Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParking Lot Plan Secure Care Mini-WarehouseDATE: FACSIMILE ·covER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 #PAGES INCLUDING COVER d 3 If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. DEPARTMENT: --------------------- PHO NE: --------- PHONE: FAX: ----------~~-------- s 4 . tf/{_ .. :, · ~~ r&r '~ oef \ 1 College Station Development Services i I I· I ' ' I l ~ - I: l 1· - SUBDIVISION GULATIONS Revised thru December 1997 "Building a Better City in Partnership with You" -~============================::::=J - l I l ' I I ' I I I I I I I CHAPTER 9 SUBDIVISIONS SECTION 1: AUTHORITY This chapter is adopted under authority of the constitution and laws of the State of Texas, including particular1y Chapter 231, Acts of the 40th Legislature, Regular Session, as heretofore or hereafter amended, compiled as Article 974a, V.A.C.S., the provisions of Section 4 of the Municipal Annexation Act as heretofore or hereafter amended, compiled as Article 970a, V.A.C.S., and pursuant to the provisions of the charter of the City of College Station, Texas. SECTION 1A: FUNCTION OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION In accordance with the authority granted by applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations, the commission shall approve or disapprove plats, subdivisions, and replats of land within the corporate limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City. If a plat confonns to this article, state law, and all other rules and regulations pertaining to the platting of land, the commission shall endorse its approval upon the plat. SECTION 1 B: FUNCTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL In accordance with the authority granted by applicable statutes, ordinances and regulations, the City Council shall be the authority for approving Master Development Plans and Master Preliminary Plats, in accordance wi th section 6-B; requests for oversize participation, as outlined in Section 9; development agreements requesting deferral of specific requirements of this ordinance; abandonment of rights-of-way requests, appeals of variances denied by the Commission, as per Section 5-C.1 and appeals of other items as per Section 5-C.2. (Ordinance No. 2179 of May 9, 1996) SECTION 2: SCOPE AND PURPOSE 2-A This chapter shall govern all subdivisions (see definition of subdivision) of land within the corporate limits of the City of College Station, Texas, and within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City as established by the Municipal Annexation Act. Such area is extended to two (2) miles from the corporate limits surrounding the City of College Station, not a part of any other city, and if by law such distance is changed, this chapter shall apply to and be in confonnity with the distances so approved by law or any amendments thereto. 2-0 The subdivision of land is a major factor in the process of sound community growth and ultimately becomes a public responsibility in that the streets must be maintained and various public services customary to urban areas must be provided. The welfare of the entire community is thereby affected in many important respects. Therefore, it is to the interest of the public, to the developer, and to the future owners, that the subdivisions be conceived, designed, and developed in accordance with sound rules and proper minimum standards. It is in the intent of these regulations to encourage the growth of the City of College Station in an orderly manner. The provisions set forth in this chapter are intended to provide for hannonious development of the area, and are deemed to be the minimum requirements adopted by the City Council for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare . This chapter shall not apply to any lot or lots fanning a part of a subdivision created and recorded prior to the effective date of this chapter, except for purposes of replatting or further subdivision thereof. (Ordinance No. 690 of July 15, 1970) 9-1 Rev. 12197 I I I I I I I I I I I I Preliminary Plat refers to a map indicating the proposed layout of a subdivision meeting the requirements of Section 6.C. Principal Street is a street so designated and indicated in the street regulation section of this Code of Ordinances, Chapter 3, Section 5. Service Line shall mean any line, wire, or cable and appurtenances used to distribute, transmit, or deliver a utility service from a source of supply, feeder line, or lateral line directly to an end user. Shall is always mandatory. Street is a way for vehicular traffic, whether designated as a highway, arterial street, collector street, or residential street. C Subdivider means any person or persons, firm, or corporation subdividing a tract or parcel of t_. land to be sold or otherwise handled for his own personal gain or use. Subdivision means the division of a lot, tract, or parcel of land into two (2) or more parts, lots, or sites, for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of sale, division of ownership or building development. This also includes the resubdivision of land or lots which are a part of a previously recorded subdivision. Divisions of land for agricultural purposes, where no building construction is involved, in parcels of five (5) acres or more, shall not be included within this definition, unless such subdivision o e (~) acres or more includes the lanning or develo ment of ne street ""liilP'!!!i~m!'""N~e~ment. An a Cfition is a sutXfiv1s1on as 1s e 1 · · rem. Surveyor means a licensed state land surveyor or a registered public surveyor, as authorized by the Texas Land Surveyors Registration Act. Utility Easement means an interest in land granted to the City, to the public generally, and/or to a private utility company, for installation or maintenance of utilities across, over, or under private land, together with the right to enter thereon with machines and vehicles as necessary for maintenance of such utilities. Zoning Ordinance refers to the duly enacted zoning ordinance of the City of College Station, Texas, adopted by reference in Chapter 12, Section 2 of this Code of Ordinances. Definitions not expressly prescribed herein are to be construed in accordance with customary usage in municipal planning and engineering practices: · (Ordinance No. 2269 of October 9, 1997) 9-3 Rev. 12197 J I I I I ~ I I I I I I I SECTION 4: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 4-A Plat Required The subdivider of a tract of land located within the limits or in the extratenitorial jurisdiction of the City shall prepare and submit for approval a plat of the subdivision in accordance with Section 6 of this Chapter. 4-B Unapproved Final Plat No building, repair, plumbing, or electrical permit shall be issued by the City for any structure on a lot in a subdivision for which a final plat has not been approved and filed for record. 4-C Noncompliance With Standards No building repair, plumbing or electrical permit shall be issued for any structure on a lot within a subdivision in which the standards contained herein or referred to herein have not been complied with in full. 4-D No City Maintenance The City shall not repair, maintain, install or provide any streets or public utilities or services in any subdivision for which a final plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained herein or referred to herein have not been complied with in full. 4-E No Utility Service The City shall not sell or supply water, gas, electricity, or sewerage within a subdivision for which a final plat has not been approved and filed for record, nor in which the standards contained herein have not been complied with in full. 4-F Enforcement On behalf of the City, the City Attorney shall, when directed by the City Council, institute appropriate action in a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this ordinance or the standards referred to herein with respect to any violation thereof which occurs-within the City, within the extratenitorial jurisdiction of the City, as such jurisdiction is determined under the Municipal Annexation Act, or within any area subject to all or part of the provisions of this ordinance. 4-G Record of Noncompliance If any subdivision exists for which a final plat has not been approved or in which the standards contained herein or referred to herein have not been complied with in full, the City Council shall pass a resolution reciting the fact of such noncompliance or failure to secure final plat approval, and reciting the fact that the provisions of paragraphs 4-B, 4-C, 4-D, and 4-E of this section shall apply to the subdivision and lots therein. (1) (2) The City secretary shall, when directed by the City Council, cause a certified copy of such resolution under the corporate seal of the City to be filed in the Deed Records of the County. If such compliance and final plat approval are secured after the filing of such resolution, the City Secretary shall forthwith file an instrument in the Deed Records of the County stating that Paragraphs 4-B, 4-C, 4-D, and 4-E no longer apply. 4-H Grandfathered ~rovided, however, that the provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit the issuance of permits for any lot or undivided tract or parcel of land upon which a residence exists 9-4 Rev. 12197 I I I I I I I I ' ' l SECTION 6: PROCEDURE AND PLAT REQUIREMENTS 6-A General 6-B 6-A.1 The procedure for review and approval of a subdivision plat generally consists of seven (T) steps. The subdivider may first request a pre-application meeting. The second step is the preparation and submission of a preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision with the appropriate application fonn and impact studies. The third step is the consideration of the preliminary plat by the Pre-Submission Conference staff. The fourth step is the consideration of the preliminary plat by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The fifth step is the application submittal for the final plat with the appropriate application fonn and construction documents. The sixth step is the consideration of the final plat by the Pre-Submission Conference staff. The seventh step is the consideration by the Commission of a final plat together with the required certificates and data. If favorable action has been taken by the Commission, the final plat becomes the instrument to be recorded in the Office of the County Clerk when all requirements have been met. The construction documents when duly signed by the City Engineer are authority to proceed with the construction of streets and utilities. Nothing in the procedure authorizes construction on private property. 6-A.2 Pre-Application Meeting Prior to any application submittal, the subdivider shall have familiarized himself with the subdivision regulations and the Zoning Ordinance, and may request a pre-application meeting. A date and time for the meeting will be during business hours at the City Hall, and held within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the request. The subdivider shall bring to this meeting a City map with the proposed subdivision marked thereon, and information relative to the proposed development. He shall be prepared to discuss its conformity with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Master Development Plan 6-B.1 A master development plan is required for large developments where there are planning issues including but not limited to street locations and sizes, public facility locations, lot layout, park and greenbelt locations, etc. -to be addressed and where there will be subsequent preliminary and or final plats oxurring over a long period of time. All Master Development Plans must be reviewed and approved by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Once a Master Development Plan is approved, the applicant may submit a Master Preliminary Plat covering the entire area included on the Master Development Plan. Developments that will be developed in one phase will not require submission of a Master Development Plan. The applicant shall submit a Preliminary Plat. In cases where there are not major planning issues such as street locations and sized, public facility locations, lot layout, park and greenbelt locations, etc., the Preliminary Plat will require only consideration by the Commission . Any master development plan shall depict the following: / (a) (b) (c) (d) proposed land uses, including but not limited to street rights-of-way; proposed zoning changes; proposed drainage development; proposed public improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools, and other public facilities. 9-7 Rev. 12197 r r (; 6-B.2 Subsequent Preliminary Plats Rev. 1'2197 6-B.2.1 When a master development plan is approved, the subdivider may submit a master preliminary plat covering the entire area shown on the master development plan, and indicate thereon his proposed plan of development by increments. When this master preliminary plat confonns to the approved master development plan, it must be reviewed and approved only by the Commission. Council consideration is not required unless there are requests as specified in Section 1.B. that require Council action. If a master preliminary plat is not submitted, then each individual preliminary plat of an area must be reviewed and approved by the Commission. Each subsequent final plat from an approved master preliminary plat or preliminary plat must be reviewed and approved only by the Commission. In the event that the master preliminary plat differs from the approved master development plan, the master preliminary plat must be approved by both the Commission and the City Council. After approval of this master preliminary plat, the subdivider may submit fractional final plats in accordance with the master preliminary plat by units or areas. Each increment or area must be adjacent to a preceding development or area. A master preliminary plat shall be effective for a period of one (1) year, and may be extended for an additional period of twelve (12) months, upon written request and approval of the Commission. The approval of each increment as a final plat will extend the approval of the master preliminary plat for twelve (12) months. Processing Master Development Plans and Master Preliminary Plats 6-B.3.1 When the master development plan or master preliminary plat is received with subdivider's application for approval and the fee, all copies received shall be dated, stamped, and signed, and one (1) copy returned to the subdivider and immediately distributed to other City departments concerned for their review prior to the Pre-Submission Conference. A Pre-Submission Conference to be held within ten (10) calendar days of the application deadline date will be scheduled and the applicant and all concerned staff notified of such conference. 6-8 .3.2 A copy of the master development plan or master preliminary plat will be forwarded to the Commission with Pre-Submission Conference comments. 6-8 .3.3 The applicant will be advised of the date set for Commission consideration. 6-8.3.4 Within thirty (30) days after the master development plan or master preliminary plat is formally filed with the City, the Commission shall recommend to the City Council whether to approve, disapprove or conditionally approve the plan/plat with modifications. Upon recommendation by the Commission, the plan/plat, minutes or reports, and findings of the Commission shall be forwarded to the Council for consideration where appli- cable. 6-B.3.5 The City Council , where applicable, and within forty-five (45) days after the Commission's <1ction, shall consider i.:ie plan/plat and shall approve or disapprove such plan/plat or conditionally approve such plat with modifications. Following formal action by the Council, the City will transmit to the subdivider one (1) copy of the plat marked "APPROVED" or "CONDITIONALLY APPROVED" with the conditions stated on the plat. Approval or conditional approval will be the authority to proceed with the preparation of the final plat but does not constitute acceptance of the final plat. 6-B.3.6 Approval or conditional approval of a master development plan or master preliminary plat shall be effective for one (1) year from the date of such notice, unless reviewed by the Commission in light of new or significant information 9-8 \ " l I I I I I l I I I I I I I which would necessitate a revision, in which case the Commission shall so infonn the subdivider in writing. 6-8 .3.7 If a final plat is not submitted within one (1) year of the effective date of approval, the Commission may, upon written application of the subdivider, extend the approval for an additional six (6) months. 6-C Preliminary Plat: Rev. 12197 6-C.1 The application date shall be at least twenty (20) calendar days prio r to the meeting of the Commission, at which time the preliminary plat is to be considered. The subdivider shall submit paper copies of the Preliminary Plat, and a mylar copy of the proposed subdivision, drawn to a scale of not less than one hundred feet (1001 per inch. The words "PRELIMINARY PLAT -NOT FOR RECORD" shall appear on the plat in letters 1/2" high. The date the plat was submitted and the dates of any revisions shall legibly appear on the plat. The subdivider shall submit with the Preliminary Plat an application for approval on fonns available in the Planning Department. 6.C.2 An applicant may request oversize participation on any infrastructure, as provided in Section 9 of these regulations. In order to do so, impact studies covering the particular infrastructure must be submitted justifying the request for oversize. These studies shall indicate what size infrastructure is necessary to serve the proposed development as shown on an approved master development plan or master preliminary plat. If the city's comprehensive plan calls for infrastructure in excess of that required for the proposed development, the applicant may request participation for this additional size. 6-C.3 An application fee shall be established by Coun cil resolution from time-to-time. Application fees are not refundable but shall not be required on subsequent submittals of revised plats. 6-C.4 The plat shall be drawn on sheets 24" x 36". When more than one sheet is necessary to accommodate the entire area, an index sheet at appropriate scale showing the entire area, shall be attached. The plat shall be drawn on mylar film positive accompanied by ten (10) paper copies. 6-C.5 The plat shall confonn to the general requirements and minimum standards of Design and Improvements as set forth in Articles Ill and IV, and shall show specifically: 6-C.5.1 6-C.5.2 6-C.5.3 6-C.5.4 6-C.5.5 The name and address of the subdivider, record owner, planner, engineer, and surveyor. The proposed name of the subdivision , which shall not have the spelling as or be pronounced similar to the name of any other subdivision located within Brazos County, Texas. The name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land , and an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted. Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards. Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which, later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers, and similar data shall be refe11·ad . The plat shall be located with respect to a corner of the survey or tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part. 9-9 r . r [ [ [ I r I l l I I I I l I Rev. 12197 6-C.5.8 6-C.5.9 6-C.5.6 6-C.5.7 6-C.5.10 6-C.5.11 6-C.5.12 6-C.5.13 6-C.5.14 Subdivision boundary lines, indicated by heavy lines, and the computed acreage of the subdivision. Existing features as follows: (a) (b) (c) (d) The location, dimension, name and description of all recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements, or other public or private rights-of-way within the subdivision, intersecting or contiguous with its boundaries or forming such boundaries. In the case of pipelines carrying flammable gas or fuel, the approximate location, size of line, design pressure and product transported through the line shall be shown. The location, dimension, description and name of all existing or recorded lots, parks, public areas, permanent structures and other sites within or contiguous with the subdivision. The location, dimensions, description, and flow line of existing watercourses and drainage structures within the subdivision or contiguous thereto. The location of the one hundred (100) year flood according to the most recent best a\-ailable data. Date of preparation, scale in feet, and north arrow. Topographic information, including contours at two foot (2') intervals, flow line elevation of streams, and wooded areas. The location, approximate dimensions, description and name of all pro- posed streets, alleys, drainage structures, parks, or other public areas, reservations, easements, or other rights-of-way, blocks, lots, and other sites within the subdivision. Proposed channel cross sections, if any. Existing and/or proposed well site locations. A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. Location of current city limits line, and current zoning district boundary. Vicinity map at a scale of not less than five hundred feet (500') per inch, which shall show existing subdivisions, streets, easements, right-of-way, parks, and public facilities in the vicinity, and the general drainage plan and ultimate destination of water for a distance of one quarter (1 /4) mile, and possible storm sewer, water, gas, electric, and sanitary sewer connections by arrows. Show number of residential lots. If a change in zoning is contemplated or necessary, the subdivider shall submit a formal request of zoning change as required under the zoning ordinance. Processing the Preliminary Plat 6-C.7.1 When the preliminary plat is received with subdivider's application for approval and the filing fee, all copies received shall be dated, stamped, and signed, and one (1) copy returned to the subdivider and immediately distributed to other City departments co11cemed for their review prior to the Pre-Submission Conference. A Pre-Submission Conference to be held within ten (10) calendar days of the application deadline date will be scheduled and the applicant and all concerned staff ,.,otified of such conference. 9-10 l I I I I I 6-D 6-C.7.2 6-C.7.3 6-C.7.4 6-C.7.5 6-C.7.6 A copy of the preliminary plat will be forwarded to the Commission with Pre-Submission Conference comments. The applicant will be advised of the date set for Commission consideration. Within thirty (30) days after the preliminary plat is formally filed with the City, the Commission shall approve, disapprove or conditionally approve the plat with modifications. Approval or conditional approval of a preliminary plat shall be effective for one (1) year from the date of such notice, unless reviewed by the Commission in the light of new or significant information which would necessitate a revision, in which case the Commission shall so inform the subdivider in writing. If a final plat is not submitted within one (1) year of the effective date of approval, the Commission may, upon written application of the subdivider, extend the approval for an additional six (6) months. General -Final Plats (including replats. minor plats. amending plats) 6-D.1 These plats shall conform to the preliminary plat as approved by the Commission, and if desired by the subdivider, it may be a portion of a master preliminary plat as authorized in 6-B.2 above; provided it incorporates all changes, modifications, corrections, and conditions imposed by the Commission and the Council; and provided further, that it conforms to all requirements of these regulations. 6-D.2 Filing Fees There shall be an application fee as established by Council resolution from time to time for the filing of final plats, amending plats and minor plats. 6-D.3 Time of Filing Ten (10) copies of the plat, together with a film positive thereof, two (2) sets of construction plans and documents, tax payment certificates, and a formal application shall be filed with the City, with the application fee, at least twenty (20) days prior to the (1) meeting of the Commission at which it is to be considered or (2) prior to consideration by the City Engineer, in the case of minor and amending plats. The plat will not be considered unless a preliminary plat has been filed and approved, except in the case of dedication of land for a street, park, school site, or drainage easements. 6-D.4 Form and Content 6-0.4.1 6-0 .4.2 The plat shall be drawn on sheets twenty-four inches (24") by thirty-six inches (36"), on a scale of one hundred feet (1001 to one inch (1 "). Where more than one (1) sheet is required, an index sheet showing the entire subdivision, and drawn to a scale of not less than five hundred feet (500') per inch sh311 be attached. The construction plans shall be drawn on twenty-four inch (24") by thirty-six inch (36") sheets. In addition to the various requirements of the preliminary plat, the final, amending or minor plat shall also include the following , based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers: 6-0.4.2.1 The exact loc<.tion, dimensions, name, and legal description of all existing or recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements, or other rights-of-way within the subdivision, intersecting or contiguous with the boundary or forming such a boundary with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii , 9-11 ~ t I l I I I 6-D.4.3 I I I I I I I 6-D.4.4 I/ I I Rev. 12197 6-D.4.2.2 6-D.4.2.3 6-D.4.2.4 area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance, and length of all curves, where applicable. The exact location, dimensions, description, and name of all proposed streets, alleys, drainage structures, parks, and other public areas, reservations, easements, or other rights-of-way, blocks, lots, and other sites within the subdivision, with accurate dimensions, bearings, or deflection angles and radii, areas, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance, and length of curves, where applicable. Lot comer markers and survey monuments shall be shown clearly by symbol, and clearly tied to basic survey datum. The following ce rtificates, when applicable, shall appear on the face of the plat: (See samples in Appendix A attached.) Certificate of Ownership and Dedication; Certificate of Surveyor and/or Engineer; Certificate of City Engineer; Approval of Commission; and Certificate of the County Clerk. When filed, the plat shall be accompanied by the construction documents as prescribed below, in duplicate, and bearing the seal and signature of a registered professional engineer. All shall be in accordance with city engineering standards. 6-D.4.3.1 6-D.4.3.2 6-0.4.3.3 6-0.4.3.4 6-D.4.3.5 Street, alley, and sidewalk plans, profiles, and sections, with specifications and detail cost estimates. Sanitary sewer plat with two foot (2') contours, plan and profile lines, showing depth and grades, with cost estimates. Water line plat showing fire hydrants, valves, etc., with specifications and a detailed cost estimate. This may be combined with 6-0.4.3.2. Storm drainage system plat with two foot (2') contours, street lines, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels with profiles and sections, and showing drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on five (5), ten (10), and twenty-five (25) year rain intensity. Detail drainage structure design and channel lining design if used, with specifications and detail cost estimate. Street lighting plan showing location of lights, design, and with specifications and detail cost estimate. When filed, the final plat shall also be accompanied by certificates from all taxing agencies showing payment of all ad valorem taxes on the land within the subdivision. 9-12 r I t l I ' I I l I I 6-D.5 Processing the Final Plat, Amending Plat or Minor Plat 6-0.5.1 6-D.5.2 6-D.5.3 6-D.5.4 When the final plat, together with the accompanying data, filing fee, and the application for approval is received by the City Planner, it will be handled in the same manner and under the same time schedule as prescribed in Section 6C above for a preliminary plat. Within thirty (30) days after the final plat is formally filed, the Commission shall approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve such plat. Within twenty (20) days after an amending or minor plat is formally filed, the City Engineer, or his designee, and the City Planner, or his designee, shall approve such plat or notify the applicant that consideration of the plat will be forwarded to the Commission. The Commission shall approve, disapprove or conditionally approve the plat within thirty (30) days of the City Engineer's decision and notification to the applicant. A report shall be made to the Commission at each meeting notifying the Commission of any new minor or amending plats that were approved by the City Engineer since the last Commission meeting. The same report shall be forwarded to the Council through the Office of the City Manager. After conditional approval of a plat, the subdivider shall notify the City Engineer within ten (1 O) days as to the construction procedure he proposes to follow. He shall follow one (1 ) of the following procedures: 6-0 .5.4.1 The subdivider may proceed with construction of streets, alleys, sidewalks, and utilities that he is required to install, in which case the City will inspect the work as it progresses, and upon completion and final acceptance, and upon written request of the subdivider, the final plat will be approved and filed for record with the County Clerk. The subdivider shall pay the record filing fee. ----7 6-0.5.4.2 -The subdivider may elect to file a "guarantee of performance" as provided in Section 7, in which case the guarantee of performance shall be filed with the City Secretary, together with a request that the plat be filed for record. In this case, the final plat will be approved and filed with the County Clerk. The subdivider shall pay the record filing fee. The City will inspect the construction work as it progresses and will make the final inspection to assure compliance with City requirements. 6-D.5.5 (Ordinance No. 2179 of May 9, 1996) Rev. 12197 Upon completion of construction, the subdivider shall deliver to the City a one (1) year guarantee of workmanship and materials as provided in Section 7. 9-13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. I SECTION 7: GUARANTEE OF PERFORMANCE 7-B If the subdivider elects to construct the required improvements prior to recording of the plat, after such plat has been approved, all such construction shall be inspected while in progress, by the City Engineering department, and must be approved upon completion by the City Engineer. A certificate by the City Engineer that the construction conforms to the plans and specifications and the standards contained in or referred to herein must be presented to the commission prior to approval of the final plat. If the subdivider decides or elects to file security in lieu of completing construction prior to final plat approval, he may utilize one (1) of the following methods of posting security. If the sub- divider elects to file security, the plat shall not be approved unless the subdivider has done one (1) of the following: 7-B.1 Performance Bond Has filed with the commission a bond executed by a surety company holding a license to do business in the State of Texas, and acceptable to the City of College Station on a form approved by the City, in an amount of the improvements as estimated by the City Engineer. The performance bond shall be approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney; or 7-B.2 Trust Agreement Has placed on deposit in a bank or trust company in the name of the City, and approved by the City, in a trust account, a sum of money equal to the estimated cost of all improvements required by this chapter, the cost and the time of completion as estimated by the City Engineer; selection of the trustee shall be subject to approval by the city and the trust agreement shall be executed on the form provided by the city and approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney. Periodic withdrawals may be made from the trust account for a progress payment of installation costs. The amount of withdrawals shall be based upon progress work estimates approved by the City Engineer. All such withdrawals shall be approved by the trustee; or 7-B.3 Unconditional Guarantee from Local Bank or Local Savings & Loan Association or Other Financial Institution as Approved by the City of College Station Has filed with the commission a letter, in a form approved by the city, signed by a principal officer of a local bank, local savings and loan association, or other financial institution, acceptable to the city, agreeing to pay to the City of College Station, on demand, a stipulated sum of money to apply to the estimated cost of installation of all improvements for which the subdivider is responsible under this chapter. The guaranteed payment sum shall be the estimated costs and scheduling as prepared by the subdivider's engineer and approved by the City Engineer. The letter shall state the name of the subdivision and shall list the improvements which the subdivider is required to provide. 7-C If one (1) of the three (3) types of security is filed by the subdivider under paragraph 7-8 of this section, the City Engineer shall inspect the construction of improvements while in progress, and, shall inspect such improvements upon completion of construction. After final inspection, he shall notify the subdivider and the City Attorney in writing as to its acceptance or rejection. He shall reject such construction only if it fails to comply with the standards and specifications contained or referred to herein. If he rejects such construction, the City Attorney shall, on direction of the City Council, proceed to enforce the guarantees provided in this chapter. 7-D When good cause exists, the City Engineer may extend the period of time for completion under paragraph 7-B of this section. Such extension of time shall be reported to the Commission and recorded in the minutes. No such extension shall be granted unless security, as provided in said paragraph 7-B, has been provided by the subdivider covering the extended period of time. 9-14 Rev. 12197 I I I ' SECTION 8: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND MINIMUM STANDARDS OF DESIGN 8-A Community Assets In all subdivisions, due regard shall be shown for all natural features such as trees, watercourses, historical spots, and similar community assets, which, when preserved, will add attractiveness and value to the property. 8-B Suitability of Lands 8-D 8-E The Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if, from adequate investigations conducted by all public agencies concerned, it has been determined that in the best interest of the public, the site is not suitable for platting and development purposes of the kind proposed. Land subject to flooding and land deemed to be topographically unsuitable shall not be platted for residential occupancy, nor for such other uses as may increase danger to health, life, or property, or aggravate erosion or flood hazard. Such land within the piat shall be set aside for such uses as shall not be endangered by periodic or occasional inundation or shall not produce unsatisfactory living conditions. Large Tracts or Parcels Zoning and Other Regulations No plat of land within the force and effect of an existing zoning ordinance shall be approved unless it conforms to such zoning or other pertinent regulations. Reserved Strips Prohibited There shall be no reserved strips controlling access to land dedicated or intended to be dedicated to the public. l t -F Standards All construction on streets, alleys, or easements shall be designed and constructed in Ill accordance with City Engineering standa s an specifications, and in particular regard for the Ill: street regulation section. I I I I, I I Streets 8-G.1 Street Layout Adequate streets shall be provided by the subdivider such that the arrangement, character, extent, width, and grade of each shall conform to the comprehensive plan of the city and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to the topographical conditions, to the public safety and convenience, and to their appropriate relationship to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets. 8-G.2 Relation to Adjoining Street Systems Where necessary to the neighborhood pattern, existing streets in adjacent or adjoining areas shall be continued, in alignment therewith. Where adjoining areas are not subdivided, the arrangement of streets in the subdivision shall make provision for the proper projection of streets into such areas. 9-16 Rev. 12/97 I I I I I I J I I 8-G.3 Street Jogs Whenever possible, street jogs with center-line offsets of less than one hundred twenty-five feet (1251 shall be avoided. 8-G.4 Half Streets No half streets shall be platted. 8-G.5 Dead-end Streets Dead-end streets shall be prohibited except short stubs to permit extension. Temporary turnarounds may be required. 8-<;3.6 Cul-de-Sacs Cul-de-sacs shall not exceed six hundred feet (6001 in length to radius point, and shall terminate in a turnaround not less than one hundred feet (1001 in diameter, with a pavement diameter of eighty feet (80). 8-G.7 Street Intersections Acute angles between streets at their intersections are to be avoided. (Ordinance No. 1971 of August 27; 1992) 8-G.8 Principal Streets on Master Plan Where subdivision embraces a principal street as shown on the master plan of the city, such street shall be platted to maintain continuity in the approximate location as shown, and of the type indicated. In certain cases the city may have constructed a street through the area to be subdivided, in which case the subdivider shall develop the necessary street intersections at his expense, in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. The Planning Commission may require that, where practical, residential lots adjacent to arterial and collector be platted or restricted so as to prevent driveways opening into such streets. 8-G.9 Minor Streets Minor streets shall be laid out to discourage their use of through traffic. 8-G.10 Geometric Standards. Street Design Criteria Design Criteria for Urban and Rural streets are shown in Table 1, Street Design Criteria. The cross sections for each of the different street types generally reflect the criteria set forth in Table 1. Refer to street regulation section for other requirements. 9-17 Rev. 12197 ~v TABLE I -STREET DESIGN CRITE~ Criteria Residential Collector ,,,,,-=~,--. Arterial Alley I Urban' I Rural Rural I Minor (Major )Minor I Minor I Major ./ (undiv.) (div.) (div.) ROW' 24' 50 ' 70' 80' 60' ~ ~ 90' 90' 120' Pavement Width' 20' 27' 24' 30' 38' 48' or 54' 70' 70' or 74' 94' Traffic Lanes ,., 2 2 2 2 3 or4 5 4 6 L Lane Width 10' 12' 12' 15' 11' or 13' 11'116'q 11116'4 11/16'4 11116'4 Shoulder Width NIA NIA 2@ 2 @2'1ea. NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA 2'1ea. Continuous Two-Way Left none none none none none permitted required none none Turn Lane (width} (12') (16') Parking none permitted none none permitted none none none none (limited) wlo bike lanes Median none none none none none none none 16' 18' Min. Grade .6% .6% .6% .6% .6% .6% .6% .6% .6% Max. Grade 8% 8% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% Min. Horz. Radius (center 200 ' 200' 200'. 400' 400' 500' 850' 850' 1,050' line) Min. Tangent between O' O' O' 75' 100' 100' 100' 100' 250' curves Sidewalks~ none one-side none none both both both both both Desirn Sneed <moh)° 30 30 30 30 30 35 40 40 45 Bike Lanes NIA NIA NIA NIA permitted permitted NIA permitted permitted ,..-(limited) Volume Range (vehicles/day) 200 to 1000 100 to 1000 to 1000 to 5000 5000 to 10,000 to 10,000 to 20,000 to 45,000 Guideline 1000 5000 10 000 20.000 25.000 1 Residential streets may be designated as either "through" or "internal" (see definitions) 2 Right-of-way width listed herein is a minimum, additional right-of~way or easements may be required. 3 Pavement width is measured from back of curb to back of curb. For payments with shoulders, the pavement width does not include the shoulder width. 4 Wider lanes required on outside lanes only. 5 There are no sidewalks required on rural residential streets or rural collectors that are wholly contained within the subdivision. (See Subsection 12-N. Sidewalks). 6 For "internal" residential streets, the design speed may be reduced. Thismay allow for a smaller horizontal radius. Advisory signage will be required by the developer. 9-18 Rev. 12/97 ~ I I RURAL COLLECTOR eo· 23' 3~· 23' 2' IS' IS' 2' T~ 0 t 0 t ~ lliRU SKll...ICR ~ MINOR COLLECTOR > ci « u· 8' \_SIOCVALK 11' ll' rnRU .0 38' OR 11' 0 ~ CFEN DITCH/ ~·I St.OP£ Ho.Xlnut'I 11' 8' SIOCVALK/ u· > d <i 7' 12' 12' 7' BIKE rnRU 0 0 THRU ALK MAJOR COLLECTOR l) 70' 5~· 16' U' 11' llRU llRU 0 0 0 rnRU ~SIOCVALK OR 70' 11' ~e· r I u· I 12' I BIKEI 1lRU I CCVLT I 0 ~SIOCVALK BIKE SJ:OCVAl..J( / 16' 0 llRU SIOCVALK7 II' I 7' 0 IBIKE llRU SIOCVALK/ 8' 11' ci o2 > ci a1 ci o2 STANDARD STREET CROSS -SECTIONS 9-20 Rev. 12197 I I I I I I ·~ I I I I I I I The m~nimum width of a one-dire~ional bicycle path is five feet (51. It should be recognized, however, that one-way bicycle paths often will be used as two-way facilities unless effectiye measures are taken to. assure one-way operation. Without such enforcement, it should be assumed that bicycle paths will be used as two-way facilities and designed accordingly. A minimum of two-foot width graded area should be maintained adjacent to both sides of the pavement; however, three feet. (31 or more is desirable to provide clearance from trees, poles, walls, fences, guard rails, or other lateral obstructions. A wider graded area on either side of the bicycle path can serve as a separate jogging path. The vertical clearance to obstructions should be a minimum of eight feet (81. However, vertical clearance may need to be greater to permit passage of maintenance vehicles and, in under crossings and tunnels, a clearance of ten feet (101 is desirable. 8-0 Water Supply 8-0.1 All subdivisions shall be provided with water supply and distribution systems for fire protection and domestic use. The design of which shall be approved and enforced by the City Engineer in accordance with applicable city, state and federal statutes, codes, City of College Station construction specifications and acceptable engineering practice. 8-0.2 Public fire hydrants of City of College Station standard design shall be installed as a part of the water distribution system in accordance with applicable city codes. 8-P Sanitary Sewers 8-P .1 All subdivisions shall be provided with an approved sanitary sew"!rage system, meeting the standards of the City Engineering department. Curved sewers of not less than one hundred foot (1001 radius are accepted, manholes of not over five hundred foot (5001 spacing. 8-P .2 If the sewerage system includes treatment facilities, the plan must be approved by the Texas State Department of Health, and subdivider must have a permit for the discharge of effluent from the Texas Water Quality Board, before the approval by the commission. (Ordinance No. 1971 of August 27, 1992) 8-P .3 On-site waste water disposal syste:ns, including private septic systems, may be used in areas where topography, density of development and/or other factors make sewer collection facilities impractical. Such systems, when allowed, must meet the requirements of Brazos County. (Ordinance No. 2131 of June 21, 1995) 8-Q Drainage Drainage shall be provided to handle runoff as calculated, street inlets for a five (5) year rain, storm sewers for a five (5) year rain, and bridges for a twenty-five (25) year rain, all as approved by the City Engineer. Water shall not be carried on the street for a distance greater than a five (5) year rain will overflow the cum. Drainage shall be handled in natural stream channels insofar as practical. No constructio11 shall impede, constrict, or block the flow of water in any natural or improved watercourse. 8-R Utility Lines All utility lines that pass under streets or alleys shall be installed before the street or alley is paved, with embedment, backfill, and depths as approved by the City Engineer, or the crossing shall be bored. Rev. 12197 9-30 I I I I I I I I I I SECTION 9: RESPONSIBILITY FOR PAYMENT FOR INSTALLATION COSTS General 9-8 Streets Subject to statutory restrictions and approval of the City Council, the City may enter into a development agreement agreeing to participate in the cost of thoroughfares where the width required by the City is in excess of those requirements specified in Section 8-G.10. and agreeing to participate in the extra cost according to the following guidelines: 9-8.1 The proposed thoroughfare and right-of-way, necessary for it must be located inside the city limits of the City of College Station at the time the construction of the streets is to begin. 9-8.2 The plans and specifications for the construction of the proposed thoroughfare must have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer of the City of College Station. 9-8.3 The street must meet the criteria described in the City's "Future Land Use Plan", as follows: 9-8.3.1 A Principal arterial located and designed to provide a direct traffic route over fairly long distances within the metropolitan area. It is intended that traffic volumes be relatively high, but speeds are high enough only to ensure smooth flow. Access controls are provided only at major traffic junctures with traffic controls located at most intersections. Frontage is either limited or controlled by use of service road . Texas Avenue and University Drive are examples of principal arterials. 9-8.3.2 A minor arterial located and designed to serve the high volume traffic needs of the local area. These routes are continuous through the commµnity, and should connect with similar thoroughfares in adjacent cities. Access is con- trolled through placement of entering streets, driveway prohibitions, medians, left-tum lanes, and signalization. Holleman Drive and Southwest Parkway are examples of minor arterials. 9-8.4 A preliminary request for oversize participation, based upon an engineer's estimate for the project, must be presented to the City Council prior to the beginning of con- struction. Upon approval of a preliminary request, funds will be encumbered through a purchase order, with the total not to exceed the City's share plus a ten percent (10%) contingency for participation in the approved project. Council approval and participation shall be contingent and subject to commencement within one (1) year of Council approval and completion of the thoroughfare by the date so designated by the Council. If construction of an approved project is not either begun within one (1) year of Council approval, or completed by the date designated by the Council, then Council approval shall be automatically revoked, the funds will be returned to the oversize street fund and will be available for the next request. After the street has been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, payment may be requested. Payment will be contingent upon the City's receipt of a deed for the land and improvements, an updated title report, and lien subordinations from all lenders. The cost of the City's participation shall not increase more than ten percent (10%) over the amount calculated using the engineer's estimate. 9-8.5 The City's participation shall be limited to a percentage of construction costs and the Rev. 12/97 actual value of the undeveloped land in excess of that required for the thor-oughfare as established by an appraisal prepared by a MAI appraiser approved by the City 9-37 l I I I ' Right-of-Way Agent, which appraisal is acceptable to the City Right-of-Way Agent. The cost of the appraisal shall be borne by the subdivider. 9-B.6 At the time of the preliminary request, the City Council reserves the right to evaluate the overall economic benefit of the thoroughfare to the City. The City Council may elect not to participate or it may elect to limit participation. 9-B. 7 The City's participation will be limited to a maximum of thirty percent (30%) of the engineer's estimate u1less the Council agrees otherwise and the project is placed out to public bid. 9-C Water Supply Subject to the statutory requirements and the approval of the City Council, the City may enter into a development agreement agreeing to participate in the cost of water pipelines according to the following guidelines: 9-C.1 A determination must be made by the City Engineer that the additional capacity is necessary for serving areas beyond the limits of the area established by the subdi- vider's master development plan. But however, in no event will the City participate in the cost of a waterline of a diameter of eight inches (8") or less. 9-C.2 The proposed waterlin e must be located inside the city limits of the City of College Station at the time the construction of the waterline begins. 9-C.3 The plans and specifications for the construction of the waterline must have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer of the City of College Station. 9-C.4 The waterline must be new. 9-C.5 A preliminary request for oversize participation based upon an engineer's estimate for the project must be presented to the City Council prior to beginning construction. Upon approval of a preliminary request, funds will be encumbered through a purchase order with the total not to exceed the City's share plus a ten percent (10%) contingency for participation in the approved project. Council approval and participation shall be contingent and subject to commencement within one (1) year if so designated by the Council. If construction of an approved project has not begun within one (1) year of Council approval, or completed by the date designated by the Council, then Council approval shall be automatically revoked, the funds will be rc•umed to the oversize waterline participation fund and will be available for the next rectuest. After the water line has been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, payment may be requested. Payment will be contingent upon the City's receipt of a deed for the land and improvements, an updated title report, and lien subordinations from all lenders. The cost of the City's participation shall not increase more than ten percent (10%) over the amount calculated using the engineer's estimate. 9-C.6 The City's participation will be limited to a percentage of construction costs only. 9-C. 7 At the time of the preliminary request, the City Council reserves the right to evaluate the overall economic benefit of the waterline to the City. The City Council may P.lect not to participate or it may elect to limit participation. 9-C.8 The City's participation will be limited to a maximum of thirty percent (30%) of the engineer's estimate unless the Council agrees otherwise and the project is placed out to public bid. 9-0 Sanitary Sewers Subject to statutory requirements and the approval of the City Council, the City may enter into a development agreement agreeing to participate in the cost of sanitary sewer lines according to the following guidelines: 9-38 Rev. 12197 I · I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I A detennination must be made by the City Engineer that additional capacity and/or depth is necessary for serving areas beyond the limits of the area established by the subdivider's master development plan. But however, in no event will the City participate in the cost of a sewertine of a diameter of eight inches (81 or less. 9-D.2 The proposed sanitary sewertine must be located inside the city limits of the City of College Station at the time construction of the sanitary sewertine begins. 9-D.3 The plans and specifications for the construction of the sanitary sewerline must have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer of the City of College Station. 9-D.4 The proposed sanitary sewerline must be new. 9-D.5 A preliminary request for oversize participation based upon an engineer's estimate for the project must be presented to the City Council prior to beginning construction. Upon approval of a preliminary request, the funds will be encumbered through a purchase order with the total not to exceed the City's share plus a ten percent (10%) contingency for participation in the approved project. Council approval and participation shall be contingent and subject to commencement within one (1) year of Council approval and completion of the thoroughfare by the date so designated by the Council. If construction of an approved project is not either begun within one (1) year of Council approval, or completed by the date designated by the Council, then Council approval shall be automatically revoked, the funds will be returned to the oversize sewerline fund and will be available for the next request. After the sewerline has been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, payment may be requested. Payment will be contingent upon the City's receipt of a deed for the land and improvements, an updated title report, and lien subordinations from all lenders. The cost of the City's participation shall not increase more than ten percent (10%) over the amount calculated using the engineer's estimate. 9-D.6 The City's participation shall be limited to a percentage of construction costs only. 9-D.7 At the time of the preliminary request, the City Coun cil reserves the right to evaluate the overall economic benefit of the proposed sewerline to the City. The City Council may elect to not participate or it may elect to limit participation. 9-D.8 The City's participation will be limited to a maximum of thirty percent (30%) of the engineer's estimate unless the Council agrees otherwise and the project is placed out to public bid. (Ordinance No. 1816 of July 27, 1989) Bridges/Culverts The subdivider shall, at his own cost, dedicate all rights-of-way and construct all drainage facilities according to the Drainage Policy and Design Standards of the City of College Station. When, in order to comply with the Drainage Policy and Design Standards, it is necessary to install bridges with hyd raulic capacity in excess of that required to serve the area being developed, the developer shall construct such oversize structures. The City may participate in the cost of overs ize bridge structures according to the following guidelines: 9-E.1 The proposed bridge or culvert must be located inside the city limits of the City of College Station at the time construction of the bridge or culvert begins. 9-E.2 The plans and specifications for the construction of the bridge or culvert must have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer of the City of College Station. 9-E.3 The proposed bridge or culvert must be on a new street. The street must meet the criteria described in the City's "Future Land Use Plan" for a major or minor arterial. The bridge or culvert must either have a span greater than twenty feet (20') or have 9-39 Rev. 12197 an open end area greater than two hundred square feet (200 sq. ft.). Considered in the cost will be the bridge or culvert structure itself, headwalls and wingwalls. 9-E.4 A preliminary request for oversize bridge and culvert participation based on an engineer's estimate for the project must be presented to the City Council prior to beginning construction. Upon approval of a preliminary request, funds will be encumbered through a purchase order with the total not to exceed the City's share plus a ten percent (10%) contingency for participation in the approved project. Council approval and participation shall be contingent and subject to commencement within one (I) year of Council approval and completion of the thoroughfare by the date so designated by the Council. If construction of an approved project has not begun within one (I) year, of Council approval, or completed by the date designated by the Council then Council approval shall be automatically revoked, the funds will be returned to the oversize bridge fund and will be available for the next request. After the bridge or culvert has been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, payment may be requested. Payment will be contingent upon the City's receipt of a deed for the land and improvements, an updated title report, and lien subordinations from all lenders. The cost of the City's participation shall not increase more than ten percent (10%) over the amount calculated using the engineer's estimate. 9-E.5 The City's participation shall be limited to a percentage of construction costs only. 9-E.6 At the time of the preliminary request, the City Council reserves the right to evaluate the overall economic benefit of the proposed bridge or culvert to the City. The City Council may elect not to participate or it may elect to limit participation. 9-E. 7 The City's participation will be based on the percent hydraulic capacity required in excess of the capacity needed to serve property owned or controlled by the developer. The amount of participation by the City shall be limited to a maximum of thirty percent (30%) of the cost of the bridge. No other participation payment shall be made on the same request. (Ordinance No. 1882 of February 14, 1991) 9-F Electric Service Costs 9-F.1. The Subdivider shall pay twenty percent (20%) of the cost of installation, including labor, materials and standard fee percentages for engineering and overtlead costs for underground electric service. The actual cost shall be calculated by the City. All costs shall be paid prior to the commencement of construction. (Ordinance No. 2020 of July 8, 1993) 9-F.2. In the case of rural residential subdivisions served by the City of College Station, if overhead electrical is provided there will be no cost to the subdivider. In the case where the subdivider requests underground electrical, he shall pay forty percent (40%) of the cost of installation, including labor, materials and standard fee percentages for engineering and overhead costs for underground electric service. The actual cost shall be calculated by the City. All costs shall be paid prior to the commencement of construction . (Ordinance No. 2188 of June 27, 1996) 9-G Street Lights The developer shall pay the entire cost of the subdivision street light installation, including the cost of service lines to supply electricity to the street lights, and all engineering design costs. Once satisfactorily installed, approved, and accepted, the maintenance of the street lights and the furnishing of electric energy to the street lights shall be provided by the City. (Ordinance No. 1985 of November 12, 1992) 9-40 Rev. 12197 r I Street Signs The City will install street signs at no cost to the subdivider. 9-1 Engineering The City will charge for engineering inspection during construction and for final inspection as established by Council resolution from time to time; however, it is to be understood that the City will do no layout wor1< or daily inspection. (Ordinance No. 1816 of July 27, 19891 9-1.2 The City may require compaction tests on embankments and flexible bases, and depth tests on flexible bases and pavments, and pressure tests on piping systems, before final inspection and approval. Charges for such inspection shall be as established by Council resolution from time to time. (Ordinance No. 2037 of October 28, 1993 9-41 Rev. 12197 02 /12/99 13 :05 '5'409 764 3496 DEVELUP.MhNT ::i vlJ;:i TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX 0. CONNECTION TEL CO ECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTI VITY REPORT *** *************************** 6498 18063725086pp152 02 /12 12:57 08 '39 23 OK FOR OF~~ U~ ONLY CASE NO. -~q DATE SUBMIITED U II SITE PLAN APPLICATION I DRESS GAL DESCRJPTION I 'PLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): Name ~#Ai ~6 • Street Address r~o6 ~~-f Ae1-2 .ft~ ~s-~. //o() City c~(G~"°DI Ck,&A-Do ~II/ I State UL,,4{?o Zip Code ~0/1/ E-Mail Address __________ _ Pl:one Number {30:;) t. f?-.("" /70 Fax N,1mber(;3e>3) ZC. S -foo C .CHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name c~£6=T7 G &{;;,,.; tt=-/2; A.JC City -&cce=wo oD E-Mail Address ------------- Fax Number {303) Zf>S-;jo,,£ Street Address S4<Kf? W ,rG:£. U&c '9cw7 ., #oy City +~~YJr-...L.A'-'-~------ State tfl. Zip Code 7 1KtJ z E-Mail Address I ----------- Phone Number ( 01) Yy:t -c 6' FF' Fax Number ( c/ tYt) '6f< C-3 D 9 ~ HER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.) Name ~,4,,J &C Street Address (:)'EF kt>v€=") City FdteWOQJ> State ~6 r~ Zip Code foll/ E-Mail Address __________ _ Phone Number(:?">)~ 9 7 -.Y7o Fax Number (303)ze:L-7l)o ( ,. .. CUR.RENT zo. 1.~ .. ??ESENT VA r I The app/i hel'efo ar. ltu~ an co; J.....J• a.+o l:lHl"(l"(t I I tNl:ilNEERING ... 13032659006 [il02 ,-I , I ,. .... . .. / / / / --- 1. Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum) SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 10 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW 2. Title block to include: 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. (ii/ Name, address, location, and legal description ~ Name, address, and telephone number of applicant GY" Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs fro m applicant) ~ Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer C!r" Date of submittal ~ Total site area Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. A key map (not necessarily to scale). Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Provide north arrow. Existing locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Streets and sidewalks Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961) Buildings Water courses Show all easements clearly designating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.) 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note ifthere is none on the site. Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings. Meter locations Topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) 8. Proposed location, type and size of the following.: ;V/!l /fr 1vf ;vfe, CJ CJ CJ CJ Building and structures Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn tabulated, and dimensioned. Sidewalks Common open spaces sites CK.DOC 02/03/99 ] ·O • Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (minimum 12 x 12 pad required). (;_ %1 ST;~ -ftt-G~f'Jf't'All~'D ,JA-~ ~i'5J 0 p~rP,J ~ Loading docks Gates Handicap parking spaces Detention ponds Medians Guard rails tJlfr ~ Retaining walls All required and other types offences (a 6' privacy fence is required between industrial/commercial and residential developments as well as between multi-family and single family developments) Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same opposite side of the street to determine separation distances be1.ween existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) f'/.1S1', ~ Meter locations (must be located in public r.o.w. or public utility easement.) 9. ,.. sf;rJC, 0 Proposed grading (l' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Show dimensions to size and locate all : czl Structures ~ Parking spaces 0 Drives !2:f Curb cuts CT Parking Islands 0 Setbacks. Show building setbacks ~s outlined in Ordinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Section 7, P 30.) 10. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. i/j.Sf;,J~ ] v 11. Minimum parking space is 9' x 20', or on a perimeter row 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. 12. 1 13. { 14. ~~,Yf!,.6 ? ,)ofeP Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang is onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. Minimum drive aisle width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking." 1:\group\dev_serv\forrns\planning\spreq l· I O 15. Ra\.sed landscape islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to the end island maybe applied toward the required 180 sq. ft.). Additionally, 180 sq. ft. oflandscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces ~ ,Jr> must be provided. All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers, or '}"~ 11 stamped dyed concrete or other decorative materials as approved. (? O 16. A twenty four foot setback from r.o.w. to curb of parking lot is required. Pavement may s11 µ{11 encroach into this 24' reserve by up to 113 4 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be (j''I-' met. In no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line. 0 17. jA r>fst rf '1'1' I ~;. J ".:;tj 0 18. Mir 0 19. 0 20. J/~ 0 21. DY ~~2. !V/e~ d' 23. 0 1 24. I s1'~is . f} r:i 4'~ 6. ~f Landscape plans as required in Section,11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance# 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 required point calculations additional streetscape points required proposed new plantings with points earned proposed locations of new plantings screening of parking lots existing landscaping to remain show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. (see application) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demands submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. Streetscape compliance is required and all streets larger then a residential street. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. (see application) The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. (see application). Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued. o:\group\dev _ serv\forms\planning\spreq .. . ' . . . O 17. ' Fi•e Department connections should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any further than 300' apart . .) (., ii. ~1Jt~ 0 28. Fire lanes a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be t;1l ,J9 established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or (f'f-pavement edge of a public street or highway. 0 32 . ~/ All FDC' s shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Rev1ew Committee detennines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Are there impact fees associated with this development? o:\group\dev _ serv\forms\planning\spreq .. ·ca e ce/f ~ora e 1 Inc. 1 ulte iOO RO 1 COLLEGE STATION P. 0 . Box 9960 Monday, July 12, 1999 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. do Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP 3400 Plaza VII 45 South Seventh Streel Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 1101 Texas Avenue Tef. 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 RE: Status of the property located at 4014-4018 Texas Avenue South in College Station (the "Premises") Ladies and Gentlemen: 'This is to advise you that [ have recently become aware of certain violations pertaining to site plan. subdivision, and building permit requirements that were unknown to me at the time I wrote you the letter dated February l, 1999, a copy of which is attached. With this letter, please take notice that the City of College Station intends to pursue these matters in order to bring the property into compliance. These measures may include code enforcement and withholding further building permits on the entire tract and on the parent tract. ·My previous letter regarding the subject property is hereby void. At the time this property changed hands, it was split from a larger parent tract without compliance with the City of College Station Subdivision Regulations. This fact became apparent to me only after I had written the attached letter, when the surveyor for the property called me with questions relating to "D/;Y/' property lines. I informed the surveyor and several other representatives involved in the transaction that the property should not change hands without complying with the Subdivision Regulations, and that the City's policy with respect to subdivision violations is to withhold future permits. On June 11, 1999, SecurCare Self-storage, Inc., applied for site plan approval to replace a gravel parking lot on the property with an asphalt lot. The information submitted at that time reveals that the front 5.79 acres were in fact divided from the parent tract. The tract under SecurCare's ownership as well as the remainder tract are therefore in violation of the City of College Station Subdivision Regulations, and no permits or approvals will be issued without an approved preliminary and final plat of any and all portions of the parent tract. During the review of the site plan, the review staff noted that the site layout fur the front portion of the property, which is essentially an "as-built" survey, does not match the site plan that was approved in 1996. The office building increased significantly in size from the approved site plan. This change would require review of a revised site plan. To date, no revised plan has been submitted for review. The City of College Station intends to request that the current owner submit a revised site plan for review and to comply with any additional site changes that may be required as a result of the changes. The review staff also researched the Building Department records this site to determine the building sizes that were permitted. We found that one of the storage buildings, addressed as "Building A" l:\GROUP\DEVE SER\BINE\40 l 4-l 8texas.doc -Home of Texas A&M University never received a Certificate of Occupancy. The records indicate that this building did not pass its last inspection, and no further inspections were called in after the building was given a red tag. Building "C", the office building, was issued a temporary Certificate of Occupancy with several conditions. The conditions were not complied with and the Certificate of Occupancy has expired (see attached copy of temporary C.0.). The City also intends to pursue these matters with the current owner to pring the buildings into compliance. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please give me a call. lbankyou. sm~d)IL{~ Sabine McCully Senior Planner cc: Alan Westfall, SecureCare Self Storage, Inc. 8400 E. Prentice Avenue, Suite 1100 Englewood, CO 80111 John S. Irwin, Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP Fax (806)372-5086 Lance Simms, Building Official Jon Mies, Fire Marshal File # 99-429 and 95-406 l:\GROUP\DEVE _ SER\B!NE\40 l 4-l 8texas.doc .. '1 ;;: .i. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE S. COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 • C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F 0 r C U P A N C Y OWNER'S NAME: NEATHERLIN HOMES ADDRESS : TEXAS AVEN UE SOUTH, 4014 BLDG C PERMIT #:9601173 : PROJECT: NEA,.THERL IN OFF I CE BLDG . . . LOT: BLOCK: · SUBDIVISION:~OBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE I HAVE EXAMINED THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION · AND DO HEREBY CEf.~TIFY THAT .THE ABOVE DESCRIBED :LAND MAY BE OCCUPIED IN ACtdRDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS FOR -ZONING D1STRI CT AS PER DRD.JNANCE NO. 1638 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES, EXCEPTIONS OP SPE:CIAL REQUIREMENTS AS FOLLOWS:_ 1) prf~r to e.1e~trlc~~-p-l~<;e4-l~ operation an app(oved KNOX key switch ~hai1 be In p1aGe as neted-on-awrov~-t-t.e;Han; 2) .lftl llty easeme_n·t document.s--must be. e ment.s-dedk-ated-te-die-t+t~efore * _JQ_/ 7-Z-I ..:J.fe_ DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS BUILDING HAS BEEN tNSPECTED AND THAT IT 1 CAN BE USED AS GROUP B -BUSINESS , GROUP . B OCCUPANCY CLA~SIFICATION AS DEFINED BY THE STANDARD BUILDING CODE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW I NG SPECIFIC REQU I R.EMENTS: ___ ..__ ______ _ -------------------c------------------------· /a)(_< ·. d~~ _tZ I :Jc-I I '<f~, DATE -C BUILPINciVfJITICIALf ' --- * the City wl 11 accept the lnfrastracture; 3) Ex, sting hadd.lcap ramp exceeds maximum slope of 1/12 and the handlc~p graH bars must be Installed In bathroom. ***THESE CORRECTIONS HUST BE HADE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS*** .. ~ . . : . ·,"' I I ., •. ·:' .-. . . . ., r ·. , ....... Monday, February 1, 1999 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. c/o Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP 3400 Plaza VII 45 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 RE: Status ofthe property located at 4014-4018 Texas Avenue South in College Station (the "Premises") Ladies and Gentlemen: This is to advise you that the wning and use of the above-captioned Premises are governed by the laws and regulations, including oil and gas regulations, of the City of College Station, and the Premises have been wned C-1 General Commercial, which lists mini-storage warehouses as a use by right. A valid certificate of occupancy was issued to the project at the time it was constructed and inspected, signifying that the buildings and improvements on the Premises complied with all building and wning codes that were in force at that time. A portion of the Premises was developed before the Premises were annexed into the City, and certificates of occupancy were therefore not required or issued. It is not necessary for a new purchaser or owner to obtain a new certificate of occupancy in order to continue its current use. Due to the age of a portion of the project, development nonconformities such as parking and landscaping are likely to exist. In the event of any damage or destruction to any portion of the building or improvements located on the Premises, such buildings may be rebuilt, repaired, and restored to current conditions, including any wning nonconformities, without conforming to the current wning code requirements. The portion of the property that was recently built is in compliance with all wning regulations. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please give me a call. Thank you. Sincerely, Sabine McCully Senior Planner cc: Alan Westfall, SecureCare Self Storage, Inc. 8400 E. Prentice Avenue, Suite 1100 Englewood, co 80111 John S. Irwin, Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP Fax (806)372-5086 . --SaJirLL~ 1d!I4 ·1/;df_qq ------_lt_)Jo_ ~ _wjfJU± ~t[)}(__d Pf-l_ f ~ am;J-tl/J?d tdf _-prnil<mA a/-/J -------- ·-- -- -- ------ .....__ . - ·- ---- --- ------ --- --- . ·--· - ---- ·~ ------ ·---------~ ---- ----.. ----.. -· --- ------------ .. ----------_ _,... ___ --------. -----·- July 16, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COLLEGE STATION P. 0 . Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM John King, via fax (303) 265-9006 <tff, 11 Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinat~Jr SecurCare Mini-Warehouse (SH6) -Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Also, during the review of this project, violations were found pertaining to the site plan, subdivision, and building permit requirements. Documents pertaining to this are attached for your information. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: __ Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments Letter to Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. from Sabine McCully dated 7 /12/99 Letter to Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. from Sabine McCully dated 2/1/99 Certificate of Occupancy dated October 22, 1996 cc: SecurCare Self-Storage, Inc., via fax (303) 265-9006 Garrett Engineering, via fax (409) 846-3094 Case file #99-429 Home of Texas A&M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.1 Project: Securecare -HWY6 Site Plan will not be approved until the property is properly platted or proof of legal nonconforming status is provided. See attached letter. 1 . Are you also asking for approval to the changes to the front portion of the property that do not match the site plan that was approved in Feb. 1996? (ex. the original office building footprint was rectangular and 640sf.) If you do not want the front portion to come under review, at this time, then draw in a phase line at a minimum of 20 feet from any of the new improvements, and either remove the information to the east of the phase line or state that only Phase xx is being submitted for review. At some point in the near future, a revised plan for the front portion must be submitted. See attached letter. 2. Correct the title block once the property is legally subdivided. 3. State year of FEMA map referenced. 4. Mini-warehouse space does not have a parking requirement. 5. Submit Drainage report. Also, Need spot elevations and direction of flow to determine if concentration of water and subsequent release meets ordinance. 6. Need paving and curbing specs. 7. Portion of drive from existing concrete to the access easement needs to be designated and designed as a fire lane. 8. All circulation aisles need to be a minimum of 20ft. 9. Provide description of surrounding uses, esp. if single family, so that the possible need for screening/fencing purposes may be determined. 1 O. Provide landscaping legend, including point calculations, irrigation and barricade plans. 11. Issues regarding the access easement will be addressed at the time of platting. 12. Upon inspection of the property it was found that the area to the south of the storage buildings is currently being used as boat/trailer storage. If that use is to continue, label the area as such and provide proof that the use is legally nonconforming. Reviewed by: Jessica Jimmerson Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 06/23/99 COLLEGE STATION P. 0. Box 9960 Monday, July 12, 1999 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. do Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP 3400 Plaza VII 45 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 1101 Texas Avenue Tet. 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 RE: Status of the property located at 40 14-4018 Texas Avenue South in Coll ege Station (the "Premises") Ladies and Gentlemen: This is to advise you that I have recently become aware of certain violations pertaining to site plan, subdivision, and building permit requirements that were unknown to me at the time I wrote you the letter elated February l, 1999, a copy of which is attached. With this letter, please take notice that the City of College Station intends to pursue these matters in order to bring the property into compliance. These measures may include code enforcement and withholding further building pennits on the entire tract and on the parent tract. ·My previous letter regarding the subject property is hereby void. At the time this property changed hands, it was split from a larger parent tract without compliance with the City of College Station Subdivision Regulations. This fact became apparent to me only after I had written the attached letter, when the surveyor for the property called me with questions relating to "new" property lines. I infonned the surveyor and several other representatives involved in the transaction that the property should not change hands without complying with the Subdivision Regulations, and that the City's policy with respect to subdivision violations is to withhold future permits. On June 11, 1999, SecurCa.re Self-storage, Inc., applied for site plan approval to replace a gravel parking lot on the property with an asphalt lot. The infonnation submitted at that time reveals that the front 5. 79 acres were in fact divided from the parent tract. The tract under SecurCare's ownership as well as the remainder tract are therefore in violation of the City of College Station Subdivision Regulations, and no pennits or approvals will be issued without an approved preliminary and final plat of any and all portions of the parent tract. During the review of the site plan, the review staff noted that the site layout for the front portion of the property, which is essentially an "as-built" survey, does not match the site plan that was approved in 1996. The office building increased significantly in size from the approved site plan. This change would require review of a revised site plan. To date, no revised plan has been submitted for review. The City of College Station intends to request that the current owner submit a revised site plan for review and to comply with any additional site changes that may be required as a result of the changes. The review staff also researched the Building Department records this site to determine the building sizes that were pennitted. We found that one of the storage buildings, addressed as "Building A" l:\GROUP\DEVE SER\BINE\4014-l 8texas.doc -Home of Texas A&M University never received a Certificate of Occupancy. The records indicate that this building did not pass its last inspection, and no further inspections were called in after the building was given a red tag. Building "C", the office building, was issued a temporary Certificate of Occupancy with several conditions. The conditions were not complied with and the Certificate of Occupancy has expired (see attached copy of temporary C.0.). The City also intends to pursue these matters with the current owner to bring the buildings into compliance. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please give me a call. Thank you. s~OJI[{~ Sabine McCully Senior Planner cc: Alan Westfall, SecureCare Self Storage, Inc. 8400 E. Prentice Avenue, Suite 1100 Englewood, CO 80111 John S. Irwin, Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP Fax (806)372-5086 Lance Simms, Building Official Jon Mies, Fire Marshal File # 99-429 and 95-406 I:\GROUPIDEVE _ SER\BINE\40 l 4-l 8texas.doc Monday, February 1, 1999 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. c/o Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP 3400 Plaz.a VII 45 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 RE: Status of the property located at 4014-4018 Texas Avenue South in College Station (the "Premises") Ladies and Gentlemen: This is to advise you that the zoning and use of the above-captioned Premises are governed by the laws and regulations, including oil and gas regulations, of the City of College Station, and the Premises have been zoned C-1 General Commercial, which lists mini-storage warehouses as a use by right. A valid certificate of occupancy was issued to the project at the time it was constructed and inspected, signifying that the buildings and improvements on the Premises complied with all building and zoning codes that were in force at that time. A portion of the Premises was developed before the Premises were annexed into the City, and certificates of occupancy were therefore not required or issued. It is not necessary for a new purchaser or owner to obtain a new certificate of occupancy in order to continue its current use. Due to the age of a portion of the project, development nonconformities such as parking and landscaping are likely to exist. In the event of any damage or destruction to any portion of the building or improvements located on the Premises, such buildings may be rebuilt, repaired, and restored to current conditions, including any zoning nonconformities, without conforming to the current zoning code requirements. The portion of the property that was recently built is in compliance with all zoning regulations. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please give me a call. Thank you. Sincerely, Sabine McCully Senior Planner cc: Alan Westfall, SecureCare Self Storage, Inc. 8400 E. Prentice Avenue, Suite 1100 Englewood, CO 80111 John S. Irwin, Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP Fax (806)372-5086 ,,,.., :- ; . . -~ .. .,,-,...t•" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE S. r -~ -l COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 • C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F 0 C C U P A N C Y OWNER'S NAME: NEATHER LIN HOMES ADDRESS: TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 4014 .BLbG C PERMIT #:9601 173 · PROJECT: NEA,..THEF~L IN OFF I CE BLDG LOT: BLOCK: · SUBDIV ISION:~OBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE I HAVE EXAMINED THE OFFICIAL ZO NING MAP OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STAT I ON AND DO HEREBY C:Ef.~TI FY THAT .THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND MAY BE OCCUP I ED I N ACCOR DANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS FOR ·ZONING DISTRICT _ AS PER ORDINANCE NO. 1638 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING .vAkIANCES, EXCEPT IONS or SPECIAL REQUI P:EMENTS AS FOLLOWS: .. 1) PdO-f:-.to e1ectr-k-g.a~-p-1-ate-O-i-R.ro­ .operatlon an approved KNOX-ke.y..-sw.l-tch ·shat 1 be IR plaGe as Rot-ed-en--app-roved--s-f··t~fah; 2;~1:•~:1eo~tRt doc""8Rt~st,b•-e~ eo:~~~fle~~efore • DATE · . <Ze~~AU I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS BUILDING HAS BEEN !NSPECTED AND THAT I T CAN BE US ED AS GROUP B -BUSINESS , GROUP B OCCUPAN CY CLASSI FICATI ON AS DEFINED BY THE STANDARD BUILDING CODE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT S : ---------------------·-----------·--------------·----- '/} ' _t'Z / __ .Jc--! /_ ·/0 . DATE ·' ~l ' . *th~· City will accept the lnfrastrocture; 3) Ex,stlng hadd.lcap ramp exceeds maximum slope of 1/12 and the handlcpp graH bars must be Installed In bathroom. ***THESE CORRECTIONS HUST BE MADE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS*** , . . '"\. ' , . . ' . • ol ,.-• ·. , ....... .,. 07/16/99 1U:4o TRAN SMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 8388 913032659006pp161 07/16 10:44 02 '04 6 OK V//.lOl :H1 .lV ; iJV TRA SMISSION OK TX /RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 8389 07/16 10 :47 02 '52 6 OK 98463094 'e:J VV..L U I I '"' VV .L I •''-' ... "!:UV I U"t: V"t:VU u n 'nLvr H1.n1, J. o 'vo TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNE CTION TEL CO ECTION ID START TIME USAGE THIE PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVI TY REPORT *** *************************** 8536 913032659006ppl61 07/29 17:24 00 '58 2 OK ~VV.1. FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 DATE: _{__;,.____---""'-3.::....D _~ --"-1 ---'-'-#PAGES INCLUDING COVER ~ If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: ------"'~~.L....1...--~-...L....>---+---------------- COMPANY: ____________________ ~ DEPARTMENT=----------------~---­ PHONE: PG '. 30~ -~3 b -~ 337-FAX: 3D-:3 ~ a&5 -CZooro REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review D Reply ASAP D Please Comment GARRETT ENGINE~RtNG Description ((?~ z; M: ~e--f'Jrf·wq J5~1%~.AJ c;-~e~ D~ ~tJ.1-.J-t9ZJ . --S:Jm?/'uJ :1:._-o\~ -!tl? ----==y.ff~"!t-~-~~~~~~~~~~L \ LO/? -- ~ 49 - - By: = ~~ © ~ o .. m ~ ~1 LJLJ OCT O 5 190 0 w By @D .· Ri:a:ivc:U Dy:----------- , .... .. '·J ' . .... ~ ' : ; .. .. , ! _..;.., l. ~ ' ... '' ' . .. ' ·. . ' '. CONSUL TING ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 4444 CARTER CREEK PKWY, SUITE 108 BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 (409) 846-2688 (409) 846-3094 City of College Station, Texas Development SeJVices Department College Station, Texas 77842 AITENTION: Ms. Sabine McCully October 5, 1999 Re: Revised and/or Updated As-Built Site Plan of Mini-Warehouse Site@ 4014 S. Texas Ave. (S.H. No . 6)-0ld Neatherlin Mini Warehouse Site, now owned by SecurCare Self Storage, Inc. Dear Ms.McCully: On behalf of our client, SecurCare Self Storage, Inc. and Mr. John King, III, P.E., Director of Development for our client, please accept this letter with the enclosed attachments as our submittal of the existing as/built and updated site plan for the above-referenced location, as requested by the City. This, as we understand, was requested by the City of College Station of SecurCare Self Storage, Inc. and was to serve be placed in your file to replace the old site plan as previously submitted by Patterson Architects on behalf of Neatherlin Mini- Warehouse Storage Company (City of College Station File No. 94-406). I believe you have been in contact with Mr. King via correspondence and you requested that he file an updated/revised as built as soon as possible to clear up any confusion on this matter and provide him clearance on the site as to the improvements as they exist and as they were acquired. Mr. King contacted us and contracted our services in providing the City with this updated as built and it is our intention to fulfill his request and his obligation to you and to his lender with this submittal. Anything you could do to expedite processing of this material and of informing him and his lender-Lehman Brothers, Inc., c/o Oppenheimer, Wolf & Donnelly LLP, 3400 Plaza VII, 45 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-of this submittal this date and of their compliance for this submittal with the City's request would be greatly appreciated by all parties Involved. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please give me a call@ (409)-846-2688. Thank you very much for your lime and consideration. Altachrnenls: 5 sels of As-Buill cc:Mr. John King, III, P.E. Director of Development SecurCare Self Storage, Inc. 8400 Easl Prentice Ave, Suite 1100 Englewood, Colo. cc:Presidenl SecurCare Self Storage, Inc. 8400 East Prentice Ave, Suile 1100 Englewood, Colo. cc:Lehman Brothers. Inc. c/o Oppenheimer, Wolf & Donnelly LLP 3400 Plaza VII, 45 South Seventh Slreel Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Sincerely yours, v;;i!J,iL,JU P. B. (Sonny) Garcia Engineering/Survey Tech. Garrett Engineering sg-C:\DRAW1NG\TXT\SCRNTCCS.DOC 2 I. ~~~~!~~~irJi&.J~i~9.n ~ f~yi~~-~p(J~fau .· .••••..•.•.. ·.··•·•···············•·····•········ ••.••• ••·•·•·•·········•·• .••••• • .• •••·····•·•·•·•·····•·•··· .·.·.· .. · .••••.••.•••.••.•.•. ·.·.·.·.· u..... uuu···· •.•••.••.• u w .. ·.·.·.· u . .·.·.·.·.··•·•·····•·•·•·····•·•·•·····•·· e~9~UI. I From: To: Date: Subject: Sabine Mccully Bridgette George 11/3/99 3:54PM review update christian science easement question -please pass the following on to christian galindo -the staff has in the past requested easements at the time of site plan to cover existing public utilities if there are no easements. we are using the authority under section 1 O of the zoning ordinance, subsection c, which requires that a site plan provide efficient access to public utilities. also, regarding the securecare plan - i am going to wait until jess gets back and then fill her in on the level of detail she nees to review the plan. we will not end up with an approvable site plan, i don't think. what we'll have is an as-built survey and a corresponding letter that points out what is not in compliance, and declare we will not take enforcement action at this time, or something along those lines. but some additional information will be required of the applicants. all they need to know at this time is that we are waiting until the reviewing staff is back in town. after that, we will get them a list of the additional information we will need. oreilly -they have been calling me and ed about the driveway comment. they are trying to decide whether they'll ask for a variance, whether they will try to remove the access easement, or whether they will move the drive into the access easement. i told them a variance would be difficult due to the proximitiy of the proposed drive to the access easement. removing the access easement would need to go to pnz and they will have to prove to the pnz that they are meeting the driveway ordinance and not creating a problem with the replat. they are trying to decide and will get back with me. until then i will wait to finish the comments. thanks. CC: Edwin Hard; Jessica Jimmerson; Scott Hester From: To: Date: Subject: Sabine McCully Amber Kelly; Bridgette George 11/15/9910:37AM Re : John King 303-836-3332 -pgr ok -this is the last of my long list of emails -now i get to listen to all my voice mail! jess, here's what jane and i decided to do with this one: we will not end up with an "approved" site plan. we will treat this one as a survey for a closing and end up with a "lender'' letter that 1) describes the nonconformities, 2) states that we will not take enforcement action and 3) gives options for legitimizing the nonconformities (ie. redoing site or asking for variances). i don't expect you to write the letter - i will write it. but i do need you to id the nonconformities. if you have problems doing so due to incomplete information, jot them down and we'll ask garrett for the info. thanks. »>Bridgette George 11/15/99 10:29AM >>> FYI ... in case he calls again ... I'm waiting to get with Jessica and Sabine regarding some problems with the site. I'm leaving at noon today, so I may not get with him until tomorrow. Thanks! >»Amber Kelly 11/15/99 10:19AM >>> re : neatherlin storage rm . Please let me know when you page him. Thanks. CC: Jane Kee ; Jessica Jimmerson; Jim Callaway Law Offtces of Bradlq K Benson, PU£ April 11 , 2000 VIA FACSIMILE ( 409-764-3496) AND FIRST CLASS MAIL: Sabine McCully Senior Planner City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 2532 Dahlia Street Denver, Colorado 80207 Phone: 303-875-8561 Fax: 303-333-3242 E-mail: bkbpllc@uswest.net Re: Pending approvals for property located at 4014-4018 Texas Ave. South, College Station Our File No: S163.015 Dear Ms. McCully: I represent SecurCare Self Storage ("SecurCare"). SecurCare is the current owner of the self storage facility located at the property referenced above (the "Property"). As you know, SecurCare purchased the Property in February of 1999 from a partnership group headed by Kenneth Netherlin, which owners previously operated the Property as "A-Netherlin Storage". SecurCare advises me that your office refuses to act in response to SecurCare's corrective work and submittals performed in direct response to your letters dated February 1, 1999 (the "First Letter") and July 12, 1999 (the "Second Letter"). I have reviewed the First and Second Letters and now write in the hope of cooperatively resolving the matters discussed therein. To begin, you know that SecurCare obtained third-party financing from a division of Lehman Brothers (''Lender") when it purchased the Property in 1999, as evidenced by the fact your First Letter was written to Lehman's Minneapolis counsel. Accordingly, you know that both SecurCare and its Lender relied upon your First Letter in executing loan documents underlying SecurCare's purchase of the Property. Specifically, SecurCare and the Lender relied on your written First Letter statements that: 1) the Property is in compliance with all zoning regulations (both the original and recently completed portions), 2) no new certificates of occupancy would be necessary for SecurCare to continue the existing use of the Property, and 3) pre-existing nonconformities would not have to be brought into compliance with current zoning requirements, even in the event of damage or destruction to any portion of the Property. Turning to the Second Letter, I am puzzled by the City's lack ofresponse to SecurCare's compliance measures. Assuming, for the sake of discussion only, that the Second Letter could effectively "void" the First Letter after the parties' reliance described above, the City's delivery • Page2 April 13, 2000 of the Second Letter to SecurCare's lender, and subsequent inaction and continuing delay in refusing to approve SecurCare's resulting corrective work, constitutes gross negligence and/or willful misconduct by the City. After noting that the City newly intends to enforce previously "unknown" violations at the Property, the Second Letter outlines three areas for SecurCare's required compliance. The first appears at paragraph two of the Second Letter, stating that SecurCare's June 11 , 1999 application for approval to replace a gravel parking lot with asphalt paving cannot be approved without proper subdivision and platting of the parent and sale parcels. Accordingly, SecurCare has withdrawn its paving application, confirmed by this letter, with the understanding for the first time that any such improvements requiring permits or approvals from the City will hereafter be contingent upon an approved subdivision and platting of the two parcels. The Second Letter next raises the issue of the Property's office building being larger than as submitted by the previous owners and approved by the planning staff back in 1996. Although this defect is plainly unrelated to any actions of SecurCare, the letter instructs SecurCare, as "current owner", to submit a revised site plan for approval for review, comment and approval by your staff of the existing office building. In a clear spirit of cooperation, SecurCare's engineer, John King, accordingly prepared and submitted such a revised site plan in approximately October, 1999. Despite SecurCare's good faith, however, your office has ignored Mr. King's repeated contacts and correspondence to facilitate approval of the revised plan, ultimately prompting SecurCare's involvement of this firm. Thirdly, the Second Letter states that noncompliant aspects of buildings "A" and "C", again resulting from the prior owner's failures, not from any duty of SecurCare, must be remedied before the City will issue final certificates of occupancy for those buildings. I understand from SecurCare's Vice President of Operation, Dave Cramer, that building "A" required only a larger character "A" be attached to help identify the building, and that building "C" required modification of two handicap improvements (reduction of the wheel chair access ramp slope and installation of handicap grip bars in the bathroom). All of said requests have now been completed by SecurCare, thereby bringing the Property into compliance with all of the newly imposed City requirements. I believe you would agree the City and SecurCare should resolve these matters by amicable means. Please follow-up with the appropriate personnel in your office to review and approve SecurCare's corrective measures described above, with a following letter from you to the Lender and to SecurCare approving the submitted site plan and confirming that the Property is now in compliance with all roning and improvement requirements of the City. Please call me if you have any questions (303-875-8561). Thank you in advance. Cc: Justin Hlibichuk/John King v~ l~ey K Benson, E:: Additional Information Required for Staff to Make Determination of Compliance SecureCare Mini-warehouse (99-429) 1. Dimension from property line to nearest portion of office parking. 2. Indicate the westerly limit of the approved plan. F:.amif . + 3. Once limit of approved plan is shown, it can be determined where the five trees down the middle of the property lie and if they count toward landscaping requirements fo~r the front portion. ,,. ~ 4. Provide coon o the.shmDliecy, creening· ·ire office par · :kz ~ (;}-;,\~\ \~_\ f) o 5. Landscaping appears to be short by at least 1000 points. ( 1.-{ \ 6. Show development phase line as on approved plan. _ .o ~l\,(J 7. Show parKing layoutb office. Dimensions of spaces including handicap. (oi-\ 8. Correct the parking analysis. Correct ratio for the office space is 1 :250. None is required for mini-storage warehouses. 9. Dimension the sidewalks and ramps by the office. 10. What is the date of the FEMA map referred to? ~'@ 11 . Remove references to "grandfather tract". i -~((:'. 12. Are the fire hydrant and water meter within a public utility easement? ~ f $ l3 .ls the fire hydrant in a median, or is it unprotected? ~ ( 14. How does the front gate/fire hydrant are · teract? By: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 4/17 /00 COLLEGE STATION P. 0. Box 9960 Tuesday, April 25, 2000 Mr. Bradley K. Benson, PLLC 2532 Dahlia Street Denver, CO 80207 1101 Texas Avenue Tet. 409 764 3500 VIA FACSIMILE (303) 333-3242 AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Dear Mr. Benson: College Station, TX 77842 I am in receipt of your letter dated April 11, 2000, and would like to clarify a few points. It seems that you are under the impression that the City is conducting site plan review and that the outcome of that process will be an approved, amended site plan for the subject property. Please understand that the "property" to which you refer is not recognized by the City as an individual parcel because it was illegally subdivided from the parent tract at some point in the recent past. The City cannot approve a site plan until all development requirements, including Subdivision Regulations, have been met. Therefore, the City is proceeding with the review of the as-built survey as part of an on- going review and investigation of potential site elements that are not in compliance with the development regulations. Our goal is to either 1) attain compliance with all development requirements (zoning, subdivision, site plan, building codes, etc.) or 2) identify any remaining ordinance violations that will need to be satisfied before any further City approvals will be possible. Please also understand that the Staffs priorities in our department are current development review and special area plans. Your client's case does not fit within these two types of work, and Staff time can only be devoted to the case when we are not short- handed. However, despite these and other circumstances, we have recently taken several steps in regards to this case. We have prepared a list of additional information we need added to the survey to make the determinations listed in the above paragraph. Also, we have conducted an on-site inspection so that the additional inform;ition needed is kept to a minimum. This list will be sent to the applicant within the next few days. Once the information is complete, your client may expect a letter outlining the items that have been satisfied and those that have not, along with any implications that may arise out of noncompliance. I would also like to inform you that I had conversations with your client's representatives after my letter of February 1, 1999 but before the property closing. In these Home of Texas A&M Univers ity conversations, I relayed that I had become aware of the possibility that your clients may be purchasing a piece of property without approval of a subdivision plat. It is my understanding that the closing proceeded nonetheless. If you are in need to further clarification, please let me know. Th~yo~, 1 \ . ~ ~/{A,p Sabine Kuenzel, AICP Senior Planner Cc: John King 04/25/00 13:25 ·o·4ul:I to4 ;j4l:lo Un Y r..LUr.1!1.n!, .1. av \ .. n.7 TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START THIE USAGE THIE PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 1803 13033333242pp161 BKBpllc 04/25 13:24 00'47 2 OK FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P. 0 . Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 Fax (979) 764-3496 DATE: 5 -~D -00 #PAGES INCLUDING COVER ~ If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: 13r-a..d\t-v\ ~on COMPANY: --------------------- DEPARTMENT: ---------------JC--~------- P HO NE: 3 b '3 -[1S -<t Se \ REMARKS: 0 Urgent 0 For your review 0 Reply ASAP 0 Please Comment 2~: ~WALCv_xe__ ~ -VJ au.1-LtJUJJ.JL. Additional Information Required for Staff to Make Determination of Compliance SecureCare Mini-warehouse (99-429) 1. Dimension from property line to nearest portion of office parking. 2. Indicate the westerly limit of the approved plan and the C-1 zoneline. 3. Once limit of approved plan is shown, it can be determined where the five trees down the middle of the property lie and if they count toward landscaping requirements for the front portion. 4. Landscaping appears to be short by at least 1000 points. 5. Show development phase line as on approved plan. 6. Correct the parking analysis. Correct ratio for the office space is 1 :250. None is required for mini-storage warehouses. 7. Dimension the sidewalks and ramps by the office. 8. What is the date of the FEMA map referred to? 9. Remove references to "grandfather tract". 10. Are the fire hydrant and water meter within a public utility easement? By: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 4/20/00 05130100 18:23 -•0•4u~ 7 t54 34!Hi TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO. CO NECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 2385 032972750pppl61 05/30 18:22 00 '39 2 OK "E:J VV.&. FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: 5 -3b -OO CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 Fax (979) 764-3496 #PAGES INCLUDING COVER .;:(. If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: OhVl I~ COMPANY: --------------------- DE PAR T~NT: PHONE:(/ o3J~Cf1-S (10 PHONE: jJ j -7(p ~ -3S7D FAX: REMARKS: 0 Urgent 0 For your review 0 Reply ASAP 0 Please Comment 7'Q : ~~ ~lJJ~6UALL Additional Information Required for Staff to Make Determination of Compliance SecureCare Mini-warehouse (99-429) l . Dimension from property line to nearest portion of office parking. 2. Indicate the westerly limit of the approved plan and the C-1 zoneline. 3. Once limit of approved plan is shown, it can be determined where the five trees down the middle of the property lie and if they count toward landscaping requirements for the front portion. 4. Landscaping appears to be short by at least 1000 points. 5. Show development phase line as on approved plan. 6. Correct the parking analysis. Correct ratio for the office space is 1 :250. None is required for mini-storage warehouses. 7. Dimension the sidewalks and ramps by the office. 8. What is the date of the FEMA map referred to? 9. Remove references to "grandfather tract". 10. Are the fire hydrant and water meter within a public utility easement? By: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 4/20/00 05/30/00 18:21 .. ' • '0'409 704 J4!H5 TRA SMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 2384 032659006ppp161 05 /30 18:21 00 '46 2 OK 't!:J VV.L c E R T I F I C A T E D F 0 r C U P A N C Y OWNER'S NAME: NEATHERLIN SELF STORAGE ADDRESS: TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH~ 4014 BLDG 8 PF:OJECT: PERMIT #:9601 0 5 8 LDT: BLOCK: SUBOIVISION:ROBERt STEVENSON LEAGUE I HAV E EXAMINED THE OFFICIAL ZONING hAP OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION f.'ll'ID DO HEF.:EBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABO'·JE DESCF:::IBED LP1ND M0.Y BE OCCLIF'I ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISTRICT REGULATION FOR DISTRICT 13F.:O UF' B ···· BUS I NESS DI STF: I CT, DPD HJ ?-1 NCE NO. 1638 BL.JBJECT TD THE f-TJl _LOW I NC:i VA!? I ANCES, EXCEF'T IONS OR SP!:::C I Al_ f.~E~QU I PEMENTS: ····--·-·--------·---·- I HEF:EBY CEF'.T I FY THAT TH IS BU I LD I 1\11:3 H{'.)3 BEEN Ji'.!SF'ECTED AND TH~Y!" I T C0N BE USED AS GROUP D -BUSINESS , GROUP B OCCUPAN CY CLASS IFICATION AS DEFI NED BY THE STANDARD BUILDING CODE SUBJECT TO Tl IE 1=-m .Lm.J I Nl~j SPECIF I c PEQU I PEMEi\!TS: ~--·---·-----;J-------·-_:_-·------·---·--· .... --··-· ----·---···--------·--· ____ · --7) ···-----' ·----------·--·--·--·~~~·-z--·· -__ e__ / .... 2. __ Q_ _ _; ___ 9y_ --·----~ !__~~-!_--~-------·--~·-·-------···~-····-· DATE 'BUILDI~I Ct AL' ~ ~ D u ~ ~ D 1. 2. 3. ~ if -Q-- g/ ~ @ 4. 5. 6. 7. ~ D ~ SUBMIT APPLICATIO AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 10 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). A key map (not necessarily to scale). Title block to include: Name, address, location, and legal description Name, address, and telephone number of applicant Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) Date of submittal Total site area North arrow. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Ownership an~8J,11g1t<@.nw 2f..~ and all abutting parcels. Existing locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Streets and sidewalks (R.0.W.). Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961). Buildings. __:::J~:::::--v1rater courses. Show all easements clearly designating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.). 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. Meter locations. ~t-o ~ ~0-~? ..i-w~ ~ Topography (2 ' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) D 8. Proposed location, type and dimensions of the following.: Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. O Setbacks. Show building setbacks as outlined in Ordinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, (Section 7, Table A). O Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. Minimum parking space is 9' x 20', or on a perimeter row 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. 0 Handicap parking spaces. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 10/25/99 1 of3 D D D D D ~ D D D D D D D -~ D NOTE: D 9. D 10. Parking Islands. Raised landscape islands, (6" raised curb) a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are required at both ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to the end island maybe applied toward the required 180 sq. ft.). Additionally, 180 sq. ft. oflandscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers, or stamped dyed concrete or other decorative materials as approved. Drives. Minimum drive aisle width is 23 ' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. Curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate drivewa throat len h as measured in the Drivewa Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) Security gates (show swing path and design specs with colors). Sidewalks (both public and private). Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or ifthe review staff determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). Medians. Show any and all traffic medians to be constructed on site. Landscape Reserve. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Pavement may encroach into this 24' reserve by up to 1134 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be met. In no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line. Common open spaces sites Loading docks Detention ponds Guardrails Retaining walls All required and other types of fences (a 6 ' privacy fence is required between industrial/commercial and residential developments as well as between multi-family and single family developments). Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.) Show all easements clearly designating as proposed and type (utility, access, etc.). If dedicated by separate instrument list by volume and page. Utilities (noting size and designate as proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings. Meter locations (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement.). Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 , R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. Show fire lanes. Fire lanes a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued. Will building be sprinkled? Yes D No D If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.OOC 10/25/99 2 of3 D D D D D D D D D 11. Show curb and pavement detail. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". Landscape plans as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance# 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: D required point calculations D additional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets larger than a residential street. D calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points.) D proposed new plantings with points earned D proposed locations of new plantings D screening of parking lots D screening of dumpsters, detention ponds, transformers, A/C units, loading docks, propane tanks, utility demarcation point on buildings, or other areas potentially visually offensive. D existing landscaping to remain D show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. 13. 14. 15 . 16. 17. 18. 19. 20 . Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.0.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demands submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W .? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be any utilities in TxDOT RO.W. ? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be access from a TxDOT RO.W.? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Yes D No D Yes D No D Yes D No D The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes D No D NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECKDOC 10/25/99 3 of3 I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I ~ ! I I I I I i I I I I l I . I I I I ~ I I · I · I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I ~ I I ! I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I { • ' I ! I r-~ I ~~' I I r I I I I I I w : iC~1 I I I I I I ' ,' I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I 1 l~: I I I I I ;.' l I ;~ I I I . .. I I I I I I I I I I I . I , I I I I I I I I :~ I N I I I I I 1 I I I I I l ~ I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I ;...__ I - I I I I I I 11 I \.,\' I I ~I! I I I I I I ~ ! I I I 1\ I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I i I I \I ·~' I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I l I I I I I \ I :' 1 I I I ' I I I I \ 1 -~ I I I I I I l I I I I I I I \ i ~ ~ 11 I I I I j I I I I I I l I 'l, I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I 'i I I I I " I I ... I I I I I f l' ' STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.1 Project: Securecare -HWY6 Site Plan will not be approved until the property is properly platted or proof of legal nonconforming status is provided. .. ~ ~ ~ . ,\ " '(tv\.9•"'(' Are you also asking for approval to the chan s to the front portion of the property that do not match the site. plan that w s approved in Feb. 1996? (ex. the original office building footprint was rectan ular and 640sf.) If you do not want the front portion to come under review en draw in a phase line at a minimum of 20 feet from any of the new improvements, and either remove the 1 (.l(t L~ .J ,:; kc.. "-' ( (• ,, ) . " ~c...c..- 4, fl~L \t.v1'';. lk~ information to the east of the phase line. or sta;e that only Phase xx is being - submitted for review. ~ ~ f ~ A ~ /~) (;{_ ~ 2. Correct the title block once the property is legally subdivided! ~ ~ ~ 3. State year of FEMA map referenced. ~'~~-:.JI.. 4. Mini-warehouse space does not have a parking requirement. r )1A.-<--a;:r- 1 fµz_. IZ(;i!;. ~ 5. Submit Drainage report. Also, Need spot elevations and direction of flow to c~D determine if concentration of water and subsequent release meets ordinance. 6. Need paving and curbing specs. 7. Portion of drive from existing concrete to the access easement needs to be designated~esigned as a fire lane. J 8. All circulati ·s1 need to be a minimum of 20ft. 9. Provide de ri ion of surrounding uses, esp. if single family, so that the possible need for screening/fencing purposes may be determined. 10. Provide landscaping legend, including point calculations, irrigation and barricade plans. 11 . Issues regarding the access easement will be addressed at the time of platting. 12. Upon inspection of the property it was found that the area to the south of the storage buildings is currently being used as boaUtrailer storage. If that use is to continue, label the area as such and provide proof that the use is legally nonconforming. CFI 1al ll 1e area has beel"I used in that capacity sinoe the area co1 -was annexed.) ( J) Reviewed by: Jessica Jimmerson Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 06122199 r Additional Information Required for Staff to Make Determination of Compliance SecureCare Mini-warehouse (99-429) 1. Dimension from property line to nearest portion of office parking. 2. Indicate the westerly limit of the approved plan and the C-1 zoneline. 3. Once limit of approved plan is shown, it can be determined where the five trees down the middle of the property lie and if they count toward landscaping requirements for the front portion. 4. Landscaping appears to be short by at least 1000 points. 5. Show development phase line as on approved plan. 6. Correct the parking analysis. Correct ratio for the office space is 1 :250. None is required for mini-storage warehouses. 7. Dimension the sidewalks and ramps by the office. 8. What is the date of the FEMA map referred to? 9. Remove references to "grandfather tract". 10. Are the fire hydrant and water meter within a public utility easement') By: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 4/20/00 PERMIT MASTER FILE REC # 19744 MEMORY: 23787 C 37629 NC PERMIT: 96-01173 TYPE: MV STATUS: C PROJECT: 96-NR APPLIED :04/23/96 ISSUED :04/23/96 COMPLETE:l0/18/96 LOCATION: TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 4014 BLDG C WORK CLASS: NEW HOLD ON PERMIT CY/Nl: MASTER PERMIT: 9601173 DESCRIPT.: MOVE IN BLDG./HWY 6 NORTH FROM HOUSTON TD LI-TURN@ ROCK PRAIRIE RD. OF WORK TD 4014 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH CONTR. ID: ELECTRIC : PLUMBER APPLICANT: NEATHERLIN HOMES BRITT RICE N/A /ME-LAVCO KENNETH INSPECT CODE: BL OCCP TYPE: B PROPOSED USE: GROUP B -BUSINESS VALUATION: FEES DUE: FEES PAID: CONST. TYPE: SQUARE FTG: HEATED SQUARE FTG: 11500.00 100.00 100.00 2314 1181 REPORT CODE: MV NBR OF UNITS: 1 Plan Review required CY/Nl: NOTES: NOTES: Use Standard Movement Keys or Press <Esc> to Exit PERMIT MASTER FILE REC # 22054 MEMORY: 23787 C 37625 NC PERMIT: 96-03483 TYPE: CA STATUS: V PROJECT: 96-NR LOCATION: TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 4014 BLDG C APPLIED :12/12/96 ISSUED :12/12/96 COMPLETE: I I WORK CLASS: NEW HOLD ON PERMIT CY/Nl: MASTER PERMIT: 9603483 DESCRIPT.: INSTALL 8'6 X 17' AWNING TO FRONT PORCH OF WORK CONTR. ID: NEATHERLIN HOMES ELECTRIC : N/A PLUMBER N/A CNO ME) APPLICANT: KENNETH INSPECT CODE: BL OCCP TYPE: B PROPOSED USE: GROUP B -BUSINESS VALUATION: FEES DUE: FEES PAID: CONST. TYPE: SQUARE FTG: HEATED SQUARE FTG: 1600.00 20.00 20.00 REPORT CODE: CA NBR OF UNITS: 1 Plan Review required CY/Nl: NOTES: VOID PER BLDG CODE 6 MONTH INSPECTION REQUIREMENT 11/19/97 NOTES: Use Standard Movement Kevs or Press <Esc> to Exit .· ·REC # STATUS: V 22054 MEMORY: 23787 C 37625 NC ' PROJECH %-NR APPLIED :12/12/96 ISSUED : 12/12/96 .. COMPLETE: t i l 1 ' . . MASTER PERtlIT: 9603483 ·~ • c ~ .. • :-' ... ' ; ··· VALUATION: ' ...... • FEES DUE: FEES' PAID: SQUARE FTG: HEATED SQUARE "FTG: , " / < 1600.00 20.00 20. (l(l Plan Revie~ required (Y/Nl: ~: ~--~ ~ :)~ ' \ > ~ A '3601173 B %02241 c '3602'354 D '3603483 MV c PL c EL c CA ~ '36 96 '36 96 NR TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, NR TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, NR TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, NR TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 9601173 NEATHERLIN HOMES BUGGE PLUMBING WELCH ELECTRIC 9603483 NEATHERLIN HOMES << Enter Letter to Select Record or Enter to Exit >> DK DK DK DK Standard Soft CR) Review Permits Screen # 74 MASTER PERM # TYPE STAT PROJ # PERMIT ADDRESS I LDC PERMIT CONTRACTOR ID CORR A 9601058 CB C 96 MP TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 9601058 NEATHERLIN HOMES OK B 9601068 CE C 96 MP TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 9601058 BRITT RICE ELECTRI OK << Enter Letter to Select Record or Enter to Exit >> Standard Soft CR) Review Permits Screen # 74 MASTER PERM # TYPE STAT PROJ # PERMI T ADDRESS I LDC PERMIT CONTRACTOR ID r.mm 11\ 00 e,\o \~-tD ., Standard Soft CRJ ;(\(,o(0~ Review Permits STAr'~~~~-~ ~=~~:~-~~~-~~= ~~~~~~ =~~~~~=~~~------:~ =~~~ Screen # 74 PERM # ------- A 9601057 B '3601067 c '3601453 TYPE CB CE ME ~ 96 MO TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 9601057 NEATHERLIN HOMES OK C 96 MO TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 9601057 BRITT RICE ELECTRI OK C 96 MO TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, 9601057 LAVCO A/C OK << Enter Letter to Select Record or Enter to Exit >>