HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
I,L Minutes
3-4-83
page 4
:ENDA ITEM NO.9: 83-433: Pci;k::
,ummerce Center.
Revised Landscaping at Woo~~tone
Mr. Mayo explained that this work has already been done, and staff recommends approval.
Mr. Hill asked why changes had been made before this Commission approved a plan, and
Mr. Mayo explained that a City Inspector had noticed work being done on the site, and
the appl icant was notified that a revised site plan was required to be approved. The
City Legal Department was contacted and advised that the City should notify the appl i-
cant that work should be stopped, or a stop work order would be issued. After noti-
fication, the representative of the applicant indicated that they were not aware that
they were in violation, and explained that landscaping had already been ordered for
this project, there was no way to keep it alive, and so chose to go ahead with the work
with the full knowledge that the Commission could deny the revised plan and the work
would have to be torn out. Mr. Hill said that this Commission resents being presented
with a fait accompl i, although he understands this was done out of ignorance, but he
wants to make it clear that people cannot revise sites without first coming before the
Commission for approval. Mr. Martyn agreed that this could be denied, but in fairness
because the applicant is ultimately doing the right thing, he thinks it should be approveo
but wanted it known that this project is being judged on its individual merits and not
on the fact that the work has already been done. Mr. Martyn then made a motion to
approve this plan with Mr. Bailey seconding. Motion carried unanimously (7-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10: 83-509: Site Plan Permit - Treehouse Village Apartments located
in Woodway West Phase I I Subdivision between Holleman Drive, Luther Street and Jones
Butler Road.
Mr. Mayo explained the plans, located the 2 phases on the plan and indicated staff
recommends approval with P.R.C. recommendations which have all been met. Discussion
followed concerning the driveways and cuI de sacs and the proposed uses of each. Mr.
Kelly referred to a note on the bottom of the plan concerning the R.O.W., and Mr. Mayo
advised that he had spoken to the appl icant1s representative prior to this meeting, who
had agreed to remove that note. Item #20 of the P.R.C. report was discussed, and Mr.
explained that the City Legal Departr'c: J determined that a moratorium on
0uilding Permits had never had legal action taKen on it, therefore there is no mora-
torium. After further general discussion, Mr. Miller made a motion to approve with
P.R.C. recommendations excluding item #20, the removal of the note concerning the 20 ft,
etback, and the addition of a note that landscaping is to include solid sod of either
St. Augustine or Bermuda. Mr. Kelly seconded the motion which carried by a vote of
~, 1-1 (Mr. Bailey - no; Martyn - abstained).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11: Other Business
0r. Hill referred to a memo regarding Tacos Al Carbon site plan and Mr. Mayo repl ied
,hat he had no other information except that the appl icant has been to the Planning
partment to discuss various problems of the site and has decided to go to the ZBA
'th an appeal cf the p&Z ruling in August,
Hill announced he has been working with
:ldout to bc:;'; i 1 ab 1 e to the pub 1 i c conce
GS and purl i,- hearings, requested staff t
ration at ~ext regular meeting, an~
L City Attornc! to prepare some kind of
: g p&Z proccd 5 regarding public meet-
, v i t e the C i r '^, t tor n e y to ma k e a pre -
ructed tha' e put on the agenda.
~omm it tee
'e II v (r'
~ppointed to study the Wes
.,), Mr. Martyn, Mr. t-1av'
'k Subdivisi
Ca 11 a\:JaV
area, consisting of
H. Resul ts of the