HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous
ENG.I.NEERI.NG
Jl4-/.Icf
/11.{;'~lhL.71~...~.~~....7'.~ &a.
~ .....J5~ k-..~ ... 'f'. 3#.~
1/
Case Number
Location:
Request:
~4//(<<1'~~ fa. .. ~.
::f~.~..~.. g/# (
\Jate r :
UfJ~Q1Q-{'C~LA ~~~e IA._
Sewer: ~lP.G:~~uf>(2G?Aia:.P
Street Capacity: h~\.>A:r<f
Access:
~ 13G- Ob"fI57Z.M\'Nf::I;> P- rL.f\ 'fTlN(l
Drainage: .~re
Flood Plain: t4/A
I
Special Features:.
CASE NO.
Ll,
83-l17
83-118
APPLICANT: StephenBaker,et al.
Thomas R. Brady
REQUEST:
Establ ish permanent zoning (upon annexation)
Appx 77.4 acres R-l Single Family
8.4 acres R-JA Single Family
11.06 acresC-I General Commercial
L GCATI ON :
Northwest corner of State Highway 6 and Barron Road (Courtland Subdivision)
PHYSICAL FEATURES:
Area:
D imens;.ons:
Frontage:
Dep th:
AREA ZONING:
North: A...O (when annexed)
East: A-O (when annexed)
South: A-O (when annexed)
West: ETJ
EXISTING LAND USE:
Rural area proposed for annexation." (Shenandoah Subdivision
under development to the south across Barron Road).
COMPREHENS.I.VE. PLAN:
Area ref lect.ed ascommerclal, off ice, low and med lumdensltyres iden ti al,.
Northwest corner BarronIS.H.6 reflected as medium density residential.
ENGINEERJNG:
Water: UnderconstrDction; not available at this time
Sewer: Plans are being.prepared;not avallab leatthi 5 time
Streets: Adequ~te
Access: Adequate: Res'identialto be determlnedat platting
Commercial to be determined at site plan review
Drainage: Adequate
Flood Plain: Not applicable on 11.15 acres
Follows Lick Creek 2000 feet upstream of S.H.6; see attached
map for 85,756.acres
NOTIFICATION:
Legal NotlcePublications: OctoberS, 1983 and October 26, 1983
AdvertisedCommlssion Hearing Date: October 20,1983
Adverti'sedCounc il Hearing Date: November 10, 1983
Number of Notlcesmalled to property owners within 200 ft.: 16
Response Received: 1 inquiry as of 10-14-83
RECQMMENDATIONSAND COMMENTS:
r-.-the requested zoning districts comply with planned uses for the overall
area.. Staff concerns with the request are:
A) -Depth of the commercial areaalongS.H.6 does not comply with the
minimum depth (400) recommended in the approved development policies.
B) No buffer (such asA-P) separates the general commercial and the
] ow den slty res identi a 1a rea s.
The commercial portion of this request, two tracts totalling 11.06 acres,
has a depth ofJlGfeetoffS.H. 6 and is adjacent to a platted residential
STAFF REPORT
83-117 & 83-118
page 2
area(proposedR-1A}~ It would not be possible to provide additional
depth ora buffer area (fora s-tep-down .inzoningdistri cts) without
replatting<.thisarea.A possible solution to these problems would
be approval of . A-Prather than C-lzoningi n this location.
P&Z ACTION:
ThePlannlng..and Zoni.ngCommiss.ion expressed concern...for the .relation-
shIp between the proposedC-l and R-IAareas. The~uffereffectof
existingdralnageways and tree line was discussed. . TheCommi ss ion
advised the appll cant that. s tr.l ct site plan .rev iew of an'lproposed
commercialdeve 1 opmen t wi llbenecess.a ryand recommel'1dedapp rova 1
by a.vote...of 7-0.