HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-34_Page_236. More documentation is needed for this encroachment into the floodplain. When was the
common area filled? Our records show that the common area has received 2'-3' of fill from
the contours on the Section 200 plans, but we do not show where this was approved.
The fill in the common area was likely placed with the construction of the detention
pond since the Section 201 Grading Plan does not show a channel or ditch in that
area.
7. In the application under certifications in the Special Flood Hazard Area, you reference an
approved drainage study for Castlegate II which demonstrates that no adverse impacts are
created. I checked the drainage report for Pond A (section 220); it only references fill for
the roadways. More documentation is needed to show that this development is not creating
any adverse impacts. A report is attached address the impact of the fill placed in this
area.
• 8. In the drainage report for Pond A, the 100-year WSEL was 311.7 for a fully functioning
outfall and 314.7 for a blocked outfall. It appears this development is filling into the pond
area. Please provide a revised report justifying this. How will this affect adjacent
properties? A report is attached describing the affects of the minor filling of the pond
area and its effect on the adjacent properties.
9. Please show the proposed contours surrounding the building and the pond. Contours
added to Sheet C3.
10. It appears some cover will be removed over the existing storm sewer pipes. Please verify
that adequate cover will still be maintained. The pipes have adequate cover.
Reviewed by: Danielle Singh
FIRE
1. Will need a Knox Box on the building. Noted.
2. No other issues at this time. Noted.
Reviewed by: Eric Dotson
SANITATION
1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Noted.
Date: 2/19/13
Date: 02/12/13
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: 2/13/13