HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
rector of Planning Callaway,
icial Johnson and Pl~nning
seconding. Motion
Mr. Gallaway located the land, pointed out area zoning and uses (which may include some
non-conforming commercial uses)., and descrLbedthefrontage and depth of the tract. He
explained that by aelding this tracttoth~ tract whLqh i<salreaay zon'ed C-N the 2 acre
maximum size limit ofC~N tracts will be e,xceeded, but further explained that this total
area will be divided into 3 separate lots which would all comply with the limitation.
He added that the applicant has submitted a plat which will accomplish this plan. He
went on to explain that the plat limits access to tot 18 through either Lot 17orLot 19,
or both, which will make the access points to the tracts further away from a major inter-
section than the original configuration would allow.
The public hearing was opened. No one spoke. The publ ie hearing was closed. Mr. Mac-
Gi lvray asked if uses in this C-N zone would have to be approved by the Commi ss'ion and Mr.
Callaway replied that ordinance requires Project Plan Approval by the Commission on any
development in aC-N zoning district. Mrs. Tongcoasked how long ago the existing C-N
tractwasestabl ished and Mr.Cal1avJay replied that he could not remember the exact date,
but- that it was sometime earlier this year. Mr. Hansen said that with all things considet-ec
including lot configuration and area uses, he does not have a problem with this request.
Mr. MacGilvray said that the only problelll he could foresee would come if all tracts were
developed independently, and Mr. Callaway again pointed out that had been discussed durillq
. review of the plat, and access easements for those three lots will have to be shared,
with direct access limited to LotI] ~nd Lot 19 only.
Mrs ~ 5ta 1,1; ngs made a mot ion to approve thi s request for rezoni n9 VJi th Mr. MacGi 1 vray
secondihgthe motion. Motion carried unanimousl~ (7-0) ~
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: 84-124: