The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDPItem No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 C3 Development Phase 1 Engineer's Estimate of Construction Costs May 22, 2015 Description Unit Unit Price Site Preparation Mobilization L.S. $18,500.00 Clearinq and Grubbinq Ac. $1,500.00 ,, '·. Site Preparation Subtotal Water System Co nstruction 8" PVC, C900 Cl 200, Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. $70.00 6" PVC, C900 Cl 200, Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. $60.00 8" DIP, Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. $85.00 6" DIP, Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. $75.00 8" x 45 deq M.J. Bend EACH $800.00 8"x22.5 M.J. deo. Bend EACH $800.00 8" x 6" M.J. Tee EACH $1 ,000.00 8"x 6" M.J. Reducer EACH $400.00 8" M.J. Gate Valve EACH $1,200.00 6"x6" M.J. Tee EACH $800.00 6" M.J. Gate Valve EACH $900.00 6" M.J. Gate Valve & Box with LockinQ Lid EACH $1, 100.00 6"x45 M.J. dea. Bend EACH $700.00 8" x 1-1 /2" Service Saddle EACH $200.00 8" x 2" Service Saddle EACH $250.00 6" x 1-1/2" MJ Reducer EACH $200.00 1" Type K Copper Tubinq with Structural Backfill L.F. $100.00 1-1/2" Type K Copper Tubini:i with Structural Backfill L.F. $125.00 2" Tvoe K Coooer TubinQ with Structural Backfill L.F. $150.00 Bacteria Test L.S. $2,000.00 Pressure Test L.S. $3,500.00 Trench Safetv L.F. $5.00 Connect to Existinq Svstem EACH $2,000.00 Std. Fire Hvdrant Assemblv EACH $4,000.00 . . Water System Subtotal Erosion Control Co nstruction 1t:.ros1on Lontro1 t-'lan & ::;earmentatron Lontrol (rnc1uaes srn tencrng, construction exits, straw bale barriers, inlet protection, grass seeding, L.S. $5,000.00 and any other sedimentation control devices) . Erosion Control Subtotal . Total Construction Cost Quantity Total 1.0 $18,500 0.5 $750 $19 250 537 $37 ,590 509 $30,540 40 $3,400 20 $1 ,500 17 $13,600 3 $2,400 4 $4,000 1 $400 3 $3,600 4 $3,200 7 $6,300 4 $4,400 6 $4,200 1 $200 3 $750 1 $200 24 $2,400 114 $14,250 113 $16,950 1 $2,000 1 $3,500 958 $4,790 1 $2,000 3 $12,000 $174 170 1.0 $5,000 $5 000 $198 420 The above construction estimate is based on the engineer's preliminary opinion of probable construction costs. This estimate constitutes our best judgment at this time. Please note that the engineer does not have any control over contractor or supplier workloads and the degree to which inflation may affect project costs between now and the bid date. During construction, additional features may become apparent as the work progresses, which will result in an increan· cost. ,.,,.,.,,,,,,,,, -----::"(, 'C. OF rs:\\\ . .::' "\I>-.. ... • .. •• -t. ,,, \ : <::i ..... *·· ... -,IS', ,# * .. · .... ,, ,,, *... ... * ~ , .... : .......................... :· ..... .z ~.~~~.9.~!~~.~:!?:.~9B§~~.~ Veron ca JB Mor ~ l\ 77689 /$ J 11 '7- 1,,01(\· ... ~~G a«-<:>/ffi ~ Y'\)"l+tA f-14-tf J t '.-" · . ., /STE"/ ~ .::' ,, '\S's ........... ~0 .: '''\/ONAL € ........ --.,,,,,, ..... ~ Date Page 1 of 1 ... Erika Bridges, EIT, CFM City of College Station Planning & Development Services PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 MITCHELL MORGAN RE: SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY LETTER FOR THE C3 DEVELOPMENT-PHASE 1 Dear Erika: April 7, 2015 This letter is intended to show that the existing public sanitary sewer system built with the Cottages of College Station development has adequate capacity for Phase 1 of the C3 Development project. The C3 Phase 1 Development is located near the Market Street and Holleman Drive intersection, bounded by the existing Cottages of College development, Dowling Road and the future extension of Junction Boys Road. The sanitary sewer system for this phase will be private and connect to an existing 8" sanitary sewer stubout constructed with the Cottages of College Station development. We have attached the Phase 1 site plans and sanitary sewer plan sheets, as well as two exhibits to this letter. Exhibit A shows the Phase 1 area to be served and Exhibit B is a spreadsheet showing the capacity of the Phase 1 sanitary sewer line as designed. The 2011 Capstone Cottages sanitary sewer report assumed a total proposed flow of 0.748 cfs, based on 20 du/acre and 5340 gpd/acre and Retail B3 at 3500 gpd/acre (Exhibit 4 of the 2011 report). From Exhibit B, the flow in pipe segment L9 represents the proposed total flow for Phase 1 at 0.304 cfs, less than the assumed value from the original 2011 report. A copy of that report is attached as Appendix B. If you have any comments, or wou19ft~~~uss this further, please feel free to contact me . .:-=:_7:-\ ...... ~~:r-4~'•1 ,;' e;, .... ~ .... 1< ,, n erely, !**./ ~ ....... ::-:·.~--'~ ~vERoNicA·:;;~:-~-~~~-~ ~·-~:.:···"'"77689 /$ J .. , ~ .... «,.Q/,ffe $ 11 o,<-,-..~€G1s1~~ .. ··& ~ PE CFM 11t ~.s"· ......... ·e.~.?' I I t\, SIONf>-\.. v-- Managing Partner ·fi~)f-~\#3 Cc : file 3204 EARL RUDDER FWY. S. • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • T 979.260 6963 • F 979.260 3564 CIVIL ENGINEERING • HYDRAULICS • HYDROLOGY • UTILITIES • STREETS • SITE PLANS • SUBDIVISIONS info@m1tchellandmorgan com • www m1tchellandmorgan com FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: IS-g€? CITY or Col.LEGE STATION Homt o/Ttxas A&M Univm ity' DATE susMITTED: ot · oa · 1s TIME: f¢: ciZO SITE PLAN APPLICATION GENERAL STAFF: +B-'-'75=--------- MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $932 Site Plan Application Fee. $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Six (6) folded copies of site plan. One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan. One (1) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate B~ilding Review (if applicable). I Building elevations to scale for all buildings. A list of building materials for all facade and screening. Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette. Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov. Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request (if applicable). {frt'Ylckv Wi.ff? /<e:Zt>Y1 ~.,,~CJ) The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Building Review checklists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not check off. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference .:..;cM.:..;::a:.:..;rc""'"h'-1'--'8~2-"-0""'"""15"----------- NAME OF PROJECT C3 Development Phase 1 ADDRESS 2415 Junction Boys Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) -=Cc:.:ra:..:wfi:..:..o:::..:rd-=-=8:.=u:.:..::mc:.:e:.:::tt:L....:.:Tra=ct:...:8::....:1J....;..8..:....:1.=2-=-1 ___________ _ APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, C/O Veronica Morgan, PE E-mail v@mitchellandmorgan.com Street Address 3204 Earl Rudder Freeway South City College Station State Texas Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _ Phone Number 979-260-6963 Fax Number 979-260-3564 ---------------~ PROPERTY OVVNER'S INFORMATION: Name Capstone-CS, LLC CIO Rob Howland, COO E-mail rhowland@capstonemail.com Street Address 431 Office Park Drive City Birmingham State Alabama Zip Code _3_52_2_3 ____ _ Phone Number 205-414-6400 Fax Number 205-414-6405 ---------------~ Revised 9/14 Page 1 of 11 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Amanda Wallis, Project Manager E-mail awa/lis@capstonemail.com Street Address 431 Office Park Drive City Birmingham State Alabama Zip Code _3_52_2_3 ____ _ Phone Number 205-414-6400 Fax Number 205-414-6405 ~--------------~ OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact): Name Eric McNair, Landscape Architect E-mail emcnair@capstonemail.com Street Address 431 Office Park Drive City Birmingham State Alabama Zip Code _3_52_2_3 ____ _ Phone Number 205-414-6400 Fax Number 205-414-6405 ~--------------~ Current zoning _P_D_D __________________________________ _ Present use of property Irrigation Pond & Vacant-Undeveloped Proposed use of property Irrigation/Retention Pond & Multi-Family Number of parking spaces required ___ 2_2_8-'S..L.p...;;.;a..;;...ce"-'s'----Number of parking spaces proposed ---=2:..::.3..:...1....:::S:.c:.P.::::.ac::..::e:.::s=----- Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes IX No This .information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? IX Yes I No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: The Cottages of College Station City Project Number (if known): 08-00500007 Date I Timeframe when submitted: P&Z Approval -February 21 , 2008 Revised 9/14 Page 2of11 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to ---· (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURA~A ~ ~ ~~ _L-l_/_1 1 +--}J_S __ _ Property Owner{s) Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. ~~ 4. I, TJtNGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AN ,,.t~s FO E DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KN_. • ~b€':~ AC U ATE. S * / Jlf( _ \ '* ~ ~.~ .. ~ ............................. NI . \(\\ I fl \ ~ \ \ \C... ~ VER0~~9,~.~:~:.~cr····~ ,, \'\.\J\i ' J ,, ..... :..... : ~ --~ -0\ 77689 ,:f.li ~ ---~1---'·----------.-i ~ " ¢ ... {ii~ Engineer Date 111~,i.;;_.?,~G1srf.!',~~"&~ .,, ~.'\9. ......... 'C..~ .::- Revised 9/14 Page 4of11 · The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill /Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Engineer Date Initial D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill/ Grading Permits: NJ Pr , certify to the following: B. I, (i) ~~~---1--=-I+-'-~~~~~~~~~~ that any nor/residential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of th is application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. N/ft I Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: c. I, ~/I} , certify that the construction, improv~ment, or fill cov~red by thi s permit shall not mcfease the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. N)lt • Engineer Date Page 5 of 11 Revised 9/14 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D. I, N/A , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction. NIA Engineer I Surveyor Date I Commercial Structures: E. I, JJ/A , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation N//r I Engineer I Surveyor Date OR I, N/f'J , certify that the structure with its attendant utility , ductwork, basement and sartitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction. Engineer I Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Revised 9/14 Page 6 of 11 CITY OF C oll.EGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University" SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: [81 Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). [81 A key map (not necessarily to scale). [81 Title block to include: [81 Name, address, location, and legal description [81 Name, address, and telephone number of applicant [8J Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) [8J Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) [8J Date of submittal [8J Total site area [8J North arrow. [8] Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. [8J Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. [8J The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. [8] The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. [8] The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Designate between existing and proposed [8J The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. [8J Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. [8J Buildings (Existing and Proposed). [8J Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5. Geography [8J Water courses. [8J 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Please note if there is none on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number. [8J Existing topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) [8J Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks lg] Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.). lg] Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7. lg] Proposed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO, Article 7 lg] Indicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Article 7 lg] Proposed curb cuts. rgi For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. lg] Proposed curb and pavement detail. lg] A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". ~Proposed medians. lg] Proposed sidewalks (both public and private). ~Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7). lg] Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. lg] Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. [8] Handicap parking spaces. [8] Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon- residential buildings. [8] Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required. Nm. Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be 'F conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. [8] Security gates, showing swing path and design specs with colors. ~Guardrails. Include design and colors. [8] Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7). lg] Please note if none is required. [8] Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes [8] No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application. Easements and Utilities [8] Easements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access, etc.) [8] Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. [8] Sewer Design Report (if applicable). [8] Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable). [8] Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. [8] Meter locations, existing and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement). [8] Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include lg] Minimum water demands [8] Maximum water demands lg] Average water demands in gallons per minute, and lg] Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day [8] Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes [8] No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application. Revised 9/14 Page 8of11 Fire Protection (81 Show fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway. (81 Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 , R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a building permit can be issued. (81 Will building be sprinkled? (81 Yes D No {5C>(Yt12) If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes, (81 Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 100' of the fire hydrant. They shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. Landscaping (81 Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: (8) required point calculations ~ additional streetscape points required . Streetscape compliance is required on all streets. QS] calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points.) (8) proposed new plantings with points earned (81 proposed locations of new plantings ~screening of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen. ~ screening of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other \ areas potentially visually offensive. fl:P'existing landscaping to remain ~show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. \1ftl Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. (8) Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C. 0 .) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. (8) Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes (8) No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application. Other ! Common open spaces sites Loading docks Detention ponds tij). Retaining walls (8) Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.) (8) Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes (8) No NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately. Revised 9/14 Page 9of11 CITY OF Coll.EGE STATION Home of Texas A&M Univmity0 NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate. ~ Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). tfJ1r Title block to include: ~ Name, address, location, and legal description "$. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant i Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) Date of submittal Scale should be largest standard scale possible on sheet. t . V-0 List of colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents. }f/# Color samples. "¢1-List of materials to be utilized. ~ Elevations of each non-residential building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on , the facades according to UDO Section 5.6.B or 7.9. N/h lnc[ude the following dimensions: ~ Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each fac;;ade separately) % Total vertical square footage of transparency (for each fac;;ade separately in Northgate) ~ Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fac;;ade separately) iJ//b Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fac;;ade separately) lfk Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and r architectural harmony. Revised 9/14 Page 10 of 11 I • CITY OF C OLLEGE STATION Home o/Texas A&M University• NORTHGATE BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northgate Districts (NG) M/B Sh~aj size :: 24~ ~ ~" (minimuml i, Title block to include: Name, address, location, and legal description Name, address, and telephone number of applicant 'tJj. Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) If# Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) !f/p Date of submittal 1fQA Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. tqh, List of colors from the City of College Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed Mh... equivalents with color samples. '[f.11' List of materials to be utilized. lffA Elevations of each building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors ;· on the facades and identify public entrances. Include the following dimensions: t Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each fa<;ade separately) >{/lJ Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fa<;ade separately) tW Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fa<;ade separately) If/Jc Total vertical square footage of transparency between zero and eight feet (0-8') above ground , level (for each non-residential fa<;ade) '7'J1 Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and architectural harmony. Revised 9/14 Print Form I · Page 11 of 11 Erika Bridges, EIT, CFM City of College Station Planning & Development Services PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 MITCHELL MORGAN RE: LETTER OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR C3 DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 Dear Erika: April 1, 2015 The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the construction plans for the site design drawings for the C3 Development Phase 1 project, to the best of my knowledge do not deviate from the B/CS Design Guidelines Manual. I also acknowledge, to the best of my knowledge that the details provided in the construction plans are in accordance with the Bryan/College Station Standard Details. If you have any comments, or would like to discuss this further, please feel free to contact me. ~~''• .:?'"\~ .··········· ... -1'..ot •• , -C:) ••• * · ... <S',.. ,, ,;'* .· ·."?'I ~*/ ...... ~ it' .•... : .••...•••.•......•..•••••.•••••• I'! ~-~~~9.~!~~-~:~:.~.9~~~-~ . ~ ~.... 77689 /41 ! Veronica J.B. organ, PE, CFM "1,~\ -9~ «.-G/.ffi ~ . 1 ~-.. G1srE'i\ ... 0~.=-Managing Partner •t,''.s's············G~-.:-\\' IONA\.. v ...... \\' ....................... ~ Cc: file fltUJ. F-1#3 3204 EARL RUDDER FWY S. • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • T 979.260.6963 • F 979.260.3564 CIVIL ENGINEERING • HYDRAULICS • HYDROLOGY • UTILITIES • STREETS • SITE PLANS • SUBDIVISIONS info@m1tchellandmorgan com • www m1tchellandmorgan com CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY (C3) DEVELOPMENT WATER LINE ANALYSIS April 201s PREPARED FOR: CAPSTONE -CS, LLC 431 OFFICE PARK DRIVE BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35223 Submitted to e ll ~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION • '"' '""' of 111' Rnwrh Vn/ky By MITCHELL M M MORGAN ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS 3204 EARL RUDDER FREEWAY SOUTH COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 0FFlCE(979)260-6963 FAX (979) 260-3564 - CERTIFICATION This report for the water design for Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development in College Station was prepared under my supervision in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station Unified Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. ___, Veronica J.B. orga l E., C.F.M . Registered Professional Engineer State of Texas No. 77689 ,.., ............ "'''' _,.-.. -;~OF TE_ \\l .: -<..~ •.....•••••.••• ..r-f. •tr -~ .·· * ··.IS'_..,, ::' •. ·· ·· ..... l !..~./ ....................... .':· .. ~ .. \ ~VERONICA J.B. MORGAN "-~·····:············· .............. :f:i:.··J ~ "13 \ 77689 /!J.J J i, 16·.. '9 <:> ••• {ii .I '' -x:-;:. ••• ~G1sre.'?:.«!.··~~.: 1,, ''.S. ······ .... .._~v.: \\\°SIONA\.. v ... -- '''''''''"""" Pultu, t P-\44 3 Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 1 - WATERLINE ANALYSIS CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY CJ DEVELOPMENT APRIL 2015 INTRODUCTION The Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development will be located in College Station, Texas, at 2415 Junction Boys Road, just southwest of the intersection of FM2818 and Holleman Drive. C3 will be a cottage style multifamily development consisting of twenty residential buildings being a mix of cottages, duplexes and townhome units, a maintenance shop, and trash compactor in Phase 1 on the west side of Junction Boys Road. Placement of the buildings in Phase 1 can be seen on the proposed site plan, Exhibit 1. There will be a second phase on the east side of Junction Boys Road as seen on the proposed site plan, Exhibit 1A. It is not the intent of these 2 phases to be constructed to stand alone, rather simply permitted separately to allow the construction on the smaller phase to proceed first. The property is currently unplatted and will be platted as Lot 3 Block 1 of the Cottages of College Station Subdivision as part of the development of the property. The tract is bounded to the north by Market Street, on the south by North Dowling Road and on the east by Holleman Drive South. South of the tract is the City of College Station Dowling Road Water Storage Facility and the Quail Run Subdivision . FIRE FLOW DESIGN CRITERIA An updated City of College Station system MikeURBAN model was used to model hydraulic events on the existing distribution system. Select Node and Link labels located near the proposed project can be seen on Exhibits 2 & 3 respectively. In order to determine if this model is sufficient, two calibration runs were performed: • Run 1 -Average Day Conditions without C3 Development (Exhibit 4A&B) • Run 2 -Average Day Conditions without C3 Development and 1300 gpm Fire Flow at Node 59414 (Exhibit 5A&B) The results from these runs were compared to the fire flow pressure test performed by the City of College Station Utilities Department (Exhibit 6). College Station Utilities performed the fire flow test at 9:30 o'clock in the morning and utilized hydrants 0-137 as the flow hydrant and hydrant 0-138 as the static hydrant. In order to closely replicate actual system conditions during the field tests, RUNS 1&2 were modeled during an average day scenario. Utilizing results obtained from RUN 1 static pressure at Node 59412 was found. Shown on Tables 1, the modeled pressure (83.42 psi) was slightly higher than actual observed pressure in the field of 80 psi . A simulated fire flow of 1300 gpm was then added to Node 59414 (RUN 2). The modeled residual pressure at Node 59412 (82 .25 psi) was higher than the actual observed residual pressure (75 psi). The calibration runs show that the pressure drops shown in the model are slightly lower at the static hydrant, i.e. 1.2 psi drop in modeled vs. 5 psi drop in measured. A comparison of measured and modeled values for the fire flow calibration run can be found on Table 1: Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 2 - Table 1-Fire Flow of 1300 gpm placed at Node 59414 (Hydrant #0-137) and Corresponding Pressure Measured at Node 59412 (Hydrant #0-138) FLOW HYDRANT Measured Modeled Node Number 59414 Nozzle size 2.5 Pitot reading in PSI 60 84.98 Flow in G.P.M. 1300 1300 STATIC HYDRANT Measured Modeled Node Number 59412 Static PSI 80 83.42 Residual PSI 75 82.25 Since the model returned values relatively similar to those actually observed during the calibration event it is considered a reasonable base model. This base model was used to determine C3's effects on the system during Average, Peak and Fire Flow conditions. C3 DEMANDS C3 will consist of 20 structures in total on the Phase 1 site and 54 structures on the Phase 2 site. The largest structures will be the 3-story multi-family residential buildings and the clubhouse in Phase 2. Exhibits 7 & 8 show the detailed information for each proposed building in Phase 1 & 2, respectively. Demands for the residential buildings were based on the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines information for water demands of 100 gallons/capita/day. To give a more conservative peak day demand, the day was considered to be 16 hours instead of the classic 24 hours. Demand for the maintenance building was determined based upon the fixture unit count method. The peak day demand for the maintenance building is 1.25 gpm with an average demand of 0.313 gpm. Exhibits 7 & 8 provide a detailed peak and average day demand per building for the entire project along with meter sizes. C3 FIRE FLOWS PHASE 1 Each building will be constructed using Type V-B construction. Referring to Exhibit 7 illustrating the building sizes, Building 14 is the largest structure at 11,970 SF but is equipped with a fire sprinkler system. Using Table B105.1 of the International Fire Code 2012 (Exhibit 9) the required fire flow for a building this size and construction type is 3,000 GPM and when reduced by 50% equates to a fire flow of 1500 GPM. Since not all structures will have fire suppression systems, one of the largest of the non-sprinklered buildings should be checked for maximum fire flow requirements. The largest non-sprinklered building is the 5 bed Duplex Manor which is 3, 776 SF. A fire flow for this building is 1750 GPM, with Building 3 being the most remote. Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 3 - When modeling this fire flow, the lines in Phase 2 were closed to understand how Phase 1 will operate before Phase 2 is complete. The required fire flow for Building 14 was split between Nodes C3-3 and C3-4 during peak day demands. The results for this run can be seen in Exhibit 11 A&B and it shows that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3- 3A and is 32.68 psi while the maximum velocities for this scenario occur in Links 4152 and C3- 1000 and are 11 .58 and 11 .20 fps , respectively. These pressures are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and the maximum velocity of 12fps. Exhibits 12A&B illustrate the fire flow scenario with Building 3 on fire. In this run a fire flow of 1750 GPM was split between nodes C3-3 and C3-3A. The minimum pressure occurs at Node C3-3A and is 20.39 psi while the maximum velocities occur in Link 4152 and C3-1000 and are 13 .21 and 12.83 fps, respectively. The pressure values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi , however since the fire flows are all being fed from the 8-inch waterline at the Cottages development, the maximum velocities in Lines 4152 and C3-1000 exceed the maximum of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. This occurrence is not a permanent conditions but rather a temporary one until the Phase 2 lines are constructed. It is not the intent to request any certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase 1 or 2 until all underground infrastructure is complete. Exhibits 13A&B illustrate the fire flow scenario with Building 3 on fire with Phase 2 complete. As seen on these exhibits, the pressures meet the required minimum pressure of 20 psi as well as the maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. This run verifies that the system operates within all code requirements once the Phase 2 waterlines are complete. PHASE 2 In addition to modeling the fire flows for Phase 1, Phase 2 was also checked for fire flow. Several fire flow runs were made to check for largest sprinklered building fire flow, largest and most remote unsprinklered building, most remote building , the clubhouse and gameroom fire flow operations. Building 66 In Phase 2, the largest building is Building 66 at 11,970 SF but it is sprinklered. Using Table B 105.1, the fire flow for this building would be 3000 GPM and with a 50% reduction it will reduce the fire flow to 1500 GPM. The required fire flow for Building 66 was split between Nodes C3-11 and C3-12 during peak day demands. The results for this run can be seen in Exhibit 14A&B which shows that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 59.12 psi while the maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1018 and is 8.8 fps. These values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. Gameroom In Phase 2, one of the remote buildings is the Gameroom/Poolhouse which is located just south of the sand volleyball court and swimming pool. The Gameroom is constructed with Type V-B construction, is 2080 SF and is not sprinklered . Using Table B105.1, the fire flow for this building would be 1500 GPM. This fire flow was placed on Node C3-11 during peak day demands. The results for this run can be seen on Exhibits 15A&B which show that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 59.08 psi while the Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 4 - maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1018 and is 8.83 fps. These values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. Building 59 One of the remote buildings on a 6-inch loop line is Building 59, located on the northeast corner of the site close to Holleman Drive. Building 59 is 2712 SF and is not sprinklered. The required fire flow for Building 59 is 1500 GPM which is split between nodes C3-17 and C3-13. The results for this run can be seen on Exhibits 16A&B which show that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 59.78 psi while the maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1018 and is 9.26 fps. These values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. Building 49 w/ Link C3-1008 as 6-inch line The largest building that is not sprinklered in Phase 2 is Building 49 at 3776 SF. According the IFC 2012, the fire flow for this building is 1750 GPM. The required fire flow for Building 49 was split between Nodes C3-8 and C3-9 during peak day demands. The results for this run can be seen in Exhibit 17 A&B and it shows that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 56.56 psi while the maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1008 and is 12.66 fps. The pressure values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi, however the velocity exceeds the maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. As a result of this another run was made increasing the line size for C3-1008 to 8 inches from the 6-inches originally modeled and a new run was completed. Building 49 wl Link C3-1008 as 8-inch line As stated previously, the velocities in Link C3-1008 slightly exceeded the 12 fps threshold . As seen in Exhibit 18A&B, with this line size increased to 8-inches, the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 57 .26 psi while the maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1008 and is 7.42 fps. The pressure values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and now the velocities are also in compliance with the maximum velocity of 12 fps. Building 56 Building 56 is located on a 6-inch loop line and it is 3684 SF non-sprinklered building. A such, the fire flow for this building would be 1750 GPM. This is split between nodes C3-17 and C3-13. The results for this run can be seen on Exhibits 19A&B which show that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 58.64 psi while the maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1020 and is 11 .59 fps. These values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions . Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 5 - Building 28 One of the most remote buildings is Building 28 located at the end of a radial 8-inch line. It is 2717 SF and is non-sprinklered. Using Table B105.1 , the fire flow for this building would be 1500 GPM and it is placed all on Node C3-6. The results for this run can be seen on Exhibits 20A&B which show that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3- 3A and is 58.32 psi while the maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1018 and is 8.23 fps . These values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. Building 67 Another remote building is Building 67 at 3864 SF and is non-sprinklered. Using Table B105.1 , the fire flow for this building would be 1750 GPM. This is split between nodes C3-11 and C3-12. The results for this run can be seen on Exhibits 21A&B which show that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 57.77 psi while the maximum velocity for this scenario occurs in Link C3-1018 and is 9.87 fps. These values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. Clubhouse In Phase 2, the largest non-residential building is the clubhouse at 8,478 SF and it is sprinklered. Using Table B105.1, the fire flow for this building would be 5000 GPM and with a 50% reduction it will reduce the fire flow to 2500 GPM. The results for this run can be seen on Exhibits 22A&B which show that the minimum pressure under this fire flow condition occurs at node C3-3A and is 54.22 psi. Originally Link C3-1018 was sized as an 8-inch line and when this Clubhouse fire flow run was made the velocities in this line exceeded the 12 fps. To correct this situation this line was changed to a 12-inch line. With that upgrade shown in Exhibit 22B, the velocity in Link C3-1018 has been reduced to 6.04 fps and the highest velocity now occurs in Link C3-117 at 9.04 fps. These values are in compliance with the required minimum pressure of 20 psi and maximum velocity of 12 fps under peak day fire flow conditions. It is this final Clubhouse run that contains the correct line sizes for all lines within the C3 development. SYSTEM UPGRADES C3 will require infrastructure to be placed as shown on Exhibit 1 & 1A. A combination of an 8- inch water main along a portion of Junction Boys Road and a 8-inch and 6-inch main line within the Phase 1 area will be constructed to adequately supply C3 during Average, Peak, and Fire Flow Demands for the project. In addition, three (3) fire hydrants will be added within Phase 1 of the project to supply adequate fire coverage for all structures. Similarly in Phase 2 there is a main 8-inch loop to Holleman with a small portion of that line as it approaches Holleman Drive being a 12-inch line and smaller 6-inch loops off that main line. Nine (9) fire hydrants will be constructed within Phase 2 to supply adequate fire coverage for all structures. CONCLUSION The model results show that the current system along with the C3 water distribution system can sufficiently serve the domestic and fire flow needs of the Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Phase 1 and 2 Developments. Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 6 ATTACHMENTS EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 1A EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4A EXHIBIT 4B EXHIBIT SA EXHIBIT SB EXHIBIT 6 EXHIBIT 7 EXHIBIT 8 EXHIBIT 9 EXHIBIT 10A EXHIBIT 10B EXHIBIT 11A EXHIBIT 11B EXHIBIT 12A EXHIBIT 12B EXHIBIT 13A EXHIBIT 13B EXHIBIT 14A EXHIBIT 14B EXHIBIT 15A EXHIBIT 15B EXHIBIT 16A EXHIBIT 16B EXHIBIT 17A EXHIBIT 17B EXHIBIT 18A EXHIBIT 18B EXHIBIT 19A Overall Site Layout -Phase 1 Overall Site Layout -Phase 2 MikeURBAN Node Locations MikeURBAN Link Locations Average Day Demands on Existing System Node Results Average Day Demands on Existing System Link Results Average Day Calibration Run with Fire Flow at 0-137 Node Results Average Day Calibration Run with Fire Flow at 0-137 Link Results Hydrant 0 -137 Flow Test Phase 1 Building Information and Water Demands Phase 2 Building Information and Water Demands IFC Fire Flow Table Peak Day Demands with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 1 ONLY-Bldg 14 with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 1 ONLY -Bldg 14 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 1 ONLY -Bldg 3 with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 1 ONLY -Bldg 3 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 1 & Phase 2 -Bldg 3 with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 1 & Phase 2 -Bldg 3 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 66 with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 66 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Gameroom with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Gameroom with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 59 with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 59 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 49 with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 49 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 49 with 8-inch Line with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 49 with 8-inch Line with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 56 with System Improvements Node Results Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 7 EXHIBIT 19B EXHIBIT 20A EXHIBIT 20B EXHIBIT 21A EXHIBIT 21B EXHIBIT 22A EXHIBIT 22B Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 56 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 28 with 8-inch Line with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 28 with 8-inch Line with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 67 with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Bldg 67 with System Improvements Link Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Clubhouse with System Improvements Node Results Peak Day Demands Fire Flow -Phase 2 -Club house with System Improvements Link Results Capstone Collegiate Community C3 Development -College Station Page 8 EXHIBIT 2 MikeURBAN Node Identifiers Description: Select MikeURBAN Node Locations C3 Development Exhibit 2 EXHIBIT 3 Mike URBAN Link Identifiers Description: Select MikeURBAN Link Locations 59 8859370 0 CRE0-6, CRE0-39 CRE0-~0'.--~=;--CRi:'b.38c~llll-l S!ll.,87 59650 __ --,.-er CRE0-41 oCRE~2 ° t>~ o CRE0010.155 CRED-1 CRE0-11CREO.g o 59650A oCRE0-32 o CflE0-10 "''-tP -"~51 .... 0 :19428 ~().34 "" t§> 0 0 (iE0.35 i.°' CREO.J1o CRE0-12 j9419 0 ~ 59425 ,.. 59477 "959476-A :R~-15 ~ :;: 59476 "'o ~ ... 14459473 0 • 59441 4176 59445 0 " 0 4135 .... 059432 ~ ... 4179 59429 0 59552 0 5951 059569 059553 0 ~ 59518 °o 5"'16 o59527 0 '59524 4181 59537 0 C3 Development CJ-5 • "' 'l1> § ~ C'\ .. ll C3.J C3-1021 CJ-4 0 CJ.JA 0 Exhibit 3 EXHIBIT4A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Average Day with Phase 1 & 2 Improvements -NO Fire Flow Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 83.42 59413 1.93 84.70 59414 5.63 86.40 59520 14.72 84.61 C3-1 4.69 82.47 C3-10 2.71 81.92 C3-11 11.88 82.90 C3-12 8.44 83.98 C3-13 0.00 84.55 C3-14 3.33 83.39 C3-15 0.31 83.42 C3-16 5.00 83.84 C3-17 4.17 84.69 C3-2 3.96 81.30 C3-3 2.08 80.30 C3-3A 4.48 79.43 C3-4 6.25 80.61 C3-5 2.60 81.28 C3-6 6.88 84.56 C3-7 4.48 83.39 C3-8 6.25 83.30 C3-9 6.25 82.00 C3 Development Exhibit 4A EXHIBIT 4B Mike URBAN Link Identifiers Description: Average Day with Phase 1 & 2 Improvements -NO Fire Flow Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 315.25 0.89 0.30 130 4116 12 313.32 0.89 0.30 130 4117 12 307.70 0.87 0.29 130 4118 12 -486.89 1.38 0.67 130 4152 8 -73.17 0.47 0.14 130 C3-1000 8 -87.89 0.56 0.16 150 C3-1001 8 -3.61 0.02 0.00 150 C3-1002 8 -7.57 0.05 0.00 150 c3-1003 6 4.48 0.05 0.00 150 C3-1004 6 11.14 0.13 0.01 150 C3-1005 6 8.53 0.10 0.01 150 C3-1006 8 80.43 0.51 0.13 150 C3-1007 8 6.88 0.04 0.00 150 C3-1008 8 9.17 0.06 0.00 150 C3-1009 6 2.92 0.03 0.00 150 C3-1010 6 -3.33 0.04 0.00 150 C3-1011 6 -31.52 0.36 0.09 150 C3-1012 6 -37.56 0.43 0.13 150 C3-1013 6 -19.12 0.22 0.04 150 C3-1014 6 -30.32 0.34 0.09 150 C3-1015 8 100.95 0.64 0.20 150 C3-1016 8 -89.65 0.57 0.16 150 C3-1017 8 -123.30 0.79 0.29 150 C3-1018 12 -171.64 0.49 0.07 150 C3-1019 6 48.03 0.54 0.21 150 C3-1020 6 38.86 0.44 0.14 150 C3-1021 6 -14.13 0.16 0.02 150 C3-1022 6 43 .03 0.49 0.17 150 C3-1023 6 38.86 0.44 0.14 150 C3 Development Exhibit 4B EXHIBIT SA Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Average Day Calibration Run -No System Improvements (lines closed) with Fire Flow @ Node 59414 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 82.25 59413 1.93 83.40 59414 1305.63 84.98 59520 14.72 83.34 C3-1 4.69 -4042367 .so C3-10 2.71 -4042368.00 C3-11 11.88 -4042367 .00 C3-12 8.44 -4042366.00 C3-13 0.00 -4042365.50 C3-14 3.33 -4042366.50 C3-15 0.31 -4042366.50 C3-16 5.00 -4042366.25 C3-17 4.17 -4042365.25 C3-2 3.96 -4042368. 75 C3-3 2.08 -4042369. 75 C3-3A 4.48 -4042370.50 C3-4 6.25 -4042369.25 C3-5 2.60 -4042368.75 C3-6 6.88 -4042365.50 C3-7 4.48 -4042366.50 C3-8 6.25 -4042366. 75 C3-9 6.25 -4042368.00 C3 Development Exhibit SA EXHIBIT SB MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Average Day Calibration Run -No System Improvements (lines closed) with Fire Flow@Node 594 14 Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Headless Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 827.65 2.35 1.79 130 4116 12 825.72 2.34 1.78 130 4117 12 -479.91 1.36 0.65 130 4118 12 -869.52 2.47 1.96 130 4152 8 56.60 0.36 0.09 130 C3-1000 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 150 C3-1001 8 13.88 0.09 0.00 150 C3-1002 8 9.92 0.06 0.00 150 c3-1003 6 4.48 0.05 0.00 150 C3-1004 6 -5.16 0.06 0.00 150 C3-1005 6 -7 .77 0.09 0.00 150 C3-1006 8 -15.54 0.10 0.00 150 C3-1007 8 6.87 0.04 0.00 150 C3-1008 8 11.16 0.07 0.00 150 C3-1009 6 4.91 0.06 0.00 150 C3-1010 6 -1.34 0.02 0.00 150 C3-1011 6 2.28 0.03 0.00 150 C3-1012 6 -1.78 0.02 0.00 150 C3-1013 6 -6.54 0.07 0.00 150 C3-1014 6 -7.11 0.08 0.00 150 C3-1015 8 6.97 0.04 0.00 150 C3-1016 8 -17.04 0.11 0.00 150 C3-1017 8 -27.48 0.18 0.00 150 C3-1018 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 150 C3-1019 6 14.08 0.16 0.00 150 C3-1020 6 4.92 0.06 0.00 150 C3-1021 6 3.36 0.04 0.00 150 C3-1022 6 9.08 0.10 0.00 150 C3-1023 6 4.92 0.06 0.00 150 C3 Development Exhibit 58 EXHIBIT 6 Hydrant 0-137 Flo w Test Description: Hydrant 0-137 Flowed at 1300 gpm (Node 59414) and Res idual Pressures Tested at Hydrant 0-138 (Node 59412) College Station Utilities Reliable, Afford,1b/e, Community Owned Date test completed Monday, March 02, 2015 Time completed 9:30 A.M. Test completed by Howard Mitchell Witness Eugene Marshall FLOW HYDRANT Location Cottages of College Station Nozzle size 2.5 Hydrant number 0-137 Pitot reading in PSI 60 Flow in G.P.M. 1300 ST A TIC HYDRANT Location Holleman Dr. West Hydrant number 0-138 Static PSI 80 Residual PSI 75 Comments Requested C3 Development Exhibit 6 EXHIBIT 7 PHASE 1 Building Information WATER DEMANDS Building Average Average Peak Water Water Water Fire Line Building Building Type Building Description Gross Area Building Bedroom Water Water Water Fixture Meter Line Size Size (in) Number (SF) Height (FT) Count Demand Demand Demand Units Size (in) per per MEP (gpd) (gpm) (gpm) MEP 1 Foxglove 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 -- 2 Cayenne 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 1.5 1.5 44 -- 3 Ginger 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 -- 4 Saffron 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 1.5 1.5 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 - 5 Chicory 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 -- 6 Ginger 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 1.5 1.5 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 -- 7 Saffron 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 -- 8 Sassafras 5 BED COTTAGE 1.5 1.5 1,832 5 500 0.521 2.083 22 - 9 Riverbirch 5 BED COTTAGE 1,832 5 500 0.521 2.083 22 - 10 Alder 5 BED COTTAGE 1.5 1.5 1,832 5 500 0.521 2.083 22 - MAINTENANCE BUILDING 300 0.313 1.250 15 -- 11 Indigo 3 Unit 4 BED/ 3 UNIT TOWNHOUSE 5,109 12 1200 1.250 5.000 57 1.5 1.5 4 12 Snapdragon 7 Unit 4 BED/ 7 UNIT TOWNHOUSE 11 ,961 28 2800 2.917 11 .667 133 2 2 4 13 Snapdragon 5 Unit 4 BED I 5 UNIT TOWNHOUSE 8,532 20 2000 2.083 8.333 95 2 2 4 14 Indigo 7 unit 4 BED I 7 UNIT TOWNHOUSE 11 ,970 28 2800 2.917 11 .667 133 2 2 4 15 Cayenne 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3,684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 1 1 -- 16 Chicory 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 1 1 -- 17 Ginger 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 - 18 Foxglove 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 1.5 1.5 44 -- 19 Cayenne 5 BED DUPLEX MANOR 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 -- 20 Aspen 5 BED COTTAGE 1832 5 500 0.521 2.083 22 1.5 1.5 -- Exhibit 8 Phase 2 -Water Demands Building Average Average Peak Water Water Water Fire Line Building Building Type Gross Area Building Bedroom Water Water Water Fixture Meter Line Size Size (in) Node Number (SF) Height (FT) Count Demand Demand Demand Units Size (in) per per MEP (gpd) (gpm) (gpm) MEP 21 Candlebrush 2712 6 600 0.625 2.500 30 C3-7 22 Foxglove 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 30 C3-7 23 Alder 1,832 5 500 0.521 2.083 22 C3-6 24 Aspen 1,832 s SOD O.S21 2.083 22 C3-6 2S Sassafras 1,832 s SOD O.S21 2.083 22 C3-6 26 Cypress 1,346 3 300 0.313 l.2SO lS C3-6 27 Sweetbay 2712 6 600 0.62S 2.500 30 C3-6 28 Sweetbay 2712 6 600 0.625 2.SOO 30 C3-6 29 Riverbirch 1,832 s SOD 0.521 2.083 22 C3-6 30 Ironwood 1,346 3 300 0.313 l.2SO lS C3-6 31 Sassafras 1,832 s 500 0.521 2.083 22 C3-6 32 Ironwood 1,346 3 300 0.313 l.2SO lS C3-6 33 Chicory 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-6 34 Ginger 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-6 3S Sweet bay 2712 6 600 0.625 2.SOO 30 C3-7 36 Sassafras 1,832 s SOD 0.521 2.083 22 C3-7 37 Sweetbay 2712 6 600 0.62S 2.500 30 C3-7 38 Blackwood 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-7 39 Cayenne 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-8 40 Foxglove 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-8 41 Daffodil 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-9 42 Cayenne 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-9 43 Blackwood 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-10 44 Candlebrush 2712 6 600 0.62S 2.500 30 C3-10 4S Chicory 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-10 46 Clover 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-9 47 Saffron 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-9 48 Ginger 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-9 49 Saffron 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-9 so Chicory 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-8 Sl Clover 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-8 S2 Ginger 3776 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-8 S3 Daffodil 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-8 S4 Riverbirch 1,832 s SOD 0.521 2.083 22 C3-12 SS Riverbirch 1,832 s SOD O.S21 2.083 22 C3-12 S6 Cayenne 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-12 S7 Riverbirch 1,832 s SOD 0.521 2.083 22 C3-12 S8 Cypress 1,346 3 300 0.313 l.2SO lS C3-17 S9 Sweet bay 2712 6 600 0.625 2.500 30 C3-17 60 Mulberry 1,346 3 300 0.313 l.2SO lS C3-17 61 Snapdragon 7 Un it 11,961 28 2800 2.917 11.667 133 4 C3-17 62 Indigo 7 Unit 11,970 28 2800 2.917 11.667 133 4 C3-16 63 Snapdragon 5 Unit 8,S32 20 2000 2.083 8.333 95 4 C3-16 64 Indigo 7 Unit 11,970 28 2800 2.917 11.667 133 4 C3-12 6S Indigo 3 Unit 5,109 12 1200 l.2SO S.000 57 4 C3-12 66 Indigo 7 Unit 11,970 28 2800 2.917 11.667 133 4 C3-11 67 Cayenne 3684 10 1000 1.042 4.167 44 C3-11 68 Amaryllis 4 Unit 6,812 16 1600 1.667 6.667 76 4 C3-12 69 Indigo 7 Unit 11,970 28 2800 2.917 11.667 133 4 C3-11 70 Snapdragon 7 Unit 11,961 28 2800 2.917 11.667 9S 4 C3-11 71 Snapdragon 5 Unit 8,532 20 2000 2.083 8.333 9S 4 C3-ll 72 Amaryllis 4 Unit 6,812 16 1600 1.667 6.667 76 4 C3-14 73 Amaryllis 4 Unit 6,812 16 1600 1.667 6.667 76 4 C3-14 74 Mulberry 1,346 3 300 0.313 1.250 15 C3-15 Clubhouse C3-12 Gameroom C3-11 APPENDIX B TABLE 8105.1 MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW AND FLOW DURATION FOR BUILDINGS FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA (square feet) FIRE-FLOW FLOW DURATION Type IA and 18' Type llA and lllA' Type IV and V·A' Type llB and 1118' Type v.s• (gallons per minute)" (hours) 0-22 .700 0-12.700 0-8.200 0-5.900 0-3,600 1.500 22,701 -30,200 12. 701-17 ,000 8,201-10,900 5,901-7,900 3,601-4,800 1,750 30.201 -38.700 17.001-21.800 10.901 -12,900 7,901-9,800 4,80 l ·6.200 2,000 2 38,701-48.300 21,801-24,200 12,901-17,400 9,801-12,600 6,201-7,700 2,250 48,301-59,000 24,201-33,200 17,401 -21,300 12.601-15,400 7,701-9,400 2,500 59.001 -70,900 33.201-39.700 21.301 -25,500 15.40I-I8.400 9,40I-I l.300 2,750 70.901-83,700 39,70I-47,IOO 25,50 I-30.100 18. 401-21.800 I 1,301-13.400 3,000 83,701 -97,700 47,101-54,900 30,IOl -35,200 2I,80I-25,900 I3,401-15,600 3,250 3 97.701-112,700 54,901-63.400 35,20 I-40,600 25.901-29,300 I5.60I-18.000 3,500 112.701 -128,700 63,401-72.400 40,601 -46,400 29,30 I-33,500 I8.001-20,600 3,750 128.701 -145,900 72,40I-82,IOO 46,401-52,500 33,501-37,900 20.60I ·23,300 4,000 145.90I -I64.200 82,IOI-92.400 52,501-59.IOO 37.901-42.700 23,301-26,300 4,250 164.201-I83.400 92.40I-103.l00 59,101 -66,000 42.70I-47.700 26,30I-29,300 4.500 183,40I-203.700 I03,101-114,600 66.00I-73,300 47,701-53,000 29,301-32,600 4,750 203,70I -225,200 114.60I-I26.700 73.30l·8I,100 53,001-58,600 32,60I -36,000 5,000 225.20I -247.700 I26,70I-139,400 81.lOI -89,200 58.601-65,400 36,001-39,600 5.250 247.70I-271 ,200 139.401-152,600 89,201 -97.700 65.40I-70.600 39,601-43,400 5,500 271,201 -295,900 152,601-I66.500 97,701-106,500 70,60I-77,000 43,401-47,400 5,750 295,901-Greater 166,50 I-Greater 106,50 l-l I 5,800 77.001-83,700 47,401 -51.500 6.000 4 --115,801-125,500 83. 70I-90,600 5l.50I-55.700 6.250 --125,501 -135,500 90,601-97,900 55,701-60.200 6,500 --135,501-145,800 97.901-I06,800 60,201-64.800 6.750 --145,801-156,700 106,801-113,200 64,801-69.600 7,000 --156,701-167,900 113,201-121,300 69,601-74,600 7,250 --167,90I-I79,400 121,301-129,600 74.601-79.800 7,500 --179,401-191.400 129.601 -138,300 79,801-85,100 7.750 --191, 40 I-Greater 138,30 I-Greater 85, 10 I -Greater 8,000 For SI: I square foot • 0.0929 m2, I gallon per minute • 3.785 L{m, I pound per square inch • 6.895 kPa. a. Types of construction are based on the fnrematlonal Building Code. b. Measured at 20 psi residual pressure. Exhibit 9 446 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE• EXHIBIT lOA Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Phase 1 & 2 Improvements -NO Fire Flow Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 69.63 59413 7.72 70.84 59414 22.50 72.48 59520 58.89 70.19 C3-1 18.75 68.07 C3-10 10.83 67.56 C3-11 47.50 68.65 C3-12 33.75 69.77 C3-13 0.00 70.37 C3-14 13.33 69.28 C3-15 1.25 69.46 C3-16 20.00 69.79 C3-17 16.67 70.58 C3-2 15.83 66.90 C3-3 8.33 65.91 C3-3A 17.92 65.04 C3-4 25.00 66.22 C3-5 10.42 66.88 C3-6 27 .50 70.21 C3-7 17.92 69.04 C3-8 25.00 68.95 C3-9 25.00 67.65 C3 Development Exhibit lOA EXHIBIT lOB MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Phase 1 & 2 Improvements -NO Fire Flow Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 648.21 1.84 1.14 130 4116 12 640.49 1.82 1.11 130 4117 12 617.99 1.75 1.04 130 4118 12 -1136.58 3.22 3.21 130 4152 8 -94.49 0.60 0.23 130 (3-1000 8 -153.38 0.98 0.44 150 (3-1001 8 16.28 0.10 0.01 150 (3-1002 8 0.45 0.00 0.00 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 (3-1004 6 20.42 0.23 0.04 150 (3-1005 6 10.00 0.11 0.01 150 (3-1006 8 178.41 1.14 0.58 150 (3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 (3-1008 6 '37 .3 1 0.42 0.13 150 (3-1009 6 12.31 0.14 0.02 150 (3-1010 6 -12.69 0.14 0.02 150 (3-1011 6 -71.21 0.81 0.43 150 (3-1012 6 -94.73 1.07 0.72 150 C3-1013 6 -56.89 0.65 0.28 150 (3-1014 6 -85.34 0.97 0.60 150 (3-1015 8 261.14 1.67 1.17 150 (3-1016 8 -247.72 1.58 1.06 150 (3-1017 8 -346.39 2.21 1.97 150 (3-1018 8 -488.38 3.12 3.72 150 (3-1019 6 140.74 1.60 1.51 150 (3-1020 6 104.07 1.18 0.86 150 (3-1021 6 -25.80 0.29 0.06 150 (3-1022 6 120.74 1.37 1.13 150 C3-1023 6 104.07 1.18 0.86 150 C3 Development Exhibit lOB EXHIBIT llA MikeURBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Building 14 -750gpm at Nodes C3-3 and C3-4 With Lines C3-1018, C3-1 006 & C3-101 1 CLOSED Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 67.30 59413 7.72 68.27 59414 22.50 69.69 59520 58.89 46.31 C3-1 18.75 39.61 C3-10 10.83 -7682901.50 C3-11 47.50 -7682901.50 C3-12 33.75 -7682899.50 C3-13 0.00 -7682899.50 C3-14 13.33 -7682900.00 C3-15 1.25 -7682900.00 C3-16 20.00 -7682899.50 C3-17 16.67 -7682899.50 C3-2 15.83 36.03 C3-3 758.33 33.55 C3-3A 17.92 32.68 C3-4 775.00 33.24 C3-5 10.42 36.12 C3-6 27.50 -7682898.50 C3-7 17.92 -7682900.00 C3-8 25.00 -7682900.00 C3-9 25.00 -7682901.50 C3 Development Exhibit l lA • EXHIBIT llB MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Building 14 -75 0gpm at Nodes C3-3 and C3-4 With Lines C3 -101 8, C3-1006 & C3-1011 CLOSED Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 12S0.61 3.SS 3.84 130 4116 12 1242.89 3.S3 3.79 130 4117 12 1220.40 3.46 3.67 130 4118 12 -1330.20 3.77 4.30 130 4152 8 1814.31 11.58 SS.OS 130 (3-1000 8 17SS.42 11.20 39.73 lSO (3-1001 8 1083.53 6.92 16.26 lSO C3-1002 8 1067.70 6.81 l S.82 lSO c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 lSO (3-1004 6 -S63.13 6.39 19.64 lSO (3-1005 6 -S73.SS 6.51 20.32 lSO (3-1006 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 lSO (3-1007 8 27.SO 0.18 0.00 lSO (3-1008 6 8.47 0.10 0.00 lSO C3-1009 6 -16.S3 0.19 0.00 lSO (3-1010 6 -41.S3 0.47 0.00 lSO (3-1011 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 lSO (3-1012 6 27.22 0.31 4.89 lSO (3-1013 6 -9.91 0.11 6.07 lSO (3-1014 6 -10.36 0.12 3.39 lSO (3-1015 8 -2S.69 0.16 0.00 lSO (3-1016 8 -24.04 O.lS 0.00 lSO (3-1017 8 -47.73 0.30 0.00 lSO (3-1018 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 lSO (3-1019 6 30.60 0.3S 0.00 lSO (3-1020 6 -6.07 0.07 19.0S lSO (3-1021 6 291.4S 3.31 S.80 lSO (3-1022 6 10.60 0.12 12.SO lSO (3-1023 6 -6.07 0.07 0.00 lSO C3 Development Exhibit llB • EXHIBIT 12A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Building 3 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-3 and C3-3A With Lines C3-1018, C3-1006 & C3-1011 CLOSED Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 66.81 59413 7.72 67.75 59414 22.50 69.15 59520 58.89 40.33 C3-1 18.75 32.33 C3-10 10.83 -7682911.00 C3-11 47.50 -7682910.00 C3-12 33.75 -7682909.00 C3-13 0.00 -7682908.50 C3-14 13.33 -7682909.50 C3-15 1.25 -7682909.50 C3-16 20.00 -7682909.00 C3-17 16.67 -7682908.00 C3-2 15.83 27.56 C3-3 888.33 24.35 C3-3A 892.92 20.39 C3-4 25.00 26.05 C3-5 10.42 28.89 C3-6 27.50 -7682908.00 C3-7 17.92 -7682909.50 C3-8 25.00 -7682909.50 C3-9 25.00 -7682911.00 C3 Development Exhibit 12A -EXHIBIT 12B Mike URBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Building 3 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-3 and C3-3A With Lines C3-1018, C3-1006 & C3-1011 CLOSED Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 1312.95 3.72 4.20 130 4116 12 1305.23 3.70 4.15 130 4117 12 1282.73 3.64 4.02 130 4118 12 -1392.54 3.95 4.68 130 4152 8 2069.31 13.21 70.24 130 C3-1000 8 2010.42 12.83 51.08 150 C3-1001 8 1344.79 8.58 24.26 150 C3-1002 8 1328.96 8.48 23.73 150 c3-1003 6 892.92 10.13 46.13 150 C3-1004 6 -556.88 6.32 19.24 150 C3-1005 6 -567.30 6.44 19.92 150 C3-1006 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.00 150 C3-1008 6 8.47 0.10 0.00 150 C3-1009 6 -16.53 0.19 0.00 150 C3-1010 6 -41.53 0.47 0.00 150 C3-1011 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 150 C3-1012 6 27.22 0.31 0.00 150 C3-1013 6 -9.91 0.11 0.00 150 C3-1014 6 -10.36 0.12 0.00 150 C3-1015 8 -25 .69 0.16 0.00 150 C3-1016 8 -24.04 0.15 0.00 150 C3-1017 8 -47.73 0.30 0.00 150 C3-1018 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 150 c3-1019 6 30.60 0.35 0.00 150 C3-1020 6 -6.07 0.07 0.00 150 C3-1021 6 -452.29 5.13 13.09 150 c3-1022 6 10.60 0 .1 2 0.00 150 c3-1023 6 -6.07 0 .07 0.00 150 C3 Development Exhibit 12B -EXHIBIT 13A MikeURBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Building 3 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-3 and C3 -3A With Lines C3-1018, C3-1006 & C3 -1011 OPEN Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 65.74 59413 7.72 67.01 59414 22.50 68.71 59520 58.89 62.09 C3-1 18.75 59.11 C3-10 10.83 59.01 C3-11 47.50 61.56 C3-12 33.75 62.92 C3-13 0.00 63.83 C3-14 13.33 63.19 C3-15 1.25 64.51 C3-16 20.00 64.34 C3-17 16.67 64.63 C3-2 15.83 55.42 C3-3 888.33 52.87 C3-3A 892.92 48.91 C3-4 25.00 56.19 C3-5 10.42 57.37 C3-6 27.50 61.92 C3-7 17.92 60.75 C3-8 25.00 60.65 C3-9 25.00 59.12 C3 Development Exhibit 13A -EXHIBIT 13B MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire fl ow at Building 3 - 875 gpm at Nodes C3 -3 and C3-3A With Lines C3 -1018, C3-1006 & C3 -1011 OPEN Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 383.19 1.09 0.43 130 4116 12 375.47 1.07 0.41 130 4117 12 352.97 1.00 0.37 130 4118 12 -1776.89 5.04 7.35 130 4152 8 755.18 4.82 10.86 130 C3-1000 8 696.29 4.44 7.17 150 C3-1001 8 1111.03 7.09 17.03 150 C3-1002 8 1095.20 6.99 16.58 150 c3-1003 6 892.92 10.13 46.13 150 C3-1004 6 -253.88 2.88 4.49 150 C3-1005 6 -264.30 3.00 4.84 150 C3-1006 8 697.79 4.45 7.20 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 C3-1008 6 149.40 1.70 1.68 150 C3-1009 6 124.40 1.41 1.20 150 C3-1010 6 99.40 1.13 0.79 150 C3-1011 6 -457.17 5.19 13.35 150 C3-1012 6 -368.60 4.18 8.96 150 C3-1013 6 -161.70 1.83 1.95 150 C3-1014 6 -254.40 2.89 4.51 150 C3-1015 8 892.61 5.70 11.35 150 C3-1016 8 -750.40 4.79 8.23 150 C3-1017 8 -1018.13 6.50 14.49 150 C3-1018 8 -1393.71 8.90 25.92 150 c3-1019 6 374.33 4.25 9.22 150 C3-1020 6 337.66 3.83 7.62 150 C3-1021 6 -686.05 7.78 28.32 150 c3-1022 6 354.33 4.02 8.33 150 c3-1023 6 337.66 3.83 7.62 150 C3 Development Exhibit 13B - EXHIBIT 14A MikeURBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire fl ow at Building 66 -75 0 gpm at Nodes C3-11 and C3 -1 2 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59385 0.00 68.82 59412 0.00 66.29 59413 7.72 67.57 59414 22.50 69.27 59520 58.89 64.77 59522 0.00 62.54 C3-1 18.75 62 .23 C3-10 10.83 61.36 C3-11 797.50 61.74 C3-12 783.75 63.61 C3-13 0.00 64.50 C3-14 13.33 63 .77 C3-15 1.25 65.08 C3-16 20.00 64.95 C3-17 16.67 65.27 C3-2 15.83 61.01 C3-3 8.33 59.99 C3-3A 17.92 59.12 C3-4 25 .00 60.23 C3-5 10.42 60.96 C3-6 27.50 64.22 C3-7 17.92 63.05 C3-8 25 .00 62.95 C3-9 25 .00 61.46 C3 Development Exhibit 14A -EXHIBIT 14B MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 66 -750 gpm at Nodes C3-l 1 and C3-12 Link Results Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness Name (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4084 12 295.58 0.84 0.27 130 4115 12 325.80 0.92 0.32 130 4116 12 318.08 0.90 0.30 130 4117 12 295.58 0.84 0.27 130 4118 12 -1704.53 4.84 6.81 130 4152 8 515.16 3.29 5.35 130 4154 6 -5.83 0.07 0.01 130 4191 8 -13.05 0.08 0.01 130 4192 4 -7.22 0.18 0.06 130 (3-1000 8 456.27 2.91 3.28 150 (3-1001 8 127.49 0.81 0.31 150 (3-1002 8 111.66 0.71 0.24 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 (3-1004 6 -79.17 0.90 0.52 150 (3-1005 6 -89.59 1.02 0.65 150 (3-1006 8 -220.44 1.41 0.85 150 (3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 (3-1008 6 135.30 1.54 1.40 150 (3-1009 6 110.30 1.25 0.96 150 (3-1010 6 85.30 0.97 0.60 150 (3-1011 6 139.58 1.58 1.48 150 C3-1012 6 214.05 2.43 3.28 150 (3-1013 6 -284.02 3.22 5.53 150 C3-1014 6 -299.43 3.40 6.10 150 (3-1015 8 -39.72 0.25 0.04 150 (3-1016 8 -700.54 4.47 7.25 150 (3-1017 8 -1013.31 6.47 14.3 6 150 (3-1018 8 -1378.73 8.80 25.40 150 c3-1019 6 364.17 4.13 8.76 150 (3-1020 6 327.50 3.72 7.20 150 (3-1021 6 85.41 0.97 0.60 150 c3-1022 6 344.17 3.91 7.89 150 c3-1023 6 327.50 3.72 7.20 150 C3 Development Exhibit 14B • EXHIBIT 15A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Gameroom -1500 gpm at Node C3-11 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59385 0.00 68.82 59412 0.00 66.29 59413 7.72 67.56 59414 22.50 69.27 59520 58.89 64.80 59522 0.00 62 .57 C3-1 18.75 62 .27 C3-10 10.83 60.84 C3-11 1547.50 59 .47 (3-12 33.75 63.82 (3-13 0.00 64.68 C3-14 13.33 63 .70 C3-15 1.25 65.07 C3-16 20.00 65 .00 C3-17 16.67 65 .38 C3-2 15.83 61.00 C3-3 8.33 59.95 C3-3A 17.92 59.08 C3-4 25.00 60.07 C3-5 10.42 60.90 C3-6 27.50 64.33 C3-7 17.92 63.16 C3-8 25.00 63.02 C3-9 25.00 61.00 C3 Development Exhi bit l SA • EXHIBIT 15B MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Gameroom -1500 gpm at Node C3-1 1 Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughnes (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /lOOO(ft) s (millift) 4084 12 291.84 0.83 0.26 130 4115 12 322.06 0.91 0.31 130 4116 12 314.34 0.89 0.30 130 4117 12 291.84 0.83 0.26 130 4118 12 -1705.30 4.84 6.81 130 4152 8 510.65 3.26 5.26 130 4154 6 -5.83 0.07 0.01 130 4191 8 -13.05 0.08 0.01 130 4192 4 -7.22 0.18 0.06 130 C3-1000 8 451.76 2.88 3.22 150 C3-1001 8 192.23 1.23 0.66 150 C3-1002 8 176.40 1.13 0.56 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 C3-1004 6 -133.66 1.52 1.37 150 C3-1005 6 -144.08 1.63 1.57 150 (3-1006 8 -96.70 0.62 0.19 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 C3-1008 6 255.48 2.90 4.55 150 C3-1009 6 230.48 2.62 3.76 150 C3-1010 6 205.48 2.33 3.04 150 C3-1011 6 258.81 2.94 4.66 150 C3-1012 6 453.46 5.15 13.15 150 C3-1013 6 -612.62 6.95 22.96 150 C3-1014 6 -481.42 5.46 14.69 150 C3-1015 8 204.20 1.30 0.74 150 C3-1016 8 -543.75 3.47 4.53 150 C3-1017 8 -1038.50 6.63 15.03 150 C3-1018 8 -1383.24 8.83 25.56 150 c3-1019 6 343.49 3.90 7.86 150 C3-1020 6 306.82 3.48 6.38 150 C3-1021 6 150.15 1.70 1.70 150 c3-1022 6 323.49 3.67 7.04 150 c3-1023 6 306.82 3.48 6.38 150 C3 Development Exhibit lSB EXHIBIT 16A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 59 -750 gpm at Nodes C3-17 & C3-13 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm} (psi} 59412 0.00 66.26 59413 7.72 67.54 59414 22.50 69.26 59520 58.89 65.28 C3-1 18.75 62.84 C3-10 10.83 62.21 C3-11 47.50 63.16 C3-12 33.75 64.13 C3-13 750.00 62.69 C3-14 13.33 64.12 C3-15 1.25 64.93 C3-16 20.00 63.62 C3-17 766.67 62.72 C3-2 15.83 61.65 C3-3 8.33 60.65 C3-3A 17.92 59.78 C3-4 25.00 60.94 C3-5 10.42 61.62 C3-6 27.50 64.82 C3-7 17.92 63.66 C3-8 25.00 63.57 C3-9 25.00 62.29 C3 Development Exhibit 16A EXHIBIT 16B MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 59 -750 gpm at Nodes C3 -17 & C3-13 Link Results Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness Name (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 265.83 0.75 0.22 130 4116 12 258.11 0.73 0.21 130 4117 12 235.61 0.67 0.17 130 4118 12 -1716.19 4.87 6.89 130 4152 8 443.53 2.83 4.05 130 C3-1000 8 384.64 2.46 2.39 150 C3-1001 8 81.54 0.52 0.13 150 C3-1002 8 65.71 0.42 0.09 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 C3-1004 6 -41.05 0.47 0.15 150 C3-1005 6 -51.47 0.58 0.23 150 C3-1006 8 -232.88 1.49 0.94 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 C3-1008 6 -4.52 0.05 0.00 150 C3-1009 6 -29.52 0.33 0.08 150 C3-1010 6 -54.52 0.62 0.26 150 C3-1011 6 55.51 0.63 0.27 150 C3-1012 6 -9.84 0.11 0.01 150 C3-1013 6 101.18 1.15 0.82 150 C3-1014 6 -158.52 1.80 1.88 150 C3-1015 8 -191.98 1.23 0.66 150 C3-1016 8 -610.28 3.90 5.61 150 C3-1017 8 -782.13 4.99 8.89 150 C3-1018 8 -1450.36 9.26 27.90 150 C3-1019 6 666.98 7.57 26.88 150 C3-1020 6 -869.69 9.87 43.94 150 C3-1021 6 39.46 0.45 0.14 150 C3-1022 6 646.98 7.34 25.40 150 C3-1023 6 -119.69 1.36 1.12 150 C3 Development Exhibit 16B EXHIBIT 17A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 49 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-9 & C3-8 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 65.73 59413 7.72 67.00 59414 22.50 68.71 59520 58.89 62.63 C3-1 18.75 59.76 C3-10 10.83 58.24 C3-11 47.50 61.22 (3-12 33.75 62.69 C3-13 0.00 63.62 C3-14 13.33 63.00 C3-15 1.25 64.41 C3-16 20.00 64.22 C3-17 16.67 64.47 C3-2 15.83 58.48 C3-3 8.33 57.43 C3-3A 17.92 56.56 C3-4 25.00 57.53 C3-5 10.42 58.37 C3-6 27.50 61.71 C3-7 17.92 60.54 C3-8 900.00 59.62 C3-9 900.00 57.68 C3 Development Exhibit 17A EXHIBIT 17B Mike URBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 49 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-9 & C3-8 Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /lOOO(ft) (millift) 4115 12 342.16 0.97 0.35 130 4116 12 334.44 0.95 0.33 130 4117 12 311.94 0.88 0.29 130 4118 12 -1784.04 5.06 7.40 130 4152 8 702.01 4.48 9.49 130 (3-1000 8 643.12 4.10 6.19 150 (3-1001 8 200.97 1.28 0.72 150 (3-1002 8 185.14 1.18 0.62 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 (3-1004 6 -141.05 1.60 1.51 150 (3-1005 6 -151.47 1.72 1.73 150 C3-1006 8 -271.93 1.74 1.26 150 (3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 (3-1008 6 1115.84 12.66 69.71 150 (3-1009 6 215.84 2.45 3.33 150 (3-1010 6 -684.16 7.76 28.17 150 (3-1011 6 274.94 3.12 5.21 150 (3-1012 6 -420.05 4.77 11.42 150 (3-1013 6 -195.05 2.21 2.76 150 (3-1014 6 -272.51 3.09 5.12 150 (3-1015 8 889.33 5.68 11.28 150 (3-1016 8 -769.27 4.91 8.62 150 (3-1017 8 -1055.10 6.73 15.48 150 C3-1018 8 -1441.88 9.20 27.60 150 (3-1019 6 385.53 4.37 9.74 150 (3-1020 6 348.86 3.96 8.09 150 (3-1021 6 158.89 1.80 1.89 150 (3-1022 6 365.53 4.15 8.82 150 (3-1023 6 348.86 3.96 8.09 150 C3 Development Exhibit 17B EXHIBIT 18A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Building 49 -875gpm at Nodes C3-9 & C3-8 Line C3-1008 as 8-inch L ine Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 65.70 59413 7.72 66.98 59414 22.50 68.69 59520 58.89 63.18 C3-1 18.75 60.43 C3-10 10.83 59.17 C3-ll 47.50 62.14 C3-12 33.75 63.58 C3-13 0.00 64.55 C3-14 13.33 63.98 C3-15 1.25 65.50 C3-16 20.00 65.25 C3-17 16.67 65.46 C3-2 15.83 59.17 C3-3 8.33 58.13 C3-3A 17.92 57.26 C3-4 25.00 58.29 C3-5 10.42 59.09 C3-6 27.50 62.39 C3-7 17.92 61.22 C3-8 900.00 60.91 C3-9 900.00 58.69 C3 Development Exhibit 18A EXHIBIT 18B Mike URBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Building 49 -875gpm at Nodes C3-9 & C3-8 Line C3-l 008 as 8-inch Line Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 292.06 0.83 0.26 130 4116 12 284.34 0.81 0.25 130 4117 12 261.84 0.74 0.21 130 4118 12 -1793.87 5.09 7.48 130 4152 8 642.07 4.10 8.04 130 C3-1000 8 583.18 3.72 5.16 150 C3-1001 8 176.11 1.12 0.56 150 C3-1002 8 160.28 1.02 0.47 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 C3-1004 6 -120.06 1.36 1.12 150 C3-1005 6 -130.48 1.48 1.31 150 C3-1006 8 -257.85 1.65 1.14 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 C3-1008 8 1163.04 7.42 18.54 150 C3-1009 6 263.04 2.98 4.80 150 C3-1010 6 -636.96 7.23 24.68 150 C3-1011 6 229.08 2.60 3.71 150 C3-1012 6 -418.71 4.75 11.35 150 C3-1013 6 -187.41 2.13 2.56 150 C3-1014 6 -278.79 3.16 5.34 150 C3-1015 8 950.61 6.07 12.76 150 C3-1016 8 -806.81 5.15 9.42 150 C3-1017 8 -1098.94 7.01 16.69 150 C3-1018 12 -1501.82 4.26 4.13 150 C3-1019 6 401.63 4.56 10.51 150 C3-1020 6 364.96 4.14 8.80 150 C3-1021 6 134.03 1.52 1.38 150 C3-1022 6 381.63 4.33 9.56 150 C3-1023 6 364.96 4.14 8.80 150 C3 Development Exhibit 188 EXHIBIT 19A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 56 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-13 & C3-17 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 65.64 59413 7.72 66.93 59414 22.50 68.66 59520 58.89 64.24 C3-1 18.75 61.71 C3-10 10.83 61.03 C3-11 47.50 61.99 C3-12 33.75 62.89 C3-13 875.00 60.76 C3-14 13.33 63.01 C3-15 1.25 63.99 C3-16 20.00 62.17 C3-17 891.67 60.75 C3-2 15.83 60.51 C3-3 8.33 59.50 C3-3A 17.92 58.64 C3-4 25.00 59.78 C3-5 10.42 60.48 C3-6 27.50 63.65 C3-7 17.92 62.48 C3-8 25.00 62.39 C3-9 25.00 61.11 C3 Development Exhibit 19A EXHIBIT 19B MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 56 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-13 & C3-17 Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) {ft/s) /1000 {ft) (millift) 4115 12 181.02 0.51 0.11 130 4116 12 173.30 0.49 0.10 130 4117 12 150.80 0.43 0.08 130 4118 12 -1811.88 5.14 7.62 130 4152 8 513.03 3.27 5.31 130 C3-1000 8 454.14 2.90 3.25 150 C3-1001 8 91.56 0.58 0.17 150 C3-1002 8 75.73 0.48 0.12 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 C3-1004 6 -49.26 0.56 0.22 150 C3-1005 6 -59.68 0.68 0.31 150 C3-1006 8 -284.15 1.81 1.36 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 C3-1008 6 -9.45 0.11 0.01 150 C3-1009 6 -34.45 0.39 0.11 150 C3-1010 6 -59.45 0.67 0.31 150 C3-1011 6 73.75 0.84 0.46 150 C3-1012 6 3.47 0.04 0.00 150 C3-1013 6 126.86 1.44 1.24 150 C3-1014 6 -170.90 1.94 2.16 150 C3-1015 8 -248.18 1.58 1.06 150 C3-1016 8 -680.01 4.34 6.86 150 C3-1017 8 -864.23 5.52 10.70 150 C3-1018 8 -1630.86 10.41 34.67 150 C3-1019 6 765.38 8.68 34.68 150 C3-1020 6 -1021.29 11.59 59.17 150 C3-1021 6 49.48 0.56 0.22 150 C3-1022 6 745.38 8.46 33.02 150 C3-1023 6 -146.29 1.66 1.62 150 C3 Development Exhibit 19B EXHIBIT20A MikeURBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 28 -l 500gpm at Node C3-6 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 66.34 59413 7.72 67.60 59414 22.50 69.30 59520 58.89 64.05 C3-1 18.75 61.36 C3-10 10.83 60.86 C3-11 47.50 62.76 C3-12 33 .75 63.96 C3-13 0.00 64.82 C3-14 13.33 64.13 C3-15 1.25 65.27 C3-16 20.00 65.18 C3-17 16.67 65.54 C3-2 15.83 60.19 C3-3 8.33 59.19 C3-3A 17.92 58.32 C3-4 25.00 59.50 C3-5 10.42 60.17 C3-6 1527.50 59.16 C3-7 17.92 61.84 C3-8 25.00 61.77 C3-9 25.00 60.88 C3 Development Exhibit 20A EXHIBIT 20B MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flo w at Building 28 -1500gpm at Node C3-6 Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /lOOO(ft) (millift) 4084 12 368.20 1.04 0.40 130 4115 12 398.42 1.13 0.46 130 4116 12 390.70 1.11 0.44 130 4117 12 368.20 1.04 0.40 130 4118 12 -1688.36 4.79 6.69 130 4152 8 603.95 3.85 7.18 130 4154 6 -5.83 0.07 0.00 130 4191 8 -13.05 0 .08 0.01 130 4192 4 -7.22 0 .18 0.06 130 (3-1000 8 545.06 3.48 4.55 150 (3-1001 8 15.09 0 .10 0.01 150 (3-1002 8 -0.74 0 .00 0.00 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0 .20 0.03 150 (3-1004 6 21.36 0 .24 0.05 150 (3-1005 6 10.94 0.12 0.01 150 (3-1006 8 -522.16 3.33 4.21 150 (3-1007 8 1527.50 9.75 30.71 150 (3-1008 6 -144.31 1.64 1.58 150 (3-1009 6 -169.31 1.92 2.12 150 (3-1010 6 -194.31 2.20 2.74 150 (3-1011 6 -73.35 0.83 0.45 150 (3-1012 6 -278.50 3.16 5.33 150 (3-1013 6 -103.61 1.18 0.85 150 (3-1014 6 -222.39 2.52 3.52 150 C3-1015 8 878.94 5.61 11.03 150 C3-1016 8 -703.69 4.49 7.31 150 C3-1017 8 -939.41 6.00 12.48 150 C3-1018 8 -1289.94 8.23 22.46 150 C3-1019 6 349.28 3.96 8.11 150 (3-1020 6 312.61 3.55 6.60 150 C3-1021 6 -26.99 0.31 0.07 150 C3-1022 6 329.28 3.74 7.27 150 C3-1023 6 312.61 3.55 6.60 150 C3 Development Exhibit 208 EXHIBIT 21A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 67 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-l l & C3 -1 2 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 65.68 59413 7.72 66.96 59414 22.50 68 .68 59520 58.89 63 .57 C3-1 18.75 60.89 C3-10 10.83 59.93 C3-11 922.50 60.10 C3-12 908.75 62.21 C3-13 0.00 63.18 C3-14 13.33 62.55 C3-15 1.25 64.18 C3-16 20.00 63.92 C3-17 16.67 64.11 C3-2 15.83 59.66 C3-3 8.33 58.64 C3-3A 17.92 57.77 C3-4 25.00 58.86 C3-5 10.42 59.61 C3-6 27.50 62.83 C3-7 17.92 61.67 C3-8 25 .00 61.56 C3-9 25 .00 60.03 C3 Development Exhibit 21A EXHIBIT 21B MikeURBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day Demand with Fire flow at Building 67 -875 gpm at Nodes C3-11 & C3-12 Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 254.64 0.72 0.20 130 4116 12 246.92 0.70 0.19 130 4117 12 224.42 0.64 0.16 130 4118 12 -1800.53 5.11 7.53 130 4152 8 597.99 3.82 7.05 130 C3-1000 8 539.10 3.44 4.46 150 C3-1001 8 141.34 0.90 0.37 150 C3-1002 8 125.51 0.80 0.30 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 C3-1004 6 -90.79 1.03 0.67 150 C3-1005 6 -101.21 1.15 0.82 150 C3-1006 8 -277.81 1.77 1.31 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 C3-1008 6 148.61 1.69 1.67 150 C3-1009 6 123.61 1.40 1.18 150 C3-1010 6 98.61 1.12 0.78 150 C3-1011 6 165.05 1.87 2.02 150 (3-1012 6 252.82 2.87 4.46 150 C3-1013 6 -328.67 3.73 7.25 150 C3-1014 6 -341.00 3.87 7.76 150 C3-1015 8 -83.78 0.53 0.14 150 C3-1016 8 -784.42 5.01 8.94 150 C3-1017 8 -1138.75 7.27 17.83 150 C3-1018 8 -1545.90 9.87 31.40 150 C3-1019 6 405.90 4.61 10.71 150 C3-1020 6 369.23 4.19 8.99 150 C3-1021 6 99 .26 1.13 0.79 150 C3-1022 6 385.90 4.38 9.76 150 C3-1023 6 369.23 4.19 8.99 150 C3 Development Exhibit 218 ' EXHIBIT 22A Mike URBAN Node Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire flow at Clubhouse -1250 gpm at Nodes C3-12 & C3-8 Node Results Name Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) 59412 0.00 63 .75 59413 7.72 65.05 59414 22.50 66.78 59520 58.89 60.29 C3-1 18.75 57.28 C3-10 10.83 56.65 C3-11 47.50 58.03 C3-12 1283.75 58.97 C3-13 0.00 60.34 C3-14 13.33 60.47 C3-15 1.25 63 .37 C3-16 20.00 62.50 C3-17 16.67 62.05 C3-2 15.83 56.09 C3-3 8.33 55.09 C3-3A 17.92 54.22 C3-4 25.00 55.38 C3-5 10.42 56.07 C3-6 27.50 58.88 C3-7 17.92 57.71 C3-8 1275.00 57.43 C3-9 25.00 56.66 C3 Development Exhibit 22A - EXHIBIT 22B Mike URBAN Link Identifiers Description: Peak Day with Fire fl ow at Clubhouse -125 0 gpm at Nodes C3-12 & C3-8 Link Results Name Diameter Flow Velocity Head loss Roughness (in) (gpm) (ft/s) /1000 (ft) (millift) 4115 12 -44.18 0.13 0.01 130 4116 12 -51.90 0.15 0.01 130 4117 12 -74.40 0.21 0.02 130 4118 12 -2085.67 5.92 9.89 130 4152 8 764.03 4.88 11.10 130 C3-1000 8 705.14 4.50 7.34 150 C3-1001 8 79.55 0.51 0.13 150 C3-1002 8 63.72 0.41 0.09 150 c3-1003 6 17.92 0.20 0.03 150 C3-1004 6 -39.44 0.45 0.14 150 C3-1005 6 -49.86 0.57 0.22 150 C3-1006 8 -556.98 3.56 4.74 150 C3-1007 8 27.50 0.18 0.02 150 C3-1008 8 1079.60 6.89 16.15 150 C3-1009 6 -195.40 2.22 2.77 150 C3-1010 6 -220.40 2.50 3.46 150 C3-1011 6 51.91 0.59 0.24 150 C3-1012 6 -179.32 2.03 2.36 150 C3-1013 6 112.23 1.27 0.99 150 C3-1014 6 -339.05 3.85 7.68 150 C3-1015 8 568.04 3.63 4.92 150 C3-1016 8 -1205.04 7.69 19.80 150 C3-1017 8 -1557.42 9.94 31.83 150 C3-1018 12 -2129.86 6.04 7.89 150 C3-1019 6 571.19 6.48 20.17 150 C3-1020 6 534.52 6.07 17.84 150 C3-1021 6 37.47 0.43 0.13 150 C3-1022 6 551.19 6.25 18.88 150 C3-1023 6 534.52 6.07 17.84 150 C3 Development Exhibit 228