HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication
P~ppliC~ttio.n for~ ZO~lC-~ Cll'J.lJ.G8 (PllEA3E. PRIIr1\ OR. ~C~(?E;)
'P&Z c[-;.~~ 1IO;a
~"
egO '- f t:)
D a,'le Il8c E:; i \,. ed _,.l(l=-1.5=liCL.-
j\l)plic~'G JoAnn Atkins PI.lone~93-0031
Addr~S3 Rt 3 Box 384 College Station, T~ 77840
o 1.,'Tler Same Adclress
Tllis p::"'operty 't-JaS con-veyed. t.o t!le Q"',.{t"lSr- by c.8ed da~tec3. January 25, 1968
AND recorded. -vol. 55 Page 67 of. the Brazos' .County. Deed Records..
Descr'iptiori: Lot__ Bloc~c
(Pla.t recor.:led. in Vol. Page
Subc1.i-vision'
of the Deed. Recol~ds of Brazos County.
From.:
. to
....,
Present use' of propertY:---R.-l
Proposed use of propert~: . C-'l
O~mers of property to be rezoned:
JIllliE
.ADDR.ESS
JoAnn.Atkins
. ~..-..-,
O'~~'1el1>S of all proper.t,y i.~ri thlll 20G feetoL b01)..riG.aI""f of zone cllfu"1.ge a,cear'cling to plwesent
.tax l"'olls:
lllG:.fE: 'J._DDRESS
Promotional Pr:Lnti'ng Co, 713 Rosemary Dr. Bryan.~ Tx.
Charles Cimeno 121 Mile Dr. Co~l,ege'Station.l.-.T.x-
A. R C'
P. O. B,ox 1009. B~yan,. 'i'x
Bob Bower 'p.. o. Box 100 g"'. .Bryan, 'Tx
Doyle L~fbetter Higll~ay>\61:~sdut:f"{,Qollege ~13t~t~o:n ',' TX77840
J. cJ::lljooh.J.n ...Il:>{}NAN . 3106 Stonebrook HoustQn, T),{ 77063
The applica:.YJ.thas prepared. this application a.l1d certifies that the fan liS sta~ed
herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct.
If a"o'crliGat,ion. is filecl by an agent, the below- power of at,torney sta'GeI!lent~ m~st be
conpleted by o~mer.
l\.tt.ached: Scale sket,ch to 200 t ba:'lond bO:..l.Ildaries of zone chCL.'1.ge.
1
,
Application for' Zone Change-(Pleaseprin.tor type).
Explain or give evidence of the following:
(I). The changed or changing ~onditions-in the area or in the City
making thi's zone change necessary:
.
Considering the changes that have occurredHwi:thin~
-1he location of the land with prospect to the Hwy
By-pass the use of the land to the North (arc) we feel
the -. property. would be incompliance as A C-l . zone.
(2) The zone change is in accordancew;ththe .Comprehensive Plan;
ori'-f i:t ts not,then. why is the Plan incorrect?
The proposed zone_ 9hangeis not as 'indicated-onthe-
. . ,.~~'i~.Y. . : ," ~
co.mpr~.hensivePla.h.~"-bu't. considering the. time ..l.enght
fromwhe~.:the Comprehensi vePlan was adopted 'and the
growth experi~ncedour request forC~l on thi~
location seems to be a reasonable request mainly because
of the. location.
(3) All other ~easonstosupport the zone change: