HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes
AGENDA ITEM NO.9 -- Consideration of a preliminary plat - Foxfire 3.
Mr. Mayo advised that the plat was being resubmitted because the one year dead-
line on preliminary plat had run out. He stated that this plat was identical
to the plat approved by the Commission .<Yne year ago..
Commissioner Gardner asked if the motion to approve the plat should include the
statement that the plat was approved with streets built to less than City stand-
ards. He noted that the reason the subdivision had not been annexed was that
the streets were substandard. He also asked if the location where Frost Drive
crossed the creek would be a low-water crossing.
Mr. Mayo explained. that the Subdivision Ordinance allowed the City to require
City standard streetsin.E.T.J. subdiyi.,~.:~,~ons but the City had not chosen to do
so in this case. He said that it was the 6pinion of the City Engineer that the
streets in Phase One and Two.of the addition did not even meetlCounty standards.
.Mr. Mark Paulson, surveyor, stated that two 48 i~ch pipes were planned for the
crossing of Frost Drive over the creek so that there would be no low-water cros-
sing.
Commissioner G~rdner moved that the plat be approved.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bailey and unanimously approved.