Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous .. ~ City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 I 101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION. TEXAS 77840 February 1, 1982 MEMORANDUM FROM: Planning and Zoning Commissioners Al Mayo, Director of Planning ~ Agenda Items, February 4, 1982. TO: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO.3: (82-101) We have prepared a study/plan of the area. Since it is in color and since we have not had time to prepare multiple copies, you may wish to come by the office prior to the meeting to see and/or discuss it. Please call for an appointment before you come. Basically, we have determined that there is more than just adequate sewer capacity to serve the area, and we will recommend approval of the R-4 request. Like most things, there are several variables that will affect the recommenda- tions on the remaining undeveloped acreage. We will discuss these at the meeting, or in the office if you wish, prior to the meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO.8: (82-504) P.R.C. report enclosed. AGENDA ITEM NO.9: (82-300) Lot 5, proposed for a 5.0 acre park, is only about one- half the total dedication. I do not know why the developer is platting only this part now. As of now, no deed has been transferred for parkland for any of the development. We will be holding all future plats and replats in University Park until this has been taken care of. As far as consideration of this plat is concerned, the staff recommends approva I . AGENDA ITEM NO. 10: (82-301) Lot 3, the Sheraton site, will be widened, probably by the time you read this, to allow for additional required parking. The staff recommends approva I . AGENDA ITEM NO. 11: (82-302) The street right-of-way between the C-l and A-P zones should be 70 feet because it is a IIcommercial street.1I The street in Block D should be connected to the street in Block A. Several lots around the cul-de-sac turnarounds are less than the minimum required depth of 100 feet. These will have to be adjusted. The street between the R-l and R-3 zones should align with Cedar Drive south of Southwest Parkway. The IIprivate access alleys'l should be paved 20 feet wide minimum. The topo- graphic lines should have elevations so they can be read. You should have a revised plat in your packets. With these changes, the staff recommends approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. 12: (82-205) This is identical to the preliminary. The staff recommends approva I . AGENDA ITEM NO. 13: (82-206) This is identical to the preliminary. We recommend approval, but with a name change on Clover Court, since we have a Cloverdale Street. AGENDA ITEM NO. 14: (82-207) The owner of all these lots wishes to build a car wash and washateria. He needs to combine Lot lR and most of Lot 3 into one lot separate from ,_ Page 2 the remainder. The staff recommends approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. 15: (82-208) The purpose of this plat is to divide this tract between two brothers. One wishes to build a house on Lot 1 and needs a plat for a permit. The access easement provides access to the rear property. The staff recommends approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. 16: (82-209) This is identical to the prel iminary. The staff recommends approval.