Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFolderFOR OFFICE USE ONLY P&Z CASE NO.: tJb/.-() 3 DATE SUBMITIED: / /7 fa;;. DP-o~-aol-C>ctbt SITE PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ~ Site plan application completed in full. _L $200.00 Application Fee. _.:is_ $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee. ___:±__ $600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. {This fee is payable if construction of a public waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) ~Ten (10) folded copies of site plan. _2 A copy of the attached site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. ~Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). * r:-ec s wa.: ... ~J. b; a~~,~~c...i ~r·c.vr.(.,.;r NAMEOFPROJECT 5()"\/ccN-t..\--5ol.,.+t, .... .s 1 °1nc. ~~f-:-c.c 8u.~)j_;"j ADDRESS L.\\ &u .. \~+t L~rc.le ,C.5. l'il. 77S45 LEGALDESCRIPTION Lo-\s 7..-A + ~-f3/illi-4'. u/k .1) lk 13 .. J: ... ~Sf C~...:Jcv-, Pht..1c.I. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary C9\1tact for the Project): Name \?..\)\>0 P~'1i\(. 1 f\1. A -((. L. ~o.';lnc:. f ftssbc:~~s Street Address I 5"c '1 ~""'tr a \A fJoA:.·~.07 J 5"' ·~ I 0 4 City ~c lie)~ 5f ~ 1-:~"' State T 'J.... Zip Code I J 8 5 E-Mail Address _f"p "''i y..e ~ r{ poy M. C.o n, PhoneNumber (91'\) h'lb-11..71..... Fax Number (q7") b96·8{{4- PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name UY'\\\JU'~~\ t~""plf'-~ Sv-v:c~.s -L"'r16.v-.. C..Oop~r StreetAddress L._l)() G\>r.\:~'t C..~rc...le City Lolfe5e 5f'-'"7\r.. State l f... Zip Code ( 7 ~ .(. S E-Mail Address ___________ _ Phone Number __________ _ Fax Number ------------- ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name J()e 5~..._l-\-c._,... T~Y-C.O"'\ Street Address l 1 () J G n, h.o '°"\ ft_ 06. J City Lo l I e J e. 5+-v.. +~ ~ ~ State l 'h Zip Code '11i4: S E-Mail Address ~o~ -''-k"" 14-'t e_ ~'Ii (Ot'\. I"\~ f. Phone Number b ~ 0 - ] '1 l I Fax Number ------=Cc=--°l-=---0--____,_~ --'-7---''-7.___ ____ _ OTHER CONTACTS {Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.) Name G J. M.:A-~c'l ...-L. F. ~c:ic-clo"' -C_6."':\.r~d-or . Street Address l 5 () 'l ~ M<c> l J P.,.-fc"" 1 1 5•-le I 0 S City to II < ) < .S: .. +, • " State -r-{_ Zip Code :C1 ~4-S -Mail Address el'ho+ft1 e c'f JorcJo"" .eoK-t Phone Number (,ti\ b -0 St> 0 Fax Number (, 'b -0 b D f Site Plan Application.DOC 113102 1 of 3 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Name/Firm: Date: I-J -loo -z_ Address: Phone: __ fo~9_o_~ •_7_1~1 _I _ Fax: bqO-~7'i7 We are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): D Master Development Plan D Preliminary Plat D Final Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR IJtSite Plan . D Grading Plan D Landscape Plan D Irrigation Plan D Building Construction Documents w I D Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ D Redlines w I D Redlin es w/ D Redlines w I D Redlines w/ D Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: D Waterline Construction Documents w/ D Redlines w/D Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ D Redlines D D D D D D Sewerline Construction Documents Drainage Construction Documents Street Construction Documents Easement application with metes & bounds description Drainage Letter or Report w/ D Redlines Fire Flow Analysis w/ D Redlines Special Instructions: ifoevelopment Permit App. D Conditional Use Permit D Rezoning Application D Variance Request D Other -Please specify D TxDOT Driveway Permit D TxDOT Utility Permit D Other -Please specify 2-adedi"-h·rr>'la..1 ~~r>fr.s o.f S,t£Pla11 -(;,.,,-b...._hi·~s ~ ....... ~ ~111t:w.1 &~ I 4 Copl£'> of CJ&wr:i ~ Tr.u Pr-ofeJ,'r,. f ~ TRANSMlTTAL LETTER TRANSMIT.DOC 1/3/02 1 or 1 M-l PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) _ ___;t\)=-C)-"'-'--c... ______________ _ #OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED +ob . 326 o ... s,'-k # OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ~,-ke.rcJ MULTl-FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL PARKLAND DEDICATION Total Acreage ____ _ #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Floodplain Acreage __ _ _ __ x $457 = $ _______ _ Housing Units ____ _ _ __ # of acres in floodplain #of 1 Bedroom Units # of acres in detention ------ #of 2 Bedroom Units ---___ # of acres in greenways # of 3 Bedroom Units --- # of 4 Bedroom Units COMMERCIAL --- FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY Total Acreage --'[----'fo_. _b_B_I __ _ ___ # Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft. Building Square Feet I 0 0 '14-4 ___ #Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. Floodplain Acreage 0 · o NOTE: Parkland Dedication fee is due prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. l-]-07- pplicant Date Site Plan Application.DOC 1/3/02 2 of 3 SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations: to-sJ-r ... J:.~,'"' c.-·t et-t=:,('.. [i.JJ:.-.0 o~A--,·--s Lo+s ,kJ (A.f: /:-+;. s I I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, ~t>S~Dh ~. Sc....\.-_~l+-L t , design engin~er/owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the Colle e Statio City Code. P. P. E, Property Owner(s) l-7 -oc Date D. I, , do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study. Engineer Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: --------------------------- In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be ~ taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply Site Plan Application.DOC 1 /3/02 3 of 3 CB" 1. B" 2. ei' 3. ~ ~ (3" B ~ 4 . SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 10 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). A key map (not necessarily to scale). Title block to include: Name, address, location, and legal description Name, address, and telephone number of applicant Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) Date of submittal Total site area North arrow. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. Existing locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.). Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961 ). Buildings. Water courses. Show all easements clearly designating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.). 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, 0ote if there is none on the site. Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. Meter locations. Topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) 8. Proposed location, type and dimensions of the following.: 0 fi/k Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. El The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. if Setbacks. Show building setbacks as outlined in Ordinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, (Section 7, Table A). ~ Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. Minimum parking space is 9' x 20', or on a perimeter row 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. Designate number -./ of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. l::f Handicap parking spaces. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 113/02 I of 3 ff" Parking Islands. Raised landscape islands, (6 " raised curb) a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are required at both ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to the end island maybe applied toward the required 180 sq . ft .). Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers, or stamped dyed concrete or other decorative materials as approved. Drives. Minimum drive aisle width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking . Curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements .) Security gates (show swing path and design specs with colors). Sidewalks (both public and private). Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or if the review staff determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ~/ Medians. Show any and all traffic medians to be constructed on site. l.JY Landscape Reserve. A twenty four foot setback from R.O .W. to curb of parking lot is required. Pavement may encroach into this 24 ' reserve by up to 1134 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be met. In no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line. Ef Common open spaces sites Ga" Loading docks 0 t-1/"' Detention ponds 0 ~//I Guardrails 0 P/A Retaining walls ~ All required and other types of fences (a 6' privacy fence is required between industrial/commercial and residential developments as well as between multi-family and single family developments). Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas . Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required . (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.) Show all easements clearly designating as proposed and type (utility, access , etc.). If dedicated by separate instrument list by volume and page. Utilities (noting size and designate as proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site , including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings. · · Meter locations (must be located in public R.O .W. or public utility easement.). /o oe 0 --? Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage J'IAISMrrTI:.~ ~ information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) lil---Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 , R-1 A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. fb 'P.>f 0 --t Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case .)..caM1rrc:f> ~ shall they be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. NOTE: 9. Show fire lanes. Fire lanes a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued. Will building be sprinkled? Yes g/ No 0 If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted . SITE PLAN CHEC KLIST SITECK.DOC 113102 2 of 3 10. 11 . 0 ti 12. /Jr'A: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13. tv/A (U/ 14. ~ 15. ~ 16. 17. 18. 19. ~ 20. NOTE: Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. Show curb and pavement detail. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception . (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations , utility pads, etc.) Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". Landscape plans as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance# 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: required point calculations additional streetscape points required . Streetscape compliance is required on all streets larger than a residential street. calculations for# of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points.) proposed new plantings with points earned proposed locations of new plantings screening of parking lots screening of dumpsters, detention ponds, transformers, A/C units, loading docks, propane tanks, utility demarcation point on buildings, or other areas potentially visually offensive. existing landscaping to remain show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.O.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation deman submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W. ? Yes 0 ·NoX If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be any utilities in TxDOT R.O .W . ? Yes 0 No)( If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W .? Yes 0 No~ If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. The total number of multi-family buildings and un its to be constructed on the proposed project site. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (mi nimum, maxi mum a~d average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes O Signs are to be permitted separately. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITEC K.DOC 1/3/02 3 of 3 ' ! t l FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P&Z CASE NO.: 0( -d:.Ct:Y / SITE PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ~ Site plan application completed in full. ~ $200.00 Application Fee. __:fs_ $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee. ____:±___ $600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a public waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) ~Ten (10}folded copies of site plan. ~A copy of the attached site plan checklist witll all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. ~Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board , please provide proof of approval (if applicable). * f="ec s We>.~" c.J... b) CJe...~'P"'c...d-Pt-sr•c.llht...,;:J;- NAME OF PROJECT 5()~/'ccN~+-Solv..1-t·, ... .s, "11'\C. C)~f\.c 5'u.:),A;"J ADDRESS L. \ \ Q.~ .. \:h L.~,,c.le . C. S. t'il.. 77 ~45 LEGALDESCRIPTION Lo1-.s 'L-A. + 1..-r.3 ~ iJ/k_ .1 lk 13 ... ;; ... tSf cf'~ P'u.1c.I APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary C9\1tact for the Project): Name {?_\) 'ovt-P'°'1r'\C. , ~I A -R. L. ~O."j'f\t f A-ss11e,-~-h-J StreetAddress ( S""o°I G~va\cl Po~v.s•7: 5u·te /04 City e..clle5e 5fo..h<>..-. State T '}..__ Zip Code I 1 8 s E-Mail Address rp o.'1 Y\e (2__ rl po'f I\~. <'..I) n, Phone Number (91<1) b'lb~lL. 71-Fax Number (q7~) b96-@ll't- PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name u~:.\JU~G \ t'>""-pv--~ s~\J; (C .s -Lo.rl 6"' C..Oo p~/" StreetAddress (_tJC) Gtuc.\:.\..'1 l~r~le City Lol/ese 5+'-t,·," State l ~ Zip Code l 7 ~ c{. S E-Mail Address ___________ _ Phone Number __________ _ Fax Number -------------- ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Jt>e 5c.1.~l-\-c__ ---TeY..C.O"\ Street Address l 1 () J G n h. o"" f2 o CJ. J City Lo t / e ') e. ..5+-"'-+~ 11"' State l {. Zip Code 11~4: S E-Mail Address )()~ .sc..k ... k-'l e_ f.N c.o"-. r'\~ f Phone Number b ~ 0 -J "1 l I Fax Number --~(c~'l~0--~~-1_1~] _____ _ OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.) Name G ~ Mo-\-\c:'l .--L. F. ~~rdov-. -tri·"':\.rerd-or . Street Address l '5 ti 'l e !'.".l<c • \ d \)..,.-!("" 1 ' s •. 1< I 0 5 City t b II < ~ < .s: ~ .\., . " State -r{._ Zip Code :I1 ~4-S -Mail Address e"4t\.o+fr1 (2 c-f' Jorclov. .(Ok-f Phone Number 0 '1 b -0 5 ei D Fax Number f!> 'b -0 b D f Site Plan Application DOC 1/3/02 1 of 3 M-l PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) __ t\)=---t:1"-_'-_______________ _ #OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 40 b MULTl-FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL Total Acreage ____ _ Floodplain Acreage __ _ Housing Units ____ _ # of 1 Bedroom Units --- #of 2 Bedroom Units --- #of 3 Bedroom Units --- # of 4 Bedroom Units --- FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY ___ #Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft. ___ #Bedrooms < 132 sq . ft. 326 o ... .s,'.J..e #OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED gu ~~e.rcJ PARKLAND DEDICATION #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units ---x $457 = $ -------- _ __ #of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention --- ___ # of acres in greenways COMMERCIAL Total Acreage -~l_fo_. _b_8_1 __ _ Building Square Feet I 0 0 '14-4 Floodplain Acreage 0 · O NOTE: Parkland Dedication fee is due prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the fa cts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. l-] -0 L pplica nt Date Si te Plan Application.DOC 1/3/02 2 or 3 SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations: L.o ...... sJ-r.._d-·,,"' 9j-et~:,c:. (3'..:1J:.-.) o<;-rk.,-..,?> Lo+s <1:~) CA-f:f:-t:~ s J I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, ----~_t>__,,S'-""-<~D_h-'---'-~-·-5=-..cc...;=~--'-'v.-'--=-l-\-_1. ___ . design engineer/owner. hereby acknowledge or affirm that: ' The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the Colle e Statio City Code. P. P. E. Property Owner( s) CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.) A.I, ~ '<;:. 5 'A\. ~ · ) ~ ... \.tl. certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this applid'ation is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. ~-~ [ _ 7 _ O (__ Engineerr+ -D-a-te __________________ _ --''''''" B. I, certify that the finished floor elevation of~16Wesf flo(>r.\~~luding any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or abov~~~~a-elil\!3*Jn established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and ma~* a.~· am . . \ * t, L * • • • * ~ ~ ................................... " ~ .. AR?.~fH P: SCHULTZ l Engineer l-7-oc_ Date D. I, , do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study. Engineer Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: ___________________________ _ In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with th e plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply Site Plan Application.DOC I 13102 3 of 3 ' ' 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 8. SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 10 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). A key map (not necessarily to scale). Title block to include: Name, address, location, and legal description Name, address, and telephone number of applicant Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) Date of submittal Total site area North arrow. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. Existing locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Streets and sidewalks (R.O.W .). Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961). Buildings. Water courses. Show all easements clearly designating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.). 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. Meter locations. Topography (2 ' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Proposed location, type and dimensions of the following.: D tJ/k Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. El The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. ~ Setbacks. Show building setbacks as outlined in Ordinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, (Section 7, Table A). g/' Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. Minimum parking space is 9' x 20', or on a perimeter row 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. Designate number _/ of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. l.d Handicap parking spaces. SITE 1'1./\N ClllT KLIST SITIT K.DOC l/_1/02 I of 3 Parking Islands. Raised landscape islands, (6" raised curb) a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are required at both ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to the end island maybe applied toward the required 180 sq . ft.). Additionally, 180 sq . ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers, or stamped dyed concrete or other decorative materials as approved . Drives. Minimum drive aisle width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking . Curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) Security gates (show swing path and design specs with colors). Sidewalks (both public and private). Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or if the review staff determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). Medians. Show any and all traffic medians to be constructed on site. Landscape Reserve. A twenty four foot setback from RO.W . to curb of parking lot is required. Pavement may encroach into this 24' reserve by up to 1134 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be met. In no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line. B Common open spaces sites ~ Loading docks 0 tl/,,. Detention ponds 0 ~//\ Guardrails 0 tJ/A. Retaining walls Ga" All required and other types of fences (a 6' privacy fence is required between industrial/commercial and residential developments as well as between multi-family and single family developments). Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required .) Show all easements clearly designating as proposed and type (utility, access, etc.). If dedicated by separate instrument list by volume and page. Utilities (noting size and designate as proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations. above ground and underground service connections to buildings. C3" Meter locations (must be located in public RO.W. or public utility easement.). /o U 0 --'> Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage 5~rric.P ~ information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Gr-Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 , R-1 A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. J?J P,,E. 0 --t Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case $1<4/JM• ~ ~ shall they be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. NOTE: 9. Show fire lanes. Fire lanes a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued. Will building be sprinkled? Yes g/ No 0 If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved. then the plan must be resubmitted. SIT!' l'L/\ Clll'.CKl.IST SITl'CK DOC I 3/02 2 nr 3 10. 11. 0 ti 12. f'l'lt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13. t-J/A Ii)/ 14. cr-15. ~ 16. 17. 18. 19. ~ 20. NOTE: Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. Show curb and pavement detail. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". Landscape plans as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: required point calculations additional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets larger than a residential street. calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points.) proposed new plantings with points earned proposed locations of new plantings screening of parking lots screening of dumpsters, detention ponds, transformers, A/C units, loading docks, propane tanks, utility demarcation point on buildings, or other areas potentially visually offensive. existing landscaping to remain show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.O.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation deman submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W . ? Yes 0 No}( If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be any utilities in TxDOT R.O.W .? Yes 0 No)( If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W . ? Yes 0 No~ If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes 0 Signs are to be permitted separately. SITE PLAN CllffKLIST SITffK.DOC 113102 3 or 3 «~ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 02-01 Project: Sourcenet Solutions, Inc. COLllGl STATION FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 2-A & 2-B Blk. 1 CS Business Center Ph . 1 DATE OF ISSUE: April 2, 2002 OWNER: Universal Computer Systems -Carlan Cooper 200 Quality Circle College Station, TX, 77845 SITE ADDRESS: 211 Quality Circle DRAINAGE BASIN: Alum Creek VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: \~C~ TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees must be barricaded, as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter. Lighting plan and specifictions must be submitted and approved by the Advisory Board prior to installation. Landscaping plan and specificaitons must be submitted and approved by staff and the Advisory Board prior to installation. All lanscaping must be installed priot to the issuance of a C.O. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of s · Station that apply. ~I a-/o.:L Ad inis tor/R p sentative _D_a_t_e---1-r-~J...__;;;...._ ___________ _ 6t I -o 2.--( Date DEVELOPMENT PE RM IT PERMIT NO. 02-001-00001 Project: SourceNet Solutions FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 2-A & 2-B Blk. 1 C/S Business Center Ph. 1 DATE OF ISSUE: January 16, 2002 OWNER: Universal Computer Services-Carlan Cooper 200 Quality Circle College, Station Texas 77845 SITE ADDRESS: 211 Quality Circle DRAINAGE BASIN: Alum Creek VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Clearing Grading Permit SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees must be barricaded, as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. /£. cr-/~Z- Owner/Agent/Contractor Date ~-w DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 02-001-00001 Project: SourceNet Solutions COLLlGl STATION FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 2-A & 2-B Blk. 1 C/S Business Center Ph. 1 DATE OF ISSUE: January 16, 2002 OWNER: Universal Computer Services-Carlan Cooper 200 Quality Circle College, Station Texas 77845 SITE ADDRESS: 211 Quality Circle DRAINAGE BASIN: Alum Creek VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Clearing Grading Permit SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees must be barricaded, as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. /£. Q'-/f,,-o Z- Date Owner/ Agent/Contractor P¥o ~ Date ~-~ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 02-001-00001 Project: SourceNet Solutions COLLEGE STATION FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 2-A & 2-B Blk. 1 C/S Business Center Ph. 1 DATE OF ISSUE: January 16, 2002 OWNER: Universal Computer Services-Carlan Cooper 200 Quality Circle College, Station Texas 77845 SITE ADDRESS: 211 Quality Circle DRAINAGE BASIN: Alum Creek VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Clearing Grading Permit SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees must be barricaded, as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will no count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control p)an as well as the City of College Statior Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden anc establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosior control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its origina condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage tc adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fencec before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All developmen shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City o College Station that apply. /£. cr-/6-oZ- Owner/Agent/Contractor Date Project Name: __________ _ Review Date: __________ _ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 1. Application Fee ($100) 2. Application 3. Erosion Control Plan 4. EP A/NOi (> S acres) S. Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee ($300) 6. Drainage Report 7. HOA Covenants for maintenance of detention/retention ponds 8. Easements Dedicated (separate instrument) 9. TXDOT permits issued 10. Engineer's Estimates ( 1-4 necessary for rough grading/clearing ....... all others necessary for full permit) 11 af12 cc: Case file #2-500003 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: SOURCENET SOLUTIONS, INC (SP)-SITE PLAN (2-500003) PLANNING 1. Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: ENGINEERING 1. Construction Documents are ok; Drainage Report, water analysis, sanitary sewer analysis are ok; Need documentation that public utility easements are recorded . Reviewed by: TED MAYO Date: 02/06/02 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station , must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2 I cc: Case file #2-500003 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: SOURCENET SOLUTIONS, INC (SP)-SITE PLAN (2-500003) PLANNING 1. Reviewed by: *PLANNER NOT ASSIGNED* Date: ENGINEERING 1. Sheet C-1 : Need public utility easement for 6'fire line to building ; need documentation of all public utility easements for new utility lines by r plat._...,,_ \ .~separate instrume t. Need details for new storm sewers on east and west sides of r newi:Sui aing; n to show existing waterline off-site at southwest corner of site; note 8-? 9' · e by 120' 2. General: Need plan/profiles and constr ction detail r new water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewers; need detailed grp ing plan ; need pavement desi details; need ? a_Qrainag.e._aoaly_sis howin comQliance with the City's Drainage Ordinance and including design calcul · n for new storm se and inlet ,....-i tc.; need fir; (J analysis s pp · g waterlin izfng; need design anW;' 1s for sanitary s . · ing. Reviewed by: Ted Mayo Date: 02/10/02 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design. 2. Developer provides 30' of #4 rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs first 1 O'. City installs remainder. 3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design. 4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes provided by the city. 5. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 14 version of plat and/or site plan . email to rbolin@ci.college-station.tx.us NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 3 -II 6. Developer provides load data for project. 7. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. 8. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines (including street lights). Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date: MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. All BackFlow devises must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: SANITATION: 1. Reviewed by: Rob Werley Date Pete Caler Date: NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 3 of3 (Ted Mayo -SouceNet Development Permit ' From: To: Date: Mary Ellen Ford Ted Mayo 1/14/02 9:24AM Subject: SouceNet Development Permit do you have that ready? Can you call Bud~y ;ie~Cdy~ issue this dev. permit at 281-467-3414? Thanks, Mary Ellen CC: Bridgette George y~~fl~ c I ~·.-uf-C. .. Prv-lL \ ._ Page 1) L [Ted'Mayo -Source Net -. \ From: To: Date: Subject: Bridgette George Ted Mayo 1/14/02 9:23AM Source Net I can't remember if I sent an e-mail to you last week on this. They are wanting their clearing and grading permit. Please let me know if you are okay on that. Bridgette George Asst. Development Manager City of College Station (979) 764-3570 www.ci .college-station.tx.us • Page 1] . " cc: Case file #2-500003 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: SOURCENET SOLUTIONS, INC (SP)-SITE PLAN (2-500003) PLANNING 1. Reviewed by : *PLANNER NOT ASSIGNED* Date: ENGINEERING 1. Sheet C-1 : Need public utility easement for 6'fire line to building ; need documentation of all public utility easements for new utility lines by replat or separate instrument. Need details for new storm sewers on east and west sides of new building; need to show existing waterline off-site at southwest corner of site; note 8-? 9' wide by 120' 2. General: Need plan/profiles and construction details for new water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewers; need detailed grading plan; need pavement design details; need a drainage analysis showing compliance with the City's Drainage Ordinance and including design calculation for new storm sewers and inlets, etc.; need fire flow analysis supporting waterline sizing; need design analysis for sanitary sewer sizing. Reviewed by: Ted Mayo Date: 02/10/02 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design. 2. Developer provides 30' of #4 rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs first 1 O'. City installs remainder. 3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design. 4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes provided by the city. 5. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 14 version of plat and/or site plan. email to rbolin@ci .college-station .tx.us NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 3 6. Developer provides load data for project. 7. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. 8. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines (including street lights). Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date: MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. All BackFlow devises must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: SANITATION: 1. Reviewed by: Rob Werley Date Pete Caler Date: NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 3 of 3 TEX.CON General Contractors Div. of CDS Enterprises, Inc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 979-690-7711 • Fax: 979-690-9797 January 7' 2002 Natalie Ruiz Development Review Manager City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Site Plan, SourceNet Solutions -College Station, Texas Dear Ms. Ruiz: Attached for your review are the site plan application and 12 copies of the Site Plan for the above-mentioned project. Two extra copies are included for use by the Business Center Review Board. Also attached are four copies on the Clearing & Tree Protection Plan, and three copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (979) 690-7711. Sincerely Yours, Joe Schultz, P .E. Civil Engineer Attachments cc: Robert Payne, R.L. Payne & Associates, Inc. Ed Motley, C.F. Jordan TEX CON General Contractors Div. of CDS Enterprises, Inc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 979-690-7711 • Fax: 979-690-9797 January 14, 2002 Ted Mayo, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Preliminary Grading Plan, SourceNet Solutions -College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Mayo: Attached for your review are 2 copies of the preliminary Grading Plan for the above- mentioned project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (979) 690-7711 . Sincerely Yours, ~~ Joe Schultz, P.E. Civil Engineer Attachments I ' Design Report Waterline Fire Flow Analysis for SourceNet Solutions, Inc. College Station Business Center College Station, Texas January 2002 Prepared By: TEXCON General Contractors 1707 Graham Road College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 690-771 1 {-5/~DZ. 1.0 INTRODUCTION & DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report is to provide a description of the proposed waterline to be constructed with the SourceNet Solutions Office Building, and to provide the results of the analysis of the waterlines under fire flow conditions. An existing 8" waterline is located along Quality Circle Drive adjacent to the project site. The proposed waterline to supply the site will connect to an existing 8" waterline stub previously constructed under Quality Circle. The water main will be constructed using 8" diameter pipe except that a 6" diameter line will be constructed to the building for the fire sprinkler system. The waterlines for this project will be constructed ofDR-14, PVC pipe meeting the requirements of A WW A C-900 with mechanical joint fittings. 2.0 FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS The flow required for fire hydrant flow for the office building is 2,100 gallons per minute (gpm), as shown on Exhibit 1. For this analysis, we have assumed that the flow comes from two hydrants. 3.0 WATERLINE SYSTEM ANALYSIS The waterline system was analyzed using the WaterCAD computer program developed by Haestad Methods, Inc. Exhibit "2" is a schematic of the proposed waterlines, which shows the locations of the fire hydrants. A normal domestic use flow of 100 gpm was included in the analysis. The residual pressure in the existing 8" waterline was determined by calculating the head loss at a flow of 2200 gpm for the existing line. Exhibit "3" presents the results of a pressure/flow test from fire hydrants connected to the existing 8" waterline along Quality Circle. A static pressure of 96 psi at a residual pressure of 80 psi with the hydrant flow at 1500 gpm were determined by Standard Automatic Fire Enterprises and College Station Public Utility personnel. The residual pressure of 63.5 psi at a flow of 2200 gpm was calculated using the following equation: Where: QR = Q available @ desired residual pressure QF = Q during fire flow test HR = pressure drop to desired residual pressure HF = pressure drop during fire flow test This results in a residual pressure of 63.5 psi where the proposed waterline will begin. The hydraulic grade was set at this pressure at the start of the proposed waterline, Junction J-1. The computer model was run with a fire flow of 1050 gpm at the two fire hydrants proposed for this project. The lowest residual pressure occurred in the system with this flow at fire hydrant No. 2 (Junction J-8). The pressure at this point is estimated by the model to be 45 .3 psi , which exceeds the minimum of 20 psi required by the TNRCC regulations. Since the domestic water peak demand of 145 gpm and the fire sprinkler demand of 750 gpm are so much lower than th e fire hydrant flow, a separate analysis was not run for each of these conditions. Exhibit "4" is a summary of the pipe system junction nodes for this scenario. Exhibit "5" is a summary of the pipe sections for the system under this demand scenario. The maximum velocity for the 8" water mains is 14.0 feet per second, and occurs in Pipes P-1 through P4. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS The waterlines proposed for this subdivision should adequately provide the fire flow required with acceptable values for headloss and velocity. This analysis was done assuming adequate residual pressure in the existing 8" water main based on the flow test data presented in Exhibit "3". Future expansion of the proposed building will require a new analysis of the fire flow requirements and could require the construction of additional water mains to connect to another 8" water line stub to the south of the proposed project. 2 EXHIBIT 1 SourceNet Solutions Office Building College Station Business Center College Station, Texas Determination of Fire Flow Fire Flow = F = 18C...f A (gpm) C = Coefficient related to the type of construction 1.0 for ordinary construction 0.8 for noncombustible construction 0.6 for fire-resistive construction A = Total floor area of building (SF) F = 18CVA(gpm) C=0.6 A=l00,944 SF F = 18(0.6) ..J 100,944 SF = 3,431 gpm Round up or down to increments of 250 gpm F = 3,500 gpm Reduce F by 50% for automatic sprinkler system F = 3,500*0.50 = 1,750 gpm Addition of exposure protection Separation Distance 101 -150' 4 Sides @ 5% Add 20% to Fire Flow Percentage 5% F = 1,750 gpm + (0.20)(1,750) = 2,100 gpm F = 2,100 gpm -Fire Hydrant Flow Fire Sprinkler System Flow = 750 gpm 3 FIRE HYDRANT NO . 1 Title: SourceNet Solutions Office Building c:\haestad\wtrc\sns1 .wed 03/03/02 12:53:21 PM Scenario: Base J-6 P-7 P-5 FIRE HYDRANT NO . 2 J-5 P-4 J-3 -3 TEXCON GENERAL CONTRACTORS © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 J-8 J-2 P-2 ~ I J-1 ~R-1 P-1 Project Engineer: JOE SCHULTZ WaterCAD v3.1 (071 c] Page 1 of 1 N Ill OI Ill Cl. .. z 0 () >< JJ A ' ... <t .... I) ::i J> D J> ::i <t N = a... -=::1" r--co = en co en = -=::1" ci :z: :x: <I: LL.. <..:> :z: l...J..J LL.. <I: U') :c a... .. ~ N 0 UJ .. -=::1" . = :z: 0 :c N = ' = N I r--= I > ~ ~ p ) p t Date: (No.! D \J:.5"S uS-9 I I I '\ 11 Ii !I Ii !l 'i l\ I --·w ----------------------- ~~h;bc• f-3 STANDARD AUTO\lATIC FIRE ENTERPRJSES, INC. I J ~-r( 0 '2. Time: g:30~ \Veather: t-.J r C.t=:. l C,c'--~ Kind of District: i-Co? FIRE HYDRANT PRE5SURES I FLO\VS c LOCATION MAKE STATIC RESIDUAL ORIFICE FLOW @ RESIDUAL PRESSURE FLOW PSI PSI (INS.-DIA.) (PITOT-P GAUGE -G) (GPM) AT20 PSI ~~1u....:> q& 83 ~<-"lo HA:;:> ~1,...,C \Le:r=. \O b.......,:)(.., N-<-~u....i 2 i ,, I SCO ()?H / 80 ·;:::>Si (?i"J'C;";") 14250 ..,...,p...q_, ·• "·-' (. :2 \ \~~ ~ ·~~ \ \* l[i . \'. "J ~~ It I ,, \ \ r_j ' :J ' I (\ ' '1~ \ i (~ J " ' ,., l\.. ... i " t .1 .... l §I N ' .._ ii I I .._ 'I ...._ c :.!. I ,r -.... '" s: --... .,. ') --~O<,,)_ 6 ------'"'-h ----·----------------------'· ... -·==-,· - I > Node Elevation Demand Demand Demand Label (ft) Type (gpm) Pattern J-1 276.00 demand 0.00 Fixed J-2 276.00 demand 0.00 Fixed J-3 278.00 demand 0.00 Fixed J-4 281 .00 demand 0.00 Fixed J-5 281 .00 demand l.050.00 Fixed J-6 280.00 demand 0.00 Fixed J-7 280.00 demand 0.00 Fixed J-8 277.00 demand \,050 00 Fixed J-9 276.00 demand 100.00 Fixed J-10 275.00 demand 0.00 Fixed J-11 274.00 demand 0.00 Fixed Title: SourceNet Solutions Office Building c:\haestad\wtrc\sns1 .wed 03/03/02 12:54:06 PM ~alculated Hydraulic Demand Grade (gpm) (ft) 0.00 420.67 0.00 415.57 0.00 405.50 0.00 38g_7g 1,050.00 388.54 0.00 385.77 0.00 385.3g 1,050.00 380.go 100.00 380.8g 0.00 380.8g 0.00 380.8g Pressure {psi) 62.56 60.35 55.14 47.05 46.50 45.74 45.57 44_g3 45.36 45_7g 46.22 ~¥-~: b;+ 4 Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Junction Report TEXCON GENERAL CONTRACTORS © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer: JOE SCHULTZ WaterCAD v3.1 [071 c] Page 1 of 1 Link Length Diamete1 Material Roughnes~ Label (ft) (in) P-2 84.00 8 PVC 150.0 P-3 166.00 8 PVC 150.0 P-4 259.00 8 PVC 150.0 P-5 220.00 8 PVC 150.0 P-11 20.00 6 PVC 150.0 P-6 21 .00 8 PVC 150.0 P-7 246.00 8 PVC 150.0 P-8 47 .00 8 PVC 150.0 P-9 11 .00 8 PVC 150.0 P-10 49.00 8 PVC 150.0 P-1 22 .00 8 PVC 150.0 Title: SourceNet Solutions Office Building c:\haestad\wtrc\sns1 .wed 03/03/02 12:53:41 PM Minor Los~ Initial Current Discharge Status Status (gpm) 0.00 Open Open 2,200.00 0.00 Open Open 2,200.00 0.00 Open Open 2,200.00 0.00 Open Open 1,150.00 0.00 Open Open 1,050.00 0.00 Open Open 1,150.00 0.00 Open Open 1, 150.00 0.00 Open Open 100.00 0.00 Open Open 0.00 0.00 Open Open 0.00 0.00 Open Open 2,200.00 Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Start End Head loss Friction Hydraulic Hydraulic (ft) Slope Grade Grade (ft/1 OOOft) (ft) (ft) 420.67 415.57 5.10 60.65 415.57 405.50 10.07 60.65 405.50 389.79 15.71 60.65 389.79 385.77 4.02 18.27 389.79 388.54 1.25 62.67 385.77 385.39 0.38 18.27 385.39 380.90 4.49 18.27 380.90 380.89 0.01 0.20 380.89 380.89 0.00 0.00 380.89 380.89 0.00 0.00 422.00 420.67 1.33 60.66 TEXCON GENERAL CONTRACTORS \) ~ \,c.: ~ ~p~ 1~.o I 'c:. '\) l '\ .o 1.3 l \. °l 1.~ ,,3 --- 14-.o © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Project Engineer: JOE SCHULTZ WaterCAD v3.1 (071 c] Page 1 of 1 I ' O:J~()/ COLLEGE STATION P. 0 . Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue March 26, 2003 Tim Welsh C.F. Jordan 1509 Emerald Parkway, Suite 105 College Statio 5 Re: Dear Tim, Tel: 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 If you recall, we spoke the week of 3/17 regarding what the City of College Station believes is unfinished grading and drainage improvements related to this project. The grading in question is currently causing a diversion of flows onto private residences within the adjacent Pebble Creek Development. I received a message from you this week stating that, to your knowledge, all work required by the 9ity had been performed. Upon researching the files, I found that Ed Motley had been informed of the defective grading in question on 11/12, and was also informed that remediation would be a condition of the Certificate of Occupancy for the building. I have attached a copy of this e-mail for your reference. The Certificate of Occupancy was issued on 12/19 only after receiving a statutory bond in the amount of $10,000 for this drainage work, which at that time was still incomplete due to weather related delays. The bond provides for a term of four months from the issuance of the CO to complete these efforts to release the bond. The due date for these remediation efforts is therefore April 19, 2003. have also included a copy of the bond for your use. Based on my site inspection last week, the work is still incomplete, and is still negatively effecting adjacent homeowners. Therefore we feel it prudent to issue this reminder that grading will need to be completed prior to the April 191h deadline to avoid a claim upon the related bond. Home of Texas A&M University I would be happy to visit the site with you and clarify exactly what will need to be accomplished in order to bring the site into compliance with the City Ordinances. Should you wish to meet, or discuss any questions or comments you may have, please do not hesitate to contact me at 764-3570. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. 7;,¥ Brett Mccully, P.E. Assistant City Engineer Xe: Kelly Templin Kim Foutz Natalie Ruiz Lance Simms Attachments (2) [spen-;;;;:-Thompson -SourceNet Drainage lss_~;-___ ·-· ·----~--- From: To: Date: Subject: Mr. Motley, Spencer Thompson Emotley@cfjordan.com 11 /12/02 1 :55PM SourceNet Drainage Issue I spoke with you concerning the drainage problem at the rear, SE corner, of the Sourcenet property. It appears that fill was placed in this area, probably when the wall was constructed. This fill material was not permitted. This fill material has cut-off the drainage path for the homes to the north and east. The City received complaints from citizens after the rainy period we experienced a few weeks ago. You were very cooperative in our conversation. I did want to notify you that this item will be added to the City's punch-list for CO approval. Thank you again for your cooperation . If you have any questions please contact me in Development Services. st Spencer G. Thompson, Jr. Development Services, Engineering City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Ph. 979.764.3570 Fx. 979.764.3496 CC: Brett McCully; Bridgette George; Carl Warren; Carol Cotter; Lance Simms; Natalie Ruiz Page 1 ( 1Z/i9 STATUTORY PAYMENT BOND-TEXAS BO.ND NO. 6187893 KNOW ALL BY TiiESE PRESENTS, that C, F. Jordan, L. P. Property Owner (hereinafter called Principal), as Principal, and Safeco I nwra nce .co. of America • a ccxporation oraanized and existing under the laws of the State o ash i n gt onwith its p<incipal office in the City of-Se att e (hereinafter called the Surety) as Surely, are neld an<l firmly bound unto the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, a Municipal Corporation, 1101 Texas Avenue, c-Ollege st( fttlQn, Te.xas0 hereinafler called City, in the amount of Ten Thousan d and No Cenfs $10 ,00U.U ) Dollars ($ 10 , 000 . 00 ) for lhe paymont whereof the saJd Principal and Surely bind themselves, their hei<s, administrators, executO<S, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, finnly by these presems. WHEREAS. the Principal is required to Install landscaping on Lot2A&2B , Block. 1 •. The Busi ess Cent er at . College station, Brazos County, Texas, as required by Ordinance No. 1638, Section 11.S of the College Station Code of Ordinances and landscaping plan, which ordinance and plan arc attached hereto and made a part hereof as funy·and to the same extent as if copied at length herein; and WHEREAS, Section 11.6 allows for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy prior to completion of required landscaping provided that th e principal providas a bond in the amount of $5,00 times tho number of landscape points required for the project; NOW. THEREFORE. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH TI-IAT if said principal shaH Install all required landscaping as required by City and detailed in the attached landscape plan and In accordance with the above-staled ordinance nnd receive tJ1e approval for same by the City Planner on or before four months from the date of issuance of a certificate of Occupancy for the property, then this obligation shaU be void. PROVlDED, HOWEVER, that the City having required ll1e said Plincipal to furnish this bond in order to comply wtth Chapter 11 of Ordinance No. 1638, Sections 11.5 and 11.6, and the landscaping ptan, all Tights and remedies on this bond shall ·inure solely to such claimants and shall be determined in accordance with the provisions. conditions and limitations of said ordinance. · . IN WITNESS VVHEREOF, lhe said Principal and Surety have signed and scaled this instrument. thls 1 7th day of December • 2002. The foregoing bond is hereby approved. Th e Cit y of Coll ege Sta t ion , Texas Owner ADDRESS ·-•-4F-·'--·L.--', PRINCIPAL __ ....:S'-'a'"""f~e-'c"-'o_· __ INSURANCE COMPANY f America IZ/19 STATUTORY PAYMENT BOND -TEXAS BO.ND NO. 61 87893 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that C . F. Jordan, L . P • Property Owner (hereinafter called Principal), as Principal, and Safeco In ~rance .Co . of Ame r i ca , a corporation oraanized and existing under the laws of the state o ashingt onwith its prtncipal office in the City of-Seatt e (hereinafter called the Surety) as Surety, are nek1 ancJ firmly bound unto the CITY OF COU.EGE STATION, TEXAS, a Municipal Corporation, 1101 Texas Avenue, COll~e stmlQn, Te;rn.shhereinafter called Ci1Y, in the amount of Ten Thousand a nd No Cenf s ($10,000.0v) Dollars ($ 10, 000 . 00 ) for the payment whereof _the 5!11d Principal and Surety bind themselves, their hei<s, administrators, executOfS, successors and assigns, Jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS. the Principal is required to Install landscaping on Lot2A&2B , Block 1 , .The Busi ess Cent er at. Coll~e station, Brazos county, Texas, as required by Ordinance No. 1638, Section 11.5 of the College Station Code or Ordinances and landscapjng plan, which ordinance and plan are attached hereto and made a part hereof as funy·and to the same extent as if copied at length herein: and WHEREAS, Section 11.6 allows for the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy prior to completion or required landscaping provided that the principal provides a bond in the amount of $5.00 times tho number of landscape points required for the project; · NOW. THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT if said principal shall Install all required landscaping as required by City and detailed in the attached landscape plan and Jn accordance with the above-staled ordinance and receive the approval for same by the City Planner on or before four months from the date of issuance of a certificate of Occupancy for the property. then this obligation shall be void. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the City having required the said Pnncipal to furnish this bond in order lo comply with Chapter 11 of Ordinance No .. 1638, Sections 11.5 .and 11.6, and the landscaping ptan, all rights and remedies on this bond shall inure solely to such claimants and shall be determined in accordance with the provisions. conditions and limitations of said ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, lhe said Principal and Surety have signed and scaled this instrument. this 1 7th day of December , 2002. The foregoing bond is hereby approved. Th e Cit y of Coll ege St a tion, Texas Ow'ner By: ____________ --:Ti:;::iU~e-- ADDRESS OJ\TE _._,_v. __ , __ . .c.. _ _,,, PRINCIPAL ___ S_a_f_e_c_o __ INSURANCE COMPANY f America j Sp~~-c~~Thompson -SourceNet Drainage l~i:;-~-----··-·--------- From: To: Date: Subject: Mr. Motley, Spencer Thompson Emotley@cfjordan .com 11/12/021 :55PM SourceNet Drainage Issue I spoke with you concerning the drainage problem at the rear, SE corner, of the Sourcenet property. It appears that fill was placed in this area, probably when the wall was constructed. This fill material was not permitted . This fill material has cut-off the drainage path for the homes to the north and east. The City received complaints from citizens after the rainy period we experienced a few weeks ago. You were very cooperative in our conversation. I did want to notify you that this item will be added to the City's punch-list for CO approval. Thank you again for your cooperation . If you have any questions please contact me in Development Services. st Spencer G. Thompson, Jr. Development Services, Engineering City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Ph. 979.764.3570 Fx. 979.764.3496 CC: Brett McCully; Bridgette George; Carl Warren; Carol Cotter; Lance Simms; Natalie Ruiz Page 1 I Spencer Thompson -SourceNet : From: To: Date: Subject: Spencer Thompson Natalie Ruiz 12/9/02 2:37PM Source Net I spoke with Ty today, project super. He said they were confused as to where the drainage problem was. They thought it was the north end of the wall instead of the south end . They inquired about bonding out of the re-grading, being wet and all. I told him it might be as easy as posting a bond for the estimated cost of the regrading , but I'd have to check. Thoughts? st Spencer G. Thompson, Jr. Development Services, Engineering City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Ph . 979.764.3570 Fx. 979.764.3496 CC: Brett Mccully; Bridgette George; Lance Simms Page 1 I ·STATUTORY PAYMENT BOND-TEXAS 80,ND NO. 6187886 KNOW. ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that C.F. Jordan, L.P. , Property Owner (hereinafter called Principal), es Principal, and Safeco Insurance Company of Americfla corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of 'WashingtoN-lith Its p<inclpal office In the City of Seat tl (hereinafter called the Surety) ~s Surety, ere neld ancJ firmly bound unto the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, a Municipal Cofporallon, 1101 Texas Avenue, COiiege station, Texas1 hereinafter called Cit}t in the amount of One Hundred Twelve Thousand Two HunaredDollars ($ 112 , 2 otl . 00 ) for the payment whereof the said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, finnly by these presents. ' WHEREAS, the Principal is required to Install landscaping on Lot 2A&2B , Block 1 , The Busi ss Center at, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, as required by Ordinance No. 1638, Section 11.5, of the College Station Code of Ordinances and landscaping plan, wtllch ordinance and plan are attached hereto and made a part hereof as fully'and to the same extent as if copied at length herein; and WHEREAS, Section 11.6 allows for the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy prior to completion of required landscaping provided that the pr1nclpal provides a bond In the amount of $5.00 times the number of landscape points required for the project; NOW, THEREFORE, TiiE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT if said principal shall install all required landscaping as required by City and detailed In the attached landscape plan and In accordance with the above-stated ordinance and receive the approval for same by the City Planner on or before 30 Days from the date of issuance or a Certificate of Occupancy for the p<0perty, then this obligation shall be void. . PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the City having required the said Principal to furnish this bond in order to comply with Chapter 11 of Ordinance No. 1638, Sections 11 .5 and 11.6, an_d the landscaping plan, all rights and remedies on thls bond shall Inure solely to such claimants and shall be determined in accordance with the provisions, conclitlons and limitations of said ordinance. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Prtnclpal and Surety have signed and sealed this Instrument, this 5th day of November , 2002. The foregoing bond is hereby approved. City of College Station , Texas O.Vner By:.~--~~~~--~--~~~~~T~rt~le~ 1101 Texas Aye •• Coll ege Station, TX ADDRESS DATE ,_1,...w:_. __ .._ __ '---..J"I America ·sTATUTORYPAYMENTBOND-TEXAS BOND NO. 6187887 C.F. Jordan, L.P. KNOW. ALL BY . THESE PRESENTS, that Pro~rty ~ner (hereinafter called Principal), as Principal, and Safeco I nsurance Com an of Amer i c a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the ate o as i ng onwtth Its p<inclpal office In the City of Seatt e (hereinafter called the Surety) es Surety, ere ne1e1 ana finnly bound unto the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, a Munlcfpal Corporation, 1101 Texas Avenue, COiiege station, Texas, hereinafter called City, in the amount of Twenty Thousand And No Cent s----------Dollars ($ 20, 000. 00**> for the payment whereof the said Prtnclpal and Surety bind themselves, their ht!ifS adm1n1Strators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, finnly by these presents. ' WHEREAS, the Principal Is required to install Sidewalkoon Lot 2A&2B , Block 1 , •The Busi ess. Center at, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, as required by Ordinance No. 1638, Section 11 .5, of the College Station Code of Ordinances and S i dewalksplan, wtllch ordinance and plan are attached hereto and made a part hereof as fully'and to the same extent as if copied at length herein; and WHEREAS, Section 11 .6 allows for the lssuance of a Certificate of Occupancy prior to completion of required Sidewalks provided that the pr1nclpal p<ovldes a bond in the amount of $5.00 times the number of Sidewall<polnts required for the project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT if said principal shall Install all required Sidewalksas required by City and detailed In the attached Sidewalkplan and In accordance with the above-stated ordinance and recelve the approval for same by the City Planner on or before 30 Days from the date of Issuance or a Certificate of OCcupancy for the property, then this obligation shall be void. . · PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the City having requlred the said Principal to fumlsh this bond in order to comply with Chapter 11 of Ordinance No. 1638, Sections 11 .5 .and 11.6, an,d the Sidewal ks plan, all rights and remedies on this bond shall Inure solely to such claimants end shall be determined In accordance with the provisions, conditions and limitations of said ordinance. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal and Surety have signed and sealed this Instrument, this ·5th day of November . . , 2002. The foregoing bond is hereby·approved. City of College St a t ion . Texas CM'ner By: ·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T~lt~le~ 110 1 Texas Ave ., Col lege Stat ion, TX ADDRESS DATE ~·'-":..--"--·4..--..1"'1 Safeco America \ ( \ I ) / __/_/ I ( I ; I / / / I \ i ~-/ ( ) ) ) / I I I / J \ ) ) ) I I / I I I City of College Station 1101 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH COLLEGE STATION TX 77842 C E R T I F I C A T E 0 F OCCUPANCY Issue Date Parcel Number Property Address Subdivision Name Legal Description . Property Zoning Owner ... Contractor Application number Description of Work Construction type . Occupancy type Flood Zone . . . . Special conditions P E R M A N E N T 12/19/02 171500 -0101-0020 211 QUALITY CIR COLLEGE STATION TX 77845 THE BUSINESS CENTER AT COLLEGE THE BUSINESS CENTER AT COLLEGE STATION PHS 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 2 A & 2B, ACRES 16.681 UNKNOWN UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SERVICES C F JORDAN COMMERCIAL 979 696-0500 02-00001514 000 000 COMMERCIAL, OFFICES/BANKS/PROFESSION TYPE IV-PROTECTED BUSINESS Provide certification test for Backflow device on lawn irrigation system. Approved Provide override on magnetic locks for egress doors per Fire Marshal Building Of~~ VOID UNLESS SIGNED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL IJ . , ' Design Report Proposed Sanitary Sewer Line Improvements for SourceN et Solutions, Inc. College Station Business Center College Station, Texas January 2002 Prepared By: TEXCON General Contractors 1 707 Graham Road College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 690-7711 REVIEWED FOR Cfl"110 t I 'CE FEB 5 2002 COLLEGE STA 1101..J ENGINEERING ~1 I '. 1.0 INTRODUCTION & DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report is to provide a description of the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed with the SourceNet Solutions, Inc. Office Building, and to provide the criteria used in the design of this sanitary sewer system. The project will include the construction of approximately 140 feet of 6" sanitary sewer line. Exhibit 1 shows the location of the proposed and existing sewer lines. 2.0 SANITARY SEWER -Design Characteristics The proposed private sewer line is to be constructed of 6" diameter SDR-26, PVC pipe which meets the requirements of ASTM-03034 or ductile iron pipe, class 250 or 350. The proposed manholes are 4' diameter manholes, and vary from 7' to 9' in depth, with sewer line slopes ranging from 1.00% to 1.50%. The maximum distance between manholes is less than 500 feet, as required by the Texas Natural Conservation Commission (TNRCC). The minimum allowable slope for 6" pipe per TNRCC requirements is 0.50%. All construction shall meet the current City of College Station Standard Specifications for Sanitary Sewer Construction. 3.0 DETERMINATION OF PEAK FLOW VALVES The peak flows were based on using the peak domestic water demand of 145 gpm (0.323 cfs). The design peak flow was determined by the mechanical and plumbing design engineer based on the number of fixture units in the proposed building. The velocities for the lines were calculated using Manning's Equation. According to the TNRCC, the minimum velocity for sewer systems flowing full is 2.0 feet per second. The minimum anticipated flow velocities for the proposed sewer lines meet this requirement. The velocities for the pipes at peak flow are 2.9 fps and 3.4 fps. The TNRCC requires that the maximum velocity for sewer systems flowing full not exceed 10 feet per second. The values for these pipes are well below this maximum velocity. As shown on Exhibit 1, an existing 8" sanitary sewer line is located at the southern end of the project site. To connect to this line would require the construction of approximately 1200 feet of new sewer line and manholes to serve the proposed building. An existing sewer line is also located in the public utility easement which goes through the project site. This line is also on Exhibit 1. This sewer line is constructed of 8" diameter pipe for the portion which is within the Pebble Creek Section 6 area and 6" diameter pipe through this site. This line was constructed to serve part of Pebble Creek Section 5 Subdivision. This line serves 54 residential structures on Lots 1 -24, Block 25 and Lots 31 -60, Block 26. The following calculations show that there is capacity in the existing line for additional flow . •' Peak Flow Calculations 54 homes @ 300 gals/day = 16,200 gpd =Average Daily Flow (ADF) Adjusted Daily Flow = ADF x l.5 = 16,200 gpd x l.5 = 24,300 gpd Peak Hourly Flow = Adjusted Daily Flow x 3 = 24,300 gpd x 3 = 72,900 gpd Peak Flow rate = 72,900 gpd = 50.6 gpm = 0.113 cfs The existing 6" sewer line has a slope of 1.2% and using Mannings Equation and an "n" value of 0.013 the existing 6" sewer line is flowing l.74" in depth at a velocity of 2.4 fps for the existing peak flow and has a maximum capacity flowing full of 0.61 cfs at a velocity of 3. l fps . The total peak flow in the 6" sewer line with the addition of the SourceNet Solutions project will be 0.43 cfs. At this flow the existing pipe will flow at a depth of 3.73" at a velocity of 3.4 fps . The Mannings Equation Pipe Calculator Sheets for this calculation are in Appendix A. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS It is our determination based on the criteria and data developed that the proposed sewer line will provide sufficient capacity for the anticipated wastewater flows generated by this development and that the existing 6" sanitary line also has sufficient capacity for the design peak flow. If an additional facility is built on this site or if the proposed peak flows are increased in any manner, an evaluation shall be performed to ensure capacity is available to handle the increased flows . 2 APPENDIX A Mannings Pipe Calculator Data 3 I· I ' Proposed 6 " Sewer Line @l.0% Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . S l ope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 6 .0000 in 0.3230 cfs 0.0100 ft/ft 0 .0130 3.2650 in 0.1963 ft2 0.1092 ft2 9.9554 in 18.8496 in 2.9578 fps 1 .5795 in 54.4164 % 0.5611 cfs 2 .8577 fps Proposed 6 " Sewer Line @l.5% Manning Pipe Calculator Give n Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flow rate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Veloc ity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 6 .0000 in 0 .3230 cfs 0.0150 ft/ft 0.0130 2.8935 in 0.1963 ft2 0.0937 ft2 9.2117 in 18.8496 in 3.4458 fps 1.4653 in 48.2246 % 0.6872 cfs 3.4999 fps Exi sting 6 " Sewer Line Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Fu ll ................... . Full flow Flow rate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Fl ow 6 .0000 in 0 .1130 cfs 0.0120 ft/ft 0.0130 1.7423 in 0.1963 ft2 0.0474 ft2 6.8293 in 1 8.8496 in 2.3865 fps 0.9984 in 29 .0390 % 0.6147 cfs 3 .1304 fps Existing 6 " Sewer Line -Ma x . flo w Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Depth .......................... . S lope .......................... . Manning 's n .......... : ......... . Comput ed Results : fl o wra te ....................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent full ................... . full flow fl owrate ............. . full flow velocity ............. . Circular flowrate 6 .0000 in 5.6400 i n 0.0120 ft/ft 0 .0130 0 .6612 cfs 0 .1 963 ft2 0.1915 ft2 15.8800 in 18 .8 496 in 3 .4519 fps 1.7369 in 94.0000 % 0.614 7 cfs 3.1304 fps Existing 6" Sewer Line -w/ SourceNet Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Results : Dept h .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 6 .0000 in 0.4360 cfs 0 .0120 ft /ft 0.0130 3 .7 319 in 0.1963 ft2 0 .1284 ft2 10 .9035 in 18.8496 in 3 .3966 fps 1.6953 in 62.1981 % 0.6147 cfs 3.1304 fps TEXCON GENERAL CONTRACTORS SOURCENET SOLUTIONS OFFICE BUILDING COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS PUBLIC WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 1 /31 /02 Item Estimated No. Description Quantity Unit Price/Unit Total 1 8" Waterline -PVC (C900)-struct. 57 0 LF $27.00 $15,390.00 2 8" Waterline -PVC (C900)-non-struct. 675 LF $23.00 $15,525.00 3 6" Waterline -PVC (C900)-struct. 60 LF $25.00 $1,500.00 4 6" Waterline -PVC (C900)-non-struct. 20 LF $21 .00 $420.00 5 Connect to Exist. Line 1 EA $300.00 $300.00 6 6" M.J. Bend -22 .5 deg. 1 EA $200.00 $200.00 7 6" Gate Va lve 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 8 6" M.J. Cap 1 EA $150.00 $150.00 9 8" Gate Va lve 2 EA $550.00 $1 , 100.00 10 8" x 8" M.J. Tee 1 EA $250.00 $250.00 11 8" x 6" M.J. Tee 2 EA $250.00 $500.00 12 8" x 4" M.J. Tee 1 EA $250.00 $250.00 13 8" M.J. Bend -45 deg. 3 EA $250.00 $750.00 14 8" M.J. Bend -22 .5 deg. 3 EA $250.00 $750.00 15 8" x 6" M.J. Reducer 1 EA $200.00 $200.00 16 2" Blow-off Assembly 1 EA $350.00 $350.00 17 Fire Hydrant Assembly 2 EA $2 ,400.00 $4,800.00 TOTAL $42,935.00 f--J/-OZ