HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
p&Z Minutes
1-6-83
page 3
de 1 i neated before the Final Plat is presented for approva 1 .
Mr. Bailey made a motion to recommend approva
that a Final Plat cannot be approvedunti1 a
Health Unit concerning percolation tests. Mr
unanimously (7-0).
of this Preliminary Plat with the stipulation
atisfactoryreport is received from the County
Fleming 'seconded the motion. Motion carried
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8:
Station located
82-451:, C()nslderationofaParking Lot Plan for Lowe 's of College
South Texas Avenue in Selmont Place.
Mr. Callaway explained the plan and reported that the revised site plan meets 'the P.R.C.
recommendations, therefore staff recommends approval. Mr. Kelly asked about the canopy
over the dumpster and Robert Ham, a representative from Lowe's, indicated this canopy is
17 ft. high. Mr. Hill asked about landscaping, and said only the parking lot appears
to be landscaped, and Mr. Callaway indicatedthe'Ordinance only requires the parking area
to be landscaped and the remainder of the area on the plan is outdoor storage, and is
shown as ,being screened by a redwood .fence. Mr. Hill then voiced his opinion that this
outdoor storage area might not be properly screened, and wondered if the portion of this
p.lan which is referredtoasl'Optlonal Property; OutdoorStoragell can be excluded from
approval of the siteplant9tf:\-Jght. Mr. Callaway said this could be included in the motion
if desired. Mr. Ham explaJlfed this optional property is under contract right now. Mr.
Hi 11 re-explained hiscontern referring to the view to travelers coming from the South. .
Mr. Ham stated the plan f6r this land is to have a6 ft. high fence with redwood slats
all the way around. Mr. Behling explained that this Commission is only approving the site
plan of the land Lowe's currently owns and will not include the land they have a contract
on, which will have to come back before the Commission for approval when plans are finalized.
,r Mr. Hill made a motion to approve this plan as shown, but to exclude the optional property
\'- which isto be used for outdoor storage. Mr. Hall seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO.9: 82-535: Cons~deration of a Site Plan for Sutter's Mill Phase I II.
Mr.Callawayexplalnedthat staff recommends approval of this plan because the revised
site p 1 an meets all P.R.C. recommendations. Mr. Ball eyasked about the fire hydran t and
Mr. Ca lla.wayexplained the<Flre Marshal~will control the number andl ocatj on of any add i-
tional hydrants required. Mr. Bailey made a 'motion to approve with P.R.C. recommendations;
Mr. Kelly seconded. Motion carried una~rjmously (7-0).
"i
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10:
Mr. Ba i leyindi catecJ his concern over the sign ordinancean,d< expressed a desire to include
amaxlmumheightallowablebyordinance. Mr. Behling suggested perhaps a workshop to
actually travel tolocati()nof particular signs before a height decision is made. Mr.
Fleming spoke of a new unbreakable sign material which could be required on signs over a
certain height. Mr. Ca 11 awaysai d materials usedi n signsm i gh t be covered in the. Bu i 1 d,i ng
Code, and that he waul d check and report back to the CommJssi on . If the current building
code does not cover thIs, he would work with the Building Department to work out some
recommendations Mr. Hill said he believes "vacant signs" should either be required to be
removed or repa red and. Mr. Callaway said this, too, is probably in the Building Code,
but that he wou d also checklnto this and bring back a report to the Commission.
/
~
1~