HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous
"
" , ' ~', ........ :' . ;
'.. '..\:". ,.' ..' ,....
, ", , , ,', , ' .' :.: '
.'.;,;: ". .... . .......
i':' ',",' <"", ", " . ,.
} C th e r : '<::;',i;;;. ,,';'
'.
" ,", ;:",;, /.: t.:'~.,: ,," ' , , , · ' ,,' ,,>,;: ;::" ;:,: :i, .. ';'.:;:/:<;j:~~ 'L : ~:j'
'l'? 5L;r:fif~1:: .",; : >:< ':~' " " ... ' '". ,. ,: :' '., ~c'~, ";',j\ 1;: '.,.: ,". ::\ , , ; :~,:: ':d; ;:~~~;:"",
'" " >':':' ".; '..: ". ":../:~; "
::':'>f:'i, <.:,~, ,',' .....
. . . "\
. " .'
,.
....... . ". " . :.'
:,' '<:.if'''
.... '"'
" "','.',;,
.
'/':"','" , "-i',':
" .,'..... ;,~,::::>..;~..
,'.
',; .'
",'
......
..",..'
j;:<,:".:.',\ .,1
:!;:~r;}~::", .'
",'; "".
';;"" ',"
ii :1
1111
III!.','
i !
H
I ii
','_',I!,I_I,!I.,'..I.A.-." .,f."..,....',.,'..,..':.___ J 1
, I .:Y- ~.,' o. ,'''b,~~~.J.;::LJ --~' _o1~ ~ -/~~f----_w~ ~lo.v, ,r}--,~,y:.~ "...,1...",; \.J.J ( --c.. ~ '
! ' * V
, fl,e!', , ,. t~ ,.,,-,. ", .,. C~",-L_- ~-OY'_-~~--O~-- ",.",G- . ~"""",-,\d'---, ,. ,:y:" ~t:1 ~ ,,~ . \ -J.. ,..
! k'(l'-b. ~,~-~;~$.-('~~- ,:l:~--h~,tJ .",.,.,'~ · v-.J'hy'~4
: i:~II)\\__J_~<q.-~~_--~~~UJ-~~~-~~~J,l ,. .,."".q:,c'.
:iJ>\~~r__'-."~_1 ., ,~.c~c..~--:s "",_,_"l,~1Y_;N_\-,_Q J- "".".', --,~~'t ". , ~- ACcJ ~,~S .,',~, J
-, --~~-
,., :CL~___"''-<(--~,S,,~~~- .---h~~_--~,Y.':~-~ C~-~ J c."~...4' "2."^'~
_~'..) .. _\~_n~~~_~'L\;o,~~~-___Q)_}:_ , m.s~~~~\~N ~l~_
.~ V'~.,)'Q_~:"~_n L- (V ~-,it=~ Sbtl rv ''\. - ti{ " eo .
, ~D\..~~__..,$-~...J_~,. ..0> 1-- . . ~Q W ~~,('.- . ~ '(A~ ~A..-~ u /"'-
~ -rt~~_....(~~_cOAJ"'..JxJ.-e'X":O~~J..'" ". "". .n.1>~'S~.....Jo ~.,('-
_ ''''):L~d\N., ,....._ ,c"l.Yll~ .n~_--'~'~O-~_Ci.s.-~e.J c..- l ~,,~"'"
111. .O! """" 'Y~.---d-t._a.l!qC'-', c>"=Jfl~--- ..-. ",t~ 1_." ~P'c v.l, J ' b,,<
<-Q^",$('~Wn'1N-~~ u....lli .~~~~" ' ,..{ ........ "2..JU....m~=-' ')
cA~-~Y'~.k1---_~- .J.._~~-~U,1.)~J.___k_"'1n--_~\-. G M~L; l,;~ ~
{
f :
.' t'
~
(9)
(10)
( 11 )
( 12)
,( 13)
SUBMIT 10 COPIES OF REVISED PLAT T
FEBRUARY 11th TO BE INCLUDED ON p&
PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 P.M. ON FRIDAY,
AGENDA FEBRUARY f7th..
City, of College station
POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATIO~. TEXAS 77840
February 9, 1983
PRESUBMISSION CONFERENCE
Attend i ng: A'l Mayo, Oi rec tor of P 1 anni ng ~y
David Pullen, City Engineer "
Harry Davis, Fire, Marshal
Mac Allen, Director of Publ ic Services
Jim McCord, Elec. Power Engrs.
David Riley, GTE
John 01sen~ Garrett Engr.
Spencer Wendt
Dick Sa t ten~"
Terry Ponzio
Shirley Volk, ~lanning Technician
SUBJECT: 83-205: Final Plat: Shenandoah Phase I
Staff recommends approval with the following changes:*
(1 )
(2)
Where alleys are shown, an additional 15 ft. on each side of the
all,ey will be requir.ed for utility easement.
Refer to street called "Southern Plantationl' appearing on sheets 2&3;
easement cannot be platted as shown ,with 1/2 of the required easement on
thi,s plat and the other 10 ft. on an area labelled "Future Developmentll
which is unplatted.
In Single Family Residential areas, a25 ft. rear setf:?ack is required;
a 15ft. front setback is acceptabl e wher'e rear ,access is provided.
The dra i nageeasement between Hunter Creek & larchmont "shaul d be under-
ground; ,if open channel ischaseri., drainage studies must be submitted
to the City, and the City Enginee.r wIll" rule on their acceptabIlity.
Remove the, deslgnation"Commercia,r Tract11and add a note to Blocks A & B
IIReserve for Future Subdivisionll,.'
A note concerning the 'future Highway 6 Right-of-Way and a l,il'1e s~owing
that R.O.W. should be included on the Final Plat.
City Engineer has reservations concerning the adequacy of 20 ,ft. uti 1 jty
easements and must confer with utility companies concerning this. If'
utilitIes are located in a common trench, 20 ft. might be 'adequate. Check
with, City Engineer.
Re-check the s- i ze of lots a 10n'g the curves of 'cu l-de-sacs. A.' SOxl 00 ft.
lot. mus't' .fit on these lots.
Show theWe'lbornwater 1 i ne easement on the plat.
Any commercial or residential site development should conform to City Codes,
~ven if this development takes place prior to annexation.
Check with City.Engineerconcerning the east side of the Highway 6 sewer
line easement.
Cul-de-sac street names should carry through to the connecting ,cul-de-sacs
across through streets.
P.R.C. requests flstraw vote" from Commission & Council regard.ing zoning
involved in this subdivision (R-l, R-la, COl1111ercial, etc.)
/'2'
\"",}
(4)
(5) .
(6)
(7)
(8)
.....-,
*Any changes to the approved plat must be cleared through the Office of the
Director of Planning
~OtEE(j:E S~Pttl()N
P.O.,Box9960 · 1101 Texas Avenue
Tel: 409 764 3500
College Station, TX 77842
March 13, 2003
Edward Froehling
3887 High lonesome,
College Station, TX77845
via facsimile..@ '7l4.0565 and via.regular mail
re: the3.273-acre tract southeast of Windswept Drive
College Station,...Texas
Dear Mr. Froehling:
On December 8, 1983,theCityCouncH rezoned the above referenced property from A-O
Agricultural Open to PUD#2PlannedUnitDevelopmentDistrict (Ordinance No. 1486).
Section 5-0.3 of theZoning.'Ordinanceineffectin1.983{Ordinance., No. 850).stated that
PU D zoning requests required thatpreHminary subd ivision plats and preHm inary
d.evelopment plans:
will be sent forward to the City Council with a recommendation for approval of the
zone change request under the, condition that the final platand final development
plan with all related information shaU'be presented to the Council, through the
Commisslon,.within one(1) year from the date of approval of the zone change
request; otherwise, the zoning shaH revert to that prior to the request.
As the City of College Station did not receive the final plat and final development plan for
the 3.273-acre tractto the southeastof Windswept Drive, the land has reverted back to the
previous zoning of A.. 0 in accordance with Section 5-0.3 of Ordinance No. 850 (mirrored in
Section? .19.Dof the current Zoning Ordinance). The zoning for the subject property will be
updated on the official Zoning Map.
If you have any questions regarding thisniatter,please do not hesitate to call me at
764-3570.
Sincerely,
~ . .. ,,' '", "'-
~~~
Molly Hitchcock
Staff Planner
83-1 z..1
cc: City Council Ordinance file;D.evelopmentServices Ordinance folder; files 02181 and
-96 194
I:\GROUP\Devc _Ser\ZONELTRS\PUD property, byWindswept.doc
Home of Texas A&MUniversity
EXHIBIT A
1. David Gower
David Foster
PhilipBI~ickburn
George Riley
Terry Ponzio
Dick Batten
Spencer Wendt
P . O. Box 9206, College Station, Texas
P. O. Box 9206 , College Station, Texas
P. O. Box 9206, College Station, Texas
P . O. Box 9206, College Station, Texas
P . O. Box 9206, College Station, Texas
P . O. Box 9,206, College Station, Texas
P. 0 . Box 9206 , College StatsLon, Texas
2. Planned Unit Development: PUD Class 2
All of the following Property:
A) Lots 1-22 Block 2
B) Lots 1-16 Block 1
C) Lots 1-8 Block 3
D) Lots 1-15 Block 4
P.U.D. Ratio's, Class 2
Total Hof Ac. 10.21
Maximum H of D.u.lAc.
Minimum Avg. D.U. 1000 sq.
Maximum Floor area Ratio
Minimum Open Space Ratio
Minimum Livable Space Ratio
Minimum Recreational Space Ratio
Minimum Car Occupant Ratio
Minimum Total Car Ratio
5.97
.158
3...8
2.66
.372
2.0
2.0
c?3-/~1
COMMENT:
By the establishment of thisP.U.D.,weareaccomplishing two objectives:
affordability for prospective housebuyers'and reduced maintainance for
single family detached dwelling units. Providing single familydetatched
residenced,on lots of reduced dimensions will allow lower overall housing
cost and maintain the "American.'Dream" concept for first-time hOTIlebuyers.
We anticipate older, persons ,,"Empty Nester"" and retired persons who have
an increased amount ofleasuretime to purchase these units because of the
l)affordability and 2) the reduced amount of maintenance required as a
result of reduced lot sizes.
t6'3 --j ~/
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO.: 83-121
83-122
APPLICANT: Shenandoah Ltd.
REQUEST: Establ,ish permanent zoning in the Shenandoah subdivision.
LOCATION: E.sideof SH6 S of Barron Rd.
PHYSICAL FEATURES:
Area:
Dimensions:
'Frontage:
Dept,h:
SEE APPLLCANTS EXHIBITA
AREA ZONING:
North:
East:
South:
West:
A-O, proposed C-l, with R-l,R-IA, and C-l in
the Courtland Subdivision.
A-O across SH 6, proposed C-l.
A-O
ETJ
EXISTING LAND USE: Subject tracts platted and under development
prior to annexation. Balance of area is recently
annexed, predominately vacant with scattered
residential, commercial, and agricultural uses.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low/medium density residential uses reflected
with commercial uses reflected at Barron Rd./
SH 6 .
ENGINEERING:
Water: Available within 6 Mo.
Sewe<r: Available within 1 Yr. - Off-site extension( s) and
pumping will be necessary.
Streets: Developing within subdivision.
Flood Plain: N/A
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Ndticepublication{s}: 11-2-83 and 11-23-83
Advertised Commission Hearing Date(s): 11-17-83
Advertised Council Hearing Date(s): ~2-8-83
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 13
Response Received: None as of 11-11-83
RECOMMENDATION AND COMMENTS:
TheR-lportion of the request(s) is compatible with existing and
planned uses.
Approval of the R-l portion of 83-122 is recommended.
The proposedC-larea does not comply with the development
policies with respect to depth. (The applicants were advised by
staff and the commission that additional depth should be provided
when platted prior to annexation.) The C-l area is adjacent to
the proposed PUD area, a low density residential area. A retail
food (convenience) store is located in the proposed C-l area.
The proposed C-l,area is platted and located. so that residential
development af this loca.tion WOUtdjJe difficult. Sta.ff
recommends that t'he follo'wingalternatives to C-1.. zoning be
considered: \
'A. Denial oftne C-l portion of the request and a waiver of
the,180waiting period prior to submission of another
request.
B.A.pproval of'C-N zoning at the retail food store location
wi th some other commercial zoning dis,trdict, such as A-P
or C-3 for the bala.nce of the commercial area. The C-3
maximumare.ao'f three acres would require that any
change to C-3be made contingent on a resubdivision into
lots that would meet the distr1ct,regulations.
The' proposedPUDisa 'low density residential area that will be
developed. as detached residences with varying ,setbacks and
f'irewallconstruction in accordance with bui'l,ding code
requi'rements. (This is sim,ilar to the Woodcreek
PUD.)PUD consideration usually: includes a preliminary plat as
well as development plan at the time ofth~ rezoning. Plats of
this development were approved prior to the annexation of this
area. A"typica1"siteqplan for the PUDarea,willbe presented
at the meeting. Approval of the PUD request is recommended.
ATTAC~MENTS,:
Applications (83-121, 83-122)
Area Map
p&Z ACTION
The Planning and >Zonlng Commlss'ion'recommendedapproval' of"theresi dent i a1
portionofthlsrequest by a vote of 5-0 on 11-17..;83. The Commission
unanimously recommended IIdenial < withoutpreJudice11of' the C'-l porti on of the
request. TheCommlsslonthen held an informal poll (see attached minutes)
on A-P,C-NandC-3zoning oftheproposedC-larea.
The applicant has proposed C-3zoning in the area north of' ,Southern Plantation
Drive wit'hC-NaridA-P<zonin'9 in'.thea'rea sou,th of Southern' Plantation Drive.
This would provIde a step-down'ln zoning from the proposed C-l area north
of Shenandoah and 'would be consistent with the- types of zoning districts
discussed by the Commission.
sjv