Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
51 85-900
April 10, 1985 Ray M. Marro Jr., AIA 212 W. Green Street Urbana, Illinois 61801 City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION. TEXAS 77840·2499 RE: Driveway Access to University Drive at 303 W. University, Coll~ge Station Dear Mr. Marro: I have received your proposal and visited the site. I cannot grant a drive access to University Drive at that location for the following reasons: (1) The Northgate business area is a heavy foot traffic area and I cannot reasonably permit vehicle traffic crossing sidewalk areas at the volumes that will be generated by opening a drive to your parking lot. (2) Left turning movements leaving the drive will conflict with left turn traffic trying to enter the University across the street and the two west bound lanes on University. The poor site distances due to grade and direction of the east bound University traffic and east bound entering traffic on University from Wellborn Road will also create unacceptable conflicts. ADDITIONAL SITE COMMENTS: (1) The parking spaces you show, though standard 9' width, are well below our standard 20' depth (2' overhang permitted yields an 18' depth measured from curb face). I suggest you may want to shift some dimensions to make better use of what mi nimal space there is available. (2) You have completely eliminated the trash container from your site. It is currently in the south westerly corner of the parking lot. I'm sure trash removal will be as necessary from your restaurant as it is from others and I suggest you consider this part of the operation in your site design. (3) There are some items of your project which appear to be overlapping to adjacent properties or frontage, par- ticularly the fence in the northwest corner which should not be higher than 3' for the 10' next to the curb, to allow vehicles to observe one another as they use your drive and/or Patricia Street, and the curb return you proposed on the westerly side of the drive on University. I hope these comments will be helpful to you as you finalize your design work. We look forward to having The Flying Tomato in College Station. -94~ David J. Pullen, P.E. City Engineer cc: Al Mayo, Director of Planning George Boyett, Boyett Properties DJP: vw Mr. David J. Pullen, P.E. City Engineer City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 Dear Hr . Pullen: July 17, 1985 On April JO, you wrote Mr. Ray Marro , A.I.A. citing your objection to driveway access at 303 W. University . I am writing in order to propose a more effective drive-up facility and corresponding curb-cut that will accommodate the safety of pedestrians and allow a controlled blending into traffic westbound on University Avenue. In our last telephone conversation on June 12th you stated your willingness to keep an "open mind" in regard to an improved presentation. I appreciate your willingness to take the time to consider this proposal. Please review these changes on enclosed site plan: I. Note illuminated sign: "No thru traffic--drive-up window only." This will remind drivers that it will be impossible (see item 3) to exit as through traffic. Additional optional identical sign could be mounted on post 20' east of proposed sign. 2. Note four speed bumps in drive-thru: the two northern speed bumps will prevent any driver from building up any speed before approaching drive-up window and steel barrier gate (Item 3). The two southern speed bumps, more closely spaced, shall prevent all vehicles from crossing sidewalk or entering westbound only University Avenue (see item 5) at a speed none other than a crawl. Please recognize that both southern speed-bumps must be approached from a dead-stop position at drive-up window location after gate (Item 3) has been opened. 3. Note 10' x 3' horizontal steel gate with access controlled inside drive-up window. Flying Tomato, Inc. P.O. Box 399, Champaign, Illinois 61820; 217-351 -1020 TM The Flying Tomato, the Tomato Balloons, and the "Home of the Flymg Tomato Brothers" ,1rP the registered trademarks of the Flying Tomato. Inc. GATE : (as shown on gate elevation) constructed of !" solid wrought iron and gate frame constructed of 2 depths of 3" welded steel tubing . (see example in polaroid photo "A" and "B") The 3 '~layers" of steel gate 3'4" high offer reasonably impenetrable barrier for vehicles inhibited from speed build up by the 2 northern speed bumps . The gate integrity is enhanced by its being anchored by rollers in a steel channel jamb to receive ends of gate . (similar to jamb detail in Polaroid photo"C") CONTROL BOX: (see enclosed spec sheet) STANLEY Model #ASJCB. Slide gate was selected over swing-arm barrier gate because of increased potential for gate because of increased potential for gate strength versus minimal gate movement. CONTROLLED ACCESS: Driver can request (or deserve) gate ope~ing only after coming to complete stop at drive-up window and summoning employee. For customers stopping and using facility, this is no inconvenience. For any attempt at through traffic, exit would be refused. -On back-side of gate frame, red reflectors will be mounted to indicate barrier at night. -On back-side of gate "watch for pedestrians" sign can be mounted. 4. Note: illuminated sign: "Right Turn Only" ("STOP" sign can also be added.) Turn restriction will allow entrance onto University Avenue westbound only eliminating majority of previous stated conflicts. Closely spaced speed-bumps inhibit rolling exit onto street. s. Note: new concrete curb cut. Curb can be "swung" as shown, to enhance right turn only tendency, and inhibit left turns. The landlord has indicated that for many decades the existing building had driveway and curb-cuts on both east and west sides exiting University Avenue. The curb-cuts weire surrendered voluntarily to the city, and no history of hazard was mentioned. -OPTIONAL: 2 yellow flashing lights for pedestrians, S'S" high could be mounted either side of driveway, adjacent to sidewalk, similar to those found in school crossing areas. Lights would flash when gate is in open position. -Note: New 90 square foot and landscaping area west of 2 southern speed bumps. Mr. Marro and I observed all the existing drive-up facilities in the City of College Station in hopes of gathering ideas for our improved facility. Although they offered no suggestions, we noted that they all exited into significant traffic traveling both directions, yet harbored no turn restrictions. They offered no speed bumps, signage, or any other traffic control equipment. Although our proposal options for the maximum safety conceivable, Ray and I had to ask whether it is excessive or out of context with every other drive-up in town? (see item "D") We feel that our proposal, if required could set a national precedent as an example of maximum drive-through window safety for pedestrians and vehicular cross traffic. It has been indicated to us by city officials that a city-sponsored study of the Northgate commercial area showed the shopper origin as 60% automobile and 40% pedestrian. This study suggests a need to accommodate access for both sources, and we belie¥e our proposal offers this access in the safest manner conceivable. Although our restaurant is providing up to 24 parking spaces (more than any other commercial entity in the immediate Northgate area) this amount of spaces is still short of that required by the new city code. Please consider that the burden put on these spaces, and the few others in the Northgate area will be lessened substantially if customers (many in the above 60%) can just drive-up to pick-up their desired product, rather than have to utilize, or search for, a rare parking space. It has been noted by traffic engineers that one of the greater sources of vehicular congestion, and hazard to pedestrians, is a vehicle constantly circling in search of a parking space. We are very :excited about our future in College Station, and very proud of the significant improvement and enhancement we are investing into this area. Flying Tomato, Inc., is a tightly run chain and in our 15 year history (of as many restaurants) this is by far our most ambitious investment to date. Although we had to add a sprinkler system to our budget, as well as many other enhancements not required by code, we were further burdened by an additional $26,000 to connect the system to adequate supply available only on Main St. The ability to maintain a drive-up window, which has been operated without incident in many of our other stores, was integral to our plan when many of the above concessions were agreed to. The inability to adequately service and accommodate customers arriving by car will put a significant burden on our ability to remain economically viable. Please consider our presentation as an acceptable solution to the need effectively integrate access by slow moving singular customer vehicles with the reasonable safety needs of pedestrian customers and other foot traffic. Ray and I welcome any further suggestions that might achieve this goal . Thank you for your consideration to this matter. Mr. Pu l len: I have express mailed this package to you for your initial consideration on Thursday and Friday. I have for 3 years planned a 2 week (July 21 through August 4) charity trip to the holy-land, and would greatly appreciate any comments, questions, (or decisions, if feasible) before my departure. ARS/jmd Enclosure cc: George Boyett-Boyett Properties Kelvin Mullins-Omni Construction Mr. David J. Pullen, P.E. City Engineer, City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77840 July 17, 1985 Dear Mr. Pullen: In reference to Paragraph 3 of your letter of June 12, 1985, I, too, am concerned about the disruption to traffic that will be caused by the city completing the water line to Boyett St. at a later date. We are presently completing the line from Main to our location and, as per our telephone conversation of June 12, we both recognize the minimum disruption would be to continue the line at this time. After consulting with Kelvin Mullins from Omni Construction Co., he said continuing the line would require an approximate $800 engin- eering fee which would then confirm exact specifications and corresponding fees to complete the line. Based on the low bid we have presently contracted, Kelvin approximates $8,500 for the run and 1,200 to 1,500 for a hy~rant, if required. Since Flying Tomato, Inc. is making a long term commitment to the community, we have no difficulty in accepting a purchase order payment arrangement from the city. Since the billing would be through Flying Tomato, Inc., I believe I could convince Omni Construction Co. to waive their 8% profit mark-up ($850) so the city could have the lowest price possible. Please let me know if you have any interest in this arrangement. A. Flying Tomato, Inc. P.O. Box 399, Champaign , Illinois 61820; 217-351 -1020 TM The Flying Tomato, rhe Tomato Balloons, and rhe "Home of the Flymg Tomato Brothers" arf' rhe registered trademarks of the Flying Tomato, Inc. July 22, 1985 Kling Engineering P. 0. Box 4234 Bryan, Texas 7780~ ATT: Tim Chinn, P.E. City of College Station POSf OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE SfATION, TEXAS 77840-2499 RE: Waterline Extension from Boyett Street to Flying Tomato Restaurant in Patricia Street Dear Tim: As we have discussed, :my office would like to enter into a time basis contract w;ith>your off;Jc'e to~:Pr-ov:lde project drawings for the above waterline. We('~re·:;~p'laniHri"g ~ Jct,~;.construct the. line with City forces .. ·,,.w~2 propos~HJli~20'hs t$Jtct -d:Ji'e~· lJne similar . to the ~~~f =~!ct c~~~~l~~~ FJ~f~S · ~~1:~rr~e.fu,}~¥tiege . Ma1 °t1'1'1ch you I will need <;a9iR ee -l;scheq le"'a'hd~~1an "<¢$qt,~mate --·;from· you>·of •'the • • ,-··:·:•::·:.·.;;-~/:,-:.;.:~ ... .-;:t·· ·Y.-'L_,r'· _..·· · , ~-~~i~"'H~r, .1-:.!,.¥;. t:.r· .. · · . ~ 1:···"it-·-;-:: • _.._. ·: Engineer ing':¥.CO,s ts . · .to ~prep.~Fe a.,~~1purc;hase ord.~r for our account ing ;~~C)p!3_1-a tJon ·s.e -do -:$'oJ ":e ·gf n war~ unJ.fl . I have provided Iyou~\v'.J, th:;;:,,t · -~ !Jil:):E3,'b~:~,. All re:v~-8~ work wi 11 be hand.'i\ei:l .. th'ifou · nni · i'{j\~_:.~+" of·flce ifa'S;t ti'sua 1. we ~ould l~~~:·Fp~rn \~@f-~~"9~P .... 1, ~:his ~~·:fff~,/~e·~,temb_er>~(~.':we plan to install.,:the ··proJec·t 9'-1:-!F-~ng -·the G rfstmas ··.break holidays. 1: •• ' J. ;¥~;:~-~-~:<-·~i-~_:,_ . . .:;.;(\; ., . ·. \. Sincerely, ~· ~ David Pullen, P.E. City Engineer DJP: vw ·'""- July 24, 1985 Flying Tomato Inc. P. 0. Box 399 Champagn~. Illinois 61820 City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840·2499 ATT: Mr. Ralph Senn, President RE: Drive-thru to University Drive at 303 West University Drive, College Station Dear Mr. Senn: I have reviewed the materials you submitted and compliment you for your efforts. As a matter of record I am ,returning to yo.u the diagram of the existing drive-thru facilities with ' comments. Also, I am sure you are aware that most of these installations do not involve pedestrian traffic at all. You seem to have addressed all of my concerns regarding ~traffic move- ments. Since large numbers of your customers will come· from campus and other areas by foot I suggest you consider m~king the "rie~ masonry wall" to the left of your vehicle gate a pedestrian gate. You may wish to install some sort of device in that area to prevent the passage of bicycles and motorcycles which might conflict with your vehicle traffic movement . From an aesthetic standpoint, considering the entire Northgate area, I am not in favor of installing this drive. However, you have addressed all the traffic problems I had previously addressed, albeit with "bells and whistles" which are of course subject to your maintenance with respect to their operational success. As a result of your efforts, I am granting you an exit drive access at 303 West University Drive with the conditions of design you have shown on your drawing submitted to me dated July 16, 1985. I am enclosing a detail of the gutter section you must install along the frontage of your drive. I recommend paving brick in your drive access in lieu of concrete. Since you are apparently intending to leave in place the existing brick sidewalk, the paving brick may be more consistent in appearance than concrete. _d),:A .~ David J~ P.E. City Engineer cc: Al Mayo, Director of Planning Kelvin Mullins, Omni Construction Ray Marro, Project Architect DJP: vw .. L..::). ·-~ ·~ <$ .. .aJ.J L J --··· ·-·· --··---·-------· -~---·-·· ··-··--·----. --·-·-------·-··--·------·-------------··-·-··------··--·-·---·--------·- ~-(. · -··-··· --t -----···· .f · ----------·~srkl1 -~----· -~ -..,~-ar-~/l'41--· J'..;,..,s-u-11 _ t ----.~---~ _ ~~-/(~~--,~----·---- -----~------ ·------- ·---·-----·-:::-----··--------~·}')~ ----... -~-~vm ~-~~~-...w-~n9 ~-~-·---------- ... --\---~ ~I • ~~i7 ----~12H~1anv·-~--i0·---··----i~r j _-1 -··---,.-------µ~Nfl<4--:W/fff ~...Lia.-l~ ~-~----. -- ---·--·r~-----·-A--··-:-·---·-·xJJ~.rm ~-~~nca sxw.~ 'Z :1£ ~ _::__]_ -·---. -----· ····--------·-----~~---~~=---~---=-----=-- ------·---·----- ··------••••• --·----M---------·---·--- ,~~~~ ?~~~-~~ ~s-aN--··-------·-··-- ·~-------·--------------------------------- ----------·----------------------------~-------------... ------- -------------------------------f~~~----------- -----------·-----·--------·--------------------------------------·· -·-. ·-------------·---------------------------------------------------. ---. ---··--·-·------· .. ---·-··-· ------------------·. ( i.-.---1511 ___ _____., fR~ 1211 ~===, .. =====~=3=i.. tn 34 ,,--Lonvltudi•al 2 11) ""+T. f l .. I / 3" _j_1Y2' .-,;f' . =1_ ~3 ~~===2411 ==-=~L TYPICAL CURB S GUTTER SECTION . I " -Rl 4 . ' 1" I " r -R . 4 T. 3"-i . I sY2 -+.-. 1 -~ \__ · 3 Longitudinal r-·3" -____,J/~ T3"· (11 II . 2 .0 18 c-c 12'! __ __, _ ___,.;..._ 12•i ___ . _-4J i 1 TYPICAL GUTTER SECTION · FOR . OFF STREET PARKING . . I 41 .. R, '. r 2 r29"-• ._, __ . ..,.:..r...;.·~---is" . 1 _41"R . \J i · · I ,. v f. 3~t · f-3" TI a ~ _..4._ s" 11. " * ~~ 712 l ---c ' . I" "' I " _/ 3" 1 . 4 '\..__t_ono.itudina1 ~ .,, a c-c j_ I .,___ ______ 2411 _____ __.,=-i TYPICAL LAYBACK GUTTER SECTION VIII - 5 ..... -···-·.~· .. • . . • J. SCHUTT ASSOCIATES Landscape Architects 110 Lincoln College Station, TX 77840 (409)764-8985 Member American Society of Landscape Architects August 15, 1985 City of College Station Department of Engineering and Planning College Station, Texas 77840 Re: Landscape installation variance for the Flying Tomato Resturant. Dear Sir·s; Our office is handling the landscape design and installation for the Flying Tomato Resturant to open soon on University Drive at Northgate. We request that the city grant the development a variance to complete the installation of the landscape on October 15th, 1985 in accordance with Section 7-D.4, paragraph 9 of the City Zoning Ordinance No. 850. y s u bm i t t e d ; Jim Schutt J. Schutt Associates \ .... _ P&Z Case No . £-~ ----~----- CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROJECT PLAN REVIEW Date -~~~------- Name/description of project/request __ [\'--'-~'-!-:~::.L..1~-===-~~:__D=-~--+--"--~~-<;-~~-<:::p-=--~ Name of Applicant __ ~R~·_;;:..B~·_..::...B~u~t~le~r_,_~l~n~c~._,_(~Co~n-t~a~c~t~R~o~b~e-r~t-B-'-._C~o~e_n~) ______ _ Address 1504 S. Texas, Bryan, TX Phone No._--'-7~79~-~3~h_.o_o ________ _ Landowner Tom Stimson/John Stimson Address -------------------Phone No . __ 69_3_-_8_6_2_1 ____ _ ~ Site Plans Required (2 copies) Staff Review with comments on site plan: _________ City Engineer _______ Fire Marshal _____ Electrical Superintendent--------Dir. of Public Services _______ Water/Sewer Superintendent ------Zoning Official Approved ~ date _c;~h __,~-=-Y.=--'/ ____ _ Denied date ----------------------- COMMENTS : Site plans returned to app. numerous times to be revised; last t ime returned was 5-10-85. On 5-14-85 had not yet received additional revised plans. 'X'z> c=· s;~..r.-,n.--6( s\...--Jos &,1:.._. ~~~ £,-~ i ~L~. -·-~-·----------- \ .. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION APPLICATION FORM SITE PLAN REVIEW Date rt"1-'r I NAME OF PROJECT 1~6/ct-;f?JO ?:<1;Vr I'troP D Resident i a I cg( Commerc i a I LOCATION/LEGAL DESCRIPTION L.ol -1-°iLOC.,lc::.. 4 /f-NDC!n2. SctJ ---~-1-~~-----t-~--------~-~~- E.. 1 o c. e-5:VE[)1viS1of\J -.PH1n5e-4 APPLICANT J?.B . '6ure..c-e. LNC... ADDRESS /So'f S'. /E-1r,,.-s °612'1',.,-,.J OWNER Ml!.. lDl'"'I ~-11-1';;0,..; / .Jolt"AJ ~T1MS0,J • ARCHITECT OR EtlG I NEER f"/tz. ~E"llG £v'17V'S. ADDRESS I 5o4 r . 7Elc''1"'S /f.v5 CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) NUMBER OF PARK I tJG SPACES REQUIRED ------ NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED --+------ The applicant certifies that the above information is PHONE 4/7i-~~oo I ~,,.,-S PHONE '77 Cf-"5400 Tt:tur:! o r applicant I F /\PPLI C/\TI OfJ I S F ILED BY /\NY ONE OTH ER TH MJ TH E OW~IE R, /\ PO\.IER OF /\TTO Rfl[Y ST/\HMENT MU ST BE I NCL UD ED . ~S'SA.7b' 0 \J - 1yu r (~ I ~} I II l- \3 I [(}_ cr J t\L. ) ~01-u ~ J ' -e -A / D. D-~ --x t VJ -----~. 9 ti ____., x -. -\I l · ~ 1---- =-y c- ~- - a r:>'-b'"t: J. a..> ·lz o.5 . '£~ PO. Box 3610 Bryan, Texas 77805 October 28, 1985 City Of College Station Planning & Zoning Department P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 Attn: Ms. Kim Johnson Re: Aggieland Print Shop 1801 Holleman Street Building Permit No. 12271 (409) 779-3400 Lot 4, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision Phase 4 Gentlemen: It is understood and agreed that R.B. Butler, Inc. will complete the landscape and parking lot striping phases of work no later than November 4, 1985 in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City of College Station and as they relate to the project. The landscape work will be performed by Leland Landscape Contractors under the supervision of R.B. Butler, Inc. and the striping will be completed by Butler personnel. We truly appreciate your cooperation in this matter and will have the work complete within 48 hours after weather permits. These conditions are mutually agreed and accepted this 28th day of October, 1985. Sincerely, c::::?~?~ Robert. B. Coen R.B. Butler, Inc. Subscribed and sworn before me this 28th day of October, 1985. of Texas P.O. Box 3610 _. . Bryan. Texas 77805 May 6, 1985 City Of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 ATTN: REF: SHIRLEY PLANNING/SITE REVIEW AGGIELAND PRINT SHOP Gentlemen: (409) 779-3400 As required, we submit three (3) copies of site plan along with traffic analysis and application form. Three complete sets of plans and specifications have been submitted for building permit along with information regarding Butler Manufacturing building framing. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions. Sincerely, Robert B. Coen RBC/nc Attachments ____ A_BU'll.ER ___ IJ INOOSTRIES co. P.O. Box 361.D Bryan, Texas 77805 (409) 779-3400 AGGIELAND PRINTING FEBRUARY 9, 1985 TRAFFIC SURVEY I. EMPLOYEES A) Four (4) Full Time (Printers 2, Recep, and Cutter) B) Two (2) Part Time NOTE: Part-Time Personnel (Typesetter and Pasteup) Frequently Work Nights and Weekends and Not During Business Hours. II. CUSTOMERS -Fairly Even Through Business Hours (8:30 A.M. to 5:30 P.M. - 5 Day). Ranges From High of 4/Hours To Low Of 1-2/Hour Except As Follows: Thursday 11:00 AM To 12:30 Friday 5:00 PM To 5:30 (5 .f!.vg.) ( 5 Avg.) Recent Months Show Average Customers Per Day At 30 For 9-Hour Period Or 3.33 Customers/Hour. Highest Customer Traffic in Last Year Was Week Of December 17-21, 1984 With Customers At 188 For Week and Highest Day On December 19, 1984 At 45 or 5 Per Hour For 9-Hour Day. NOTE: Using this information as guideline for parking requirement and traffic information, the worst possible condition in past year was as follows: December 17, 1984 --11:30 A.M.· To 12:30 P.M. With Four Employees At Office and With The Eight Customers During The Hour (Assuming All Were There At Sarne Time) The Maximum Demand Was For 12 Places. ____ A_BUll..ER ___ fJ INDUSTRIES CO. However, using a recent typical two days as standard, the worst conditions would be as follows: MAXIMUM MAXIMUM TIME 2/7/85 LOAD 2/08/85 LOAD 8:30 10:00 AM 4 + 3 7 4 + 1 5 10:00 11:00 AM 4 + 1 5 4 + 3 7 11:00 12:00 AM 4 + 5 9 3 + 5 8 12:00 1:00 PM 2 + 5 7 2 + 4 6 1:00 2:00 PM 5 + 3 8 4 + 2 6 2:00 3;00 PM 5 + 4 9 4 + 1 5 3:00 4:00 PM 4 + 5 9 5 + 2 7 4:00 5:30 PM 3 + 4 7 3 + 6 9 These figu1es assume that all customers were simultaneous and that each employee was driving separate car. Such is not the case now but could be. ~?.£__ ROBERT B. COEN DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1985 D. SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES NEAR CHURCHES, SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS (l) Definitions The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and the enforcement of this section: Church: A building used principally for reliaious worship and in which persons assemble and congregate to worship at least once each week and which is owned by such congregation or persons or leased by such congregation for a period of more than one year. Public Hospital: A hospital to which the public at large is admitted for medical treatment. Public School: A school which has one or more of the grades kindergarten through twelfth grade, and which is owned and conducted by the state or a political subdi- vision or agency thereof. Sales of Alcoholic Beverages Prohibited No person shall sell or engage in the business of selling an alcoholic beverage where the place of business of such person is within three hundred (300) feet of any church, public school or public hospital, the measurements to be along the property lines of the street fronts and from front door to front door, and then direct line across street intersections where they occur. (3) Exceptions This ordinance shall not apply to a place of business which is legally authorized to sell alcoholic beverages prior to the effective date of this ordinance; however, should such a place of business discontinue the sale of alcoholic beverages, then the provisions of this ordinance shall apply thereafter. (Ordinance No. 1 '30 of June 23, 1983) ( 4) City Secretary to Certify Application Rev. 10/1/90 Any person intending to sell alcoholic beverages within the city limits of the City of College Station, shall make application to the City Secretary, who shall designate on the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission Application whether or not the same is lawful by the ordinances of the City of College Station. If the City Secretary denies the application as not complying with the City ordi- nances, applicant may appeal directly to the City Council. If the City Secretary fails to review the application within ten (l 0) working days, applicant shall have the right to appeal to the City Council for review of the application. In order to be placed on the agenda, applicant must file a written request for Council review within ten (l 0) days of the decision of the City Secretary. The City Council shall hear and review the application at the next available Council meeting. There is no time limit for the filing of a written request for Council review of an application when the City Secretary has failed to act. {LQ.W»e~·~~ ~ I 1-7 Ho II i; MM 1~ / / / To R. B. BUTLER, INC. Box 3610 Bryan, Texas 77805 PHONE: (713) 779-3400 ?.o. 130~ C\9too GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU D Shop drawings D Copy of letter "rf, Attached D Prints D Change order LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL JOB NO. I DATE I S' <o/8~ PROJECT A~'°' E"'-lr'NO v~1,yr S"°~p LOCATION Ho~L.e Ml\'""'1 <; i'11. EC'\ D Under separate cover via the following items: ~ Plans D Samples D Specifications COPIES DRAWING NOS. DESCRIPTION 3 ' OF \ l °KeJ1~Et) £I TE 'i>L..ltw-.j \ 0~1.Col l\J lrL-<; \£.ETC. ti • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~ For approval D D D REMARKS , ....... ,~ For your use As requested For review and comment D Approved as submitted D Approved as noted D Returned for corrections D D Resubmit copies for approval D Submit copies for distribution D Return corrected prints COPY TO 'F' a.,.E' ~ BUTLER F_O_R_M_:...N_Q __ -5--W---------------------s I G NED :(_('~ 6. ~ P&Z Case No.~~-~~/__ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROJECT PLAN REVIEW Date _.3~2...1.J.D~----------- Name/description of project/request _________________ _ c~\)4.J. ..._ £" s~ Q)c.0...~cl.a ~ / '!!'-t~ ~,L. "4 !b:t- Name of Applicant --~=-""S:.....i:~~,ic~~~~~==~~~;__----'-~-~-'\~J;;.._?--.f$'.....:...:.__ __________ _ Address '°5\\ ~,.rQJ-s,14 Phone No. ~~ -1-~0'L Landowner ~~ \._L ~ Site Plans Required (2 copies) Staff Review with comments on site plan: -~~ ........ ~-'---City Engineer __ ('!'"--A--___ Fire Mars ha 1 _ .... ~~Pr,___ Electrical Superintendent __ ~_h __ Dir. of Public Services --"C-~-P<r __ Water/Sewer Superintendent __ J __ Zoning date ~)v1i t"Z> Denied --------- COMMENTS: 3~k @l___ 4.ff C ~ ~ ~aj · City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 l l 0 l TEXAS A VENUE COLLEGE ST A TION, TEXAS 77840-2499 October 2, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: Al Mayo, Director of Plannin~ \/.n/ Jane R. Kee, Zoning Offici~ J The Flying Tomato Restaurant As you requested the following is a chronological listing of events that have taken place concerning The Flying Tomato restaurant. 1. Jan. 17, 1984 I sent a letter to Tomato's architect, Paul Rowald, indicating that seating for their restaurant could not exceed 230 seats (based on a prior non-conforming use). 2. The site plan was approved on April 30, 1985 indicating MAXIMUN SEATING-230. 3. The building permit was issued on May 5, 1985 with an approved site plan attached. 4. An inspection by Kim Johnson on August 19, 1985 found in excess of 330 seats on the premises. The Certificate of Occupancy was held until all but 230 seats were removed. The seats were removed the next day, the C.O. was issued and the restaurant opened for business. 5. Ralph Senn, owner, filed an application before the ZBA that was two-fold. He first appealed my decision that the Zoning Ordinance regulates outdoor seating. The ZBA upheld my decision on Septmber 3, 1985. He then requested a variance to parking for the addition of 148 seats to be placed outdoors. The ZBA denied this request based on a lack of unique and special conditions and lack of undue hardship as presented by the applicant. 6. Ralph Senn filed another application before the ZBA which was again a two-fold request. He requested first a variance to 27 parking spaces to add 81 more seats to the restaurant. The ZBA denied this request on September 19, 1985 for the same reasons as before. He then requested a variance to the parking requirement that off-premise spaces be on property within 200' and under the same ownership. The ZBA tabled this request pending the location by Mr.Senn of property for off-premise parking. I I ; ,I P&Z Case No. 8~~~~ CI~i OF COLLEG E STATION PROJECT PLAN REVI EW Date __ f)JiaL~S___________ ~ /I~~. '2,,J ~-~l (A~ Name/description of project /request /f::7' (_Lj ~ _ -- Location ..?q ~ ""~(ltt~ ,$;76;#S ~ Name of Applicant .,(/ 1'--/?J te}~ .,..'-£c,.../ Address /~/f ,(/ ~ ~ Phone No . 77S:-/Jl..5rt( Landowner ~ ~ Address . ..()i , > ~ Phone No.--------- Site Plans Requ i red (2 copies ) Staff Revi ew with comments on site plan : -----City Engineer ------Fire Marshal -----Electrical Super i ntendent----Dir. of Public Services _____ Water/Sewer Super i ntendent ____ Zoning Offici al Approved ----fk-¥......._.""----- Den i ed ---------d ate ___________ ~ COMM E NTS:~ • P&Z CASE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION APPLICATION FORM SITE PLAN REVIEW Date . May 8,1985 Cl Res i dent i a 1 NAME OF PROJECT __ H_&_M_T_EXA __ C_O_REM __ O_D_EL _____________ _.IXXl-=--=C=o=nm=e'-'rc;;...;i~a;..;,1_. _ LO CAT I ON/ LE GAL DES CR I PTI ON __ 1_40~5_S_.;_. ~T_e_xa_s _A_v_e~._,_, _C_o_ll_e_,.g'--e_S_t_a_t_i_o_n,_, _T_e_x_a_s ____ _ APPLICANT H & M WHOLESALE PHONE 775-1834 ----------------------- ADDRESS 1214 S. College Ave., Bryan, Texas OWNER ___ M;;.;;.a;..;...ry..;.w._-'-'Al._f"-o-rd--.. ______________ PHONE 775-1834 ARCHITECT OR ENG I NEER BILL TAP CONSTRUCTION CO PHONE 764-9053 ADDRESS P. 0, Box 9559, College Station. Texas 7784-0 PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Service Station ___ ..;.....;.....;.......;._.;..;;.;..;..;;;;;;...;;..__ _________________ __ CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY ------------------------~ VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED __ Jr __ 5._· __ NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 .....------- The ~pplicant certifies that the above information is true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER, A POWER OF .ATTORNEY STATEMENT MUST BE INCLUDED. ! l J P&Z Case No. cj7~!f!j_/__ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROJECT PLAN REVIEW ....... L~c; ti on _..3....;;_;;_/._'/_.;.¥_---:--""--/C:-=~~'9..'-=~'---'-,4~~--=-~-~-~-e_-_____________ _ Name of Applicant_~-~-~-Y-~-~-~-~-S--~-~-~-~-~--~-~-~-~ __ t_~~'---~~~-6~.£- /J L? /1---t. 9~-t:>6b~ Address f12c:>tl~ /7f , (!.S Phone No. ________ _ Landowner Alfa lf,r;-12,e) Address Phone No . -------------------~ ---------- Site Plans Required (2 copies) Staff Review with comments on site plan: ~-----City Engineer ..... /"-------Fire Marshal ____ Electrical Superintendent \....,/ ____ Dir . of Public Services ____ Water/Sewer Superintendent ,,.../ ___ Zoning Official Approved -------- Denied _________ _ date -----------~ r 8£'911 C I TY ·; c CC LlJ" GE ST AT I ON ------------ APP: l U'·l ! ON 'O RM SITE PLAN REVIEW Date 11/19/85 D Res id ent ial NnME OF PROJECT ~--T_h_e __ S~p_a_S_h_o~p----------------=ng~~C~o~mm~e~r~c~i~a~l~ LO CATI ON/LEGAL DESCR IPTION 3114 Tex. Ave So . Lots 15&16 , Block 16 , Section 3 Southwood Valley , CS APPL I CANT Tony Jones Enterprises PHON E 696-8669 ADDRESS POB -AT Coll. Sta. Tx 77840 OWNER M/M Barry PH ONE --------- ARCHITECT OR ENG INEER T.G .I . VAUGHN , ARCHI TECT PHONE 696-1262 -------~ --------- ADDRE SS 1504 Quail's Nest ' cs 77840 PRESENT US E OF PROPE RTY Undeveloped CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY C-1 VARIANCE (S) REQUES TE D ANO REASON(S) NUMB ER OF PARKING SPACE S REQU IRED 10 NUMBER OF PARKING SPACE S PROVIDED 14&loading Th e app li cant cert i f ies that the abov e or appl icant IF APPLICAT ION IS FIL ED BY ANYONE OT~ER THAN TH E OWN ER, A POWE R OF ATTORN EY STATEMENT MUST BE INC LUDED. 0 9 f --ur,ro1 -~ 0N4'> .. ~ & ~I _?1.,~~~~g-©-'f tn\ ~I -\WmQchifP.d ~cnQ_-G -'€1 ~===-=·-=--==->2_1c=,. _ _J --~ ~!'s-~L -- ~ __ {_ -. ,~ • .l'~ • I I t 1,e1·' ~· ·, . ~ -------~~. ' -----------~------' ;d 't?~ ' ' . Fdf7'P . . . . . ' ~-- ,).... i •• "t> ______ _ .. - ~rY'<P _)-. ~'°"~~~ft,,.~ 9E ~ ~J.. ,)...d~:;/ )._ 't'"ll \ ~1'V.fV<.R )""ii ~ -;J}·o;..s~"?"'"v ..L.: ~ ·~ r ::.-i.. ~9 -/i_l...i' , ~~0'7 .. I ·---~··',_, /i I ,J 1· :r, CI,~ 0,~J COLLEGE STATION P&Z Case PROJE}; PLAN REVIEW Location Lor /6/1-1, ?/?eTo,c-LL:JT /6_, ~~A:::CV/ctd /?ca-=s; Name of Applicant /J14L1 A M <? J5/::A CKEEA.J Address d<f;;/9 L:Ra.S$T7/h8cte-S:. Phone No. c:<t.£-.;<~ Landowner ~{;' Site Plans Required (2 copies) Staff Review ~~~mments on site plan: J~ ~ /} ;-J --r~ V · C~ngi~dr~· d /J.-/V Fire Marshal h> ~~ 1·3 -~ ..--.....,,~~·)o(J-~·~Electrical Superintendent ~ Dir. of Public Services /-3~6, Water/Sewer Superintendent ____ Zoning Official Denied~---------date------------ COMMENTS : -----------------------------------~,-~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION APP LI CATION FORM SI TE PLAN REVIEW Date /Z-2 3 -85- D Res iden tial 113'" Commerc ial NAME OF PROJECT b -i k Au'\o s v'ff>Lt t LOCATION/LEGAL DESCRIPTION loT /0 Jl -/ , IZPol?T!()A/ oE Lor /6, LAKC::eteW ~-;__.<-=LL--L--7-f-"c:J....L..=£-!....!...~--'~~~'....._L.£~7'--'~'...lS...!~'1££!.::'.~- APPLICANT kJ1u tt4th c. bi2Ackeet\) ADDRESS PHONE ZG ¥--2000 Co!/e4e ~~,.TY, 7/J;YO T l OWN ER _ __,W<-=-'1.....,L=L_,_1.w.A.c.l'h.l...-_,,_Q.J...., .J....h u..::i<:...!..fl.!....:c:o.!..K:::..:e::..::e:....:..N-=--;+--' ._.J,TI_.:~~v s~I e~e~ _____ P HONE 2£ '6 -2 o oo ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER -::t"cRRY 'b.151..Jo,bv (\.;-5 Llrrv-et/A;l>.(e~HONE --------- ADDRESS CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY -""'-----'------------------------ VARIANCE(S ) REQUESTED AND REASO N(S) NUMB ER OF PARK I NG SPACES RE QUIRED _ _._)__,,lo"'---- NUMBER OF PARK! NG SPACES PROV I OED _ __,_)_!_,__ __ The appl icant certifies tha t the above information is true and correct . c~uvL_ Signature of owner or agent or a pplicant IF APPLICAT ION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER , A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT MUST BE INCLUDED. -- -- -- ) P&Z Case No. ~7}z.}::' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROJECT PLAN REVIEW Date ___ A,.o~-L~? _________ _ Name/description of project/request_Lf\....u.C...w....~~¢=--~=...1.~0..~S~S.l.--~~~~~~ --t~ \.;;?t. ~ w ~ Location _____ \\_,_~_~\..s::....:....o..t:t---'=....:::CS).:,,,.~~------------------ Name of Applicant _ __,ff).__~,~1..__~...;,_;;~~~r<\--"-tr?)(_,_~__,;,,;;-------------~ "' Site Plans Required (2 copies) Staff Review with comments on site plan: City Engineer ~Fire Marshal _ __.""--_Electrical Superintendent ~ Dir. of Public Services _,._ ___ Water/Sewer Superintendent __ ..---__ Zoning Official Approved --~!-"------- COMMENTS: P&Z Case No .~9oZ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROJECT PLAN REVIEW Date __ 4[?x;:>j_?:?'S __________ _ Name/description of project/request_'l4::i:=~l'\"\CO!!~~~L=--_?k(.....,,,,,_a~e--l."'---"-S....,.__L~l.,j__::~~~~<:r,=sl~~~~- Location "30-:> W U~ct"'""( Name of Applicant 12 . [\'\AR\\.o l.t:\t2.f.h,~c.::r) / 12-. ~N -M,..s!R... I Address 1\'l.. W.&.~~;t)~ \l\1no.$ Phone No. 2\1' -~g4_i;,t;S I eo1 Landowner ~Cf (}/ Address Phone No. ________ _ C.---Site Plans Required (2 copies) Staff Review with comments on site plan: ~City Engineer ------Fire Marshal _____ Electrical Superintendent ____ Dir . of Public Services Superintendent Wat!~mr Approved _-+~----""---- -----zoning Official date __dJ_:;c~J~~~S ____ _ Denied ---------date ___________ _ COMMENTS : ~\1'$ f\.A~ \S 1 l '91!0 -\..,\Ntf'O'" wj C..0~1'~~. P&Z Case No . CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROJECT PLAN REVIEW Location ~/I {);t)y. Name of Applicant--:h...-ru~dL_u~~t-a.u ........ 1J0=1 --...&~·~~Z1-.......uJ ........... ~~{c,:.=-________________________ ~ Phone No. _(Q.._Cf....,~.._-_.3..._Z"""""~3-----Address 3 Zla Je1 s~ 7 Landowner ____________________________________________________ _ Site Plans Required ( 2 copies)~ a:t/,ocl.ul Staff Review with comments on site plan: ~ Jo/W Pcu+er 6a.Aa o.~. -~-----Fire Marshal · I ____ City Engineer ____ Electrical Superintendent ____ Dir. of Public Services ____ Water/Sewer Superintendent ___ Zoning Official Approved Denied ---------date ______________ _ MODELASJCB Medium-Duty Slide Gate Operator For comm ercial/industrial applications. Now you can reduce your pay- roll and still provide secure, limited-access perimeter con- trol, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You can depend on Stanley quality for gate operators with long life and few service requirements. 1 /3 or 1 /2 HP motor (available in 115-volt or 230-volt single-phase motors) provides quiet, reliable power • solenoid activated brake reduces gate coasting • full systems capability~ gives you the flexibility to design your own system for your special requirements Typical Uses. Stanley 's Model ASJCB is a medium-duty slide gate operator for commercial and industrial applications. It's available with a variety of con- trols and accessories for a ·'total systems approach '' to security and perimeter control. Depend on Stanley. The Stanley name is your assurance of American-built quality. Today, Stanley is th e industry leader, with careful quality control procedures and operational testing during each step of production . STANLEY @ MODEL ASJCB Medium-Duty Industrial/Commercial Slide Gate Operators Specifications: Recommended Capacities of Model ASJCB: • 1 /3 or 1 /2 HP motor (115-volt or 230-volt single-phase motors) • open override circuit (automatic timing modules simply plug in) • single belt, chain , and sprocket Model ASJCB-3 ASJCB-2 Gate Travel Speed Per Motor Minute 1/3 HP 57 ft. 1/2 HP 57 ft. Maximum Maximum Overhead Gate Gate Weight Opening 550 lbs. 20 ft. 700 lbs. 20 ft. motor speed reduction Dimensions: • #41 output, idler sprocket, and roller chain • four-inch friction clutch • solenoid activated brake Cto reduce gate coasting) Model ASJCB shall have a (minimum 1 /3 hpl _volt single-phase high starting torque reversible motor protected against overload and undervoltage in both the start and run windings. Motor contactor meets NEMA size "O" specifications. Limit switches are 'readily adjustable and securely locked in place aftef adjustment. Single-belt, chain and sprocket motor speed reduction, with adjustable friction clutch for mechanical overload protection. Unit shall have an adjustable solenoid activated disc- type brake and a manual disconnect. Operator shall have open override circuitry to provide com- plete control of gate (from external controls) while closing. Housing of 16-gauge painted galvanized steel. Also a power on/off switch to stop power to the unit without opening the electric control box. U.UCSA listed. MODEL A ASJCB 281//' I I ~ocm-1 B c D 16 " 15%" 22 " Maximum Maximum Cantilever Roller/V trac~ Frequency of Gate Gate Shipping use CComplete Opening Opening Weight cycles/hour) 12 ft. 16 ft. 185 lbs. 20 12 ft. 16 ft. 190 lbs. 20 -I Hci;r E F G H J 271//' 131/2" 17%" S•j./' 73/a" Controls and Accessories to build your total system. STANLEY ® helps you do things right ~ Stanley Automatic Openers Division of The Stanley Works 5740 East Nevada Avenue Detroit, Ml 48234 Phone C313l 366-1300 Form No. 910-781 Digital controls and trans- mitters let you operate the gate from your car and provide 1,024 possible codes that can be easily changed. The card reader permits access only to authorized cardholders. All new magnetic vehicle detector is self-tuning to eliminate frequent adjustments. You 'll find this "loop" detector convenient and trouble-free . Digital keyless entry allows access only to those who know the code using ttie telephone-like button panel. Provides 10,000 possible codes. Additional Accessories- intercoms, warning lights, electric gate locks, and time delay systems. Ask about the many other quality Stanley accessories for the ''total systems approach.'' The friction clutch is not.an automatic reversing device. Its sole function is to minimize damage to the gate operator and. gate and to limit maior vehicle damage. If pedestrian traffic 1s a problem and an automatic reversing device is desired, accessories such as g.ate edge.s are available. Proper maintenance of friction clutches and gate edges is required for their proper operation (see installation manual for detailed instructionsl. Printed in U.S.A. © 1981 The Stanlev Work" ·-. July 24, 1985 Flying Tomato Inc. P. 0. Box 399 Champagne, Illinois 61820 City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 I IOI TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840·2499 ATT: Mr. Ralph Senn, President RE: Drive-thru to University Drive at 303 West University Drive, College Station Dear Mr. Senn: I have reviewed th~ materials you submitted and compliment you for your efforts. As a matter of record I am ,returning to you the diagram of the existing drive-thru. facilities with ' comments. Also, I am sure you are aware that most of these installations do not involve pedestrian traffic at all. You seem to have addressed al.l of my concerns regarding traffic move- ments. Since large numbers of your customers will come from campus and other areas by foot I suggest you cons i.der m·aking the "new masonry wa 11" to the left of your vehicle gate a pedestrian gate. You may wish to install some sort of device in that area to prevent the passage of bicycles and motorcycles which might conflict with your vehicle traffic movement. From an aesthetic standpoint, considering the entire Northgate area, I am not in favor of installing this drive. However, you have addressed all the traffic problems I had previously addressed, albeit with "bells and whistles" which are of course subject to your maintenance with respect to their operational success. As a result of your efforts, I am granting you an exit drive access at 303 West Universi~y Drive with the conditions of design you have shown on your drawing submitted to me dated July 16, 1985. I am enclosing a detail of the gutter section you must install along the frontage of your drive. I recommend paving brick in your drive access in lieu of concrete. Since you are apparently intending to leave in place the existing brick sidewalk, the paving brick may be more consistent in appearance than concrete. _dS:A .~ David J~ P.E. City Engineer cc: f::i Mayo, Director of Planning Kelvin Mullins, Omni Construction Ray Marro, Project Architect DJP: vw ~ ®~---:--,--~----, -------------~~ --. :i }r-tl -- _______________ ),_, M~-----~ __ _uN_~~---··----~----~ ----t -~ L~J-j --- ______ !bl/®:"_~_y_tJ_~Y.~rrY ~--~-~ ____________ ... _ ~---L , _____ l__ ---·--·--------··-~----·-··· ·-----·-· ~-et.--~)P'~1: -----· -------·----·--'---'-----------·--------___ .,,_,, _____ - ------------------· ------· -·------·-----~------c-::-~~-~v.: --~-~..l{~~-~~-~~-~--~1~11Y-------~--""-~ J -~~~ :: :!_ ~:'._: :-:rrY----. ----'---.-t!=3J~~---"" ------·--···--··-------~---------------\_._-. ----~(.(·~ ------ ~$~. ------------·--·--- ---------------~ --- --·----·--·-·----··-·--··--·-·--·--~lr\:\la -,.,,~1'7/ ----··----- ------~~ --~~--~~ --~w~ --~-· .~tf _______ _ ---·-----;,;;~ -'"9--;:_~.-~-s~---a.r· -J:NJ /Nl ------·-·--- •W2 --'a.Ay--"f,~--..;-~ --i-~ttu~;--~_:.,-4-1 ·-·-·or --·-- ----·--·-----------·------·--- ---·_;M~-~ .. ~-------·--·-·-----~~·\1~--~t'i-.G'J' ·--··-·----·--·- ·---·--------~ e;>~~~Ja-·~--~~--~ ·-·04 ·--------- ;.-=::ih-·r ---s-~--~---=-x~~ -~M.14lQS. ·--C?+---.»v; / M ,..-.. ---·-----~ ·-·----·----· · --·-'1 ---,~-~::,L7t -A~-~a-~i-~---~;w ---.~---·-· --- ~ . . I -··--·----·---··-----,-~----··:---·-----·----·-----·--·····-----·--- ,.~fl~~---~---·---·---- '?1i:;I~-~~--~· ~·wr~---~Js--OJ"# ·----- ---· ~"v !>~~-----·--,~~-~·sow-::·-~·· -~oU:irN---;r-~wv.t:.-17··-.,-~------ . . I II 12" ..-----15 11 ----1 fR~ ""'--=========, ll=====l-=3=i.. ti 3,~/r---Lon9itudinal 2 el--+T. ill 3" _j_1Y2' .. ~ =i ~3=-=::..~==-==2==411 ====~~j TYPICAL CURB a GUTTER SECTION . I" I" I" 4 Rl . F4 R ~'~.~~~=.=.,.~;::==========~~-3"1 sY2. . .i._ + ;-r,:...,..-\_ __ / To· l : . 3" LonQitudinal r (I 18" c-c ..._f ·--12'! --~---12 11 . I . . -f TYPICAL GUTTER SECTION · FOR : OFF STREET PARKING !"R,' . r2~29" l r~ rs" . t _ 4 \j . t . .· _____,. f--. --'--'· J -. . -, . ---'411 !"R . r.. 3•~ I 1--3" TI a~ -+::-~T: s" 7 1;2" 1 l.:-\.__ · I" "' ra" _/ 3" 1 1 · 4 l:ono.itudinal ~ JJ c-c ~-::___~=== -=====2411===~1 . TYPICAL LAYBACK GUTTER . SECTION --t/.SED 1/\/ 7)rRJ vtWAy ..S VIII - 5 '"·· _. .. . . ~I ~ ~ Gt ~oI -~ -bz -hf> I q I f ,.;, <I)/ ----u ·o7 oi~ ---~L ;, j, pZ <a~ ~ \ I.~ . ,511 ····~ • ~ g ""t-C -tr cvt 91 j,t:;, -vt Q'Z q <t.-t p~I si 'l I -fL o~ I ti ~ -1,, ((, ~ '.;' '/,, <; J t fl-- dJ</ fl 0£ 1~ " • ~A.. ~ ~ (A,tA'°"\ °'-- t C ~ Ck~ ~+. 1.___· - lJCL)t\.,. 4-o a.M a. . 5e. '-\1 ·Cf> (\,~tt»'leL L<.:o...l \\-~ ~c le.-t-~ fr-e,e.:urJ-B.'1-//p: s~+ ~ ()A ~ ~ \c.t,to « 0 ~_reJl_ £.._I\""°- ~"' C ~~; c. 1A.f o"'-+ ~re.se,.t\_i W \ A ~ I Y\. -lo a., CA_S uQ_,.. ~a \ \ ~ ~ ~. O V\!,rt;-Oof\ ~ ch~y{ ,ql'l z. fy -/Jm . 0/3ne,,, /~9/g) r~V!sel_ 1,'ljB~ P&Z Cas e N o.~~-2o3 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PROJECT PLAN REVIEW Date c.-3-0 £0 --~----Q ___________ _ Name/desc ription of project/request___.1.ba~-~--L!<a~c~~"1-1'CU~e~r~,·a..~~~~~~~~~~- N/Laddr:ho/l 1£ 'x &,~' , k /uwSL-ta mad/A.£,,~ ~ ~ Location_~/_O~~--'C~.k~~c.A_,_,6~+-'--'-. ~~~-~-~---~~-~~-- Name of Applicant_~__.~·t~l ~0....._'~6~r~ie~A"'--~~~~~~~~~~~~--~--~~~- Ad dress _ _._.J?x>~x"--=C'-"q_.___.C~· ~...._· _7---'--'7'--'~'--''f ...... l ___ p hone No . -~-=-'f-""'fo~. -__.;t;?.=-Cf_,_O;;;.__ __ Address Phone No . I Site Plans Required <,,i copies) Staff Review with comments on site plan: _ __._M...,.:A-'--C i t y Engineer i./A- _ _,,_M.u.'11.J.--_ Electrical Superintendent &!A __,_M....:....:....:'ll __ Water/Sewer Superintendent ()!( ~--~--~--~---- Fire Marshal Dir. of Public Servic es /10 se'6bat=L Zoning Official jJ/061t>m6 Approve d ?/{,. date __ =s=_-_3_-~0.~S:"-----~ Den i ed ~~~~~--~--- COMMENTS : awb 4 DeutJtt /Ja,.J«c .?k-~ add/0a \ I/SE THIS A/111/ll FOii -ESTIC Sllll'tllE/tTJ A/ID FOii Sllll't/IE/tTJ FROM /IUEllTO 11/Cll TO THE ll S.A. Fill Ol/T /IU/ll'f.E A/IEAS. FOii A.SSISTAMCE CAIL l#-1Jl-SJ55. TOll FREE SEE llACK OF FOllM SET FOii a.JUTE l'llEl'AllAT/Dlt IMSTlll/CTIDltS. Sender's Federal Express Account Number I I Date City PRIORI OVE 10 =1= 6 9"x12" OVERNIGHT DELIVERY 2 0 /!!!!f,,/ff!!t=NG 12" x 15Y,," 30 ~~%~x l" Ao 4D ~t;~~s .. aO STANDARD AIR so =~~=:: SERVICE COMMITMENT PRIORITY 1 -Oe••~•ry '' teneduled 11rly oext btlt1net1 moro•ng m moec loc"'°"' II m•y t1ke two or more bu1me11oS d•Y• 11 1he de1Hn"'°" 11 ov\tlde our pm1111y _.nee.,_ ST ANOARO AIR -OetlYtlry 11 g11,,.r1lly oext butmess d1y or 001 i.11r lh•n MCond bu11net1 d1y It may take lhrN or more bu11,_. d1ys It 1ri. de1tm111on 11 ovt"de our primary MfVlce areal 10S•S611667 Your Phone Number 0Jery Important) DepartmenVFl00< No State DHOLD FOR P/CK..IJP Give the Federal Express ad9ress where you want package held rn ~O.•HAt,;pt. 2 El/VER WEEKDA Y 3 0 DELIVER SATURDAY (Extra chwge applies) Total Total 4 0RESTRICTED ARTICLES SERVICE (P-1 and Slandald Al P-<rt; Ex>a cllarge apploa) 5 0 CONSTANT SllRVEILlANCE SERVICE (CSS) (Extra chwge applies) 6 OoRYICE lbS 0 OTHER SPECIAL SERVICE 8 0 9 0 SATURDAY PICK.QI' DR SATURDAY DROP-OFF (Extra charge apploes) .. Recopienrs Phone Number rJer; lmportan1) State Orog<n Agent Charge Emp. No Date 0 Cash Received 0 Rell.m Shoon'enl Of'ler Total D TlwdP<W1Y D 0,., To(lel 0 0,., To- Street Address State Zip FedEx Employee Number TERMS AND COND/TJ .... .,, DEFINITIONS Oii this Airbill, .we, our and us refer to Federal Express Corporation, its employees and agents You and your refer to the sender, its employees and agents. ·AGREEMENT TO TERMS By.giving us your package to deliver, you agree to all the terms on this Airbill and 1n our current Seiv1ce Guice, which is available on request. No one is authorized to alter or modify the ter<ns of our Agreemen.t ' RESPONS/(lll/TY FOR PACKAGING AND COMPLETING AIRBlll You are responsible for adequately packaging your goods and for prpperly filling oui this Airb1ll Becau.se the number Qf packages and weight per package aie critical to.our ability to correctly bill you, any emission of this 1nformationfrom this Airbill wi~ result in a billing based on our best estimate of the number of packages received from you and an es!1mated "default" weight per package, as determined and periodically ad1usted by us. AIR TRANSPORTATION TAX INCLUDED Our basic rate includes a federal tax required by Internal Revenue Code Section 4 2 71 on the air transportation portion of this service. llM/lATIONS ON OUR .llABlllrt Our liability fQl' Joss or damage ro your package. is limited !o you, actual damages or $100, whichever is less, unless you pay for and declare a higher value. 'fie do not carry cargo liability insurance, but you may pay thirty cents for each add•tlonal $1 00 of declared value. If you declare a higher value and paylfle adaitional charge, our liabnify will be.th€Jesser of your deol~fed value or the actual value of your package 1 Our liaq_i)ity for delays not caused by your negligence shall be limrt!)d to~ refund_of you,deliveJY charges. \ .. "" We won't be liable for your acts or omissions, including but not limited to improper or insufficient packing, securing, marking or addressin~. or for the acts or omissions of the rOC1piOOt or anyone else witb.an interest ifJ.the package. Also, we won't te liable If you pr the recipient violates any of the terms of our agreement. F1nal~e won't be hable for loss, damage or detay caused by events. we cannot reasonably foresee or control, 1nclud1ng but not limited to acts of God, penis of the air, weather conditions, mechanical delays, acts of public enemies. war, stnk€S;I:1vil commotion~. or acts or 0111jss1onsof public author1t1es (rnctud1ng customs and quarantine. officials) with actual or apparent.authority. i WE WON'TSE-LIABL-£ IN ANY CASE FOR INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER OR NOT WE KNEW THAT SUCH DAMAGES MIGHT BE INCURRED. -DECLARED VALUE LIMITS The high~t declared value we allow 1s $25,000 per packag~ unless your package contains 1lems of "extraordinary value," in which case the highest declared value we allow 1s $500. Items of "extraordinary. yalue': include artwork. 1ewelr;, furs, money, precious metals, negotiable instru- . men~, and otner itenw listed 1n our current Seiv1ce Guide. - ff you send more than one package on this Airbrll, you may fill in the total declared value for all packages, not to e•ceed $25,000 per package (Example: 5 packages carr have a total declared _\lalue .of up lo $125,000.) However, if more than one package is shipped on this airb1ll, our liability for loss or damage will be limited to the total declared value (not lo exceed $25,COO per packege), regardless of the num- ber of packages lost or damaged. You have the responsibility of proving the actual Joss or damage. · FILING A CLAIM ALL CLAIMS MUST BE MADE BY YOU IN WRITING· • WJJH!N 15 DAYS.AFTER.WEDEUVER YOUR PACKAGE IFYOUR CLAIM RE6UL 'ffi.FROM , SHORTAGE, DAMAGE OR DELAY; OR • WITHIN 180 DAYS AFTER WE ACCEPT YOUR PACKAGE IF YOUR CLAIM RESULTS FROM NON-DELIVERY We'll-consider your claimJi\ed if you call and notify out Custamer5ervice Oepartment at 800/ 238-5355 and notify us in wrrt1ng as soon as-p0ss1ble • , • Within 90 days after you notify us of your cla1m,'You 'l'ust ~end u3all retevanhi atton about 1t. We are not obligated to act on any clair~1 until you have paid all transportation charges, and you may no! deduc1 the amoun! of your clatm from tho,se charges. tt lhe'rec1pient accepts your package w11ho\Jt noting any damage on the delivery record, we will assume that the package was delivered in good condition. In order torus to process your claim, you must. lo the extent possibleT make the original shipping cartons and packing available for ur spection. 1 Claims for overcharges and refunds must be made in writing w1th1n 12 months bf the billrng date. RIGHT TO lfiSPECT We may, at our optmn, open and inspect your packages prror to or after you give them to us to deliver NQ C.O.D. SERVICES• 'I/le don't provide C.0.D. seivi(;es. If YOLtsend a package C.O.D. by.mistake, we'll deliver tpe pa age and bill our charges to the rec1p1ent. RESPONSIBILITY FOR PAYMENT ' Even 1f you give us different payment i~structions 'you will always be pnmanly respohs1ble for all delivery costs, as well as arly costs w'e may incur 1n either returning your package to you or walehOusing ii pending disposition. QUALIFIED ACCEPTANCE We reserve the right to reject a .shipment after acc;eptance and prior to the performance 'of any portion of the transportation seiviC'es, when soi:;h shipment would be likely to cause damage or delay to other shipments, equipment or personnel,'ot 1f the transportatio9 of which Is prohibited by law or is in viola!ion of any rules contained 1n this Airbtll or our Service Guide. FROM (Your Name) COMPANY STREET ADDRESS OVERNIGHT IS NEXT BUSINESS DAY IMONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY); TWO DAYS tlll'IM ALASKA/HAWAII. SATURDAY DELIV- ---··0-"""-TINENT U.S. DEPARTMENT/FLOOR NO STATE Ill I Ill Ill I llll llll llll llll llll llll llll llll lll\ \Ill a: "' > ::; w c II Hold For Pick-Up 0< Saturday Delivery, !;( Aec1p1ent's Phone Number 1\ In te~~rlng lh!st stripmM!s for c~r age the shipper agrees to these TEAMS ANO shipments not acceptable for transportation or shipments acceptable only under C c;oNt>1tlOf\IS 9F CONTRACT. whl¢ :110 aiient or employee of the parties may alter certain cond1t1ons: acts of God, penis of the air, public enemies, public authorities and the! fnjs F9dfrBI Express Corpontfion (FEC) Manifest 1s NO. N-NEGOTIABLE and acting with actual or apparent authonty, authority or law, acts or om1ss1ons of has been PfePhreli' by.him or; on hrS behalf by Federal Express customs or quarantine officials. nots. strikes or other local disputes, civil commo- 2. The shipper agrees that carnage 1s subject to terms and cond1t1ons of contract t1ons, hazards incident to a state of war weather cond1hons or mechanical delay of iStated herein and those terms and condtlions which are also stated in the most re-the aircraft or acts or omissions of any person other than FEC, including com-~ cent Federal Eipress Service Guide, which 1s available for inspection and incor-phance with delivery instructions from the shipper or consignee. FEC shall not be porated into this cor1tract by reference liable for the loss of articles loaded and sealed in packages by the shipper provided 3 In tendering the sh1pments for carnage. THE SHIPPER WARRANTS that the ship-the seal 1s unbroken at the time of delivery and the package retains its basic integri- ments are packi\ged adequately to protect the enclosed goods and to insure safe ty FEDERAL EXPRESS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE IN ANY EVENT FOR ANY SPECIAL, transportation 'with ordinary care and handling. and that each package is ap-INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE$, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO propnately labeled and is in good order (excef>I as noti>d) for carnage as specified LOSS OF PROFITS OR INCOME WHETHER OR NOT FEDERAL EXPRESS HAD 4 When the destination of lhe shipment 1s not within the Federal Express dehv-KNOWLEDGE THAT SUCH DAMAGES MIGHT BE INCURRED. ery area as listed in the most recent Federal Express Service Guide. Federal Ex-CLAIMS WRITTEN NOTICE OF LOSS DUE TO DAMAGE, SHORTAGE OR DELAY press makes no commitment with respect to time of delivery of the shipment MUST BE REPORTED BY THE SHIPPER WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE DELIVERY OF S In the eveRt of international carnage 'of any shipment hereunder. the rules THE SHIPMENT. WRITTEN NOTICE OF tQSS DUE TO NON-DELIVERY MUST BE relating to liability established by the Convention for the Un1f1cat1on of Certain REPORTED BY THE SHIPPER WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF THE Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air signed at Warsaw. Poland on October SHIPMENT OR CARRIAGE. Written notlf1cat1on will be considered to have been made if 12, 1929 shall apply to the carnage insofar as the same ts governed tpereby. the shipper calls and notifies the Customer Services Department at 800/238-5355 (in 6 DECLARED VALUE ANO LIMITATION OF LIABILITY THE i.tABILITY OF FEDERAL Tennessee 800/542-517t) and as soon as practicable there~ter Ides 1•mt1Bn not1f1cat1on EXPRESS IS LIMITED TO THE SUM OF $100.00 PER PACKAGE unless a h1ghervalue 1s Documentation of all claims other than ovel'1:har9e claims must be subm1tled1n wnllng to declared for carriage herein and a greater charge paid at the rate of 30¢ per $100.00 FEC within ninety (90) days after receipt of written notification No claim 'or damage wtJI value In thf case of ft-1 service the ma1e1mum higher declared value rs $5000 00 tn the be entertained unlll all transportation charges have been paid_ The amount of a clairn may case of Courier Pa\. or Standard Air Service the maximum higher declared value 1s not be deducted trom the transportation charges Receipt of the shipment by the $2,000.00 In the case of Overnight L~tter the maximum t11gher declared value 1s $500.00 consignee without written notif1cat1on of damage on the delivery receipt shall be prima Shipments containing items of extraordinary value. including, but not limited to, fac1e evidence that the shipment was delivered in good condition. except that in the case drawings, paintings, sculptures. porcelain, ceramics, furs, 1ewelry. fur trimmed of claims fpr concealed damage which 1s JlOt discovered at the t1mt! of delivery, the clothmg. watches, g~ms. stones, money, bullion. currency, coins. tr•dmg stamps, or other' shipper shall notify FEC m writing as promptly as possible after the discovery thereof and extraordinary ·valuable items. are limited to a maximum declared value of $500.00 In the m any event not later than 15 days from the date of delivery. The shipper must make the case of P-1 service when multiple shipments are placed on a single alrb11t but the shipper original shrpplng cartons and pack1~g ~vailable for inspection by fEC Claims for has not specified the declared value of each md1v1dua1 shipment. the declared value for overcharges and r£funds must be made m wntmg to FEC within t\Nelve (12} months of the each individual shipment will be determined by divip1ng the total declared value on the billing date All claims must ~e filed by the sh1l'per airb11! by the number of shipments indicated on the a1rb1tt. subiect to a $100 00 minimum All shipments are sublect to inspection by FEC. including but not limited to, declared value per ind1v1dual shipment. In the casti of Standard Air Service. when ~he opening the shipment. Howeyer, FEC 1s not obJ1gated to perform such inspection. shipment consists of. two or more pieces. the declared value lo~ each piece will be 9 C 0 D services are not available and a C.010 shipment sent in error will be determlried by div1d1ng the deciared value on the airb11! by the number of pieces in the delivered as a normal pre-paid or collect shipment shipment The ltab11ity of Federal Express 1s limited to the declared value of the shipment 10 Fe'deral Express carries no carg liability tn$urance but maintains a separate or the amount of loss or damage actually sustained whtc!hever 1s lower fund for the satisfaction of cargo claims which may arise out of the carnage of Federal EXpreSs is not ·na"ble for loss;"' damage, delay. mis-dellve,.Y or non-OeHvery cargo pursuant to the cond1t1ons of contract contained herein ~nd in the most re- not caused by its own negligence or any loss, damage. delay. m1s-dehvery or non-c"ent Federal Express Service Guide delivery caused by .the act. default or omission of the shipper, consignee or any _ 11 Notwithstanding the shipper's instructions to the contrary. the shipper shall be other party who clauns interest m .!he shipment the nature ot. the shipment or any primarily liable for all costs and expenses related to the shipment of the packages, defect, characteristic of inherent l/1Ce thereof. v1olat1on by the' shipper or consignee and for costs incurred !fl either returrung the shipments to the shipper or warehous- of any of the conditions of contract containeq 1n this airb1ll or m the Federal Express ing the shipments pending a1sposition Service Guide. including, but not limited to. improper or insufficient packing, secur-1~. Federal Express assumes no respons1bihty for billing disputes resulting from mg marking or addressmg. or 1a1ture tp-observe any of the rUles relating to -inaccuracies m. or omissions from. the Express Manifest