HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication
~1->6'1
A,pL,.ltA\\~ ~ -?r{e: pLAN ~,,..
~Vl.'1l ~''\ ~.....~~,. P.\iU:U'C .~E.\ RE':n:t: .\Pfl.I8.','fHm
P&Z Case No,
Date Received
Phone Jt3 w. I (}() 0
Applicant ---=kbV\'te~AI" ~ I/MG.
,
Address lOt?5 T~ Ave ~~
Owner VV\i~ ~);~ Address
Name of project ~ ~ ~v-h~.It
Location ~ ~~a- it7 IOQ-reJ .a~frP>4~~~ .
U~i()er?~\r€. ~ On th-e e.:J?-r- ~J.e.
No, of parking spaces required ~~
No. of parking spaces provided ~~
Variances requested: tze: t?r.d~ N~.- ~ (,,~#t t ~eiz r~ui("eme.t+~ ~r .
. -.L.~t'',:?/net ~. ...n. _ 1:</ ~~~~ /1
We (}AL;. r9flk:~"'7.a (l8rl~c.e pn I~ l/ ~~.H-I'-' I fJr
j~~~h~:;~= ;;~~~~>t~~
~ ~fU';Ac';>Fm'; r>f 11\.0.. e>rd=>->:lc.e.. .f6c qviJltOUa · ,
_~ 'me.,! w,ti1 -fh,2.. ~ ~ JI1Y1 ~e- f'~(wrfh a e .
~ i:~ ~(~WJ B~ dr~",~€ ~fe.wt~ .~
~d(ic -/r, -fh/~ PyZ>~1 we -r~l -f1vz- UOvIe",ce-- ~ j v~tif1,e,J.
The applicant certifies the above information to be true and correct.(;~ ~dC1).
6ft" ~ 0(//
e11 /ir
~et nDrt\\ ~
o-fJ ~a:k.v~ ~~
owner) or agent
If application is filed by an agent) a po~er of attorney statement must be insluded.
.nlln..,lnl. su,..,lnl. II plGnnlnl
ATTACHMENT TO PARKING AREA REVIEW APPLICATION
FOR NORTH PARK SECTION II
~~
,
The original project plan that was reviewed by PRC/could
have been revised to meet all the requirements. But then} the
following problems occurred t~ necessitate the variance of the
buffer strip along Meadowland Street.
(1) Homefinder Realty has a contract with Mike Davis to
purchase 43,120 square feet of land. The contract is subject
to a site plan, re-zoning, and a final plat being approved by
the City of College Station.
(2) The seller discovers that (after final plat and site
plan have been turned in for approval) he acutally has less
property to sell Homefinder, because of a previous sell of
land to the motel between this property and Texas Avenue.
(3) Now Homefinder is faced with a reduction of land that amounts to
cutting out 5' of depth across the entire project. Homefinder is now faced
with the problem of trying to make the project work, after already bearing
all costs for surveying, site planning, engineering, building design, and
the time expended by their own staff in lining up contractors, credit, ever
increasing interest-rates, etc.
(4) Numerous alternatives were tried, in revising the site plan, so
that the project could still be viable. Parking was even tried in the rear
of the property with the buildings being moved forward to a front 15' build-
ing set back, but this plan failed to be satisfactory due to a drainage
problem.
(5) The property drains from the southern most corner at Meadowland
ptreet to the northernmost corner of proposed Lot 5. In order to keep from
tiraining water directly on the adjacent properties, the parking (if placed
in the rear) would have a fill secion of 3 to 4 feet to get the water back
to Meadowland Street or even attempt to get it to drain to the private
access easement and out to Texas Avenue
(6) This fill section would cause a hardship on the buyer, and with
all factors involved in the costs of putting the project together, the
buyer could not sell the product for the return of investment that would
be required for the project to sell. Therefore it would kill off the pro-
j eeL
(6) The variance is asked for due to these factors, plus, the variance
would align the buffer from this portion of Meadowland with the approved
buffer (Ramada Inn) along Meadowland adjacent to this project.
jerry bishop
& associates,
incorporated
1:/-507
.0
-~
...
~...
,"
5""
"-
......
_c
"H
..,
~~
., .
"z
~o
...-
~
:J:~
::...
.,.,
3"
.,
~~
o~
.0
_u