The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBarron Rd.PLAN VIEW Sf,C f'ION A-A },'LEVA TION lza-ou CONCR£TE STRENGTH • 3000 ••II NORV.trl. CUTTER LIC OEPRtSSEO GUTTER LINE _jA 28·0AY COHCRCTC STMflfCTH • J000 psi •4 BARS 12-O.C.C.W. 0.0. • &-.-.. SIX WAHS •4 BARS 6'" O.C.C.W. TOP ' BOTTOM SI.Ml SECT/ON A-A SINGLE GRATE INLET SINGLE RECESSED CURB INLET & CURB INLET W /EXTENSION Dl-00 Dl-01 28·0AY COHCRCTE STRENGTH• JOOO ~ .... l' SOU ARE SECTION A-A _jA STD. CAST IRON MNH>l.E COVER /HJ f'RMilE (JO" OIA.J •4 BMS &-O.C.C.W. TOP • BOTTOM SLAB STORM SEWER JUNCTION BOX Dl -02 •4 8MS t2 .. O.C.E.W. SIDE WM.LS A ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •4 BARS e-O.C.E.W. TOP • BOTTOM sue SECT/ONA-A GRATEINLET A 6" SIDE WM.LS SECT/ONA-A DOUBLE BARREL INLET TROUT LOGO Dl-03 DI-04 PLATE Dl-05 z C> ::::r.: ,_.... E-< ra <e:: E-< c:i C/'.:1 u:.:l u:.:l 0 0 <e:: u:.:l z .........:i ~ .........:i C> c:i C_) ~ z <e:: ~ :>-< i::::i:::: o::l C/'.:1 ~ ~ F ~1 8 B ... yN;tftQ BfARltC SL.RfN;E: NOTE: Wrf. 19·· TOC WN..l TO BE CONSTRUCT£ AT BEc....c; ' EPCl OT CONCRETE OR AS OCSICNATEO OH Pl.ANS •J BM>S O 111· O.C.E.W. DITCH CHN*IEL • RP·RAP S(CTJOHS. I VARIES ~· ~· ~· ~· /2-0 lo----''-=~--... 1-f =!=i-lL'.J.f!,1"~~"::.c (~-,- WEf,'P I-f()f,E /JETA//, 128-0AY CONCRETE STREl<GTH• JOOO psiJ CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING r·&"' HEIGHT VARIES 12"'X 12"' CH. V. HWO. CLOTH '/•"' MCSH W/GRANA.AR MATERIAL D2-00 OR AS OCSICNATEO ON Pl.ANS 18" TO J6" AS OCSICNATEO ON Pl.ANS NOTE' lrilN. 19" TOE WALL TO BE CONSTRUCT£ AT BECfrlllWG • ENO Of' CONCRt:TE DITCH CH....:L • RtP·RAP SECHONS. HEIGHT VARIES 12"X12"" CM.V. HWO. CLOTH V4'" MESH W/GRNrU,.AR MATER!..._ ~· .... ~!~1~1~ 141:n. -:..~" ~---,.-~=-> ll ~-,-s~:t~~H c.~T;,. 2-11•-LrJO·j-12- ' i 22 ;::: a f ~ COVER SECTION PICK HOLE DETAIL COVER FACE COVER FACE COVER BACK MANHOLE RING AND COVER D2-04 *MAX ...... SLOPE ~ TYPICAL LINED CHANNEL SEC'rION STANDARD CHANNEL SECTION D2-02 128·0AY CONCRETE STREl<CTH• J000 psiJ STANDARD FLUME SECTION.----1 EXPAHSK>N JOINTS AT 50' O.C. D2-05 OR AS OCSICNATEO ON Pl.ANS 18" TO J6" AS OCSICNATEO ON Pl.ANS WE'EP /-/OLE DLTAIL CONCRETE RIP-RAP D2-0l S()(WALK 111- HEIGHT VARIES 28-0AY CONCAE TE STRENGTH• J000 p~ NOTE1 18" TOE WM..l TO 8E CONSTAUCTEO AT BE~ Ii ENJ OF CONCRETE DITCH LINNC ' RIP-RAP SECTIONS CONCRETE SIDE SLOPE PROTECTION ~ J;; ~~ 8 CITY OF BnYAN ., ... ,_"'""''t'VO"" ... ••• ,,, .lit. 4U• Ol·Ot·ot CALI•• TS 'Hftl• W. P. K. FIGURE' [Q)~ •J "Ir BARS 1 PER BLOCK 9- FRONT ELEVATION D!SSIPATOR BLOCK LOCA TION DISS/PA TOR /JLOCK SIDE ELEVA TJON 28-DAY CONCRETE 1• STRCl<CTH • JOOO psi ~j j PROVI()[ Rfl'·RAP ROCK c.-.. 20 LB. PIECES) •4 BARS 12" O.C.E.W. WALLS, BOTTOM SLAB • T()[ SECl70NA-A 128·0AY CONCRETE STRENGTH • JOOO psll -..,, DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO PIP(S Mt* TO l6* · 12* APNf.T 48* OR LARCER • Mt" N'Nf.T TYPICAL CONCRETE HEADWALL & END WALL WIT H WINGS IDL coos.=•'°" ...... '"'---"'o-7" 1 """ ~-lo A _J PI.AN VIEW CC!0.41. 9IOTCS: Ill [IP05£0 COlll:RS SMlrt.L E CMllWCllED }14•. fl:lf'OllCIC STCn SMll.L 8( Pua:o •TH Tt€ aNtEI rx lf'( QJTSU LAYU rx IMS ,... ro ft€ 9.# ICl. fl Tt« ct'llOUL TOTAL ClW'11TlS Ml.I.IX IX 20 CJMl(l[I LAP fOlt All 8MS (W(R 6._0'"N LOCilH. 8MS Ji·A. ... . SECT/UN A-A 8MS. D3-00 CONCRET E HEADWALL FOR 2 PTPE,S SCLECT MATERIAL --------------- MATERIM. EXCAVATED F'ROM TH[ [)ITCH, CWHICH rs F'R([ or ROCKS, LUMPS, CLOOS, OR OCBRrS LARGER THAN TWO 12J INCHES " THE LARCCST DIMENSION>. COMPACTED TO A -..,, ()( 90• ()( MAX ...... OCNSITY AS OCTE-0 BY ASTM 0698 CSTN«>ARCU AT A WOISTlME CONTENT, WIT .... OPT..._... TO •U'. OF OPTlil..M lHXR NON·STRUCTl.JfUL ~ MEAS Cie ... YAROS, PASTURES, EASCMENTSJ IHIJ TO A . ....... OF Ml Of WAXMJM OCN's.TY AS OETCRMNCO 14-.> BY ASTM 0698 CSTANOMOJ AT A MOISTlME CONTENT WIT ... OPT ...... TO •4X Of OPTUJM UNDER FUTURE STREET AREAS. .., P£ lil.JST OESOt TRENCH OCTAi.. SITE SPECIFIC FOR HOPE PIP(. HOPE PIP( IS NOT TO 8( USED UNOCR Pia.IC STREET PAVEMENT CEMENT STM!l.IZEO SANO AS A ....... Wl.L AL.WAYS 8£ REOUIREO. THE TRENCH BOTTOM SHM.L BC~ GllAOCO SO AS TO PROVIOC UNIFORM NC> CONTNJOUS SlPPORT FOR Tt£ PIP( BARREL BCTWCEN BCLL HOLES. D3-0 I COMPACTED CEMENT STABl.IZEO SANO, 1· 112 SACK/CY CPUCMl.L ON.. YJ. SPACE BY LFTS INTO Pl.AC(, TO f'l.L Al.L VOIDS AROlHl Pf)[, WAN.IALL Y CONSOLIDATE AT OPTIMUM . L MOISTURE . 8* MN.112'" MAX. BEDDING AND TRENCH FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE 0 3-02 Cm OF l~lYAN /J,,(;. • .11M.1~-"· .. ue• '''C .. M. "'' 0 .. 0 .. 0I CA4.C• N t S HOWll•W,,.I, SH T (8/26/2009) Venessa Garza -Fwd: Re: Barron Rd Interchange From: To: CC: Date: Subject: "Bob Appleton" <BAPPLET@dot.state.tx.us> "Chuck Gilman" <Cgilman@cstx.gov>, "Joe Guerra" <Jguerra@cstx.gov>, "Jef ... "Venessa Garza" <Vgarza@cstx.gov> 8/24/2009 5:27 PM Fwd: Re: Barron Rd Interchange I don't know that I have ever seen a curbed Bike/ped shared use path . It is not specifically addressed in the AASHTO guide. However, under the section on Bike Lane Widths it discusses how bicyclists tend to ride a distance of 32-40 inches from a curb face. This would reduce the effective width of the path to approximately four feet. This is even less than the sidewalk currently shown in the plans. There is also still the issue of the horizontal alignment. We would have to look closely at the drainage issues caused by what you propose as it may concentrate runoff in areas that might create a hazard to either pedestrians or vehicles. I must not fully understand what the city hopes to accomplish with the proposed change or the reasons behind it. Perhaps a meeting would better foster understanding than continued email back and forth. This electronic message transmission and any documents, files, graphics, or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information that may be legally confidential and/or privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual(s) or entity(s) named above and access by disclosure, copying , distribution, or other use of the contents of this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender pointing out the error, and delete the message. This message may also contain personal opinions of the author and should not be considered as an official TxDOT policy or opinion. The greatest ability in business is to get along with others and influence their actions. --John Hancock »>"Joe Guerra" <Jguerra@cstx.gov> 8/24/09 5:11 PM»> Bob in regard to the hike and bike accommodation at Rock Prairie and Sh 6, if we notched that sidewalk and kept it a grade the median island would incorporate curb and gutter. The curb and gutter would provide a barrier lessening the horizontal clearance. For vehicles when utilizing curb and gutter I think the clearance is reduced to 1.5 feet. Does it work the same way for bicycles? Furthermore ADA ramps would not be needed because the pedestrian facility would be at grade. If the cross slope on Rock Prairie under the bridge is maintained drainage should not be an issue. I am assuming there will be a slight crown at Rock Prairie. Please let me know what you think? Joe R. Guerra Jr. AICP, PTP Transportation Planning Coordinator Planning and Development Services P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue City of College Station, TX 77842 979-764-3556 Office Phone 979-764-3496 Fax email: jguerra@cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University ® Page 1 8/26/2009} Venessa Garza -Fwd: Re: Barron Rd Interchange >» Venessa Garza 8/24/2009 4:41 PM »> FYl..comments would be appreciated ... You'll have to read the full string of emails ... Venessa Garza -Greenways Program Manager Planning & Development Services City of College Station 979-764-3674 www.cstx.gov »>Chuck Gilman 8/21/2009 4:18 PM»> Venessa , please see the comments from Bob Appleton regarding the Barron Road Interchange sidewalk modifications and let Jeff know how you want to proceed. >>> From: "Bob Appleton" <BAPPLET@dot.state.tx.us> To:"Chuck Gilman" <Cgilman@cstx.gov> CC:"Courtney Kennedy" <Ckennedy@cstx.gov>, "Donald Harmon" <Dharmon@cstx.gov>, "Jeff Haeber" <Jhaeber@cstx.gov>, "Bob Richardson" <BRICHAR@dot.state.tx.us>, "Carlos J. Rodriguez" <CRODRl2@dot.state. tx. us>, "Maury Jacob" <MJACOB@dot.state.tx.us> Date: 8/21/2009 4:01 PM Subject: Fwd: Re : Barron Rd Interchange Chuck, We can do a boile rplate AFA very quickly for this item that the district engineer can execute. The time will be for your review and city council approval. This is an enhancement to an acceptable design at the city's request and I think the city should fund it. Of equal or greater concern to me as I look at the plans are the changes that widening to ten feet and making this a shared use bike/ped path creates complications. At the bridge columns there is currently 11 .5 feet from face of curb to face of column. A ten foot path would leave nine inches of clearance on either side. AASHTO's "Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities" recommends a minimum of three feet of horizontal clearance and six feet is desirable. The plans indicate 13 foot radius reverse curves at each end of the sidewalks on the turnaround islands. The minimum horizontal curve radius should be 36 feet. We will have to request approval of design exceptions from Austin for these factors. The design and location of the ADA curb ramps must be modified somehow to accommodate the additional width. The calculation of the additional cost is not a simple calculation of additional sidewalk because of this and because of the reduced quantities of brick pavers. Lastly, in looking at the typical sections I see that there are sidewalks and 5 feet of width in each direction for bike lanes. Is a Page 2 8/26/2009} Venessa Garza -Fwd: Re: Barron Rd Interchange ten foot path really necessary to meet the intent of your bikeway plan? I believe we can make this work somehow and we are willing to work with you to do it. Bob A This electronic message transmission and any documents, files, graphics, or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information that may be legally confidential and/or privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual(s) or entity(s) named above and access by disclosure, copying, distribution, or other use of the contents of this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender pointing out the error, and delete the message. This message may also contain personal opinions of the author and should not be considered as an official TxDOT policy or opinion. The greatest ability in business is to get along with others and influence their actions. --John Hancock »>"Chuck Gilman" <Cgilman@cstx.gov> 8/21/09 11 :37 AM »> Good afternoon Bob. Below is an exchange of correspondence between the CoCS and TxDOT about potentially modifying the width of the sidewalk at the Barron Road grade separation. I fully understand the fiscal constraints on this project, and the challenges the State is facing . However, I am concerned that both TxDOT and the CoCS will spend well over $2,000 each in staff time to generate the paperwork and secure the approvals to allow the CoCS to pay for these improvements. Do we have any options available to get this change approved without reimbursement from the City? Thanks, erg . >>> From: Jeff Haeber To:Gilman, Chuck CC:Harmon, Donald Date: 8/14/2009 10:30 AM Subject: Fwd: Re: Barron Rd Interchange fYI »>"Carlos J. Rodriguez" <CRODRl2@dot.state.tx.us> 8/13/2009 3:20 PM >>> Hello Jeff, Page 3 8/26/2009 Venessa Garza -Fwd: Re : Barron Rd Interchange Each Area Office of the Bryan District has been notified that there is not any additional monies for change orders. We are looking at different ways to cut costs in anticipation of necessary changes. Therefore, it is not feasible at this time to approve any additional work unless funding is secured from the CoCS. Let me know if you have any questions. Carlos J. Rodriguez, P.E. Transportation Engineer Bryan Area Office (979) 778-6233 (979) 778-1375 fax crodri2@dot.state.tx.us »> "Jeff Haeber" <Jhaeber@cstx.gov> 8/13/2009 10:21 AM »> Good morning Carlos, I am following up from our meeting awhile back when we met and discussed possible modifications to the sidewalks through the interchange for the future trail system. I got with Michael Martin and he modified the sidewalk sheet to show a wider sidewalk, which is attached . Michael ran some quick numbers and he estimates that by providing 10' wide sidewalks, there would be about $2,000 in increased construction costs based on unit bid prices. Is there any possible way that TxDOT can make these changes and is TxDOT willing to fund these changes? Thanks for your assistance on this and let me know if you have any questions. Jeff Haeber, P.E., CFM Assistant City Engineer City of College Station Capital Projects Department 2613 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Office: (979) 764-6248 Cell: (979) 255-7280 Fax: (979) 764-5014 Email: jhaeber@cstx.gov College Station-Home of Texas A&M University « Page 4 8/26/2009) Venessa Garza -Fwd: Re: Barron Rd Interchange Page 5 College Station-Home of Texas A&M University College Station-Home of Texas A&M University