HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
p&Z Minutes
8-22-83
page 5
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12: 83-229: Final Plat - Regency South- Resubdivision of Lot 35 Block 16
Southwood Valley Section Ill.
Mr. Mayo explained that this l"eplat represents an lias built" plat of a PUD,and the changes
are minor from the approved plat, therefore staff recommends approval. Mr. Miller made a
motion to approve the replat w1th Mr~ Kelly seconding. Motion carried unanimously (7-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13: 83-310: PrelimlnaryPlat - Walden Pond Townhomes located between FM
2818 and the extension of Southwest Parkway west of Holleman
Mr. Mayo explained the Presubmission Conference recommendations had all been met and staff
recommendsapprovai as sho~. He pointed out that items 2&3 on the report will be taken
care of before construction begins and the City Engineer has control over that ashe will
not sign the Flnal Plat until recommendations are satisfactorily met. Mr. Bailey made a
motion to approve the plat with Mr. Hansen seconding. Motion carried ufl~nimously (7-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14: 83-311: PreliminaryPlat- One Lincoln Place located on the south
side of University Drive
Mr. Mayo explained the plat and located the land on a map. He stated that staff has no
problem with this plat, other than it would request that the access easements be des,ignated
as ..private access easements". Discussion followed concerning access to Lot 2 from Lincoln,
the plans for the extel1sion of Lincoln, the reasons for the inclusion of Item #4 on the
staff report being that the street had been shown as a public street on the original plat.
Adequacy of the proposed 30ft. drive was discussed, and Mr. Miller stated he believes a
wider street is called for and Mr. Martyn said he would prefer that this be a puolic streete
Mr. Pullen sald he had no problem with the width if it is a private easement. Mr. Mayo
said in his opinion, this 30 ft. private access easement would be minimal for the proposed
residential project, and a 40 ft. width would probably be better. Mr. Pullen pointed out
that a private traffic study-had been done for these developers and taking into account
the A-P zoning and the residential zoning,amlnlmum street width of 30ft. would be suffi-
cient~ Mr, May.Q then pointed out that a 30 ft. private drive is more efficient than a
public 28 ft. street, because it would be aflr~ lane with no parking.
M.r. . Bai. l.ev.... ma..d. ea.. . mo.. ti ...0.... n..... ....t...o... .......a.p... p. r. o. .v.. e. ... with ...p. r.....e.s...u. ..~......... i 5.S.. iO..... n . reco... mme..n. d...at ions .W. ith the deletion
of item #4 and theadditlonofa note that ace 5S easements shall be private. Motion .
seconded by Mr. Miller and carried by a vote 0 6-1 with Mr. Martyn voting against it.
MroKaiserrequestedpresentation. of more information, including the pros and cons of pri-
vateaccess easements 30ft, fn width when the Final Plat is considered.
AGENPAlTE.MNO~15: 83-512: Site Plan Permit -Cedar Creek Condominiums located in
One Llncoln.Place,
Mr. Mayo explained the site plan! stated there are some problems with this revised plan
and then llstedthemas being: (l)density is indicated at 16.1 dwelling units per acre and
maximl!m allowed by Ordinance in R-4 zoning is 16.0 d.u.lacre; (2)clarification needed con-
cerning the 611 raised curbIng where parking adjoins the sidewalk, (3)fire hydrants are not
shown, although. there lsa note about them, (4)buildings#4& #6 are too close if a stair-
way is included, as a stairway cannot extend into the clear space required by Ordinance and
{5}durnpster locations as shown are questionable and appear to be in the driveway, and .sug-
gests that the applicant work out a plan with the Director of Public Services and let the
Planning Department see the results; he further stated that perhaps the use of screens
could help delIneate the location of the pads to the garbage people.
Mr. Martyn rnadea motion to approve this plan with the addition of a note to include dir-