Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes MINUTES Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting June 17, 1976 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Mathewson; Commissioners Stover, Etter, Bailey, Sweeney; City Planner Mayo; City Engineer Ash; Planning Assistant Longley MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Burke, White VISITORS PRESENT: See guest register. Agenda Item No. 1 -- Approval of minutes of meeting of June 3, 1976. Commissioner Stover pointed out that the third paragraph of Item No. 4 should read, tiThe commission directed..." Commissioner Stover moved that the minutes be approved as corrected. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Etter and unanimously approved. "Agenda Item No. 2 -- Hear visitors. No one spoke. .Y. Agenda Item No. 3 -- Consideration of a final plat resubdividing Lot 14, Block -/~ 3, College Hills Estates. City Planner Mayo explained the purpose of the proposed resubdivision. Commissioner Stover pointed out fuat this resubdivision would create a small commercial frontage on Texas Avenue which would require at least one curb opening. Mr. Mayo stated that the owners had no plans for the development of the subject property. Commissioner Stover moved that the final plat be denied. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Etter and unanimously approved. Agenda Item No. 4 -~ Consideration of a recommendation from the Land Use Sub- connnittee regarding the rezoning of the 32.81 acre tract east of Munson Road and north of Harvey Road known as the "Seaback" property. City Planner Mayo gave the history of the zoning and development of the area and presented a group of maps showing the recommendations of the Land Use Subcommittee. Chairman Mathewson opened the meeting for public discussion. Mrs. Fredda Kozik, l010Dominik, spoke questioning the park dedication required for the property. Mr. Mayo stated that park dedications for this area would probably be obtained in the Oaks Park. Mrs. Philip T. West, 1416 Magnolia, spoke stating that the property should be MINUTES, P1ann~ and Zoning Commission Meeting January 20, 19& 7:00 P.M. Page 4 The Commission established thefollowirig sc.hedu1efor.consideration of revision to,the Comprehensive Plan: February 3; continuat_ion ,of public hearing at regular Commissio.n 1!leeting February 17; continuation of public hearing and final vote at regular Commission meeting. . ~ Agenda Item No. 8-- Consideration of a revised site plan for Lot 14, Block 3, ~ College Hills E~tates. Mr. Fred Wallis presented the revised site plan. The Commission objected to the indicated curve of the driveway on the proposed plan. Commissioner Stover . moved that the plan .be approved providing tha,t the property be rep1atted to show an access easement on Lot 14, Block 3 in order to insure permanent use of the drive and curb cut by the adjacent property and to allow for the straight alignment of the driveway. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sweeney and unanimously approved. Agenda Item ~o.. 9 --. Cons'ideration of an ordinanc'e amending the Zoning Ordinance No. ,850 establishing. landscaping. and safety requirements for parking areas ,in certain 'zones. David Pugh presented the revised ordinance. Michael Murphy gave a slide presentation showing the benefits of the proposed ordinance. Michael David spoke in opposition to the ordinance. Commissioner Stover moved that the Commission recommend approval of the proposed ordinance. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sweeney and unanimously approved. Agenda Item No. 10 -- Other business. Commissioner Bailey moved that the Commission ,recommend that Madison Avenue be renamed Anderson Street. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sweeney and unanimously approved. Agenda Item No. 11 -- Adjourn. Commissioner White moved that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Stover and unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned. APPROVED ATTEST Chairman Secretary MINUTES, Regular Planning and Zoning Commission September 2, 1976 Page 4 Agenda Item No. 9 -- Consideration ofafinal plat resubdividing Lot 14, Block 3, College Hills Estates. The Commission discussed the development plans with the owner, the proposed purchaser and their representatives. The owners presented a site plan of the proposed development. Commissioner Stover moved that the Commission recommend approval of the plat with the following conditions: 1. That access easement at rear of property be as specified by City Eng:i-neer. 2. That issuance of building permit be based on construction as per site development plan presented 9-2-76 to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. The adjustment of the access point at Texas Avenue to provide for a wider radius on the south side of the driveway. The motion was seconded by Connnissioner White and approved with Commissioner Burke abstaining. Agenda Item No. 10 --A disucssion of requlrlng Conditional Use Permits on apartment developments of over 10.units. Councilman Gardner presented his proposed ordinance which would require Use Permits. Commissioner Stover suggested that the Conditional Use Permit procedure also apply to commercial development and all residential development above R-2. Following a thorough discussion, Commissioner Stover moved that an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance be drafted which would require a Conditional Use Permit for all land uses greater than R-2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Etter and unanimously approved. Agenda Item No. 11 -- Other business. There was no other business. ~genda ,Item No. 12 --- Adjourn. Commissioner Stover moved that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Etter and unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned. APPROVED Chairman ATTEST Sec~etary MINUTES, Regular City Council Meeting September 9, 1976 7:00 P.M. Page 5 Age.iida-Ite.m No.. 12 '""--Consideration of ,a final plat resubdividing Lots l-F, Block A, Cu1pepp~er Plaza Addi ton. Councilman Gardner spoke against the resubdivision of Lot 1-F, Block A, Culpepper Plaza Addition. Councilman Halter moved approval of the final plat of Lot l-F,B1ock A, Culpepper Plaza as recommended by the Planning' and 'Zoning Commission with the following conditions: 1. That Lots IF-3 and IF-4 be combined 2~ That design and construction of a paved access way in the 30 foot access easement be completed prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. That the location of at least 2, and not more than 3 curb cuts be specified by the City Engineer. 4. That a 60 foot building line be established and located 30 feet back from the 30 foot access easement. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dozier and failed by the following vote: FOR: AGAINST: Councilmen Hazen, Dozier,Halter Mayor Bravenec; Councilmen Stephenson, Gardner Councilman Halter made the same motion with an amendment that a dedication be made for the 30 foot access easement as a right of way, or a legal arrangement be drawn to provide for maintenance of the roadway. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stephenson 'and passed with Councilmen Dozier and Gardner voting against. Agenda Item No. 13 -- Consideration of a final plat of Southwood Valley 7-B · The final plat of Southwood Valley 7-B was approved by consent. Agenda Item No. 14 -- Consideration of a final plat resubdividing Lot 14, Block 3, College Hills Estates. Planning and Zoning Chairman Mathewson described the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Halter moved approval of the final plat resubdividing Lot 14, Block 3, College Hills Estates as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the following conditions: 1. That access easement at rear of property be as specified by City Engineer. 2. That issuance of building permit be based on construction as per site development plan present,ed 9-2-76 to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. The adjustment of the access point at Texas Avenue to provide for a wider radius on the south side of the driveway. ()~~~ MINUTES, Regular City Council Meeting September 9, 1976 7:00 P.M. Page 6 The motion was seconded by Councilman Dozier and passed unanimously. Agenda Item No. 15 ---, Consideration of adoption of the Pinnell Plan. Councilman Stephenson moved approval of the Pinnell Plan. Councilman Halter seconded the motion. Mr. W. D. Fitch spoke on his general support of the plan, but he pointed out that there were many inconsistencies and severe shortcomings to the plan in its present form. Ms. Jerri Ward spoke against the adoption of a polan, stating that she felt it was not in the city's best interest to adopt any plan. Mayor Bravenec questioned Ms. Ward as to her desire to eliminate zoning. Ms. Ward stated that she would like to see .this. Mr. Gardner stated that he felt there had not been enough public review and discussion of the proposed plan. The motion to adopt the Pinnell Plan passed with Councilman Dozier and Gardner voting against and Councilman Halter abstaining. Agenda Item No. 16 -- Discussion of the ward system. Mayor Bravenec commented on the law suit challenging the ward election. Agenda Item No. 17 --Consideration of bid tabulations on police patrol cars. City Manager Bardell read the bid specifications and recommended acceptance of the bid submitted by Beal Ford of $25,850. Councilman Hazen moved acceptance of the recommended bid of $25,850 submitted by Beal Ford for 5 police patrol cars. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dozier. Mr. John Halsell of Halsell Dodge, commented on his bid and servlce records he had kept on city police cars previously purchased from his company. The motion to accept the bid of Beal Ford was passed unanimously. Agenda Item No. 18 -- Other business. Councilman Stephenson announced a Civic Center meeting to be held September 13. Councilman Halter presented a letter to the Council on his inquiry and follow up of a special census for College Station at a cost of $15,000 plus 10% for Block data, the purpose being to increase revenue sharing receipts by a minimum of $58,000. Councilman Halter asked the Council to authorize Mayor Bravenec to write a letter to the Census Bureau requesting a special census. Mayor Bravenec was so directed. Councilman Gardner requested Council approval of use of one of his classes to work on projects for the City. The probable cost for out-af-pocket expenses would be about $100. Councilman Halter moved approval of the action with Councilman Hazen seconding. 02023