HomeMy WebLinkAboutFolderFOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P&Z CASE No.{)/-0 ~
DATESUBMIITED: ?j OJ
/.~
F'lrif Ai PLAT APPLICATION !JI~ tJO J ocoJCJ
(check one) Minor __ Amending XX Final __ VaCAting __ Replat
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Conunission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS:
~Filing Fee of $200.00.
_x_ Development Permit Application Fee of $100.00 (if applicable).
-X-Iufrastructure Inspection Fee of $300.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed.).
_x_ Application completed in full.
~Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
nJ..a_ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
_x_ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Braz.os County and College Station LS.D.
~A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
_K_Two (2)copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (If applicable).
APPLICATION DATA
NAME OF SUBDMSION EDELWEISS GAR'IENS, PHASE ONE
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION located at the northwest end of Hartford Drive
at the Victoria Avenue intersection and southeast of University Industrial Park, Phase III
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Mr. Steve Arden, General Partner -EDELWEISS GARTENS VENTURE
Street Address 311 Cecilia Loop City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77845 E-Mail Address -------~~~~~~~~~~~--
Phone Nwnber 846-8788 Fax Nwnber 846-0652
-~---------
PR 0PER1Y OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name same as above
StreetAddress -----------------City--------------
State Zip Code ______ E-Mail Address -------------
Phone Nwnber ___________ Fax Number _________________ _
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Michael R. McClure, P.E., ILP.L.S. -McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC.
Street Address 1 008 Woodcreek Ori ve
State TX ----77845 Zip Code ------
City College Station,
E-Mail Address mikem@tca.net
Phone Nwnber 693-3838 Fax Number 693-2554 _ ___:: _ __;__..:..._______ ----=...:=-=---==-=--=--------------
F1NAL PLAT AP PUCA TION
FNLPAPP.DOC 3f25/99 I
I (
l ofJ
.. I
_AL ACRES OF SUBDIVISION 15 • 241 Ac R-0-W ACREAGE 3. 52 Ac. TOTAL# OF LOTS 63 Lots
J1vffiER OF LOTS BY ZONING DISTRICT R-1 I 63 Lots I I __
AVERAGE ACREAGE OF EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT BY ZONING DISTRICT:
R-1 / 0.19 Ac. / I ! __
FLOODPLAIN ACREAGE none -----
PARKLAND DEDICATION ACREAGE___._y_es ____ ORFEEAMOUNT ____ _
A STATEMENT ADDRESSING ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TIIE FINAL PLAT AND APPROVED MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND/OR PRELIMJNARY PLAT (IF APPLICABLE):
REQUESTED VARIANCES TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS & REASON FOR SAME _______ _
REQUESTED OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION none ----------------------~
TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED:
2777 L.F. STREETS
2703 L.F. SIDEWALKS
2445 L.F. SANITARY SEWER LINES
2788 L.F. WATERLINES
CHANNELS -----
999 L.F. STORM SEWERS
_____ BIKE LANES I PATHS
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station
of the above identified final plat.
~l~ ~iatw-~' 11µ)£(!.1 €M:;1,,Ja:~
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
FNU'APP.DOC 3125199
Date' 1
2 of3
~-v DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 100049
DP-EDELWEISS GARTENS, PH 1
COL llGl STATION FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
EDELWEISS GARTENS PHASE 1
DATE OF ISSUE: AUGUST 30, 2001
OWNER:
STEVE ARDEN
311 CECILIA LOOP
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77849
SITE ADDRESS:
3850 VICTORIA AVE
DRAINAGE BASIN:
LICK CREEK
VALID FOR 6 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
YOUNG BROS
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: FULL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PHASE 1
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
1. THE AREA, WHICH IS TO BE DEDICATED AS PARKLAND, MUST BE BARRACADED OFF SUCH
THAT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CANNOT ENTER INTO THE AREA.
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT CAN CAUSE THE PARKS BOARD TO DENY
ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSED PARKLAND.
2. All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans.
3. All trees must be barricaded, as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not
count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter.
The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate
construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station
4. Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are
ineffective to retain all sediment onsite; it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet
City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are
sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for
temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be
returned to its original condition , placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for
any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as
well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work.
5. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely
fenced before any operations of this permit can begin.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be
taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets,
or existing drainage facilities.
7. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area . All
development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer in the development permit application for the above na ed pro·ect and all of the codes and
or inance of ~·ty of College Station that apply.
Ad inistrator/Re e entative
Owner/ Agent/Contractor Date
• McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC.-------
September 9, 2002
Mr. Brett McCully
Assistant City Engineer
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Re: Edelweiss Gartens Subdivision -Revised Master Preliminary Plat
Dear Brett:
Accompanying this letter is the revised Master Preliminary Plat for Edelweiss
Gartens. Also enclosed are our responses to the staff comments regarding the plat, an
addendum to the water and sewer reports for the subdivision, and a support document
from the original submittal. We believe we have addressed all of the city requirements
for the revised plat and we request to be placed on the agenda for the next Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting. Thank you.
Sincerely,
l~Elr
Project Manager
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838 • FAX (979) 693-2554 •email: mcclure@tca.net
Reply to Staff Comments for
Edelweiss Gartens Amended Master Preliminary Plat
1. Please show street extension off Graham Road on plat. This entrance is a requirement of the
rezoning. If property is under separate ownership, include owner on Final Plat.
This change has been made to the Master Preliminary Plat (MPP).
2. Do not include "Future SH 40 ROW' in platted area unless dedication is proposed or shown
reserve tract.
This note has been deleted. The area will be reserved by the developer.
3. Show required hydrants on Oldenburg Lane.
Hydrants have been added to Oldenburg Lane in the approximate locations where they will
be built in that phase. That section of the subdivision is currently being designed and the
hydrant locations may vary somewhat.
4. It does not appear a 6" water line will be sufficient for the entire length of Oldenburg Lane
with required hydrants unless looped back to main.
A revised model of the water system has been prepared and included with this submittal. In
it, the water line on Oldenburg Lane has been changed to an 8 " line. The report
demonstrates that this 8" line is sufficient to serve anticipated development along Oldenburg
Lane even without the future loop that is planned in subsequent phases.
5. Lots 64-66, Block III do not appear to meet the 70-ft, R-2 requirement, as measured at
setback. A note on the plat will be required stating "Parking to be provided in side yard or in
rear" if this is the case. See Zoning Ordinace, Table A, Note E.
A note to this effect has been added to the MP P.
6. Please show 24" W/L in easement along rear of Block 9 lots.
The 24 " water line easement was placed outside of the lots in accordance with a memo from
Spencer Thompson to the Planning and Zoning Commission dated May 14, 2001 when the
original Preliminary Plat was being considered. The memo states "The new water line
should be in the future TXDOT ROW along the back of the lots in Block 7. " (A copy of that
memo is attached.) It is the developer's preference to leave the easement in the future
TXDOT ROW to avoid construction in the backyards of the lots where many obstructions
could be encountered.
7. What zoning district boundary goes through Lot 7, Block 9 and Lot 4 7, Block 8? Label.
The zoning district boundary does not go through Lot 7, Block 9 or Lot 47, Block 8. It
terminates at the northern property line of Edelweiss Gartens. This was the city limit line
when the zoning for this area was approved. The Zoning District Boundary shown on the
plat divides M-1 on its west and M-2 on its east. Each is labeled accordingly.
8. Show Lot to NE, 1.2879 acres, as M-1.
This change has been made to the MP P.
9. An Engineer Report has not demonstrated that the 8" sewer line from Westfield Phase 3 can
gravity sewer the entire Edelweiss Subdivision. An approval of this Preliminary Plat cannot
be supported without documentation of this matter. The last study performed for this area
show a different scenario and limited capacity.
Accompanying this submittal is an addendum to the original sewer report that analyzes the
sewer systems in Edelweiss Gartens and Westfield Addition. It demonstrates that the existing
and proposed systems will adequately serve both subdivisions under the land use scenario
shown on the MP P.
10. Take 8" water along Brandenburg through to adjacent property. Adjust OP request if needed.
This change has been made to the MPP. A request for oversize participation on this line is
not anticipated.
11. Take sewer to adjacent property if required Engineering Report show excess capacity.
The proposed sewer system for Edelweiss Gartens contains a separate system for the
southern third of the subdivision that does not utilize the current outfall through Westfield
Addition. The original sewer report and the addendum that accompanies this submittal both
account for about 63 acres south of the subdivision that will eventually connect to it. A
future stub out to that tract has been shown on the MP P between Phases 5 and 6
12. Show all lot widths were they vary from the "norm" shown.
This change has been made to the MP P.
13. Gas line crossing Brandenburg shall be a perpendicular crossing.
The gas line crossing on the MP P has been changed to indicate a perpendicular crossing,
but the design of that line is not within the developer's control. The gas company will
prepare the design that ultimately dictates this alignment.
14. Show fire hydrant on Baden Court more toward Victoria but still meeting 500' limit.
The fire hydrant has been moved to the mid-block area of Baden court on the MP P. The
final location of the hydrant will be determined when that phase of the subdivision is
developed.
15. Rename Karten Loop from Lots 1 thru 12, Block 8 and Karten Court, Lots 1 thru 23, Block
11.
This change has been made to the MP P.
16. Rename Karten Loop, Lots 13-29, Block 8. Lots 30-40, Block 8 will be considered Karten
Lane.
This change has been made to the MP P.
17: 01 From: Susan Hazlett 979-764-3896 Page 2 of 11
..
MEMORANDUM
May 14, 2001
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Spencer Thompson/ DevServ, Engineering
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT for EDELWEISS GARTENS (BELLA V/STA)(PP)
Item: Discussion and possible action on a PRELIMINARY PLAT for EDELWEISS GARTENS
(BELLA V/STA)(PP), consisting of 386 residential lots on 86 acres, south of Graham Road and
east of Wellborn Road . (1-500104)
Applicant: Mr. Steve Arden
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval with conditions, as follows:
1. The developer must show adequate access, free and clear, before a Final Plat is submitted.
2. The developer agrees to take water service from the point dictated by the City, beinQ Graham
Road at Wellborn Road.
3. The developer receives final approval from the Parks Board before a Final Plat is submitted.
4. The Preliminary Plat show the correct zoning class for each lot.
Item Summary: This item is a Preliminary Plat for the Edelweiss Gartens Subdivision. The
Developer will construct a collector street from Graham Road to the south through the
subdivision, a portion of Victoria Street through the property to the south, and an additional east-
west collector connecting the two. A Master Development Plan and Rezoning request were
approved by the Commission on March 1, 2001 . The Rezoning request was approved bye~
Council on March 8, 2001. The A-0 zoned property was rezoned to R-1, R-3 , R&D, andWJ-1 . )1
There has been no M-2 approved for any of this property (please see plat). -
A few issues are still outstanding with the development. As can be seen from the plat, access is
not being provided with this submittal. The developer has an agreement on the 0.26-acre tract
along Graham in order to construct the north-south collector. The subdivision does not have
access to Graham by way of the Victoria extension and is dependant on the Fry-Link, 1.29 acres,
and Westfield Addition Phase 3 properties to get access. Th_~_g~_y~Jope_r ~11.J~~ r.esponsiQlgjor
constructing bjscp.ortj91)...Qf.J:h~jnfr.§\stn}_C2_t.u.r~jo. the Victorj@ ROW. Therefore, before any Final
Plat is submitted, the access issue MUST be resolved. Access shall be from either Victoria or
Graham. A~ces.~ ~h~~ugh Westfielg Eb.~:;e ~J~ not ad~g_~g!e.
The City is requesting that the developer take water service from the Graham Road-Wellborn
Road intersection. The new water line should be in the future TXDOT ROW along the back of
the lots in Block 7. The City would like the developer to upsize this line from whatever is required
for the project up to a 24" line. ~-?~ation=(-OP.+b.y_tbe..City.,js available to the
\
Item
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
EDEL WEISS GARTENS, PHASE 1
Engineer's Estimate
. July 2, 2001
Description Unit Quantity Estimated
Unit Price
Paving Construction
Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 12,000.00
Roadway Excavation C.Y. 5,564 3.50
Embankment (fill material imported from offsite) C.Y. 3,277 5.25
1.5" HMAC Surface Course S.Y. 8,693 4.50
6" Lime Stabilized Subl>T3.de S.Y. 11,008 3.25
Extra Lime Ton 110 80.00
7" Crushed Limestone Base S.Y. 3,374 6.75
6" Crushed Limestone Base S.Y. 5,3 19 5.80
Curb and Gutter (Type 1) L.F. 1,391 7.00
Curb and Gutter (fype 3) L.F. 3,475 7.00
Concrete Apron (all types) S.Y. 590 33.50
4" Sidewalk S.F 15,141 2.75
Sidewalk Ramps S.F 821 6.25
Traffic Signs and Stripping Lump Sum 1 1,500.00
End of Road Markers EACH 4 125.00
Paving Subtotal
Draina!!e Svstem Construction
18" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Str. Backfill L.F. 90 32.00
21" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Str. Backfill L.F. 30 35.00
24" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Str. Backfill L.F. 325 37.00
24" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 49 35.00
27" Reinf. Concrete Pioe, Str. Backfill L.F. 296 41.00
27" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 93 39.00
30" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Str. Backfill L.F. 81 44.00
30" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 43 41.00
Standard 1 O' Inlet EACH 11 2,900.00
Standard 5' Inlet EACH 3 2,250.00
Sloped Headwall for 24" RCP EACH 1 800.00
Sloped Headwall for 27" RCP EACH 1 1,000.00
Sloped Headwall for 30" RCP EACH I 1,250.00
Construction Exit S.Y. 67 25.00
Inlet Protection EACH 14 30.00
Silt Fence L.F. 870 2.00
Fibermulch Seeding S.Y. 9,500 0.50
Dry Concrete Rip-Rap S.F. 939 6.00
45 degree bend for 27" Reinf. Concrete Pipe EACH 1 500.00
Det Pond Inlet Structure (30" RCP, junct box, lml1es.. headwall) LumoSum 1 12,500.00
Trench Safetv (storm drain) L.F. 1.007 1.00
Drainage System Subtotal
Water System Construction
6" PVC, C900 Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. 380 23.00
6" PVC, C900 Water Line, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 1,524 17.00
8" PVC, C900 Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. 651 26.00
8" PVC, C900 Water Line, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 240 20.00
Fire Hydrant Assembly EACH 4 1,900.00
6" Gate Valve EACH 4 425.00
6"x 13" Anchor Coupling EACH 4 100.00
6"x 45 degree Bend EACH 4 100.00
8" Gate Valve EACH 3 650.00
8 "x 13" Anchor Couplin~ EACH 3 175.00
1 of2
Total
12,000.00
19,474.00
17,204.25
39,118.50
35,776.00
8,800.00
22,774.50
30,850.20
9,737.00
24,325.00
19,765.00
41,637.75
5,131.25
1,500.00
500.00
288 593.45
2,880.00
1,050.00
12,025.00
1,715.00
12,136.00
3,627.00
3,564.00
1,763.00
31 ,900.00
6,750.00
800.00
1,000.00
1,250.00
1,675.00
420.00
1,740.00
4,750.00
5,634.00
500.00
12,500.00
1 007.00
108,686.00
8,740.00
25,908.00
16,926.00
4,800.00
7,600.00
1,700.00
400.00
400.00
1,950.00
525.00
Item
No.
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
EDELWEISS GARTENS, PHASE 1
Engineer's Estimate
July 2, 2001
Description Unit Quantity Estimated
Unit Price
8"x6" Tee EACH 3 200.00
8"x 11.25 degree Bend EACH 1 125.00
2" Blow-Off Assembly EACH 2 400.00
1.5" Type K Copper Water Ser.,> 10 ft. length (47 ft. avg.) EACH 15 700.00
I" Tvoe K Cooner Water Ser.,> 10 ft. length (12 ft. avg.) EACH 2 600.00
Trench Safety (water) L.F. 2,795 1.00
Water System Subtotal
Sewer Svstem Construction
6" PVC, D-3034, Str. Backfill L.F. 165 35.00
6" PVC, D-3034, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 1,334 18.00
6" PVC, D-2241, Str. Backfill L.F. 60 37.00
8" PVC, D-3034, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 888 20.00
8"Cap EACH 1 50.00
Standard Manhole, 0-8 ft. deep EACH 6 1,400.00
Standard Manhole, 8-10 ft. deep EACH 3 1,600.00
4" Sewer Service S 10 ft. (5 ft. avg. length) EACH 13 250.00
4" Sewer Service> 10 ft. ( 63 ft. avg. length) EACH 20 800.00
Trench Safety (sewer) L.F. 2.447 2.00
Sewer System Subtotal
Total Construction Cost
2of2
Total
600.00
125.00
800.00
10,500.00
1,200.00
2 795.00
84,969.00
5,775.00
24,012.00
2,220.00
17,760.00
50.00
8,400.00
4,800.00
3,250.00
16,000.00
4,894.00
87.161.00
$569,409.45
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2
Project: Edelweiss Gartens Phase 1
ENGINEERING
1 . Please be aware that the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design
Standards requires a 25% reduction in flow area of all pipes 24" and less in the
design of storm sewers. Technically, this calculates to a reduction in flow of
more than 70% when the area (A) in Manning's equation is reduced. We allow
the design engineer to use a 75% reduction in flow to simplify calculations.
However, your design utilizes an 80% reduction in flow. Please explain your
demand for this variance in writing for our consideration.
2. There are still storm sewer pipes in the system that exceed design standards
either by excess flow or velocity. Please ensure compliance with City regulations
unless you are requesting a variance in writing. It appears that flow information
shown on the plans does not agree with the Drainage Report. Please show
actual flows and velocities.
3. I have looked at the HGL sheets. These are a part of the Drainage Report. The
Engineer of Record must stamp and sign each of these sheets for the record.
For the record, please make any corrections you wish to these sheets before
they are sealed and resubmitted. I will review the sheets and may ask you to
show your calculations.
4. Please include energy dissipation structure or show velocity calculations on exit
velocity for the RCP below Ardenne Court.
5. As requested in Staff Comments 1, please demonstrate in your report that the 8"
sewer will serve all the properties shown in Edelweiss Gartens and all other down
stream properties. This includes all of Westfield Phases 1, 2 and 3.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: August 21 , 2001
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on
these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments
J:\PZTEXT\PZ05243.DOC
Page 2 of 3
Edelweiss Gartens, Phase 1
Review Response
The following is a response to the city review comment letter dated August 2, 2001 for the
Edelweiss Gartens Phase 1 project.
Planning:
1. Concerning the Plat, please change your boundary line (and acreage, ifneeded) to not include the
proposed Victoria A venue.
The plat has been updated to show this revision.
Engineering:
1. Sheet 1: Please show 1.5" water line to lots 26 and 27 as 4" sewer lines.
The plans have been updated to show this revision.
2. Sheet 3: Please show actual Q-10 and Q-100 for designed storm sewer. Please show calculated
velocities for actual Q-10 and Q-100 flows at the designed slope, not theoretical slope. Use reduced
areas where applicable for velocity calculations. Please plot HGL-10 and HGL-100 on profiles, as
required. The storm drain must carry Q-10, while Q-100 must be maintained in the ROW.
All jlowrates shown on the plans are calculated flows for each storm drain. The velocities shown on
the plans are calculated JO-yr velocities based on design slopes. HGL-10 and HGL-JOO have been
plotted on supplemental sheets.
3. Please include valve box detail showing 24-sq.in. by 4" concrete block at surface.
The plans have been updated to show this revision.
4. It appears that several of the storm water lines exceed the flow allowed with the 25% reduction. Please
check and verify.
The calculated flow rates for all pipes less than 27" have been increased by a factor of 1.25, as shown
on Exhibit C-3. This method eases the design of the spreadsheets found in the drainage report. Both
methods of over-sizing the storm drains achieve the same result. Jn most cases, the size of the storm
drain is increased by 3" in order to account for the additional flow or the reduction in cross sectional
area. Differences can be found in the resultingfriction slopes, but they are small.
5. It appears the exit velocity of the RCP below Ardenne Court is very high. Please include energy
dissipation in the outlet.
The J 0-year storm velocity exiting the pipe is approximately 13. 87 fps. At the end of the concrete rip-
rap pad the velocity is reduced to 4.45 fjJs.
6. Concerning the Drainage Report, the adjusted design flows should decrease with decreased cross-
sectional area. Please show actual flows and allowed flows. Please show velocities based on actual
installed slope and actual or allowed flows.
Please see response for comment #4.
Edelweiss Gartens Phase 1
Review Response
Pagel
7. Concerning the Sewer Report, it is obvious from your report that an 8" line is sufficient for your
anticipated service area. What is of concern, is whether the 8" line can efficiently serve as much of
your subdivision as you want it to and Westfield Phases I, 2, and 3. The 12" line along the proposed
East-West collector was designed to service this area. Please show calculations that demonstrate that
the 8" can serve all you are intending it to.
The computations for the offsite 8" sewer line include 135 lots in the Westfield Subdivision. This is
shown on Exhibit F in the line segment between nodes L and M The calculations indicate the 8" line
is of sufficient size to carry the peak flows from Edelweiss Gartens as well as those from the Westfield
Subdivision.
8. Water Report is satisfactory. Please remember as you plan for future phases of this project, that the
24" water line along the proposed SH-40 ROW should be included in your design. It may be
necessary to include easements for branches where applicable that were not shown on the preliminary
plat. OP request should be based on the cost difference between the design shown in the water report
and the design necessary for an efficient system utilizing the 24" water line.
9. Do you have the easements for street lighting as per McCord Engineering and Public Utilities?
Yes
Edelweiss Gartens Phase I
Review Response
Page2
SAS
0A\ 'i?/11 fol
• McCLURE ENGINEERING, 1Nc. _____ Jc;2_:_t7__:_P_m ___
August 16, 2001
Mr. Spencer Thompson
Graduate Engineer
Development Services Department
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 777842
RE: Edelweiss Gartens, Phase One
Revised Construction Plans
Dear Spencer:
Attached please find seven (7) sets of construction plans, revised per staff comments in a
letter dated August 2, 2001. Four (4) sets of plans are for your use and three (3) sets are for the use
of the Contractor at the job site.
Also attached, please find a set of written responses for each of the City Staff comments in
the 8/2/01 letter. These responses described how the plans were changed to address the Staff
comments.
I have also included two (2) sets of an additional three (3) exhibits that need to be added to
the Drainage Report.
Please let me know when our sets of stamped construction plans are ready to be picked up.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Very truly yours,
Graduate Engineer
JR/mlm
attachments
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838 •FAX (979) 693-2554 •email: mcclure@tca.net
Case file #02-00500183
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: EDELWEISS GARTENS (MPP-AMENDED) -02-00500183
Please make all required corrections to the plat before resubmitting . The Plat cannot
be taken before the P&Z Commission without meeting all requirements.
ENGINEERING
./1. Please show street extension off Graham Road on plat. This entrance is a
/2.
~-~·
requirement of the rezoning . If property is under separate ownership, include owner
on Final Plat.
Do not include "Future S.H. 40 ROW'' in platted area unless dedication is proposed
or shown reserve tract.
Show required hydrants on Oldenburg Lane.
It does not appear a 6" water line will be sufficient for the entire length of Oldenburg
Lane with required hydrants unless looped back to main.
Lots 64-66 , Block Ill do not appear to meet the 70-ft, R-2 requirement, as measured
at setback. A note on the plat will be required stating "Parking to be provided in side
yard or in rear" if this is the case . See Zoning Ordinance, Table A, Note E.
~---6. Please show 24" W/L in easement along rear of Block 9 lots.
7. What zoning district boundary goes through Lot 7, Block 9 and Lot 47 , Block 8?
Label. /s. Show Lot to NE, 1.2879 acres, as M-1 .
9. An Engineer Report has not demonstrated that the 8" sewer line from Westfield
Phase 3 can gravity sewer the entire Edelweiss Subdivision. An approval of this
Preliminary Plat cannot be supported without documentation of this matter. The last
study performed for this area shows a different scenario and limited capacity. ~O. Take 8" water along Brandenburg through to adjacent property. Adjust OP request
if needed.
11. Take sewer to adjacent property if required Engineering Report show excess
capacity.
12. Show all lot widths where they vary from the "norm" shown .
v4' 3. Gas line crossing Brandenburg-shall be a perpendicular crossing.
A'4. Show fire hydrant on Baden Court more toward Victoria but still meeting 500' limit.
C
5. Rename Karten Loop from Lots 1 thru12 , Block 8 and Karten Court, Lots 1 thru 23 ,
Block 11 -6:'" Rename Karten Loop , Lots 13-29, Block 8. Lots 30-40, Block 8 will be considered
Karten Lane. Please contact Melissa Rodgers at 764-3570 if you have any
questions concerning 15 and/or 16.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on you r plans_ Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
~lccJc °t / Ll)~ \'1 ->l
\\ t l~ ~~t>c..k l . lo'3 1:, 3 ~ Co 1
2 of3
~ -~ " ~ -~ " ~ ExbibitF Edelweiss Gartens Revised Subdivision Sewer Analysis (Subdivision only and Ultimate Development Scenarios) Edelweiss Garlcns Onlv -Revised for Phases 2, J, and 4 -Line Arca of Contributing Land Uses Flow Calculations j,., 1 l ; ]g ~ From To ~ ] i Average Daily Infiltration Peaking Peak Flows SU.: Type Mal<: rial Inside = Q ~ Flows (ADF) (10"!.ADF) FactDr 2•PVC Diameter ::>"' -~ ;:; ~ "' ' MH# Mil# Ac. Ac. lots GPO GPO CFS CFS CFS GPM MGD (in.) lnchcs A c 0 0 116 30,972 o.os 0.00 3.SS 0.17 78 0.113 6 2 03034 S.193 B c 0 0 26 6,942 O.ot 0.00 4.11 O.OS 20 0.029 6 2 03034 S.193 c E 0 0 0 37,914 37,914 0.06 0.01 3.48 0.21 94 0.136 6 2 03034 S.193 D E 0 0 27 7,209 0.01 0.00 4.10 o.os 21 0.030 6 2 03034 S.193 E G 0 0 I 45,123 4S,390 O.Q7 0.01 3.42 0.25 lll 0.160 6 2 03034 S.193 F G 0 0 28 7,476 0.01 0.00 4.08 0.0S 22 0.031 6 2 03034 S.193 G I 0 0 18 S2,866 S7,672 0.09 0.01 3.34 0.31 138 0.198 6 2 03034 S.193 H I 0 0 18 4,806 0.01 0.00 4.26 O.oJ IS 0.021 6 2 03034 S.193 I K 0 0 4 62,478 63,S46 0.10 0.01 3.31 0.33 ISO 0.216 """ 2 03034 7.754 I K 0 0 23 6,141 0.01 0.00 4.16 0.04 18 0.026 to...«' 2 03034 7.754 K M 0 0 0 69,687 69,687 0.11 0.01 3.28 0.36 163 0.23S ~, 2 03034 7.754 L M 0 0 23 6,141 0.01 0.00 4.16 0.04 18 0.026 6 2 03034 S.193 M 0 0 0 0 75,828 7S,828 0.12 O.ot 3.25 0.39 176 0.254 [AL 2 03034 7.754 N 0 0 0 17 4,S39 0.01 0.00 4.29 0.03 14 0.020 6 2 03034 S.193 0 p 0 l.S 17S 80,367 131,232 0.20 0.02 3.08 0.6S 290 0.417 '5.A 2 03034 7.754 AA cc 0 0 40 10,680 0.02 0.00 3.94 O.Q7 30 0.043 6 2 03034 S.193 BB cc 0 0 s l,33S 0.00 0.00 4.84 O.ot s 0.007 6 2 03034 S.193 cc EE 0 0 12 12,0IS IS,219 0.02 0.00 3.81 0.09 41 O.OS9 6 2 03034 S.793 DD EE 0 0 4S 12,0lS 0.02 0.00 3.90 O.Q7 33 0.048 6 2 03034 S.793 EE FF 0 0 28 27,234 34,710 o.os 0.01 3.SI 0.19 87 0.125 ,,,< 2 03034 7.754 • Unc between 0 and P includes offsitc lots in the Westfield Subdivision. It is laid at 0.33% 1lopc. ~e:-66 ~ ~SY:F B Ultlmate Devel opmcnt Scenulo-Revised for Phases l, J, and 4 Line Arca of Contributing Land Uses Flow Calculations j,., 1 l ~ l~ ~ ~ Average Daily Infiltration Peaking Type Inside From To •• Flows(ADF) (10"/,ADF) FactDr Peak Flows SU.: 2•PVC Mal<:rial Diameter Q ::>"' ] ~~ ;:; ~ MH# MH# Ac. Ac. lots GPO GPO CFS CFS CFS GPM MGD (in.\ Inches A c 0 0 116 30,972 o.os 0.00 3.SS 0.17 78 0.113 6 2 03034 S.193 B c 0 0 26 6,942 0.01 0.00 4.11 o.os 20 0.029 6 2 03034 S.193 c E 0 0 0 37,914 37,914 0.06 0.01 3.48 0.21 94 0.136 6 2 03034 S.193 D E 0 0 27 7,209 0.01 0.00 4.10 O.OS 21 0.030 6 2 03034 S.193 E G 0 0 I 4S,123 4S,390 0.07 0.01 3.42 0.25 Ill 0.160 6 2 03034 S.193 F G 0 0 28 7,476 0.01 0.00 4.08 o.os 22 O.QJI 6 2 03034 S.193 G I 0 0 18 Sl,866 S7,672 0.09 O.ot 3.34 0.31 138 0.198 6 2 03034 S.793 H I 0 0 18 4,806 0.01 0.00 4.26 0.03 IS 0.021 6 2 03034 S.193 I K 0 0 4 62,478 63,S46 0.10 0.01 3.31 0.33 ISO 0.216 1. f 2 03034 1.1S4 I K 0 0 23 6,141 O.ot 0.00 4.16 0.04 18 0.026 I. I 2 03034 7.754 K M 0 0 0 69,687 69,687 0.11 0.01 3.28 0.36 163 0.23S H 2 03034 1.1S4 L M 0 0 23 6,141 0.01 0.00 4.16 0.04 18 0.026 6 2 03034 S.793 M 0 0 0 0 7S,828 75,828 0.12 0.01 3.25 0.39 176 0.254 t. I 2 03034 7.754 N 0 0 0 17 4,S39 0.01 0.00 4.29 0.03 14 0.020 6 2 03034 S.793 0 p 0 l.S 17S 80,367 131,232 0.20 0.02 3.08 0.6S 290 0.417 1.' 2 03034 7.7S4 AA cc 0 0 40 10,680 0.02 0.00 3.94 O.Q7 30 0.043 6 2 03034 S.193 BB cc 0 0 s l,33S 0.00 0.00 4.84 0.01 s 0.007 6 2 03034 S.193 cc EE 0 0 12 12,0IS lS,219 0.02 0.00 3.81 0.09 41 O.OS9 6 2 03034 S.793 DD EE 0 0 4S 12,0IS O.Q2 0.00 3.90 O.Q7 33 0.048 6 2 03034 S.193 EE IF" <\ 63 0 28 27,234 148,110 0.23 0.02 3.04 0.72 323 0.46S 10 2 03034 9.692 • Unc bctwocn 0 and P includes off1i1e lot.a in the Westfield Subdivilion. It 11 laid at 0.33% slope. GG. FF ~ Pronosed Sewer Svstem Cale. Min. Cale. Min. Ave. Daily Ave. Daily Slope Slope Peak Flow Slope Slope Flow Flow Peak Peak Velocity ADF ADF Velocity Depth Flows Flows % % "" % % fps Inches 0.12 0.60 2.10 0.04 0.60 1.49 1.16 0.01 0.60 1.42 0.00 0.60 0.92 O.S8 0.17 0.60 2.19 0.06 0.60 1.59 l.4S 0.01 0.60 1.42 0.00 0.60 0.97 O.S8 0.23 0.60 2.28 0.09 0.60 1.67 l.4S 0.01 0.60 1.46 0.00 0.60 0.97 O.S8 0.36 0.60 2.39 O.IS 0.60 1.78 1.74 0.00 0.60 1.29 0.00 0.60 0.86 0.29 0.09 0.40 2.11 0.04 0.40 1.54 1.94 0.00 0.40 I.IS 0.00 0.40 0.74 0.00 0.11 0.40 2.16 0.05 0.40 1.57 1.94 0.01 0.60 1.38 0.00 0.60 0.92 O.S8 0.12 0.40 2.20 o.os 0.40 1.63 1.94 0.00 0.60 1.25 0.00 0.60 0.82 0.29 0.33 0.33 2.22 0.16 0.33 1.76 3.10 o.oz 0.60 l.S9 0.01 0.60 1.09 O.S8 0.00 0.60 0.92 0.00 0.60 0.56 0.00 O.QJ 0.60 1.76 0.01 0.60 1.19 0.87 o.oz 0.60 1.64 0.01 0.60 1.13 0.87 O.QJ 0.40 1.82 0.01 0.40 1.28 1.16 • • Slopes Listed in Rod Color are less than the Minimum Slope Allowed Refer to the next column for Mnimum Slope. Prooosed Sewer Svstem Cale. Min. Slope Slope Peak Flow Cale. Min. Ave. Daily Ave. Daily Peak Velocity Slope Slope Flow Flow Peak ADP ADP Velocity Depth Flows Flows % % fos % "· fos Inches 0.12 0.60 2.10 0.04 0.60 1.49 1.16 0.01 0.60 1.42 0.00 0.60 0.92 O.S8 0.17 0.60 2.19 0.06 0.60 1.59 l.4S 0.01 0.60 1.42 0.00 0.60 0.97 O.S8 0.23 0.60 2.28 0.09 0.60 1.67 l.4S 0.01 0.60 1.46 0.00 0.60 0.97 O.S8 0.36 0.60 2.39 O.IS 0.60 1.78 1.74 0.00 0.60 1.29 0.00 0.60 0.86 0.29 0.09 0.40 2.11 0.04 0.40 1.54 1.94 0.00 0.40 I.IS 0.00 0.40 0.74 0.00 0.11 0.40 2.16 0.05 0.40 l.S7 1.94 0.01 0.60 1.38 0.00 0.60 0.92 O.S8 0.12 0.40 2.20 o.os 0.40 1.63 1.94 0.00 0.60 l.2S 0.00 0.60 0.82 0.29 0.33 0.33 2.22 0.16 0.33 1.76 3.10 o.oz 0.60 l.S9 0.01 0.60 1.09 O.S8 0.00 0.60 0.92 0.00 0.60 O.S6 0.00 0.03 0.60 1.76 0.01 0.60 1.19 0.87 0.02 0.60 1.64 0.01 0.60 1.13 0.87 0.13 0.30 2.30 0.06 0.30 1.73 2.91 • • Slopes Listed In !led Color are lou dwt the Minimum Slopo Allowod Rofer to the next column for Minimlll'll Slope. ExbibitF 002S-Rl!V.xlo 9/6/2002
-~ .... ~ ExbibitF Edelweiss Gartens Revised Subdivision Sewer Analysis (Subdivision only and Ultimate Development Scenarios) ..... -···--~ .... -. -··~ .,.._ --~-·~ ... ., •• ··-~-· -1 -1 -··-~ Line Area of Contributing Land Use. Flow Calculations l~ 1 l ~ i;: From To .5 g ~ t i Average Daily lo filtration Peaking ~ Q Q Flows (ADF) (!0% ADF) Facior ::>"' -~ 0 ;;; .§ ~ Mil# Mil# Ac. Ac. Lots GPD GPD CFS CFS A c 0 0 116 30,972 O.OS 0.00 3.SS B c 0 0 26 6,942 0.ot 0.00 4.11 c E 0 0 0 37,914 37,914 0.06 0.01 3.48 D E 0 0 27 7,209 O.ot 0.00 4.10 E G 0 0 1 4S,123 4S,390 0,07 O.ot 3.42 F G 0 0 28 7,476 0.01 0.00 4.08 G I 0 0 18 S2,866 57,672 0.09 0.01 3.34 H I 0 0 18 4,806 0.01 0.00 4.26 I K 0 0 4 62,478 63,546 0.10 0.01 3.31 l K 0 0 23 6,141 O.ot 0.00 4.16 K M 0 0 0 69,687 69,687 0.11 0.01 3.28 L M 0 0 23 6,141 0.01 0.00 4.16 M 0 0 0 0 7S,828 7S,828 0.12 O.ot 3.25 N 0 0 0 17 4,S39 0.01 0.00 4.29 0 p 0 1.5 175 80,367 131,232 0.20 0.02 3.08 AA cc 0 0 40 I0,680 0,02 0.00 3.94 BB cc 0 0 5 l,33S 0.00 0.00 4.84 cc EE 0 0 12 .12,0IS 15,219 0.02 0.00 3.81 DD EE 0 0 45 12,015 0.02 0.00 3.90 EE FF 0 0 28 27,234 34,710 0.05 0.01 3.51 • line between 0 and P includes offsitc lots in the WC!tficld Subdivision. It is laid at 0.33% slope. UIUmatc Development Scenario-Rcvbcd for Phases l, 31 and 4 Line I Ar.a of Contributing Land Uses From To Mil# I Mil# l~ t~ ~~ ~ Ac. ] 0 ~ I ~ ~ .§ Ac. Lota GPD Average Daily Flows (ADF) GPD I CFS Flow Calculations Infiltration I Peaking (!0% ADF) Facior CFS Peak Flows Size Type Material Inside 2cPVC Diameter CFS GPM MGD (in.) Inches 0.17 78 0.113 6 2 D3034 S.793 0.05 20 0.029 6 2 D3034 S.793 0.21 94 0.136 6 2 D3034 S.793 o.os 21 0.030 6 2 D3034 S.793 0.25 111 0.160 6 2 D3034 S.793 O.OS 22 0.031 6 2 D3034 S.793 0.31 138 0.198 6 2 D3034 S.793 O.oJ IS 0.021 6 2 D3034 S.793 0.33 ISO 0.216 8 2 03034 7.7S4 0.04 18 0.026 6 2 03034 S.793 0.36 163 0.23S 8 2 D3034 1.1S4 0.04 18 0.026 6 2 03034 S.793 0.39 176 0.2S4 8 2 03034 7.7S4 0.03 14 0.020 6 2 03034 S.793 0.6S 290 0.417 8 2 D3034 1.1S4 0.07 30 0.043 6 2 D3034 5.793 0.01 s 0.007 6 2 D3034 5.793 0.09 41 O.OS9 6 2 D3034 5.793 0,07 33 0.048 6 2 D3034 5.793 0.19 87 0.125 8 2 D3034 7.754 Peak Flows Sille I Type I Material I Inside 2~PVC Diameter CFS I GPM I MGD I Cin.l Inches Proooscd Sewer Svstcm Cale. Min. Cale. Min . Ave. Daily Ave. Daily Slope Slope Peak Flow Slope Slope Flow Flow Peak Peak Velocity ADF ADF Velocity Depth Flows Flows % % fus % % fus Inches 0.12 0.60 2.10 0.04 0.60 1.49 1.16 0.01 0.60 1.42 0.00 0.60 0.92 O.S8 0.17 0.60 2.19 0.06 0.60 1.59 l.4S 0.01 0.60 1.42 0.00 0.60 0.97 O.S8 0.23 0.60 2.28 0.09 0.60 1.67 l.4S 0.01 0.60 1.46 0.00 0.60 0.97 O.S8 0.36 0.60 2.39 O.IS 0.60 1.78 1.74 0.00 0.60 1.29 0.00 0.60 0.86 0.29 0.09 0.40 2.11 0.04 0.40 1.54 1.94 0.01 0.60 1.38 0.00 0.60 0.92 O.S8 0.11 0.40 2.16 o.os 0.40 1.57 1.94 0.01 0.60 1.38 0.00 0.60 0.92 0.58 0.12 0.40 2.20 o.os 0.40 1.63 1.94 0.00 0.60 l.2S 0.00 0.60 0.82 0.29 0.33 0.33 2.22 0.16 0.33 1.76 3.10 0.02 0.60 1.59 0.01 0.60 1.09 0.58 0.00 0.60 0.92 0.00 0.60 0.56 0.00 O.Q3 0.60 1.76 0.01 0.60 1.19 0.87 0.02 0.60 1.64 0.01 0.60 1.13 0.87 0,03 0.40 1.82 O.ot 0.40 1.28 1.16 •• Slopes Listed in Red Color arc less than the Minimum Slope Allowed Refer to the next column for Minimum Slope. Prooosed Sewer Svstem Cale. Slope Peak Flows % Min. Slope Peak Flows % Cale. Peak Flow' Slope Velocity ADF fus % Min. I Ave. DailylAve. Daily Slope Flow Flow ADF Velocity Depth % fu• Inches A I c I o I o I 116 I I 30,972 I 0.05 I o.oo I 3.5S I 0.17 I 78 I 0.113 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I S.793 I 0.12 I 0.60 I 2.10 I o.04 I o.60 I 1.49 I 1.16 B I c I o I o I 26 I -I 6,942 I o.ot I o.oo I 4.11 I 0.05 I 20 I 0.029 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I S.793 I 0.01 I 0.60 I 1.42 I o.oo I o.60 I 0.92 I 0.58 c I E I o I o I o I 37,914 I 37,914 I 0.06 I o.ot I 3.48 I 0.21 I 94 I 0.136 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I S.793 I 0.11 I 0.60 I 2.19 I o.06 I 0.60 I 1.59 I I.4S D I E I o I o I 27 I -I 7,209 I 0,01 I o.oo I 4.10 I 0.05 I 21 I 0.030 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I 5.793 I 0.01 I 0.60 I 1.42 I o.oo I 0.60 I 0.97 I 0.58 E I G I o I o I 1 I 4S,123 I 45,390 I 0.01 I o.ot I 3.42 I 0.25 I 111 I 0.160 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I S.793 I o.23 I 0.60 I 2.28 I o.09 I o.60 I 1.67 I 1.45 F I G I o I o I 28 I -I 7,476 I 0.01 I o.oo I 4.08 I 0.05 I 22 I 0.031 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I 5.793 I 0.01 I 0.60 I 1.46 I o.oo I 0.60 I 0.97 I 0.58 G I I I o I o I 18 I 52,866 I 57,m I o.09 I 0.01 I 3.34 I 0.31 I 138 I 0.198 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I S.793 I 0.36 I 0.60 I 2.39 I o.ts I 0.60 I 1.78 I I.74 'ii H I 0 0 18 4,806 0.01 0.00 4.26 0.03 IS 0.021 6 2 D3034 5.793 0.00 0.60 1.29 0.00 0.60 0.86 0.29 ~ I K 0 0 4 62,478 63,546 0.10 0.01 3.31 0.33 150 0.216 8 2 D3034 7.7S4 0.09 0.40 2.11 0.04 0.40 1.54 1.94 l I K I o I o I 23 I -I 6,141 I 0.01 I o.oo I 4.16 I 0.04 I 18 I 0.026 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I 5.793 I 0.01 I 0.60 I 1.38 I o.oo I o.60 I o.92 I o.s8 K I M I o I o I o I 69,687 I 69,687 I 0.11 I o.ot I 3.28 I 0.36 I 163 I 0.235 I 8 I 2 I D3034 I 7.754 I 0.11 I 0.40 I 2.16 I o.o5 I 0.40 I 1.57 I 1.94 L I M I o I o I 23 I -I 6,141 I 0.01 I o.oo I 4.16 I 0.04 I 18 I 0.026 I 6 I 2 I 03034 I 5.793 I 0.01 I 0.60 I 1.38 I o.oo I 0.60 I 0.92 I 0.58 M I o I o o I o I 75,828 I 7S,828 I 0.12 I o.ot I 3.25 I o.39 I 176 I 0.254 I 8 I 2 I 03034 I 7.754 I 0.12 I 0.40 I 2.20 I o.o5 I 0.40 I 1.63 I 1.94 N I o I o o I 11 I -I 4,S39 I o.ot I o.oo I 4.29 I om I 14 I 0.020 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I 5.793 I o.oo I o.60 I 1.25 I o.oo I o.60 I o.82 I 0.29 o I P I o I 1.5 I 175 I 80,367 I 131,232 I 0.20 I 0.02 I 3.08 I o.65 I 290 I 0.417 I 8 I 2 I D3034 I 7.754 I o.33 I 0.33 I 2.22 I 0.16 I o.33 I 1.76 3.10 AA I cc I o I o 40 I -I 10,680 I 0.02 I o.oo I 3.94 I 0,01 I 30 I o.043 I 6 I 2 I D3034 I 5.793 I 0.02 I o.60 I 1.59 I 0.01 I 0.60 I 1.09 I o.58 "' BB CC 0 0 S 1,335 0.00 0.00 4.84 0.01 5 0.007 6 2 D3034 5. 793 0.00 0.60 0.92 0.00 0.60 0.56 0.00 ~ CC EE 0 0 12 12,0IS 15,219 0.02 0.00 3.81 0.09 41 0.059 6 2 03034 S.793 O.QJ 0.60 1.76 O.ot 0.60 1.19 0.87 6 DD EE 0 0 4S 12,015 0.02 0.00 3.90 0.o7 33 0.048 6 2 D3034 S.793 0,02 0.60 1.64 0.01 0.60 1.13 0.87 EE I FF I 63 I o I 28 I 27,234 I 148,110 I 0.23 I 0.02 I 3.04 I 0.12 I 323 I o.46S I 10 I 2 I D3034 I 9.692 I o.t3 I 0.30 I 2.30 I o.06 I o.30 I I.73 I 2.91 ' Linc between 0 and P includes off1ite lots in the Westfield Subdivision. It i1 laid at 0.33% slope. •• Slopes List.eel in Red Color arc less than the Minimum Slope Allowed Refer to the next column for Minimum Slope. Exmbi.IF OOH-teWcrREV.xls 9/1112002
Page l or 1
Spencer,
I was finally able to reach Joel Mitchell regarding the computation of peak flows. Joel developed that
spreadsheet several years ago when he worked here. The formula he used is taken from a book entitled
"Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers" published by American Society of Civil
Engineers (1969). On Page 35 of that book is a graph developed from field data in Los Angeles that
compares average flow rates and peak flow rates. Using that graph, Joel developed an empirical formula
that describes the relationship which could be used in the spreadsheet. (I attached a file that has the
formula on it because it involves log and exponential functions that I couldn't write using Outlook
Express.) The graph shows that a peaking factor is not constant and it decreases as the average flowrate
goes up. I will fax you a copy of it if you would like. Thanks.
*****************************************
Kent Laza
McClure Engineering, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838 office
(979) 693-2554 fax
*****************************************
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\sthompson\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00002.... 10/3/2002
Peaking Factor Formula
for Sewer Lines
from the ASCE Design Guidelines
Peaking Factor= e-0.098563 In (Avg Flow + 0.96697)
EXHIBIT E
I Graham Rood _J l
a· Sew.-Line
[]]
FGN= 506'
8
8 6
6
f--r--+-+-+--+--+--+---l--l---l--i8 ( I I I I I j· 1------j 6 t---1
-....--~~~~g .O.D.~.U}J.~
8 1271 8
(Optional)___,
~ 8
i
~ ~
6 6
'' ,. 1
/"f"
-,
I
\ .
~~o...a.-.....-----...\ I 29 I
Bald Prairie Subdivision
' .
I
~
EXHIBIT A
Water System Anatysls
Water Llne Schematlc
ul~io
1:30 f
• McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC.---------.....
November 7, 2002
Mr. Spencer Thompson
Graduate Civil Engineer for Development Services
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
RE: Edelweiss Gartens, Phases Three and Four
Revised Construction Plans
Dear Spencer:
Attached please find eight (8) sets of construction plans revised per staff comments dated
10/22/02. Please note that Sheet 11 has been removed from the plans. I have attached a copy of the
Access and Drainage Easement along the Wellborn Road as conveyed from D.F. Carroll to
Edelweiss Gartens Venture. I have also attached field notes and an exhibit for a Temporary Turn-
Around at the south end of Phase Four.
Please keep as many sets of plans as you require and call me when our stamped sets are ready
to be picked up.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please advise.
Very truly yours,
~chae!R.
President
MRM/mlm
attachments
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693·3838 • FAX (979) 693-2554 •email: mcclure@tca.net
I
/
•
Doc Bk Vol 00791~~0 OR 4892
ACCESS A.ND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF BRAZOS §
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION ofTen and No/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and other valuable
consideration in hand paid, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
DONALD F. CARROLL (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor") does hereby grant, sell and convey
to EDELWEISS GARTEN VENTURE, a Texas Joint Venture (hereinafter referred to as
"Grantee") an easement for drainage, detention and access from Edelweiss Gartens to Wellborn
Road, which easement is more fully described as 0.8929 acres of land, more or less, lying and being
situated in the Robert Stevenson League, Abstract No. 54 in College Station, Brazos County, Texas
and being more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for
all purposes.
TO HA VE AND TO HOLD, w1to Grantee, its successors and assigns, so long as the rights
and easement herein granted shall be used by Grantee, its successors or assigns, for the purposes
herein granted.
The Easement herein granted is a temporary easement until such time as a permanent
alternate route is available to Highway 40 and until such time as the Texas Department of
Transportation has .contTo!led and redirected drainage from Wellborn Road to Highway 40, at
which time tbis Easement shall terminate and all rights herein granted shall thereupon revert to the
Grantor, his heirs and assigns.
SIGNED AND DELIVERED this~ day of hr,-&1_, '2002.
GRANTOR:
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF BRAZOS § .
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the R-fJv day of Y~w
2002, by DONALD F CARROLL. /,,.~. ~ ~
Noury Mlio, Si.1< o~ i ~~. DEBBIE J MOORE My Commission Expires: // -,,2 -v f.fw'f.\ NQTAf\Y PV8LIC • - -_ ~ ~~:~ Stele of Texas ~p Comm. Exp 11-02-2004
tnv-,11 """''1~117VllA ;:~Qn Q~A RJ_R \'V.~ or:tt ::u.r. 7.007.16ZI OT
.
~
,, , ,
~ ,, ,,
\Ii x
~ .........
~
-.l..
('-
.... ~-..
17
....
............
"-.
OOH-1004-pond.dwo
..1= 9 '08 '411 •
R-2914.19'
l•465.J2'
Tz2JJ.16'
18'00'04" w
£ddlnlss Cartens VMflltY
66.028 Acnr Troct
Vo/um• "167, Pogd 212
.f.UtJJ'
"-.
"-. '
"'°' "-. ""-' ...
"-.
i.EGENO
0 -Wood Stcko S.l ~ -Breu !lroW Morlc.tr n Conr•t•
OftfCIN Of' It.A.RIM() S"l"ST[M: lcarfng1 t~own on this plat an
bciud ct1 loo Slclt Plon1, Centro! ZOf'I•. Wl>-lll do\um rn
occ:ordal'ICI wtt.h Clt.Y of Coll•~• StatiOft 1 9514 CPS Control Motiumcnl No. 132.
Scola: 1 • • 100'
. . . Point of Commt!ncfn9 Point of BtJgmntng 1....,. ~od fouod w;\h 2· Numl•u"'
/ Wood St-:IM S.t Cop 1lamp1d 1'xOOT i.ow M'o,..,_r· ":
-----------------------------~---r-N 4!}"'28'42" w -625.08' I
Futum S.H. -40 R.O.W. I Grodd S~poroflon
By Tdxos Deportment of Transpcrlofion
Donald F. Carroll
Remainder of 100 Acm Tract
Volume 147, Poqe 514
I
' ~
' ...
""'
PAGE 1 OF 2
/WcCLURE ENG/NEER/NG, /NC• .,008 ffl'ooo'cresk Dr/ve, Suit's -,03 • Co//ege Srar/on_, Texas 77845 • ('.97.9.J 6.93-3838
so Sc ""' IQ ..
' oo:i ;ti.I;
• CD ID<: !\)a ...
I'\)
Ill -..JtJ IC
Doc 8k Vol Pg 00791540 OR "t892 288
Page 2 of2
FIELD NOTES
0.8929 ACRE ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Being all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the ROBERT
STEVENSON LEAGUE, Abstract No. 54 in College Station, Brazos County, Texas and
being a portion of the 100 acre tract conveyed to Donald F. Carroll by deed recorded in
Volume 147, Page 514 of the Deed Records of Brazos County. Texas (B.C.D.R.) and
being more particularly dcscnOed by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING: at a found iron rod with a 2" aluminum cap stamped "TxDOT ROW
MARKER" in the proposed northeast right-of-way line of State Highway 40, said iron
rod also marking the south comer of a 86.028 acre tract described in the deed from
Donald F. Carroll to Edelweiss Gartens Venture recorded in Volume 4167, Page 212
(0.R.B.C.) and being in the northwest line of the W. Barton MWU"o, Trustee 110.57 acre
tract as described in a deed recorded in Volume 2726, Page 165;
THENCE: N 49"28' 42" W along the proposed northeast line of State Highway 40 for a
distance of625.08 feet to a wood stake set for the PDrNT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE: S 81" 34' 54" W through the prop<>sed State Highway 40 right-of-way for a
distance of 218.23 feet to a wood stake set for comer in the existing northeast right-of-
way line off.M. 2154-Wellborn Road (based on a l 00-foot width);
THENCE: 465.32 feet along said F.M. 2154 right-of-way in a coWlter-clockwise
direction along the arc of a curve having a central angle of 09" 08' 48" , a radius of
2914.79 feet, a tangent of233.16 feet and a long chord bearing N 18" 00' 04" Wat a
distance of 464:83 feet to a found bcass right-of-way marker in concrete for corner;
THENCE: S 36" 02' 32" E along the beforesaid mentioned proposed northeast line of
State Highway 40 for a distance of 237.30 feet to a found brass right-of-way marker in
concrete fur an angle point;
THENCE: S 36" 48' 22" E continuing along the prop<>sed State Highway 40 line for a
distance of I 04.97 feet to a found brass right-of-way marker in concrete for an angle
p<>int;
THENCE: S 49· 28' 42" E for a distance of206.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
and containing 0.8929 acres of land, more or less.
I, Michael R. McClure, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 2859 in the State of
Texas do certify that this survey is true correct and agrees with a survey made on the
ground under my supervision. ~~du..e,:{</>L
Michael R. McClure, R.P.L._;.S~. <:.7 .. ~~
"
.S?fve_ 4J~
3// Cec ,)J;p ftflt:;K:7
Bk Doc "'"" OR 007915~
Vol 4892
Filtd for Rtconf in:
BlflZlll cwm
Pg
289
.., 289C at t9:t9A On: Oct D>1
As a
R•cordings
Docuunt flQ1btr:
Aiount
b r _ ze.1059 Rrcript Nua ' By, Trre5a Raurez
a ~snt.as m IF hrrr'-artifr tut ~is .. = "' II I ., lldti11stup8 fillll 111 lhf ~ in thr nl•t Dd ~
ilMlllH ·~nnmef: ,, tflt 1ID lllll5 (]Ul1l
n~lwmbi•·
Oct 09,2002
""""' aum a1Jt IOllltilUllEN-...,
lllRlllillllllY
' (,__ C•1Jye s;,,,,.;:~~/ 1-x > >rrr_s._
NOV U4 Uc lc:ccp Michael McClure
THIS FORM REPLACES PREVIOUS FORM 3510·6 (8·98)
· See Reverse for Instructions
Form A~proved. OMS No. 2040 -0188
NP DES
FORM &EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington. DC 204QO
N--ali~~ gf lntent (NOi) for Storm Water Discharges Associated with
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Under a NPDES General Permit
Submission of this Notice of lnten_t constitutes notice that the party identified in Section I of this form intends to be authorized by a NPOES permit issued I
for storm water discharges associated wi:h conslrucllon activity in the State.llndi2n Country Land Identified in Section II-of this form. Submission of this Notice I
of Intent also constitutes notice that the party identified in Section I o: this form meets the eligibility requirements in Part 1.8. or lhe general permit (including
thos·e related to protection of endangered species determined through the procedures in Addendum A of the general permit), understands that continued .
authorization to discharge is contingent on maintaining permit eligibility. and that implementation. or the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan required under
Part IV of the general permit will begin at the time the permittee commences work on the construction project identified in Secion II below. IN ORDER TO
OSTAIN AUTHORIZATION, All INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST BE INCLUDED ON THIS FORM. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK OF FORM.
I. Owner/Operator (Applicant) lnrormation
Name: 't/ 101U1nd,1 C1 QI ~11£ZJ~1C1Ti01fl 1S 1 . I Zifl.f (± I I I I I I l I Phone: ft 171?1717191/1 /1/ I~ I
Address: 1P1 C>1 18101 xi ,[p,r;, t/r Status of [t:] I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I Owner/Operator:
City: 1§R1t1f11Afi l I I I l I I r I I I I i I I I I State: L&J : I I
II. ProjectJSite Information Is the facility located on lndi~n
Country lands?
Proi·ectNarne: lf1D 1 f.1LiV-..l~il66 1 1b1A 1"-1 1Jf1~.5 1P1t-f 1 12.i .13 1 f di I I I I
Yes O No [)j
ProiectAddress'location:lb1Jt1A1f.'18JtrJ ,Ji vJtZLL_f3()~:nJ1 1@J01>41Q 1 I I I I I I I I I I I
City: 16 01 Li L 1 'l iL~ 11::; I I ~:wn AfTi I 1011J1 t 1 I I I I 1 I state: T71'f\ Zip Code: l.__.l__._l __.._l __.._I _._1 -...... 1_..1__,_1 ___.__I __.[
Latitude: 1.:310!Jd!010I · Longitude; IC1 '11&i / 1l 1l/-ife1 County: IB11'-it=hi:i01S1 "1 I I I I I ! ! I l I 1 j
Has the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) been prepared? Yes [Q"" No 0
Optional: Address or location of 0 Address in Section I above SWPPP ror viewing 0 Address In Section II above 0 Other address (ii known) below:
SW PPP
Address: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I
Phone:
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
City: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j State: LLJ ·Zip Cod~: I I I I ! 1-1 1 I 1 I
I C.1e1f.1~1K'.i I .. Name of Receiving Water: rllfY I 1fi1Urr1A-1f1...111 1016 1l1/1C.1.t'1
lj 1011..i l1110101'2d 101310t[1il71t7d1
Month Day Year Month Day Year
Estimated Construction Start Date Estimated Completion Dale
Based on instruction provided In Addendum A of the permit. are
there any listed endangered or threatened species, or designated
critical habitat in the project area?
Estimate of area lo be disturbed (to nearest acre): 18 ! A, Ct I I
Estimate of likelihood of Discharge \choos·e only one):
·1. 0 UnliKely 3. 0 Once per week 5. 0 Con tinual
2. ~ Once per month 4. 0 Once per day
Ill. Certificatio11
Yes 0 No~
l have satisfied permit eligibility with regard to protection or .
endangered species through the Indicated section or Part l.B.3.e.(2)
or the permit (check one or more boxes):
(a)~ (blO (c) 0 (d)o
I certify under penalty or law that this document and all attachments ~ere prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submit1ed. ·eased on my inquiry of the p'erson or persons who
manage this system, or those persons directly responsi~le !or gathering the information. the Information submitted Is. to the best ol my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete: I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting ralse.lnlormation, including the possibility ol line and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
Prin!Name:i1£1/1bh1 1Bl1'i.1flt5pid I I I I I I I I I It l. I I I I I Date: 11p,·1,~o,g..
-----.~~~·...,,._---Z:,~~--"'~:n~-v~=:--=-~----~~~~~-:-~~~~~--Signature:
EPA Form 3510·9 replaced 3510-6 (8·98)
J
I
(J(;,31-0 ~
JI~
• McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC.--------....
October 31, 2002
Mr. Brett McCully, P.E.
Development Engineer
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
P.O. Box 1000
College Station, Texas 77842
RE: Edelweiss Gartens, Phase Two
Revised Construction Documents
Dear Brett:
Attached please find the following:
A. An exhibit and field note description, complete with Surveyor's seal for the additional Public Drainage
Easement required on Lot 21, Block 5 of the proposed EDELWEISS GARTENS, PHASE TWO.
B. Authorization letter from the owner/developer of the lot (EDELWEISS GARTENS VENTURE),
granting the City the right to construct the planned drainage improvements on the property.
C. Eight (8) sets of revised construction plans incorporating the most recent City Staff comments dated
10/24/02 as follows:
1. Added erosion control measures
2. Easement description provided (Lot 21, Block 5, Phase Two)
3. Adjusted pipe sizes to provide more clearance
4. Omitted manhole
5. Deleted Bends
6. Added dimensions to plans
7. Revised as requested
8. Added note to plans requiring boring of water line or advanced placement of cement/sand bedding
for culvert.
D. Two (2) copies of the Revised Drainage Reports (this report also includes phases 3 and 4 calculations).
Please retain the number of construction plans that you require and notify me when I can pick up the
remaining stamped sets and a copy of the stamped Drainage Report.
Very truly yours,
:Zhae~
President
MRM/mlm
attachments
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 •College Station, Texas 77845
{979) 693-3838 •FAX {979) 693-2554 •email: mcclure@tca.net
October 31, 2002
Mr. Brett McCully, P.E.
Development Engineer
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
P.O. Box 1000
College Station, Texas 77842
RE: Lot 21, Block 5
Proposed Edelweiss Gartens, Phase Two
Dear Brett:
I, J. Stephen Arden, Managing Partner, EDEL WEISS GAR TENS
VENTURE, hereby grant to the City of College Station, Texas, the right to construct
the planned drainage improvements on Lot 21, Block 5 of the proposed Edelweiss
Gartens, Phase 2 subdivision, in accordance with the approved subdivision
construction plans.
Very truly yours,
J~-==er
fiiDEL WEISS GARTENS VENTURE
I
I
Proposed
Brandenburg Lane
60' R.O.W. ,.., 39' Pavement
l ... , ,, , Point of Beginning
1 __ s4878_3! E -!7_6.85 ____ -ss--_1_ --SS-__________ _
Edelweiss Gortens Venture
Remainder of 86. 028 Acres
Vol. 4167, Pg. 212
IG SYSTEt.4: Bearings shown on this plot ore
)tote Plane. Central Zone. NAD-83 datum in
City of Coll99e Station 1994 GPS Control
12.
98.225
54.173
0.0064 Acre
Pub I i'c Drainage Easement -=-"'-
CURVE
Cl
Lot 21
Block 5
LINE
L1
L2
LINE TABLE
BEARING
S 48'18'33" E
N 11·11'09·w
DISTANCE
8.15'
41.52'
CURVE TABLE
DELTA
90'00'00"
RADIUS
25.00'
LENGTH TANGENT
39.27' 25.00'
Scale: 1" = 20'
LEGEND
0 -1/2" Iron Rod Found
O -3/4" Iron Pipe Found
CHORD. BRG.
S 03°18'33" E
CHORD
35.36'
PAGE 1 OF 2
W~ /NC• ?008 VVoodcreek Dr/ve? Su/re ?03 • Co//ege Srar/on? Texas 77845 • (979,) 693-3838
I
Page 2 of2
FIELD NOTES
0.0064 Acre Public Drainage Easement
Being all that certain tract or parcel ofland lying and being situated in the ROBERT STEVENSON
LEAGUE, Abstract No. 54 in College Station, Brazos County, Texas and being part of the 86.028
acre tract described in the deed from Donald F. Carroll to Edelweiss Gartens Venture recorded in
Volurne4167, Page212 of the Official Records ofBrazos County, Texas (O.R.B.C.)) and being more
particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING: at a found 1/-inch iron rod (with an orange plastic cap stamped "HP MA YO
RPLS 5045") marking the west corner of the said 86.028 acre tract, said iron rod also being in the
northeast right-of-way line ofF.M. 2154 (based on a 100-foot width);
THENCE: N 41 ' 41' 27" E along the northwest line of the said 86.028 acre tract for a distance of
942.91 feet to a found 1/-inch iron rod marking the east corner of the 0.50 acre Robert B. Waltman
tract described in Volume 1415, Page 43 (O.R.B.C.) and the south corner of the 0.259 acre Triro,
Inc. tract described in Volume 1839, Page 215 (O.R.B.C.), said iron rod also being in the southwest
line of the proposed Brandenburg Lane right-of-way (based on a 60-foot width);
THENCE: S 48 ' 18' 33" E along the proposed Brandenburg Lane right-of-way for a distance of
676.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE: S 48' 18' 33" E continuing along said right-of-way line for a distance of 8.15 feet to the
Point of Curvature of a curve to the right;
THENCE: 39.27 feet along the arc of said curve at the intersection of proposed Brandenburg Lane
and Hartford Drive, said curve having a central angle of90' 00' 00", a radius of25.00 feet, a tangent
of25.00 feet and a long chord bearing S 03 ' 18' 33" Eat a distance of35.36 feet for comer;
THENCE: N 11 ' 17' 09" W for a distance of 41.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and
containing 0.0064 acres ofland, more or less.
I, Michael R. McClure, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 2859 in the State of Texas do
certify to the best of my knowledge information and belief and in my professional opinion that this
survey is true correct and agrees with a survey made on the ground under my supervision. lq~,~ /of2sft-
Michae1 R. McClure, R.P.L.S. #2859 ~~~