HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
Mr. Hansen arrived at the meetIng 'and'Mr.Kell y askedlf.theCha i." 'wol:Jld 'now entertai n
a motIon to approve themlnutes of the 'June 16th meet lng. . Mr. Hill agreed. Mr. Kell~:
made amotion to approve the mlnutes;Mr. Kaiser seconded; motion carried 4-0-2 (Mille-'r
';. :,::j ., ')
!X;,;E!\1'f;&. Ba I ley .~~stall1ed' ·
.,:::<~j'~~:I,:~:t';J,,).:~"'<>d . ..... .' .... .... .... ..... .... . ..::
,;,;,,~,;i:AGENDAITEM NO.3: 83-110: ApublJc hea:t,Tng anthequestionofrezoni'ng Lots 8 & 9 .
;\t,;i~~,'/yBlock 2 Cooner Addition Subdivision located at the corner oLJaneand Cooner Streets, from
,.:~:~,\l,<H',;",~";:"Apa rtmen ts Med i um "Dens ity'D i sf r ict. R-S dto : 'Adm i H'i s t ra t., ve-Profess i ona 1 Di s t r i c t A-P.
:"'\,,>;:, "",App 11 cation 'is Inthename 'ofRepubllcBankA&M,
r
.
,I
'-':.'~.> >~j('\',;,
'.' . I,: ", ~' :'
; !....I ...f./
.
';',:,.:.-</~:: .: ..~'r' "', .
': "~:~'(:.{:r.":':::~:~r,' I
." !.'. ''',:~, ",:.~!
.:'~:J;>;::/:J
7. I:'
\.... ~f" :;.' ,:l
. ~.~:~. ~";'
'd'- ./r~.': .
, - -,~! . -, ,,':
,:.)_ ;_:',(;, ';,'I"},'
..
~
MINUTES
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Planning and Zoning Commission
July 7, 1983
7:00 P.M.
Kelly, Bailey~ Miller" Kaiser & Hansen.who
Director of Planning Mayo, Ass't Dlrector of Planning Callaway,
City EnglneerPullen .and Planning' Technician Volk
Approval of Minutes - meeting'>of'June 16, 1983
Mr. Kelly made a motion to approve the minutes with Mr. Kaiser seconding. Motion
with a vote of 3-0-2 (Miller & BaiJ"ey abstained). Approval of minutes was post-
"~AGEN DA I TEMNO. 2: Hear "Vlsi tors
!' ,,' ,~'f '
{.
~'/"~::\
:BobCorni sh came forward to announce a'meetlng':onJul y>18,1983at.4: OOP. M. at the
Brazos Center rega rdlng LIB razos 19311, a report covering' 7 counti esln the Brazos. reg i on,
.and' nvltedallc i tizens'fo'rcommentswhlch w i'llbe :j ncorcporated' lnto.thef i na 1 report.
Mr. 'Hotl1 asked the staff to obtain copLestobe avai.labletothe Commissioners for study.
Noone else spoke. Pub ll'cheari ngwas c losed. ,~~
.
;,\Mr. Callawayexpla.inedtherequest'andlocated the 'subject'lots on'an aerial photo. He
:<";llsted land uses in the area and sa'ld the area :is cljrrently zoned for multi-fami Iy and
.adminlstratlvedevelopment. He lndlcated:that .:thi srequest is. compat.ibl.e.withcurrent
usesandzoni ng 'nthe area'and thatA-Pdevelopment'lstypJ ca lly usedas'a buffer bet-
'ween'.resi dent i a l..and..commerclal...development. Hei'ndi cated.. .tha tone '1 ot'wl].l.......be left' whi ch
Is zoned R-5, and.that staffrecommendsapprovalofth'lsrequest if .the'Commission will
entertain andinltlate rezonIng of that one rema'in'inglot on Jane' Street from R-5 to A-P.
Discussion followed concerning any single fami'ly'residences. in the area and the figure
11811 wasoffered,with 4 being owner....occupi ed. ~.
Public hearing was opened. Noone spoke, Public hearing was closed.
Mr. Miller said due to the lack of response from the resIdents and . land-owners within
"~,200 ft .of these lots, and the fact that rezon ingprobab 1 y would not adversel yaffect
current uses In the area, he can see no reason' not to rezone these lots. Mr. Hill dis-
cussedtheposslblllty of rezoning this with the inclusion of giving direction to staff
-"".-
P&Z Minutes
7-7-83
page 2
~
.
to bring backa.rezoning reqLJes.tfor the' remaining R-5 lot. 'Mr. Balley agreed that
direction toth'a.t., effect should' beglven to staff ,but It should not be attached to the
mot ion. Mr','Mlll erthen made amoti onto recommendapprova lof the rezoni ng reques t with
Mr. Balleysecondlng'. Motion carried S-O-l(Kelly abstained).
AGENDA ITEM'NO..'4: 83-425: Reconsideration of a Parking Lot Plan '-Storage/Parking for
Repossessed":Vehicles& Equlpment,Lots 8 & 9 Block 2, Cooner Addition. This item was
tabled atthe....J'une 16, 1983' meeting.
Mr. Mayo'explalned the site plan and rem'lnded.the Commission that Mr. Arrington of the
'bank had,ass~red,"'themat theTas tmeet'i ng that the pl ansi ncludea 6'ft. sol i dscreen fence
along the two 5 Ides'adj acent'to resJdent'ial development, but that the archi t.ecthad i n-
adverten t'l yomitted..the note to that affect.Mr . Mayoadv 'sed 'wlththatcond i ti on,s taff
recommends approval. Mr. Bailey asked if the slats would be included in'the rest of the
,chat nlink'fenceand- Mr. >Mayo 'sal'd'thatwou ldbe up totheapp 1i can t. Mr. H ill asked i f
only vehicles 'could be parked or' whether this'lotwould house motors, etc., which could
look mess'ythroughachaln 1 fnkfence " Mr. Mayo sa ld the CI tywoul dhave some contra 1
over what was allowed"because the zonlngat this location wouldbeA.-P. Mr. Ha'nsen
sa ld that..J..n h isop' nlon th is pa r k lngl otp lan I sbel ow normalA-P standards lnseveral
'<'ways, including the lack of landscaping. Mr. Kelly pointed' out that this is for a locked,
, storage area and wll1 not beapubl ic parklng>lot, and further that it will be' scre,ened
from the residential areas, Discusslonfollowed concerning what might be preferr~d to what
is being proposed; afterwhichMr.'Kalsersaidthe way this.. project has been treated is
out of character wi tb theproJectthe'appllcant'hasac ros sthe street. . Mr . Arrington",
representative of the applicant requested permission' to address ,theCommlssion ,but ,the
.Chair'lrefuse'd. 'Mr.Balley thenmadeamotJonto approvethe'parkinglotplanwitrn P.R.C.
recommendat J ons',plus thecondltloothat a 6 ft, soli dscreen fencemus"t be inc 1 uded on
all four' sides 'and slatsmustbei ncluded i nthe hurri care..typeg-ates. .~:Mr. Kelly seconded.
Motion carried unanimously (6-0}.
.
AGENDA ITEM NO, 83-307:
. . ,/',.' ......: "": '.' ....... .' . ...'
Mr. Mayo rocat:edtheplat,expla ined that" thelots,a rebas'i ca llyrura 1 ,one-acre
and pointed out that our subdivision, regulations requlre70ft.rights-of-way,.butthe
County requires-60ft. R.O.W.with 16 ft. easements on.eachside, and the developers
of th' 5 have chosen to meet County st.andan:ls .Mr.Mllleraskedlfi tis safe Jor<the
Commissi on to aS$umethatFoxfl rewlll not 'become a partoftheCltysoon, and Mr. Mayo
repl ied thatJsnotil safeassumptlon,anditls his oplnlonthatlfa petit10nwas re-
ce 'vedframtheres~'dents,.the' Ci ty"'woul dcons'Jder'annexati on, D lscus 5 i on followed
concerning controltheCltyrni ght havel n ET J '.. areas and the. County' sconcern.",il th ] ack "
ofsetbacksfromHthe.,rlght~of-.way.' Mr. Hansen asked Mr. Hedderman (who' was in the aud i-
ence) If. thearchltecthas control of setbacks,andMr ~ Hedderman rep 11 ed>tha ta 50ft.
setback IsrequlrecL'>Mr..Miller thenmadearnotiontoapprove this plat with presubmis-
, S i onrecommendat 'ons . ahd"Mr."Kellyseconded,'.' Mr:.' Mayo"asked how.this'motion. affects the
70 ft. R.O.W'. the Ci:tynormally"requlres',andMr.Mll1er' sa'J'd the proposed '60 ft. R.O.W.
with 16 ft. eC)'sements'on each's'i'de'are acceptable, Motion to approvecarr'iedunanimously
,(6-0). -
AGENDA ITEM NO.6:
.
Mr, Kaiser asked about landscaping ordinances from other'clt'ies, and Mr. Miller said he
had recently received' them from the Assistant Zon'lng OffIcial and would soon share the
,i nformatlonwfth the Committee. Mr. Kaiser then thanked staff. for the recent tour.
Mr. Mi ller ,then spoke further on. the landscaping
i 5 attempt i ng to col1 a tethe lnformat'i on for the
.i