HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
P&Z - Ju 1 y 1 ,1'982
page 10
cities that are attempting somek nd of control are doing it exactly this way. Mr.
Perry said that the State says th s is the only way to control modular housing.
Mr. Miller made a motion to recommend approval of this amendment to the Ordinance.
Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. Motion carried, 4 in favor, lagainst, 1 abstention.
Due to the lateness of the hour, the acting chairman called for a 5 minute recess.
The meeting was then recalled to order.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12: 82-805: A publIc hearing on the question of amending the
Zoning Ordinance No. 850 revising the'parking requirements for Medical/Dental Clinics.
Mr. Mayo explaIned the amendment. The public hearingwas>opened. Noone spoke. The
public hearing was closed. Mr. Miller made a motion to recommend approval of this
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No.8SG. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. Motion
carried unanimously.
\Y__AGENDA ITEM NO. 13: , ',' 82-420: Consideration of a parking lot plan for Southwest
-r-- Cross ing Townhomes 1 ocatedon Southwest Parkway east of Dartmouth Avenue.
Mr. Mayo explained the project, pointing out that the landscaping on the site plan
was inadequate. He requested a note to identify the groundcover, trees, shrubs, etc.
With this landscaping note, staff recommends approval.
Mr. Kelly asked Mr. Cruse, developer of the project to identify the landscaping or
else present the Commission with a landscaping plan. Mr. Cruse attempted to identify
the landscaping, however Mr. Mi.ller made amotion to approve the site plans, but to
withhold the building permit until such time the landscaping plan is presented and
approved by staff. Mr. Cruse said landscaping would be done according to the Ordinance.
Mr. Hall seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM NO. ,14: 82-422: Consideration of a parking lot plan forl.M.E.
Condos 1 ocatedonUniverslty Drive in Un i versLty Park II.
Mr. Mayo explained the project, and indicated that all P"R.C. recommendations had been
completed, therefore staff recommends approval of plans. Mr. Bailey made a motion to
approve site plans, but to withhold the building permit until such time that the land-
scapingplan is presented and approved by staff. Mr. Miller seconded the motion. Mr.
Denton po i ntedout that, it was bad practice of the Commis.si ontode 1 egate what is
acceptable or not to the staff, and that the Commission should be doing this. Mr. Kelly
ca 11 ed for a vote. Mr" Bail ey withdrew h is mot ion . Mr. tv1 ill erwi thdrew his second .
Mr. Hall then made a motion to approvethesLte plan subJect to developer returning
to the Commission with a landscape plan which must be approved prior to issuance of
a building permit. Mr. Miller seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
AGENDA I TEMNO. 15: 82--423 : Cons idefat ion of a parking lot plan for an Office
Complex located between Spring Loop and University DrIve in University Park II.
Mr. Mayo explained the project and said staff would require the same type landscaping
note as in thei tem covered before, then would recommend approval upon recei pt of it.
Mr. Robin Srunowiththearchitectural firm said developer IS intent is to keep existing
trees but to prune them back. Mr. Miller made a motion to approve the plans with the
P.R.C. recommendations, but.towithhold the building permitunti,l a landscaping plan is
approved by the Commission. Mr. Bailey seconded the' motion. Motion carried unanimously.