HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
.
.
~
P&ZMinutes
2-17-83
page 6
said they want a park, but this done may be traded or enlarged in the future, but appar-
ently the Parks Department feels comfortable with this plan. Mr. Hill said he disagrees
and thinks itis too small. Mr. Miller made a motion to approve this prel iminary plat
with presubmission conference recommendations; Mr. Bailey seconded. Motion carried
6-1(HT 11) .
AGENDA ITEM.NO. 7: 83-403: Consideration of a Parking.Lot Plan for the. Marlon Pugh
Office/Warehouse located on the proposed Marion Pugh Drive.between Jersey & Luther.
Mr. Mayo located the project on a map and explained the plan, but questioned the lack of
curbing along the back and side of the project. He also pointed out a couple of islands
do not show dimensions and this is required. Mr. Bailey asked about the size of the
trees to be planted and Mr. Mayo said they would have to conform to ordinance require-
ments, unless theP&Z sets a size. Discussion'ofthe location of water lines in the
area followed. Mr. Miller made a motion to approve withP.R.C. recommendations and Mr.
Bailey seconded. Motion to approve carried unanimously (7-0).
Larry Hudler came forward and addressed the curb and said it had been omitted to give
access to aland-locked tract behind this project. Mr. Behling said a letter defining
perm iss ion to use aCcess across. thi sproperty will probab 1 y creat~ an easement and he
thinks this driveway should be developed only at that point to control traffic. . Mr.
Kelly asked why itis necessary to eliminate all the curbing and M.r. Hudler explained
that access to the projectisgainedonlybycros.sing his land. Mr. Behling suggested
that Mr. Hudler redraw this plan showing driv.es and the circulation of traffic for this
proJect and that of the neighboring project.
Mr. Bailey made a motion to reconsider this plan. Mr. Hall seconded this motion. Mr.
Mayo pointed out that if this site plan is app'rovedwith.adrlve~Jay, the City will have
to have a separate instrument to cover the driveway, which Mr. Hudler has indicated his
company is unwilling'to provide. Mr. Miller asked if Mr. Hudler is resisting a revision
which guarantees access and Mr. Hudler indicated this is true, and that all he is asking
is to be allowed to leave out some curbing so informally> he can give his neighbor access.
Voting.was cast to reconsider this site plan and passed6-l (Miller). Mr, Bailey then
made a motion to table thLspark-ing lot plan and Mr. Kelly seconded. Motion to table
carried unanimously (7-0). Mr. Miller asked the purpose of tab] i'ng this plan if the
applicant resists. Mr. Mayo explained that the neighboring project (Drew WOOdiS) would
have to be looked at again, as at the time of approval , it was indicated there was public
access to the project.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: 83-405: Consideration ofa Parking Lot Plan for the Creekside Retail
Center located".inUnlversity Park"'II.
Mr. Mayo explained the plan and pointed out a note concerning location of a dumpster
had been overlooked, and by mistake had not been removed on this revised plan. He also
explained thatgates'ondumpster pads are usually not allowed and must be cleared through
the Director of Publ icServices. He then indica.ted that inter-ior islands should be 9x20 ft.
Mr. Kelly asked about a sign and Mr. Wood,. developer of the project, stated there will be
no free-standing sign. Mr. Behling asked about the 4 ft. island between parking rows and
Mr. Mayo pointed out thIs had only been a suggestion, rather than a requirement; Mr. Wood
advised thatthls is not being included. Mr. Mayo also pointed out that wheel stops will
not be required. Mr. Pullen advised that some of the land in this project is in the flood
plain, that he has discussed possible problems with Mr. Wood, and anticipates Mr. Wood
will have this well in hand before he gets too far along, but at this time he cannot put
the City En,gineerl s stamp of9Pprova lon thi s proj ect unt i 1 Mr. Wood presents hi s work
and it is evaluat.ed. Mr. Wood said that he understands that if the project cannot come