Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments(* F"" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Te AdM UW.v iry' MEMORANDUM January 31, 2013 TO: Juan Salamanca, via: jsalamanca@texaslandengineers.com FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP Principal Planner SUBJECT: SHOPS AT SPRING CREEK(SP/NRA) Thank you for the submittal of your SITE PLAN — COMMERCIAL and NON- RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS application. This project will be distributed to staff next week for their review. cc: James Chang, Ponderosa Land Development, via: jchang@ponderosaland.com Case file no. 13-00900024 (SP) Case file no. 13-00900025 (NRA) PLm.i.B& IJeVe%OjIM S.. P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77942 TEL. 979.764.3570 • FAX. 979.764.3496 atK.gov/Aevservices (* F4" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Homr ofT AdM U.ro ,,• MEMORANDUM January 31, 2013 TO: FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP Principal Planner SUBJECT: SHOPS AT SPRING CREEK (SP/NRA) Thank you for the submittal of your SITE PLAN — COMMERCIAL and NON-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS application. This project will be distributed to staff next week for their review. cc: Case file no. 13-00900024 (SP) Case file no. 13-00900025 (NRA) Pknxing &Deve%pmmt Service P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77942 TEL. 979.764.3570 • FAX. 979.764.3496 atK.gov/Aevservices WIV CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Hom ofT. A&M UW.v iry' 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM February 15, 2013 TO: Juan Salamanca, via: jsalamanca@texaslandengineers.com FROM: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Shops At Spring Creek (SP)- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above -mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review: City of College Station Transmittal Letter, _ Memo providing written responses to all of staffs comments (identify the specific page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the comment), One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached, Four (4) revised site plans, One (1) landscaping plan, Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please note that the Site Plan will not be stamped approved until the Blanket Easement, or all other appropriate easements, have been dedicated to the City of College Station). Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact *Planner Not Assigned* at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments PC: James Chang, Ponderosa Land Development, via: jchang@ponderosaland.com Case file no. 13-00900024 Plaxeixge4D.16pm S.. P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842 TEL. 979.764.3570 • FAX. 979.764.3496 cstx.gev/devservkms STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: Shops At Spring Creek (SP) — 13-00900024 PLANNING 1. Please contact Teresa Rogers at (979) 764-3570 to set up a facilitation meeting, or call if you have any questions regarding the comments. 2. Switch the labels for the "General Site Plan Notes" and the "Legal Description". 3. Provide the applicant's name, address, and telephone number in the title block. 4. Revise the use from "Proposed shell building for future tenants" to the proposed land use of restaurant and retail. 5. Revise note #121 to state the sign is existing. 6. Add a note stating: Signs are to be permitted separately. 7. Add a note stating: This property is considered a pad site and is also part of a building plot with Lots 1, 2, 3, 4R, 5R, 7, 8 & 10 of Block 1 of the Spring Creek Commons Subdivision. As such, this lot is required to meet the Non -Residential Architecture Standards in excess of 150,000 square feet of gross floor area. These additional requirements can be found in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), Section 7.10. 8. Label the site plan with the ownership and zoning for this property and adjacent properties. 9. It appears there are different uses proposed within the building. Please label and depict the location of the uses within the building. 10. This property is located within the Greens Prairie Corridor Overlay. Under the LIDO, Section 5.10 Overlay Districts, this property must meet additional requirements, which include a building setback of 40-feet and a parking setback of 20-feet. Please add a note to the site plan stating this. The parking layout will have to be revised to meet this requirement. 11. Label all parking and building setbacks on the property. 12. The ATM queuing lane and bailout lane do not meet current spacing requirements. The queue lane will need to be a minimum of 10-feet wide and the bailout lane must be a minimum of 12-feet wide. These requirements can be found in LIDO Section 7.3.J Drive - Through Facility Queuing Requirements. 13. For note #160 please specify if the dividing line will be paint or a physical barrier. Please note that if you are proposing a physical barrier there may be additional requirements. 14. Dimension all end islands and provide these calculations on the site plan. Per LIDO Section 7.3.D end islands must be a minimum of 180 square feet in area. 15. An interior parking island measuring 180 square feet must be provided for the 15 interior spaces on the site plan. As an alternative any end island areas that exceed the minimum required 180 square feet may be counted toward the interior parking island requirement. 16. The parking space calculations may be revised to reduce the number of required spaces currently listed. Requirements for this site would be calculated at one parking space for every 250 square feet of building area to yield 28 parking spaces. If you are proposing an intense use (pizza buffet) you would need to provide an additional two spaces, in order to accommodate an intense use covering over 25% of the building. This would bring the total number of parking spaces required by ordinance to 30 instead of the 34 currently listed. These requirements can be found in LIDO Section 7.3.1. 17. Please verify the number of parking spaces being provided. It appears there are only 36 spaces on the site plan. 18. Provide a cross access easement that runs parallel to the frontage road and connects the driveway at the northwest side of the property to the driveway at the Whataburger property. 19. Provide a bike rack detail and space layout in the site plan. This requirement can be found in the Site Design Standards. The facility should be 55 square feet in area, and approximately 9'x6'. 20. The bike rack will need to be relocated to a place on the property that is so it is separated from vehicle parking and traffic. The bike rack should have a 3-foot clear space around it to ensure ease of use. 21. Relocate the exterior dumpster bollards to allow the gates to swing 180 degrees from the closed position as required in the Site Design Standards. 22. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will constitute a completely new review. Reviewed by: Teresa Rogers Date: February 14, 2013 LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. Because this site is part of a 150,000+ square foot building plot, additional requirements found in UDO Section 7.10 apply: - Landscaping points for the site must be doubled. - All trees must be a minimum of 2.5' caliper - Parking areas must be screened from the public right-of-way using berms. - Tree wells are required along 15% of the linear front of the fagade facing the public right- of-way (SH 6) and must have a minimum of one canopy tree for every six feet in length. This landscaping may count toward the overall landscape requirement. - Pedestrian connections must be provided to connect this building and site to the other buildings and sites within the building plot. Walkways must be a minimum of 5-feet and if they are within a parking lot area, must be clearly designated using brick pavers or stamped dyed concrete pattern. 2. Screening shrubs and non -screening shrubs receive 10 points per plant, so long as the plants are a minimum of 5 gallons. The landscape point totals should be edited to reflect this allowance. 3. Streetscape trees are required within 50-feet of the right-of-way. This site is required to have 8 streetscaping trees. 4. Provide documentation that shows the proposed irrigation system is a water conserving system in order to obtain point credits. 5. This site is eligible for additional point credits. Please revise the landscape points to account for any reductions in points. Reviewed by: Teresa Rogers ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 Date: February 14, 2013 Site Plan 1. Please add a note stating that the property does not lie within the 100-year floodplain as regulated by FEMA. Please show all existing utilities. Please show all proposed meters/services. Please provide a legend. Please provide a vicinity map. What is the dashed line near the frontage road? Please provide a fire flow report to verify the number of hydrants required. 8. Please add a note stating that this site is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area. Fees will be collected at the time the building permit is issued. 9. Please show the removal of the temporary curb for the connection to the adjacent site. 10. What does the hatching near the rear driveway represent? 11. Please show all the details called out in the notes section. 12. Please provide documentation that permission has been given to encroach into the pipeline easement. 13. Please clearly show the extent of the sidewalk being constructed at the rear of the lot. Is this intended to be public? This is within a private site and needs to be private. 14. At the northern corner of the site, there is a landscaped area that does not appear to have curb around the entire area. This area also encroaches into the adjacent lot. Development Permit 15. Please provide an engineer's estimate of all public infrastructure. 16. Please provide a drainage report verifying that this site meets the assumptions of the original drainage report. The drainage report needs to also address the drainage onsite. 17. Please provide details for modifying the existing storm sewer manhole. Has permission been obtained from the owner of the storm sewer manhole to make modifications? 18. Please show ponding depths at the proposed inlet in the drainage report. 19. Please provide legends for sheets C3-05. 20. Please provide a detailed plan for the fire hydrant and the waterline modifications that are being proposed. 21. It looks like you are proposing to place a bend in the 6" waterline and connect each meter individually to a public line. There should only be one connection to the public line. 22. Water services are required to be copper to the meter. 23. There are additional Standard City Details that would apply to this site. Typically, these sheets are submitted as full sheets (water, sewer, drainage, sidewalk, etc) so that any issues that arise during construction can be covered with these details. Reviewed by: Danielle Singh TRANSPORTATION Date: February 12, 2013 Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) made provisions for two drive-thrus on the building plot, including out parcels (pad sites). There are currently two drive-thrus in existence. No additional restaurant drive-thru is be allowed for this development or future developments unless the TIA is revised at the developer's expense. Reviewed by: Joe Guerra, AICP, PTP Date: February 11, 2013 FIRE 1. No more than a six percent (6%) grade is allowed on any length of fire lanes. 2. Fire lanes will be constructed using the "Fire Apparatus Turning Radius Template" and have a fire lane sign at the entrance. Curbs to be marked "Fire lane, No Parking, Tow Away Zone" with a minimum of four (4") letters. 3. A "Knox Box" security key system is required on all buildings and a Knox Switch is required on all gated entrances. 4. Commercial construction requires a fire hydrant within three hundred feet (300') from the main entrance and within four hundred and fifty feet (450') from any part of a structure. 5. F.D.C. locations will be within one hundred and fifty feet (150') of a fire hydrant and located on the "road side" of a structure. 6. According to the site plan there will possible be a Pizza Buffet located in this structure. If so we are currently under IFC/IBC 2012 and an automatic fire suppression system (sprinkler system) may be required. Reviewed by: Eric Dotson SANITATION Date: February 5, 2013 1. If at all possible, for a better angle and approach, can we have the dumpster enclosure turned 5 degrees clockwise. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: February 6, 2013 (*/" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Hom of Texas A&M UaheNry' 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM February 15, 2013 TO: FROM: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Shops At Spring Creek (SP)- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above -mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review: City of College Station Transmittal Letter, Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the comment), One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached, Four (4) revised site plans, One (1) landscaping plan, Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please note that the Site Plan will not be stamped approved until the Blanket Easement, or all other appropriate easements, have been dedicated to the City of College Station). Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact *Planner Not Assigned* at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments PC: Case file no. 13-00900024 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: Shops At Spring Creek (SP) — 13-00900024 Pknning e4De &pm tSe ices P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842 TEL. 979.764.3570 • FAX. 979.764.3496 atcgov/Aevservices PLANNING 1. Please contact Teresa Rogers at (979) 764-3570 to set up a facilitation meeting, or call if you have any questions regarding the comments. 2. Switch the labels for the "General Site Plan Notes" and the "Legal Description". 3. Add a note stating: Signs are to be permitted separately. 4. Add a note stating: This property is considered a pad site and is also part of a building plot with Lots 1, 2, 3, 4R, 5R, 7, 8 & 10 of Block 1 of the Spring Creek Commons Subdivision. As such, this lot is required to meet the Non -Residential Architecture Standards in excess of 150,000 square feet of gross floor area. These additional requirements can be found in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), Section 7.10. 5. Because this site is part of a 150,000+ square foot building plot, the following additional requirements apply: 6. Provide the applicant's name, address, and telephone number in the title block. 7. Label the site plan with the ownership and zoning for this property and adjacent properties. 8. It appears there are different uses proposed within the building. Please label and depict the location of the uses within the building. 9. This property is located within the Greens Prairie Corridor Overlay. Under the UDO, Section 5.10 Overlay Districts, this property must meet additional requirements, which include a building setback of 40-feet and a parking setback of 20-feet. Please add a note to the site plan stating this. The parking layout will have to be revised to meet this requirement. 10. Label all parking and building setbacks on the property. 11. Revise the use from "Proposed shell building for future tenants" to the proposed land use of restaurant and retail. 12. Revise note #121 to state the sign is existing. 13. The ATM queuing lane and bailout lane do not meet current spacing requirements. The queue lane will need to be a minimum of 10-feet wide and the bailout lane must be a minimum of 12-feet wide. These requirements can be found in LIDO Section 7.3.J Drive - Through Facility Queuing Requirements. 14. Provide a bike rack detail and space layout in the site plan. This requirement can be found in the Site Design Standards. The facility should be 55 square feet in area, and approximately 9'x6'. 15. The bike rack will need to be relocated to a place on the property that is so it is separated from vehicle parking and traffic. The bike rack should have a 3-foot clear space around it to ensure ease of use. 16. For note #160 please specify if the dividing line will be paint or a physical barrier. Please note that if you are proposing a physical barrier there may be additional requirements. 17. Dimension all end islands and provide these calculations on the site plan. Per LIDO Section 7.3.D end islands must be a minimum of 180 square feet in area. 18. An interior parking island measuring 180 square feet must be provided for the 15 interior spaces on the site plan. As an alternative any end island areas that exceed the minimum required 180 square feet may be counted toward the interior parking island requirement. 19. The parking space calculations may be revised to reduce the number of required spaces currently listed. Requirements for this site would be calculated at one parking space for every 250 square feet of building area to yield 28 parking spaces. If you are proposing an intense use (pizza buffet) you would need to provide an additional two spaces, in order to accommodate an intense use covering over 25% of the building. This would bring the total number of parking spaces required by ordinance to 30 instead of the 34 currently listed. These requirements can be found in LIDO Section 7.3.1. 20. Please verify the number of parking spaces being provided. It appears there are only 36 spaces on the site plan. 21. Relocate the exterior dumpster bollards to allow the gates to swing 180 degrees from the closed position as required in the Site Design Standards. 22. Provide a cross access easement that runs parallel to the frontage road and connects the driveway at the northwest side of the property to the driveway at the Whataburger property. 23. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will constitute a completely new review. Reviewed by: Teresa Rogers Date: February 14, 2013 LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. Because this site is part of a 150,000+ square foot building plot, additional requirements found in UDO Section 7.10 apply: - Landscaping points for the site must be doubled. - All trees must be a minimum of 2.5' caliper - Parking areas must be screened from the public right-of-way using berms. - Tree wells are required along 15% of the linear front of the fagade facing the public right- of-way (SH 6) and must have a minimum of one canopy tree for every six feet in length. This landscaping may count toward the overall landscape requirement. - Pedestrian connections must be provided to connect this building and site to the other buildings and sites within the building plot. Walkways must be a minimum of 5-feet and if they are within a parking lot area, must be clearly designated using brick pavers or stamped dyed concrete pattern. 2. Screening shrubs and non -screening shrubs receive 10 points per plant, so long as the plants are a minimum of 5 gallons. The landscape point totals should be edited to reflect this allowance. 3. Streetscape trees are required within 50-feet of the right-of-way. This site is required to have 8 streetscaping trees. 4. Provide documentation that shows the proposed irrigation system is a water conserving system in order to obtain point credits. 5. This site is eligible for additional point credits. Please revise the landscape points to account for any reductions in points. Reviewed by: Teresa Rogers Date: February 14, 2013 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 Site Plan 1. Please add a note stating that the property does not lie within the 100-year floodplain as regulated by FEMA. 2. Please show all existing utilities. 3. Please show all proposed meters/services. 4. Please provide a legend. 5. Please provide a vicinity map. 6. What is the dashed line near the frontage road? 7. Please provide a fire flow report to verify the number of hydrants required. 8. Please add a note stating that this site is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area. Fees will be collected at the time the building permit is issued. 9. Please show the removal of the temporary curb for the connection to the adjacent site. 10. What does the hatching near the rear driveway represent? 11. Please show all the details called out in the notes section. 12. Please provide documentation that permission has been given to encroach into the pipeline easement. 13. Please clearly show the extent of the sidewalk being constructed at the rear of the lot. Is this intended to be public? This is within a private site and needs to be private. 14. At the northern corner of the site, there is a landscaped area that does not appear to have curb around the entire area. This area also encroaches into the adjacent lot. Development Permit 15. Please provide an engineer's estimate of all public infrastructure. 16. Please provide a drainage report verifying that this site meets the assumptions of the original drainage report. The drainage report needs to also address the drainage onsite. 17. Please provide details for modifying the existing storm sewer manhole. Has permission been obtained from the owner of the storm sewer manhole to make modifications? 18. Please show ponding depths at the proposed inlet in the drainage report. 19. Please provide legends for sheets C3-05. 20. Please provide a detailed plan for the fire hydrant and the waterline modifications that are being proposed. 21. It looks like you are proposing to place a bend in the 6" waterline and connect each meter individually to a public line. There should only be one connection to the public line. 22. Water services are required to be copper to the meter. 23. There are additional Standard City Details that would apply to this site. Typically, these sheets are submitted as full sheets (water, sewer, drainage, sidewalk, etc) so that any issues that arise during construction can be covered with these details. Reviewed by: Danielle Singh Date: 2/12/2013 TRANSPORTATION 1. No restaurant drive thru's will be allowed (permitted). 2. Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) made provisions for two drive thru's, on the overall Lowe's site to include out parcels (pad sites). 3. If restaurant drive thru's are proposed now or in the future the TIA will have to be redone and revisited at developer's expense. Reviewed by: Joe Guerra, AICP, PTP, Transportation Planning Coord. Date: 2/11/2013 SANITATION If at all possible, for a better angle and approach, can we have the dumpster enclosure turned 5 degrees clockwise. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: February 6, 2013 FIRE 1) No more than a six percent (6%) grade is allowed on any length of fire lanes. 2) Fire lanes will be constructed using the "Fire Apparatus Turning Radius Template" and have a fire lane sign at the entrance. Curbs to be marked "Fire lane, No Parking, Tow Away Zone" with a minimum of four (4") letters. 3) A "Knox Box" security key system is required on all buildings and a Knox Switch is required on all gated entrances. 4) Commercial construction requires a fire hydrant within three hundred feet (300') from the main entrance and within four hundred and fifty feet (450') from any part of a structure. 5) F.D.C. locations will be within one hundred and fifty feet (150') of a fire hydrant and located on the "road side" of a structure. 6) According to the site plan there will possible be a Pizza Buffet located in this structure. If so we are currently under IFC/IBC 2012 and an automatic fire suppression system (sprinkler system) may be required. Reviewed by: Eric Dotson Date: 02/05/13 WIV CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Hom ofT.A&MUW.v iry' 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 61=16 [e1.Y_1 @ I Bill 6 March 20, 2013 TO: Juan Salamanca, via: jsalamanca@texaslandengineers.com FROM: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Shops at Spring Creek (SP) Staff reviewed the above -mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $932 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review: City of College Station Transmittal Letter One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will be returned to you, please submit additional copies if you want more than one approved set) Two (2) revised site plans One (1) landscaping plan Two (2) copies of the grading plan (if applicable) Two (2) copies of the erosion control plan (if applicable) Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: James Chang, Ponderosa Land Development, via: jchang@ponderosaland.com Case file no. 13-00900024 P/axeixge4Deoe16pm S.. P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842 TEL. 979.764.3570 • FAX. 979.764.3496 cstx.gev/devservkms STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: Shops at Spring Creek (SP) - 13-00900024 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 3 1. Thank you for showing the adjacent 6" water line. Please also show the 24" waterline in front of the site. 2. There are several public curb details which are not permitted for private sites. Please specify which curb detail or show a separate detail on the site plan. The curb should be a 6" monolithic raised curb. Details ST1-01, ST1-05, or ST 1-04 are acceptable to use for private sites depending on the grading of your site. 3. Please provide a detail for concrete paving. Our standard details do not include concrete paving details. 4. 1 do not see the location of the second fire hydrant that is being utilized. Please show the location or add a note showing the direction in which it is located and an approximate distance. 5. It appears a landscaping wall has been added with this review. We do not allow walls in our easements. Is this permitted by the pipeline company? It does not appear to be included in the encroachment agreement. Have the berms been approved by the pipeline company? 6. The meters you are showing on sheet C5 do not match the size specified on the site plan. Please change as necessary. It appears you are using larger meter sizes than necessary. Your impact fee will be calculated based on your meter size. By reducing the meter size can you connect with a 2" line instead of 4? 7. A blow off is not shown (on the plan view) or necessary at the end of the 4". Please remove it from the notes. 8. Please revise the fire hydrant configuration to avoid connecting with a 45-degree bend. If you change the configuration of the sidewalk, the fire hydrant will have room to be located behind the sidewalk. As, I have stated previously, the existing stubbed out line should end in the fire hydrant. Please feel free to email me this sheet for review prior to resubmitting the entire site. 9. If you would like to receive a clearing and grading permit before full site plan approval, please submit 2 copies of the grading plan and erosion control plan. Reviewed by: Danielle Singh Date: April 15, 2013 TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS 1. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has yet to be submitted. The site plan cannot be approved without TIA submittal and review. Reviewed by: Joe Guerra Date: April 15, 2013 (* F"" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Hom ofT. At4M UW.v iry' 141=165*].YG1@Upll4 March 20, 2013 TO: Juan Salamanca, via: jsalamanca@texaslandengineers.com FROM: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Shops at Spring Creek (SP) Staff reviewed the above -mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $932 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review: City of College Station Transmittal Letter One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will be returned to you, please submit additional copies if you want more than one approved set) Two (2) revised site plans One (1) landscaping plan Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: James Chang, Ponderosa Land Development, via: jchang@ponderosaland.com Case file no. 13-00900024 Pkxxixg&Development Se kv P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77942 TEL. 979.764.3570 • FAX. 979.764.3496 a tcgovidevsenrices STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: Shops at Spring Creek (SP) - 13-00900024 PLANNING 1. It is necessary to provide documentation that the cross access easement has been filed prior to the site plan being approved. 2. The 3 foot berms that were provided as a requirement for screening must be shown on the grading plan. 3. Please use the bicycle parking space layout and appoved inverted U design for all required bicycle parking. These requirements can be found in the City of College Station Site Design Standards. 4. Revise note #121 to include a sentence which states: Signs are permitted separately. 5. Revise the ownership information for Lot 4R to state "Whataburger Real Estate LP" instead of "Whataburger, Inc. and Chick-fil-a Inc." 6. Revise the ownership information for Lot 7 to state "Chick-fil-a Inc" instead of "Corinth-S.H. 6 & Green Prairie L.P." 7. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. Reviewed by: Teresa Rogers Date: March 15, 2013 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2 Site Plan 1. Please show the existing water lines adjacent to the site. These need to be shown, so that the contractor is aware of the approximate locations of existing utilities. 2. Please show the sanitary sewer service on the site plan. 3. How will the brick pavers be installed around the existing sanitary sewer manhole near the proposed driveway? Please add a detail for this. 4. It appears that there is additional sidewalk shown with this submittal that will be located on the adjacent lot outside of the access easement. Please provide permission of the adjacent land owners or an access easement. An access easement is required for the driveway connection which is not located in the existing access easement. 5. It appears that concrete paving and curb details are not included in the civil drawings. The curb requirement for parking areas is shown in our Site Design Standards. This detail is different than our public curbs. 6. Please provide a detail for the brick pavers. 7. Label 113 no longer points to the dumpster enclosure. 8. Is label 114 intended to show the pavement for the dumpster pad? I do not see this label utilized on the site plan itself. 9. Label 125 says curb has been removed. Unless it has been removed, please change to remove. Development Permit 10. Please add all the sheets (site plan, site plan details, landscape, etc) to the index on the cover sheet. 11. Please provide one copy of sheet C3 (independent of the full construction set) so that I may file it with the drainage report. 12. On sheet C5, please revise note 2. The International Fire Code requires 2 hydrants for the required fire flow. If you will be utilizing an existing hydrant, please reference it here. 13. My records indicate that the existing waterline is 6" not 8". 14. 90 degree bends are not permitted. 15. In order to simplify the water design, I would recommend removing the existing blow off at the end of the line, replacing with a fire hydrant and placing a tee (or tap depending on the size) for the services. 16. The waterline as proposed on the plans would require a profile view. Using the recommendation above would not require a profile view as no additional public waterline is being added. 17. Please show and label all fittings, taps, etc. Reviewed by: Danielle Singh Date: March 19, 2013 TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) scope was submitted in the latest round of comment replies. The TIA scope is sufficient and represents the analysis that is required. However, site plan approval will be contingent on the submission and approval of the TIA and any mitigation requirements that may be necessary. Reviewed by: Joe Guerra, AICP, PTP FIRE 1. No further comments at this time. Reviewed by: Eric Dotson SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this change. Date: March 19. 2013 Date: March 15, 2013 Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: March 12, 2013 TRANSPORTATION A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) scope was submitted in the latest round of comment replies. The TIA scope is fine and represents the analysis that is required. Any site plan approvals will be contingent on the submission of the TIA and or mitigation requirements if any. Reviewed by: Joe Guerra, AICP, PTP, Transportation Planning Coord. Date: 3-19-2013 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2 Site Plan 1. Please show the existing water lines adjacent to the site. These need to be shown, so that the contractor is aware of the approximate locations of existing utilities. 2. Please show the sanitary sewer service on the site plan. 3. How will the brick pavers be installed around the existing sanitary sewer manhole near the proposed driveway? Please add a detail for this. 4. It appears that there is additional sidewalk shown with this submittal that will be located on the adjacent lot outside of the access easement. Please provide permission of the adjacent land owners or an access easement. An access easement is required for the driveway connection which is not located in the existing access easement. 5. It appears that concrete paving and curb details are not included in the civil drawings. The curb requirement for parking areas is shown in our Site Design Standards. This detail is different than our public curbs. 6. Please provide a detail for the brick pavers. 7. Label 113 no longer points to the dumpster enclosure. 8. Is label 114 intended to show the pavement for the dumpster pad? I do not see this label utilized on the site plan itself. 9. Label 125 says curb has been removed. Unless it has been removed, please change to remove. Development Permit 10. Please add all the sheets (site plan, site plan details, landscape, etc) to the index on the cover sheet. 11. Please provide one copy of sheet C3 (independent of the full construction set) so that I may file it with the drainage report. 12. On sheet C5, please revise note 2. The International Fire Code requires 2 hydrants for the required fire flow. If you will be utilizing an existing hydrant, please reference it here. 13. My records indicate that the existing waterline is 6" not 8". 14. 90 degree bends are not permitted. 15. In order to simplify the water design, I would recommend removing the existing blow off at the end of the line, replacing with a fire hydrant and placing a tee (or tap depending on the size) for the services. 16. The waterline as proposed on the plans would require a profile view. Using the recommendation above would not require a profile view as no additional public waterline is being added. 17. Please show and label all fittings, taps, etc. Reviewed by: Danielle Singh Date: 3/19/2013 ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format, version of plat and / or site plan as soon as it is available. Email to: gmartinez(cD-cstx.gov. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available. This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size of transformer, and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure to provide load data could result in construction delays. Delivery time for transformers and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks. EASEMENTS: Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure as designed by CSU, as shown on plat or site plan. The developer will be responsible for locating existing easements on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries. GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers and other existing devices or locations and extend as required. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices, developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide electrical service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations, and conduit routing as designed by CSU. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at 979.764.6255. Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez Date: 03.18.2013 (*/" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Horn ofT. A4M UahsNry' 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM March 20, 2013 TO: Juan Salamanca, via: jsalamanca@texaslandengineers.com FROM: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Shops at Spring Creek (SP) Staff reviewed the above -mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $932 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review: City of College Station Transmittal Letter Seven (7) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will be returned to you, please submit additional copies if you want more than one approved set) Two (2) revised site plans One (1) landscaping plan One (1) 24x36 grading and erosion control plan Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: James Chang, Ponderosa Land Development, via: jchang@ponderosaland.com Case file no. 13-00900024 P/neeixg&D.4.pm Snv . P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842 TEL. 979.764.3570 • FAX. 979.764.3496 atcgov/Aevsenrices STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: Shops at Spring Creek (SP) - 13-00900024 PLANNING 1. It is necessary to provide documentation that the cross access easement has been filed prior to the site plan being approved. 2. The 3 foot berms that were provided as a requirement for screening must be shown on the grading plan. 3. Please use the bicycle parking space layout and appoved inverted U design for all required bicycle parking. These requirements can be found in the City of College Station Site Design Standards. 4. Revise note #121 to include a sentence which states: Signs are permitted separately. 5. Revise the ownership information for Lot 4R to state "Whataburger Real Estate LP" instead of "Whataburger, Inc. and Chick-fil-a Inc." 6. Revise the ownership information for Lot 7 to state "Chick-fil-a Inc" instead of "Corinth-S.H. 6 & Green Prairie L.P." 7. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. Reviewed by: Teresa Rogers Date: March 15, 2013 Page 2 of 2 FIRE 1) No further comments at this time. Reviewed by: Eric Dotson Date: 3/15/13 SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this change. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: March 12, 2013 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 3 1. Thank you for showing the adjacent 6" water line. Please also show the 24" waterline in front of the site. 2. There are several public curb details which are not permitted for private sites. Please specify which curb detail or show a separate detail on the site plan. The curb should be a 6" monolithic raised curb. Details ST1-01, ST1-05, or ST 1-04 are acceptable to use for private sites depending on the grading of your site. 3. Please provide a detail for concrete paving. Our standard details do not include concrete paving details. 4. 1 do not see the location of the second fire hydrant that is being utilized. Please show the location or add a note showing the direction in which it is located and an approximate distance. 5. It appears a landscaping wall has been added with this review. We do not allow walls in our easements. Is this permitted by the pipeline company? It does not appear to be included in the encroachment agreement. Have the berms been approved by the pipeline company? 6. The meters you are showing on sheet C5 do not match the size specified on the site plan. Please change as necessary. It appears you are using larger meter sizes than necessary. Your impact fee will be calculated based on your meter size. By reducing the meter size can you connect with a 2" line instead of 4? 7. A blow off is not shown (on the plan view) or necessary at the end of the 4". Please remove it from the notes. 8. Please revise the fire hydrant configuration to avoid connecting with a 45-degree bend. If you change the configuration of the sidewalk, the fire hydrant will have room to be located behind the sidewalk. As, I have stated previously, the existing stubbed out line should end in the fire hydrant. Please feel free to email me this sheet for review prior to resubmitting the entire site. 9. If you would like to receive a clearing and grading permit before full site plan approval, please submit 2 copies of the grading plan and erosion control plan. Reviewed by: Danielle Singh Date: 4/15/2013