% toN.E. n =0.016 (asphalt) Qcapadty of 1/2 street to the S. ~~. = 7.9 cfs Qcapadty of 1/2 street to the N.E. = 14.4 cfs Kling Engine>e rin:g & Survey ing