HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
P&Z Minutes
1-20-83
page 6
(Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council) have to approve, so if this body denies
thep 1 at, i t wi 11 not go to the Coune iT.
Robert Harris, an attorney on behalf of Woodson . Lumber'. Company of Cameron cameforwa rd
andasked.to speak. Hewasrecogni zedbytheCha i r, and then stated the plat meets all
requirements of the City andhas,been<.withheldfor along period of time to allow the
CLty time to correct any problems in tbearea, and further delay is unfair. He then
quoted Mr.Pullen's statement that the addition of 25 dwelling units would not substan-
tiallyaffect the sewer.
Mr. K~ 11 Y asked. who would paythe.$40,OOOtocorrect the prob1 ems,andMr '. Bailey said
itwasaCity sewer, and theCityls respQn5ijbility. Hr. MilJer said he agreed that 25
homeswoul d not suhs tan tiallyaffecttheqsewer, .' but thi n ksthat perhaps to de lay the
approval of this plat until the sewer is fixed would be the best way to handle this.
Discussioh"'b''1 the Commission followed Concerning the various ways to handle this plat,
and Mr. .. Pu 11 en poi n ted outtha ti fthis .. development i sdeve loped, i twill .not re 1 ieve
any..problem, and wi 11 probably> not add an 'I problems, but thedownstreamhomeswoul d
most 1 ike1y have the same type problemastl)e qpstream homes are having now as a resu1 t
offurther deve 10pment.t1r. Mi l1erask~dMr.Jones what could be expected from Counc i 1
to correct the problems and.he explaiged.pdditiona1 funding from bonds would be necessary
and that no money is available now and it could not be done before the next C. I.P. pro-
gram and a bond election. Mr.Pullenexp~ctsCouncil would anticipate this need and put
it.beforethecitizens.as.a.bondissu(:;.Mr.Mayo said he did not believe there is a
time. limit before consider.ationof the plat>canagain come before Commission'.
Mr.Bai ley made a motionto.approye.thisiprelimina ryp 1 at, and stated he ha sa recommenda-
tiontomake a 1 so. Mr. Kellyseeondeclthemotion. Mr. Flem ing sa i dhethi nks thi s is
thebes t way togett he sewer fixed. Moti.on toapp rove ca r ried 5-1-1 with Mr. Ha 1 ]
opposJ.ng and Mr. Behl..ing 'abstal.ning.
Mr. Bailey then said he wantedarec()rnmen9ation to go to Council to either rule that
nobuilding permits be issued until the sewer problems are solved (if this plat is
approved) or to approve the plat, but. not file a Final." Plat unti 1 the sewer is corrected.
Mr. Jones advised to make the1atter.recommendation. Mr. Kelly disagreed with the first
recommenda t i on because he bel ievesthIswlllaccompl ish noth ing. ~1 r. t1 i 11 ersaidhe
dJdn1t care how it is handled, just as <long as no building takes place until the prob-
lems'are corrected. Mr. Hall agreed with Mr. Jones. Mr. Bailey said he would agree to
that. It was then dec ided thatanoteshQuldgo toCounci 1 wi th a recommendat i on to
approve the Preliminar'l Plat but a ruling be attached precluding the fil ingof a Final
Plat unt i 1 all sewer problems in. the area are corrected.
June Treyllng of 912 Pershing spoke about flooding problems in the area and begged the
drainage problem be considered also. Mr. Miller explained that this Commission can do
nothJng. Mr. Behling expressed his opinion that what the solution is should be deter-
mined before any restrictions on the Plat are made.
AGENDA ITEM NO...IO: 83-400: ConsIderatIon, of a Parking Lot Plan for Anderson Ridge
(a .......comme rc ial,"devel opment loca tedat.. .'Holleman.&Ande rs on.)
Mr. Mayo<explained the plan andstatedthat:a]l P.R.C. recommendations had been met
on this revised plan with exceptionofacl.Jrb2feet from the fence and the developer
had requested he be allowed to usewheels1:9psatthis location which would solve the
same problem. Mr. Kelly made a motIon to approve withP.R.C. recommendations. Mr.
Hall seconded the motion. Motion carriedunan imousl y (]-o).