Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous !Ii Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, .D.C.20472 May 10, 1985 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Honorable Gary Halter Mayor of the City of College station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 Dear Mayor Halter: This is in response to a letter, dated october 25, 1984, submitted by Mr. DavidJ.pullen,P.E., City Engineer for the City of College Station, and forwarded to us by our Region VI office. In his letter, Mr. Pullen requested that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) review a proposed channel modification project on Wolf Pen Creek in CollegeS.tation and issue a conditional statement of belief. with his letter, Mr. Pullen submitted a technical r:eport entitled "Hydraulic Study of Wolf Pen Creek for Texana Retail Center: Co!llege Station, Texas," prepared by> Bury-Pittman ConsultirigEngineers, dated September 1984. This reporteontains a summary of the proposed project and hydraulic backwater models for the reach of Wolf Pen Creek affected by the project. Subsequently ,at thereques t of our Technical Evaluation Contr actor ( T:OC ), Mr.PauIJ.Bury, III, P.E.,OI Bury-pittman,sul:>mitted additional data in- eluding topographic information referred to in the aforementioned report. From our review of the technical data submitted, we have identified the following concerns with the hydraulic model: . The.100-year discharge used by Bury-Pittman for this portion of Wolf Pen Creek is significantly different from that used in the effective FlOod Insurance study (FIS). . The100-year water-surface elevation used by Bury-Pittman at the downstream end of the proposed project is not the same as the eleva- tion at the corresponding station along the effective FIS profile. These concerns were discussedina telephone conversation between our TEe and Mr. LesPittmanof Bury-pittmainon AprilS, 1985. AlthoughBury-Pittman's current model is conservative in its discharges and elevations, Mr. Pi ttman said they may redesign the proposed channel modification project based on the discharges and starting water-surface elevations used in the effective FIS. When plans and hydraulic models are submitted which represent. the redesigned project and use the same disch.arges and starting water-surface elevations as the effectiveFIS, FEMA will t"eview the project and, if warranted, issue a conditional Letter of Map Revision (LOMR),also known as acondi tional state- ment of belief. ~~ 2 If the technical data discussed in the aforementioned April 8, 1985, telephone conversation is not submitted . within 30 days of the date of this letter, our processing of this request 'will be terminated. If, after 30 days, weare provided with this data, your communi ty,mayask for reconsideration of the request. We have enclosed documents, entitled "Conditions and Criteria for MapRe- visions" and "conditions and Criteria for Floodway Revisions, "which further describe the nature and extent of the material needed to support a request to revise an effective FISandFIRM. Compliance with the criteriaoutlin~din these documents will expediteFEMA'sreview process, thus allowing the effec- tiveFIS and FIRMs for your community to be revised as appropriate, ini: a timely manner. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Chief, Natural and Technological Hazards Division oftheF.ederal Emergency Management Agency in Denton,. Texas, at (81 7) 387...5811 o.r meml:>ers of our Headquarters staff in washington, D.C., at (202) 646-2754. Enclosures cc: Mr. David J. pullen,P.E.,w/enclosures Mr. PaulJ.Bury ,III ,P.E. ,w/enclosures City of College station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 IIOI1~EXASAVENUE COL..L.EGE.STATION. l~EXAS. 77840.2499 December 19,1984 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Gary Payne,. Enviroplan Paul Bury, Bury-Pittman Consulti ng Engr;.neers Project . Review Committee: . ..... .. . Al Mayo, Director of Planning. .. ............ . . Mark Smith, Assista.nt City Engineer Dan ~1acGilvray, P&Z Representa.t'~ve Other Staff: Joe Guidry, Electrical Superintendent HarryDav i s , Fir.eMarshal Jane... ...Kee, Zoning ..Official Kim Johnson"Assi stantZoni ngOffic;al Rick Ploeger, Urban Forester David Riley, General... Telephone Go. Bill Riley, Water &Sewer.Department Parking LotPla.n - ParkVill age\Shopping Center -84-434 The P.R.C. met on Dec. 19, 1984 to review the above mentioned project and Gannot recommend approval until the following items are addressed.* (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8 ) (9 ) (10) (1) The property must be rezoned.fromitscurrentA-Pzoning C-IGeneralCommercial. This project cannot be approved zon ;ng . Submi t load data to Joe Guidry, Electr;cal Department. General Telephone will coord;natewithElectrical Department for construction purposes~ GTE requires conduit. Request for underground utilities must be submitted to Joe Guidry. Electrical Department requests blanket easement for underground utilities. Once located applicant may dedicate soecific easement bv sebarate instrument. Ifapplicantch"oses overh.eadutilitie's along westpropeoJy'ty 'line there must be a dedicated 20 I utility easement sho~Jn on the plat.... Civil Engineer must submit water and sewer requirements. Fire hydrants must be. wfthin300. of all parts of all buildings. Building E must be sprinkleredasitis a restaurant over 5,000 S.F. Check Building Code-number of handicap spaces is inadequate. ( 11) (12) (13) (14) ( Ip) (16) AlJ parking directly n front of bui ld. ngs. must be removed and curb marked as fire lane a per Fi re> Marsha .' DeVelopmentPermit is required prior to any dirt work. CQmp]iancewith PRC Dra inag~ Stat~mentrequired. SCY'~en. fence shall b~ no closer than 15' to right-of-way line. Si~pmustbe ID'fromany easement. Frorl't~g7will allowonly3ourb cuts. Close cuts at each end of project. Ma~chir~it~wjthopeni n9S. or> drives across Hwy. 30. (Hark Smi th. wi 11 q'~~:gM\~,~,,~,t;QOlJrQrut (the one just north of the center entrance) with t;Q(:1\Im~~~'fiOiEnginee r . ) ..' . '. .' . DlJmPe~~rsrequire50'clearance - meet with Bob Epps, Assistant Director of..........Pu.Ql.iC..........Se rv .t.ces.... . Rernoy~:~at.es.fromdumpsterat .restaurant. R~J'(,')S~~~P9rkingin rear or provide public access to rear of Building C a:r).dH?~~.~bly(Butldj.ng B. R$ClUS,e.p7ripHeralrows to 18' of pavement. wi th 2 I overhang. Reduo~,drives up 23' to reduce amount of concrete. Jl.l1,isl~ndsare 9' . wide by 20 I 'long. t.()~~~~:~] 1 trees to be saved and protected- key the . landscape plan. M:i~;ht:f?J~Detteroffto remove trees where fill will be placed. C~!~':f1g!e;dnotefrom live Oak to Post Oak . (17) (18) (19) (?O) (21) (22) (23) (2Lj.) .'(25) *<4copi~s()fa revised site plan must be. submitted for approval to .the Director of....Planning.