HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
Recommendations and Comments:
Th€~ .w.ppl i c.:.~n-t: sel ectf.=d C-'l and 1~1-"1 for this r'eques;t a'H:er
discussing his; curr'ent i::1.nd proppsed USf.:~s o.t the pl'''cJperty tA!it:h
s; t ~::\ .f: .f: IC
C"-<1. and 1"1,-,:1, l"-len~ de'l:el'oo mi ned to be th f.-? most appl~opr i .;ate
cHstr'ic::ts ":Clr" ~~!!!H!!! uses .;at this location.
( J' t'l :i ~H} ct. Cl €:? ~:s 1"1 (:) t
constitute staff recommendation for these zoning districts at
t: t"} :i. it:; 1 C) C::ii:\ t :t. C) n a: )
The requested M-1 would allow fabricated metal
produc:tsmanufacturing and other uses the applicant has
t::i :i it:; c: U.1iS S; ~!t d. It
The ay"ea 0.,: this l'''eqw::!st i~:; ,"'eflec.ted as loltlden$ity
re$idential on the City's land use plan.
C: CJ fit fT\ t:~:'I'" c:: i ~\ 1 a 1'- e a. S ,B. I'" (.:,:.~
reflected at the intersection$ of Barron Rd./SH 6 and Greens
Prairie Rdu/SH 6"
Indu$t.r:i, al u~:;es ar"f:.~ n?.f1 ected on the e,::ast. si d0~
of SH 6 south of Greens Prairie Rd.
This area was annexed into the City in
or '''1 €~
'I .. . · .1.' . t .
c:: .. . i::\ f.ii f.i}:1. -t J. c: i~\ .... J. t.::) r\
of A-O Agricultural/Open was established as a
tempor'cu"ycl assi f i cati on upon "mnel.:eti on.
F= f..;.~ Y" in ii:\ I"l f.-? 1"1 t, ~~ CJ rl i rl (;J
classifications have been established by Council in response to
requests submitted by property owners in this area.
Commercial zoning along the west side of SH 6 has been
w~~
cl::>ncentr"a-t:ed at the i n'l:ersecti cnl ~ BarTon Rd.. and Greenmi
I:::' I.... i:\:i. I'''':i.. t.? .1:~~c:I. II
(52 atc. l:;)f C"d at Greens Pl"'i::d. d. e, appn:'1H. ::20 ac .of
C; ..... l ,::\ t. l:~ i::\ I~" r" C) n )
The recent 88 ac. C-1 request to the south was
reduced to 52 .;ae.. to allow for a step-down in intensity from the
i n t.<<-?I~" !H;'(~~H::: t. i <::)1"\ IS
Commercial zoning .;at the Barron Rd.. intersectibn
was stepped down from C-l to C-3,
~.... i" I
t... -.. 1\ !l
and A~P southward along S~
l:~ IS
:t
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request on
March 3, 1984. The Commission voted on several motions before a
motion was passed. A cop.y of the P&Z minutes are attached. A
summary of the motions considered and their results follows:
- A motion to recommend approval failed by a vote of 2-4
- A motion to recommend denial .failed by a vote of 2-4
- A motion to recommend approval of 6.2 ac. of A-P and
13.69 ac. R-1 failed by a vote Of 4-2
- A motion to recommend denial passed by a vote of 4-2
Commissioners in opppostion to the request made the following
points:
- The request did not comply with the City's plan for
development in this area
- Approval of the request would contribute to further
"commercialization" of the SH 6 frontage between Barron
and Greens Prairie roads
- The applicant could still use the property and expand his
current uses by up to 25% (subject to ZBA approval)
- Approval of the request would remove some of the
Commission's opportunity to plan the development of the
newly annexed area
There have been numerous rezoning requests in this area since
annexation. A summary of these request and other development
proposals, etc. prior to and after annexation follows:
Date Ci ty aquirred land 7!,;?./jcfl ,
Date Mathews aquirred land I~d/~ ? 3/~~//~ ·
Date Mathews developed anything (if in files) 1'1'~)..(r;~~4.1q 1lJ ;j;/J77H41~i)
Dates and "events" for everything from Shennandoah to JAC
request- include plats, site plans, ect.
A-v '). I ~ fJ I -
ct
t-\ ~ ~~.
~'\
'l..O~
0' "".
'C) ~ Co. ~
~Cl
fj
"'^(
f ""'.1' ~ ".....-1") \. '" U -.J y.A ·
,J
-.. A~ ~ \ I ~ q ~ -
/\J
./ -s 1...:..-