HomeMy WebLinkAboutFolderz~~ ~ ( DATE SUBMITTED
PVV\ c<)4l, ~\e_a._~ ~~ L}\ ".}..._*° l~A-~ ~
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ~ ~ t>Jill~fo~
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS -.--+-f~ $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee. 0J.
~-+-<-Drainage and er9sion control plan, with supporting Drainage Report two (2) copies each fl.,,
Notice of Intent (N.0.1.) if disturbed area is greater than 5 acres p ~~--------~--------------~----~...---------~!!llm----~/ _i~ I I J ~ ~ 7 I":)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION_JC~~~~~v~r i_!:_Sf~r~~~'J,L~lJJ~t ~i(+]:9__._!.~~~:::__J_Jj_~~~~~~ ~ ~
( 317_~+ APPLICANT Primary Contact for the Project): .J lf ~(.,f
City ________ _
Name ,JOln Slv-. P.J J-.1~S j 1t-. ke__.
Street Address ~I ~ ~i,w·Y1.~r GL L--
State j~. Zip Code J 1'8 lf\J E-Mail Address __________ _
Phone Number ~ 19) ~ ~ l · "fa 1 l Fax Number -----------
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name l' -----------------------------
Street Address _________________ City _______ _
State ____ Zip Code ______ E-Mail Address __________ _
Phone Number Fax Number -----------
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name ~~ffJ\~1~·~·Q-.;""--~"""""";=-1-'~~_,,.,.,"-=-.:..+--.!-:.-=--"'+-"'-"-'-~+.>.<.'4--J~-t-::..-.---+---.--.-
Street Address l -'-"-'4-->.L..µ...\.-ll..=..'----""''--'-"-'.~0:,,1!--'-'-~--'""""'1,:X:..:::=...<'-4---
St ate 1'f?
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
I, if<JL"J.-1(;., c8 .Q L;,,./ Yu. 1:-k , <is&i911 l!R!iJiAeet/owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: 17
The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current
requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design
Standards.
As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
DPERMIT.DOC 03/26/02
ments and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the C I ege Station City Code
I of2
\ J . -.
CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.)
A. I,--~.....---------' certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of
ation is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100
Engineer Date
B. I, , certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of
any residential structure, pro sed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in
the latest Federal Insurance Ad 'nistration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended.
Engineer ~1::)-r
C. I, ___________ ,certify that the Iterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish
the flood-carrying capacity of the waterway adJ 'ning or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or
development are consistent with requirements of e City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning
encroachments of floodways and of floodways fringes.
Engineer
D. I, , do certify that the proposed alterati s do not raise the level of the 100 year flood
above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administr ·on Flood Hazard Study.
Engineer Date
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure
that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage
facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall
apply.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
DPERMIT.DOC 03/26/02
2 of2
GALINDO ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS, INC.
3833 South Texas Ave., Suite 213 Bryan, Texas 77802 (979) 846-8868
Mr. Spencer Thompson
Engineering Department
City of College Station
College Station, TX
Subject: Northgate Condos
October 28, 2002
Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 19
Dear Spencer:
W. C. Boyett Estate Partition
College Station, TX
We have completed an on the ground survey and topographic map of the referenced property.
Th is has allowed us to establish more clearly the limit of the 100-year flood plain affecting a
portion of this property. Exhibit 1 shows the results.
The procedure we followed to establish the flood plain was as follows:
1. From FEMA Map No. 48041 C 0143 C, dated July 2, 1992, we determined the maximum
extent of the graphical flood plain affecting the referenced property. This is shown in
Exhibit 2.
2. Measurements from Exhibit 2 were translated to Exhibit 3, City of College Station
contour map. The measurements were adjusted to accommodate scale accuracies in
Exhibit 2. Exhibit 3 indicates that the flood plain elevation at this site would rise from
332 ft. at College Main to nearly 333 at the flood plain 's maximum reach.
3. This flood plain was then inserted in ou r topographic map thus producing Exhibit 1.
Please le me have your comments.
Sincerely,
G ALINDO ENGINEERS AND P
Christian·A; Galindo, P.E. # 53425, R.P
President
Cc: John Fu
)
I
I
I
I '
I
I
. .
I
I
I
I
I . .
I
I
' '
I
N
'
EX/6T//\/G
51./RFAC~
EXHIBIT 1
•
City of Bryan
480082
MAP
4804/C tJl4~c
SCAL/::
I 11 ::500 1
ZONE X
ZONE X
-
1• ,.
[~
SPE< BY .
zo
zo
zo
ZOI
ZQI
ZOI
ZOI
FLO•
on-·
zor
on1
zm
zm
UNO
---513-
<!~I.----
(EL 987)
RM7x
•Ml.5
•f:eferenced to 1he N.
Thi map is for use in J
cio 15 not neces~rily idc
drainage sources of sm
HacardAreas. The com
up.lated flood hazard ir
or ·:onstruction purpo''
Coastal base flood elev•
effocts of wave action;
developed by the Narin
Ar.,as of special flood h.
V, Jnd VE.
Certain areas nol in 51
control structures.
Boundaries of the !lorn
between cross sections
with regard to requirer
Floodway widths in son
widths are provided in
Elevation reference ma
I"= 100 I
-.../
. ~ -~ '/) l , ' , r·-~ ( ' <v . < '" \ / 1,-.J
i
Engineering
ENGINEERING REVIEW
COMMENTS No. 1
Cherry Street Condos (02-00100035)
1. We received the information you supplied to the City concerning floodplain beh ind
the Cherry Street Condo project. Even though you show where you estimate the
floodplain to be or depicted on the FIRM , please remember this is an Approximate
Zone A SFHA. Therefore, the Floodplain Administrator may use the "best available
data" to determine floodplain coverage and base flood elevations. Mitchell and
Morgan utilized the 02 data to adjust the Zone A to where it logically would go, i.e.
centered on the creek. That adjusted layer fell on the 336-ft contour. They also
obtained data from a previous project which studied the creek that shows the flood
level of the 100-yr event to be approximately 336-ft. Based on this "best available
data" it is the Floodplain Administrator's judgement that the base flood elevation at
the subject property is 336-ft. If you have any additional data or information you
would like the City to consider, please submit it to Development Services.
I believe I forwarded to you electronic documents ·concerning floodplain determinations.
If you did not receive these please let me know.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: November 6, 2002
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must
be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these
plans that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review.
Home of Texas A&M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Project: DP-CHERRY STREET-DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (02-00100035)
ENGINEERING
1. Your engineer has slashed through the portion of Development Permit that is
applicable to this site, even though the engineer states "Not Applicable". The FIRM
shows an Approximate "A" Zone floodplain to the rear of this property. Staff has
reviewed the map and other pertinent data and has concluded that floodplain does
impact one or more of the subject lots. It is not clear how your engineer made the
determination that there is no floodplain on the property unless they have other data
that was not supplied with this application.
2. As determined by Mr. Brett McCully, P.E., Asst. City Engineer, you may obtain a
Clearing and Grading Permit at this time. However, this permit will be for clearing
only. This is due to the fact that the Permit Application is not filled out properly and
the applicable section not sealed by an engineer.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: July 26, 2002
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on
these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
'
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Project: DP-CHERRY STREET-DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (02-00100035)
ENGINEERING
1. Your engineer has marked through the portion of Development Permit that is
applicable to this site, even though the engineer states "Not Applicable". The FIRM
shows an Approximate "A" Zone floodplain to the rear of this property. Staff has
reviewed the map and other pertinent data and has concluded that floodplain does
impact one or more of the subject lots. It is not clear how your engineer made the
determination that there is no floodplain on the property unless they have other data
that was not supplied with this application.
2. As determined by Mr. Brett Mccully, P.E., Asst. City Engineer, you may obtain a
Clearing and Grading Permit at this time. However, this permit will be for clearing
only. This is due to the fact that the Permit Application is not filled out properly and
the applicable section not sealed by an engineer.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: July 26, 2002
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on
these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
. w
0: ... c .... la QJ f'€ o~
J: gi
ai'5 • IQ
'"" lij la l:: .~ c 0
"'"' QI >
u.i a:
~
'i .... ~ cu ~c ·-~ :I: ~ .
'"" "! '""
Ling Yu He
718 Summerglen Drive
College Station, TX 77840
Re: Northgate Condos Floodplain
Dear Ling,
September 25, 2002
As stated in our last correspondence we agreed to look at the FEMA Q-3
floodplain data available for this site and "fit" this data to the existing topography.
This was requested by the City of College Station to assure that your fill was not in
the floodplain. On the attached drawing you will see the original FEMA Q-3 flood
data per the FEMA digital information. The dashed line is this Q-3 floodplain
adjusted to fit the contours of the property. This floodplain elevation especially
across College Main appeared to be rather high. The depth of water over College
Main given this 100-year floodplain is approximately 5 feet. Because of the
magnitude of this depth we felt it was important to try to find any documentation
to either support or refute this number. The only information we could find as a
check on this number was old design files that the City of College Station had
from the College Main Rehabilitation project. In these design files we found a
HEC-2 run and corresponding graphics which appear to support this 5 foot depth.
We have attached these graphics for your reference.
We have forwarded this same information to the City of College Station. We
believe that the City will now want you to verify that your limits of fill are outside
this floodplain line or provide them engineering data to support that the amount of
fill in the floodplain does not adversely affect adjacent properties.
Veronica J.B. org
Managing Partner
Cc. File
Brett McCully, Asst. City Engineer
"'";.;. [~-i~ COLLEGE Jj f 34 3 . 2 YEAR STORM MAIN ~;~;::-.,..-;-..~ ll ;;;!~··· ' .. ·:.. ·'··· ·: .• ·: .,:... :~~~~ .,_. " ·ff:; _.~-~r· ~--'.%f;;: -~ ~}f?: :~'~;·:· ·\~t; ;' ;'.';,:~.~· ::r.,.'.: . ·.~;r ,.r.-.... ·•:: ·.~IJ;' .· ._, "·): .. <7 . ~-~·;, \~/ ""( ~--0 u ~\ ~ 1.-.' 1 332 330 <1..? ;{ .·.:~3!;; -~28 >~t.:· 326 324 .: .... ~~. 322 z 0 ~ <( > w _J w -7000.0 7200.0 7400.0 .• ) 0 ..... , <:·.~· ~ ·-·----/ . ---. .-·----7 . ~ < ~~/ / cf''%/ ~~ /~ ____ j$4 ~~'v "?'~ (,~ I I I sx,'V ~&-0'°/0~~ -.~:~ ,1, •. }~~t', ·~ii I .;;t'·· ~~::--: ··'. ·"'' -~·: .·•. .~ .. 1) .f ·wx ·: .• .. :-f.:. ; ..,.r· , •:, 1;: ' ~3 THE PROFILES SHOWN REFLECT THE FL06'0-·Zi " ELEVATION FOR THE DESIGNATED STORM ¥j~ ,~ WITH THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS: f::iJ-·£;\;; -------EXISTING CONDITION :'.\Pi ~1•! -·-b--·-·-· · · · · · -· · -COLLEGE MAIN CUL VERTfdNL Y>: '\!<; ;., -· --· --CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS-~'AND~-; -COLLEGE "MAIN CULVERT~~· --CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTSf'.[ .-·"'-NAGEL STREET CULVERTP.Ji!. • .<· _:tfg . iei,·i; AND COLt'.EGE MAIN ;:¢u1~ ~ . '.I I t~'. I <? /a~ v ~v -,'&'•-" -D 1-s 1-,:~YA:w~~ -.-N> I I 7600.0 7800.0 ~~~· '' ' ~ i!!f> E ;,:,.,. "'''"-~ ._.,-I, " ~ -i---it~-.' ;;Ji; ;~ ;~id ·-• .. .-:: .. ~·:.:t:':,:; -~ .... ~,,..,.. .. ~~{~~·< 8000. 0 {1'&1;J~--~ ·:~~~~f > ~r· :~: 8200·~ ~ ·~.~~~' .tr.f:~'.' 8400•·:0 t;;;~J-~
i336
334
332
326
324
322
.,
;·
z
0
~
<(
> w
_J
LU
COLLEGE
5 YEAR STORM
(•
---
I t-w I w ~ (/)
_J I w (!) <( z
7200.0 7400.0 7600.0
. ' .::
MAIN
I
7800.0
·~:·
THE PROFILES SHOWN REFLECT THE ~ootf
ELEVATION FOR THE DESIGNATED STORM..):: -, .
WITH THE FOLLOVw1NG IMPROVEMENTS: ·;,' i:,. ~ .. '·
EXISTING CONDITION : : .. \:;;;, ~~:'
· · · · · · · COLLEGE MAIN CUL VE~T~NL Y~-,
--· -· --CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT~WANo+:
COLLEGE MAIN CULVERr:;'.4
--CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTSfi;c
NAGEL STREET CULVER
AND COL.i2EGE MAIN . CO
:•·•:.· .:84d8~fo
. !~~~
.i, :a~ as{jb.o -~;'!li';' ,i.m;
.{ ..
......
·:334
3.32
330
326
324
z
0
I-
<(
> w
_J
w
7000.0
COLLEGE
7200.0
10 YEAR FLOOD
1-w w f:: (/)
-' w 0 ~ z
7400.0
----
I
I
I
I
7600.0
MAIN
;1r,
·~-~~~~ :
~~Y~::f
~' ·:: ..
I
!"· •.
86Qb.o
·:.-.. ·.-:
7800.0 8000.0 <'•' 82b0.0 8400.0
...... •:
•336
v.'.· ~!::
(334
:.1·
. '
330
326
324
:322
z
0
I-
<(
> w
_J
LU
. 7000.0
COLLEGE MAIN
7200.0
25 YEAR FLOOD
1-w w ~ (/)
....J w 0 <( z
7400.0
I
I
I
7600.0 7800.0 8000.0 .~ .•
~-!.":·
THE PROFILES SHOWN RE~LECT TI-IE F:tb
ELEVATION FOR TI-IE DESIGNATED STORM ~1k
Wllti ltiE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS: · .. '*~
------EXISTING CONDITION '~li\
· coLLEGE MAIN cuL VERrKoNL yf,: ··• -~::.. .....~.' .·
--· -· --CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS·~·'AND ·.··•
COLLEGE MAIN CUL VERH:f
---- -CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS~~
NAGEL STREET CUL VERTf~.,
AND COLLEGE MAIN CU ;
·336
'332
330
,·,
.. ~~~-,
;~328 ~.
326
324
322
z
0
r-
<(
> w
_J
UJ
7000.0 7200.0
50 YEAR FLOOD
t-w w g:
(/)
_J w (.'.)
<( z
7400.0
I
I
7600.0
I
MAIN
I
-'·.
~'z I
. ,!~r-
~··
,~._:,i
~ .. .,,~.~. .,
··~~'!' ' ~
. '' ~?/'.. ~·~t{-
... ; . : ; :~ '. . ,;,;::
iHE PROFILES SHOWN REFLECT THE FL
ELEVATION FOR THE DESIGNATED STORM ~1% ~£~ . ,
WITH THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS· ., ·~ jff · :. . . ' • <. ~![:; ~fi ·-· . EXISTING . CONDITION :· :il{ -;.:·
· · · · · · · · · COLLEGE MAIN CULVERTfONL 'r{, ,
--. -. --CHANNEL IMPROVEMENrsi:.A.No''·
COLLEGE MAIN CULVERT i~i :~:
---- -CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS~~r .
NAGEL STREET CUL VERT1~:
AND COLLEGE MAIN CUL
DIS]f\NctE ~-~ ..
::.•.'Po
'
. -: :f; ~
7800.0 8000.0 '.n• s40&-;·o·
~~·~r::
~ .. :
336
330
~~~·~: ·/r . ..i~i.~:-:. ~~
',~t·
·~28
326
324
322
z
0
t-
<(
> w
_J
LU
7000.0
GOLLE1GE MAIN
72.00.0
100 YEAR FLOOD
1-w w ~ (/)
_J w 0 <( z
7400.0
I
I
I
7600.0
I
I
7800.0
.THE PROFILES SHOWN REFLECT THE FfocSB
ELEVATION· FOR THE DESIGNATED STORM d. ;j:
WITH THE FOLLOYllNG IMPROVEMENTS: ._;; Y~f cl:? ..
. . . EXISTING 'CONDITION ·~· '~~· -:~!:· .
· · · · · · " · COLLEGE . MAIN CUL VE~Yf~NL y;f{; _
' f<...'v . --,. __ . · --CHANNEL .IMPROVEMENTS~fANo1,~!' .<: ~~ . "I> .•.. G~'?' COLLEGE MAIN CUL VER.Tjj~~. ,:;;} .•
- - - -CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS«1i1. ;'ti'·: •• ~~ NAGEL SIREET CUL VERTJ~~ 0~0q v~<v . . . :~ · ·· AND COLLEGE MAIN CUL .
~~ 0~ . ---~·'"'-.•··· -ELMIN y:. ~v .:. · ,.,, ·{l~~¥:
o 1 s T~N 4 E ~* .. ,_r_~.~.~.l.,.:
.7;{:{~ ::0 ;'
~: :
8000.0 .
\,
. ·J
~
0 0 ·o ·
0
l'V
0 0
9
0
(j.j
0
0
0
0
..f:o. 0 0
0
0
{J1
0
0
0
0
0
U)
--1
)>
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~. .'·\A~*~;t' •·•·•
0
9
0
..... ·,.:·.·'
\~
\\\~
\\\\
\ \\\\\
\ \\\\\
\ \\\\\
\\\\~.
\ \ \\\\
(j.j (j.j
. ~~:~~~f '2tf«),~, ';• ,: :~) ;;,o;J/,9 >; )'
ELEVATION
· ......... .
TEXAS AVE. BRIDGE -(ADEQUATE)
~~
' \\ \ \\\
\ '\
I
l -\~
~ \~
' \ \\~ '\. \\\\ "" \\~ ' \\\~
(j.j
(j.j
.0
~
~ ' . '; '?i"~1t~?'
~ ;!~~Vi.:·~
.· .. .-
~. : ·. z
., >.~~·. -~
' '
·,, \--.~--5l-
.. ,~-.... -,:::--::..-
""' ·~r ~ -~~
~./::;·~·
-<
: -· ·-.\ :. ·· .• ' • -=~-:.:·,:. _. -: -;...-·!._··· ·:--':' ·· ... _:. :;/ ... ~ -~r. k:-.:-.:•;;,-\1,'h;~·).;l.-.. ' ::~ ~~1:-;,: ....
PEAK FWW AND ST.AGE (ENirOF.:PElUOD)' siJHM.ARY FOR MULTIPLE PLAN;:RATIO ECONOMIC COMPUTATIONS
FLOWS IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, AREA IN SQUARE KILES
TIME TO PEAK IH HOURS
RATIOS APPLIED TO PRECIPIT!TIO!r
OPID.TION STATION !REA PLAN RATIO 1 RATIO 2 RATIO 3 RATIO 4 RATIO 5 RATIO 6
11.00 9.80 . 8.80 7.40 6.20 4.50
100 ~o -:z..s 10 5 2.
HYDROGRAPH AT
+ A-1 0.02 1 FLOW 91. 78. 68. 53. 41. 24.
TIME 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58
ROUTED TO
+ PIPE 0.02 1 FLOW 89. 77. 66. 51. 39. 23.
TIME 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.67 11.67
HYDROGRAPH AT
+ A-2 0.05 1 FLOW 243. 215'. 192. 159. 131. 91.
TIME 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 . 11.50 il.50
2 COMBINED !T
+ SPRUCE · 0.07 1 FLOW .. 325. 286. 'Gi"_/ 206. 166. 111.
TIME 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 . 11.50
HYDROGRAPH !T
+ B 0.06 1 FLOW 256. 224. 198. 161. 129 •. 84.
TIME 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58
2 COMBINED AT
CULV 0.13 1 FLOW
TIME
+ 573. 503.
11.50 11.50
(~ 360. 289. 190.
11~"50 11.50 ' 11.50 11.50
ROUTED TO
.: . ; , -., .!P\~i;·:t~z.;9.:,!~1t lf~vt~\~;:;
·,·~_;_ :=>· "£··::: :::.--·~~v-~~-----=
. ··.
+·
HYDROGRAPH AT
~,; ~J~,~:ittii~~~h ,,,_, · ...
,-,·' -.:·
+ C 0.08 1 FLOW
··, ·· ,"·<'r;.bi&i':/Mf.'j:'.ff:/· ,:; : TIME
2 COHBOOD •JJ.y ·,;;li}i;~~J{~%~1f ~}~~-;~;:~:-,:~:·
+ NAGLE· J '· 0.21 ... ·· 1!. ·FLOW
TIME
·'.·
389.
dL50
946 ;
11.58
341. 301. 245. 197. 129.
11.50-11.50<.· ll.50.:,. 11.50~'-+i\'.11;58 :·• ·.
,··-· :, . . ), : ;:r-~J?(':'~'~· . ..
827; . 478.· .{ . 314.
11.58 11.58 11.58
... ·:
.·.:, :: .·:· ;··.
+ I~, o.'.~.·, •i / .~ .,, FLOW i ·; 934.. 815. . 717. 581. 465. 302.
,.· :. ::·. 7(:· .. ~~~{::,;>··;_;/TIME . · .. ·< U.58' ·;,.:11-:s,ay · 11.~sN:;, lt:;~~(-'_ :·_~L5S .: 11"58
HYDROGR!PH !T
+-::''. . ,
2 COMBINED AT
,/· 525~~'.:.~;: ·. 462~\t~)i.":374~J':\/~299'•
11.58 11.58 11.58 11.58
193;
11.58
-·~\:~-.:;·.
·. : .. '.
.. > • 'l'OO
...•. . ·.;.~ ...... .« I' ' \;;A ',':..·r._ .. .,. HYDROGRAPH 'AT'
' + E 0.08 1 FLOW
TIKE
HYDROGRAPH AT
+ J' 0.30 1 FLOW
TIKE
3 COHBilfED AT
+ FORK 0.73 1 FLOW
TOO .,
ROUTED TO
+ HAT. 0.73 1 FLOW
TIME
HYDROGIDH AT
+ G 0.20 1 FWW
TOO
2 COMBINED AT
+ TEXAs 0~93 1 FLOW .... TIKE .. ~
ROOTED TO
+ ROSE 0.93 1 FLOW
TIKE
HYDROGIDH AT
+ H 0.21 1 FLOW
TOO
2 COMBnmD AT ..
·+ ~ .. c.·., . :·,!>·:-._~ ... ;;·. -~-:-\/~~ FEKR7,~~i·~;l. lf\;;,,~11}:tif .. ' FWf'. · .
:·· .. :~
::~;~\+~¥~'.;:g·~\;.:;~.-~--:,_ i:: .:/\~*;~~-~-~£;t:~;~~<?~i;~~~~%~}~t--· }i;~/»:.·: ', :·
. ·~ --~A:~i~!~~~,·: . ·
11.58
268.
11.83
607.
12.33
1973.
11.58
1815.
11.83
725.
11.67
2524.
11.75
2116.
12.00
744.
11.67
2~68~.:?.
11.92·
11.58
234.
11.83
526.
12.33
1720.
11.67
1584.
11.83
633.
11.67
2198.
11.75
1853.
12.00
649.
11.67
2350.
11.92
11.58
206.
11.83
459.
12.33
1512.
11.67
1392.
11.83
555.
11.67
1928.
11.75
1638.
12.00
570 .•
11.67
11.V I
166.
11.83
365.
12.33
1221.
11.67
1125.
11.83
447.
11.67
1556.
11. 75-
1346.
12.00
460.
11.75
'11.58
132.
11.83
285.
12.33
973.
11.67
899.
11.83
355.
11.67
.. '.·
1242.
11.75
1081.
12.00
366.
11.75
11.58
84.
11.83
176.
12.42
623.
11.67
587.
11.83
227.
11.75
813.
11.75
700.
12.00
234.
11.75
'·
. ::~·h~h~i~~,~1t~r,f.i~:' ~~~;;~
~'.: ~:-~,~~
({~
COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 02 00100035
Project Description: CHERRY STREET
FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 8, 9, 10
BLOCK 19
BOYETT
DATE OF ISSUE: 07/29/02
OWNER:
FU , JOHN QIANG & LINGYU HE
718 SUMMERGLEN DR
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: CLEARING ONLY
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
315-319 CHERRY
DRAINAGE BASIN:
BURTON CREEK
VALID FOR 6 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans
THIS IS A CLEARING PERMIT ONLY. EROSION CONTROL MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO WORK.
FLOODPLAIN MUST REAMIN UNDISTURBED.
The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate
construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station
Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective
to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State
and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and
establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion
control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original
condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to
adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion,
siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work.
Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced
before any operations of this permit can begin.
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be
taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets,
or existing drainage facilities.
I hereby grant this permit for development of an area INSIDE the special flood hazard area . All development
shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the
development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of
College Station that apply.
Date I I
City of College Station July 18, 2002
Attachment to Development Permit
At this time, and as stated on the application, the site is to be cleared only with removal
of trees and brush. As noted on the elevations, current topo reflects 341 sloping to 335
on approximately 150', at College Main. Basically level at the Cherry Street side of the
property, then sloping off similar at the west side.
The site is to be cleared and then a grading and site plan is to be furnished to the City for
permitting.
Based on the elevations, an erosion plan is to place a silk fence along the north and mid
point up on the west side of the property. Material set in ground 4", with staking -see
plan.
Kenny Philips
KMI Homes, Inc.
\
~)
_) /
/
r
I
\
\
/
// /
// ij
~/
/ /
City of Bryan
480082
\
J
ZONE X
,,
"·
,-,.
l:'f"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION * ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ ~ 110\ TEXAS AVE. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
PROJECT:
DESIGNED BY: DATE:
CHECKED BY: SHEET NO.
... ~ ( Od'"' ~ S"'
GALINDO ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS, I NC.
3833 South Texas Ave., Suite 213 Bryan, Texas 77802 (979) 846-8868
Mr. Spencer Thompson
Engineering Department
City of College Station
College Station, TX 77840
Subject: Northgate Condos.
College Station, TX
GEP Project No . 29-02
Dear Mr. Thompson:
November 5, 2002
Further to my letter of October 28, 2002, I have reviewed the Q-3 data and the storm data
from the City of College Station's College Main Rehabilitation project.
The result of this review is shown on the attached drawing where the College Station data has
been applied to our field survey reported in my previous letter. The drawing shows the existing
contours and elevation of the flood plains for the six storms .
Based on the above analysis it appears that the proposed building will not lay in the 100-year
flood plain. A portion of the fill does lay in the flood plain, but it will be removed in order to
compete the proposed driveway and parking construction.
Sincerely,
G ALINDO ENGINEERS AND PLA NNERS, /NC.
Christian A. Galindo, P.E. # 53425, R.P.L.S. # 4473
President
Cc: John Fu
Clo Rick Pustejovsky
First Bank of Snook
701 University Dr. East, Ste. 105
College Station, TX 77840