Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFolder• " DRAINAGE REPORT -ADDENDUM, APRIL 2003 CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, PHASE 2 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this addendum is to provide infonnation concerning the revision to Pipe No. 3 13 of the Castlegate Subdivisioll, Section 3, Phase 2, and to verify that these revisions do not affect the previous hydraulic analys is perfo1med for this development. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The previous design of 60" RCP (Pipe No. 313) and Channel No. 4 did not allow enough room for the proposed 8' concrete walking path th at wi ll be constructed in the Restri cted Open Space Reserve and drainage easement. By extending the length of the pipe, not onl y is there more space for th e pathway, but it also wi ll be more aesthetically pleasing from the street. In order to extend this pipe, a 30-degree bend is needed. The proposed revision to Pipe No. 313 involves adding 16 feet of pipe, then a 30-degree bend (8 ' in length) and then and additional 88 feet of pipe. The concrete headwall and rock riprap will be placed at the end of the pipe as previously designed. Table 1 (fonnerly found in Appendix B of the original Drainage Report for Castlegate, Section 3, Phase 2, dated July, 2001) below shows the changes to Pipe o. 313. TABLE 1 -Revised Pipe Data Castlegate Subdivision -Section 3, Phase 2 Pipe Data -REVISE D APRIL, 2003 Inlet Outlet 1 O year storm 100 year storm Pipe# Size Length Slope Invert Elev Invert Elev ti't' Actual Flo\ Design Flow v,. Travel Time, lflo I"" Actual Flo._ Design Flow v, .. % Full % Full (in) (fl) (%) (ft) (fl) (cfs) (cfs) (fps) (sec) (min) (cfs) (cfs) (fps) 308A 54 85.0 1.30 303.38 302.28 153.41 14.3 63.8 6 0.10 214.14 14.9 84.8 310 60 134.0 1.10 301.41 299.94 162.51 13.7 58.2 10 0.16 226.54 14.6 73.7 311 60 174.1 1.10 299.84 297.92 162.51 13.7 58.2 13 0.21 226.54 14.6 73.7 312 60 125.0 1.10 297.71 296.34 169.49 13.8 59.8 9 0.15 234.01 14.7 75.8 313 60 *292 0.95 296.24 293.47 251.42 13.5 90.2 22 0.36 351.97 13.2 100.0 309 18 28.1 0.96 305.27 305.00 4.89 7.90 6.0 69.3 5 0.08 6.35 10.26 6.0 92.1 321 27 201 .6 1.00 304.42 302.40 26.60 8.2 75.9 25 0.41 30.80 8.1 91.2 320 27 141 .2 1.00 302.36 300.95 26.60 8.2 75.9 17 0.29 30.80 8.1 91.2 318 36 224.6 0.98 300.16 297.96 48.50 9.6 67.1 23 0.39 65.81 9.7 92.0 317 42 161.6 0.43 297.57 296.88 48.50 7.1 67.1 23 0.38 65.81 7.1 92.4 ---· ----------· ---·-----314 48 39.9 1.10 296.78 296.34 70.82 11 .2 50.4 4 0.06 102.73 12.2 63.7 ----·--- -- 319 27 28.3 1.43 301.56 301.16 8.27 7.1 33.4 4 0.07 16.64 8.6 49.0 316 27 28.0 0.54 298.74 298.59 11.40 5.4 52.3 5 0.09 22.20 6.0 87.5 315 30 69.1 0.84 298.36 297.78 22.32 7.5 58.1 9 0.15 36.92 8.0 88.5 *This length includes 8 LF for the 30-degree pipe bend. Travel Time, luoo (sec) (min) 6 0.10 9 0.15 f.--- 12 0.20 --9 0.14 22 0.37 5 0.08 25 0.41 17 0.29 23 0.39 23 0.38 --3 0.05 3 0.05 5 0.08 9 0.14 ,. ' CONCLUSIONS The drainage area and the peak runoff flowing into the pipe do not change; therefore, the increase in length of Pipe No. 313 does not alter the previous hydraulic analysis perfonned for this development. Please refer to Exhibit B of the Drainage Repo11 for the Cast legate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2, dated July 2001, for the drainage areas for this pipe. Table 2 in that same report provides the peak runoff values for Pipe No . 313. 4--7--o3 2 TEX CON General Contractors Div. of CDS Enterprises, Inc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 979-690-7711 • Fax: 979-690-9797 April 7, 2003 Spencer Thompson Development Services City of Co llege Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Castlegate Subdivision -Section 3, Phase 2 -Coll ege Station, Texas Dear Mr. Thompson: The Developer of the above referenced Subdivision is requesting to extend the 60" diameter storm sewer pipe, (Pipe No. 313), which discharges into the proposed Channel No. 4 and thence into the existing tributary of Spring Creek. The pipe extension will allow more area to construct the proposed 8' wide concrete pathway in the Open Space area that the pipe and channel are located within. The proposed headwall and rock riprap will be installed at the end of th e pipe as previously shown. Attached are an Addendum to the Drainage Report and revised plan Sheets 4 and 6 of 13 for this Subdivision for yo ur review. If you have any questions or need additional information,'pl ease do not hesitate to give me a call at (979) 690-77 11. Sincerely Yours, Joe Schultz, P.E. Engineering Manager Attachments cc: Wallace Phillips I \ DRAINAGE REPORT-ADDENDUM, APRIL 2003 CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, PHASE 2 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this addendum is to provide information concerning the revision to Pipe No. 313 of the Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2, and to verify that these revisions do not affect the previous hydraulic analysis performed for this development. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The previous design of 60" RCP (Pipe No. 313) and Channel No. 4 did not allow enough room for the proposed 8' concrete walking path that will be constructed in the Restricted Open Space Reserve and drainage easement. By extending the length of the pipe, not only is there more space for the pathway, but it also will be more aesthetically pleasing from the street. In order to extend this pipe, a 30-degree bend is needed. The proposed revision to Pipe No. 313 involves adding 16 feet of pipe, then a 30-degree bend (8 ' in length) and then and additional 88 feet of pipe. The concrete headwall and rock riprap will be placed at the end of the pipe as previously designed. Table 1 (formerly found in Appendix B of the original Drainage Report for Castlegate, Section 3, Phase 2, dated July, 2001) below shows the changes to Pipe No. 313. TABLE 1 -Revised Pipe Data Castlegate Subdivision -Section 3, Phase 2 Pipe Data -REVISED APRIL, 2003 Inlet Outlet 10 year storm 100 year storm Pipe# Size Length Slope Invert Elev Invert Elev 1-t-Actual Floy Design Flow V10 Travel Time, tm Actual FIOY Design Flow V 100 % Full % Full (in) (ft) (%) (fl) (ft) (cfs) (cfs) (fps) (sec) (min) (cfs) (cfs) (fps) 308A 54 85.0 1.30 303.38 302.28 153.41 14.3 63.8 6 0.10 21 4.14 14.9 84.8 310 60 134.0 1.10 301.41 299.94 162.51 13.7 58.2 10 0.16 226.54 14.6 73.7 311 60 174.1 1.10 299.84 297.92 162.51 13.7 58.2 13 0.21 226.54 14.6 73.7 312 60 125.0 1.10 297.71 296.34 169.49 13.8 59.8 9 0.15 234.01 14.7 75.8 313 60 '292 0.95 296.24 293.47 251.42 13.5 90.2 22 0.36 351.97 13.2 100.0 309 18 28.1 0.96 305.27 305.00 4.89 7.90 6.0 69.3 5 0.08 6.35 10.26 6.0 92.1 321 27 201.6 1.00 304.42 302.40 26.60 8.2 75.9 25 0.41 30.80 8.1 91.2 320 27 141.2 1.00 302.36 300.95 26.60 8.2 75.9 17 0.29 30.80 8.1 91.2 318 36 224.6 0.98 300.16 297.96 48.50 9.6 67.1 23 0.39 65.81 9.7 92.0 317 42 161.6 0.43 297.57 296.88 48.50 7.1 67.1 23 0.38 65.81 7.1 92.4 ----------· ----· ---... -·-------· --- - 314 48 39.9 1.10 296.78 296.34 70.82 11.2 50.4 4 0.06 102.73 12.2 63.7 -·------------ --- f---319 27 28.3 1.43 301.56 301 .16 8.27 7.1 33.4 4 0.07 16.64 8.6 49.0 ·-316 27 28.0 0.54 298.74 298.59 11.40 5.4 52.3 5 0.09 22.20 6.0 87.5 315 30 69.1 0.84 298.36 297.78 22.32 7.5 58.1 9 0.15 36.92 8.0 88.5 *This length includes 8 LF for the 30-degree pipe bend. Travel Time, tl1oo (sec) (min) 6 0.10 9 0.15 12 0.20 9 0.14 22 0.37 5 0.08 25 0.41 17 0.29 23 0.39 23 0.38 ----3 0.05 - 3 0.05 5 0.08 9 0.14 CONCLUSIONS The drainage area and the peak runoff flowin g into the pipe do not change; therefore, the increase in length of Pipe No. 313 does not alter the previous hydraulic analysis performed for this development. Please refer to Exhibit B of the Drainage Report for the Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2, dated July 2001, for the drainage areas for this pipe. Table 2 in that same report provides the peak runoff values for Pipe No . 313. 4-7--o3 2 DP-oi-0016005L./. FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (check one) Minor _Amending V Final _ Vacating _Replat The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ./ Filing Fee of $200.00. v · Development Permit Application Fee of $100.00 (if applicable). ~Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $300.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed.). / Application completed in full. ~Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ....::::_One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). _L Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station LS .D. L_ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. ~Two (2)copies of public infrastructure plans associated with tills plat (if applicable). APPLICANf/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name br~~\tf~s Lk\ -\~lalliau ~l~ps StreetAddrcss ~~-0~0Q'e City Col(~ Sta:hE!YJ State \'X._ Zip Code :J 1£il:S E-Mail Address -----+------- Phone Number q 1 'I -(i;q 3 -I 1)30 Fax Number j 11 -(,,'10 -{ 4-~ -4 + (,;, 0 PROPER1Y OWNER'S INFORMATION: ~ Name Gv ~]roi<\.Q.., Iwx<di> ~~ J LJ-J . Street Ad~s SD\D ~LJ<Jt (_,\ v-&.L City Co\ l 9. 9if-Sf-a.J; CLO State I Y, Zip Code "'] 1. 'D4S: E-Mail Address __________ _ Phone Number CJ lq -l:,43 ..... lCQ?;Q Fax Number q :JC! -V/D-J 4-100 ARCfllTECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name 1:e XLDV\ -Joe Svkv--\*.:t.-1 P. E · , Street Address 11o1 Gca haxn ](~ City ~L(g12f ~fa-h w? .· State r x z;p Code 11164s= E-Mail Address j oe s~b .c I+ le e ±e u Qtl • '1 t'1 Phone Number VJ.11 ~ l/tO -1J l \ Fax Number q 1C( -fclf_O -'j_1q] FINAL PLAT APPUCATION I ofJ TOTAL ACRES OF SUBDIVISION 1$.1o R-0 -W ACREAGE 2 . Sit-TOTAL# OF LOTS l,? TUMBER OF LOTS BY ZONING DISTRICT Z-.3 I PDD --:ft I I AVERAGE ACREAGE OF EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT BY ZONING DISTRICT: Q SL\-1 tpi)-\k ! __ I ----I ---- FLOODPLAIN ACREAGE k , \ \ PARKLANDDEDICATIONACREAGE __ Q ___ ORFEEAMOUNT ____ _ A STATEMENT ADDRESSING ANY DIFFERENCES BE1WEEN 11ffi FINAL PLAT AND APPROVED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND/OR PRELIMINARY PLAT (IF APPLICABLE): (t REQUESTED VARIANCES TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS & REASON FOR SAME ______ _ Kt{ev= =tu PDD -t\-1Do 1~ SfanJa&Js TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED: __ l'"-"'<Q'-=~-=-· _STREETS 0 SIDEWALKS --~--:--4 l 3' SANITARY SEWER LINES __ (..._(o~q'--~-, -WATER LINES -------=3'""---'lt''-=~'--·~ CHANNELS _ _,_l-"'-(p-=--7-__,_\ _' _ STORM SEWERS __ Cf_._CO .......... _' -BIKE I ~sms I PA1HS NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) MUST BE SUBMITIED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attachea hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above identified final plat. FINAL PI.AT APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT fNFORMATION development specific site/waterway alterations: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, ___ \rJ _ _:_D...:_li_~"-"':;__:c_-~+-''--'~"""~-"-ll-"-'-=--~~2'----' design engineer/owner, hereby acknowledge or affinn lliat: The infonnation and conclusions contained in ll1e above plans and supporting documents comply wiili ll1e current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter l3 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in iliis application according tl=e documents and the miuire;;_~ f Chaple< 13 of !he College Siation City Code A~&t~ ------ Property Owner(s) Contractor CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.) A. L , certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as par of this application is design£.ted to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Engineer Date I, , certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any ..ement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended. Engineer Date c. L j D~ Y · Schv... l t 1::... certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood<aIItillg capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter l3 concerning encroachments of floodwa sand offloodway: frin _,_,,,,,, ---(..~OF /~ \\ 7 -7 J _ ol '4-~···*········ .. ~...,IS''•• ----''----------If'----.·· ·.. * ., Date '-* : ·. * ~ . l.!.: ... £p··-r·sci'.iu'1Ir··~ Sc1Ju.. \.~~o certify that the proposed alterations do not~J?~·~of-ch'e"l"l'p.Qf&u- e la ederal Insurance Administration Flood Haz.ard Stu~"•. ~ 65889 ,..... .: Ii/ I ,;o ·.-:r~ ~ v. ~ .,, f :;(\ ••.G'/STE.~···',.. ..__, -1..J -~ r ,,~si• ......... ~0J ---/-+----------\\ IONAL <;;;. __ Date ,,,~- Engineer D. L .Jose~ y. flood above elevation lished i Engineer Conditions or comments as part of approval:----------------------------- .::cordance wiili Chapter l3 of the Code of Ordinances of ilie City of College Station. measures shall be taken to insure that dcbri 1rom construction. erosion. and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance will1 the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by ilie City Engineer for t11e above named project. All of ll1e applicable codes and ordinances of ll1e City of College Station shall apply. J:1'N A' Pf AT A PPI rr A TJ{)N J ofJ · :1 r· '' u \:!I 1 ;_'. \l (l il i ;·, ;-.: '·,' "' ..-, t · ; ,-, p ,, ;-t y OI [1 : I ; :i \1 / ? .i ": r l\ :< f; I' ,'; ~--(' ~': l -'• l I i I 1_-, )' ( Ci .i ) Col l ege ~t~t i on City (C2) (. ,, J_ J (·.: ~! (• :·: ·j __ ;_; 1··. i ,, r1 r ::: [) ( '.:. ~-·) ---------------·------------ C• '·-' n t~ r-J [J : l 6 0 f: c-; ~. I : :~ l . I. : I I .• :. ' ' •• ----------- 1 (: <.: 'i 1.1 n 1: ~ ~ 1.1111 : t~ ~' :;, ,~ 0 i. . '' c' i3 :·~ -~' 0 ; ~1 (i fi L f ll :~ :> : 1 1~ 1 l\ T r:: T N \;' r: 0.: T tl ; \ ~:. L T :J ~ :3 0 s 4 0 :L r I ~~~ T [ '/ [ w~ (J N ( T C' L ) , l I~ (\ c T ~-;: , ~ l: : ~ ; : :·:: :·~ l 0 . 0 :·~ ~ l ~'>01 0 .C1ll C U S T1~ CH{ -------------- .h i.:.~ d1-:0 1;1.1m e ni"". ··::. 1:1) 1.::c::;·t i.fy t h ,•\t .--;fi:::.1· .'~ ::.-,;;·::~·fu l. c h ;;\;l< of ·i-.h :•: t:.-:;< 1-·ei::c)r·d :. · :: t h _i ~: u f f j_ • .. : t:: , i. I 1 ,,, f \) 1 1 o w 5 r 1 g c 11 r· 1--e n i:~ ,., r d f~ l :;_ n c ! u 8 n t t ;; x e. s , p e n ;:; 1. t i e :;:: , ,~, n d 'ni'.8 r (~:-~i-. ·'1 1"(; d 1.1 ;~ c)n t h e prop:)ri':y f1)t' i;h ::-:: i".a:-<i ng e n t i.ti.:1 ::~ d escribed ,:\;)l)\/E:; ·_ntlty ~:; I::,-, t ;:: me n t TD x (Ju e o 5 ~. c . ; f' r..J r~t t .. Fer: T c· t ~' J.. D u <: -C 1) ti'< l I) I.I ;': 0 n I~ 1_ 1. fj i. l. l. ::> : t 0 .0 0 c 2 T <• >: (, ~' () l Ta:<e:; :::: 2 Tc< x e ~: P .. ~ i d f 0 r ;> a i_d f C) ,. p,'; i <J i 0 r 2 00 0 ..... (10 0 ,, 0 0 (j <.. ; : : :~ 3' 2 6 8 . 7 4 :j;3 ,l?1 .1 4 ~02,~;.lj tl .4 :~ This certificate is issued on rea I estate only. It does not include minerals and/ or personal property. SPECIAL CONDITIONS EXIST ON THIS ACCOUNT! SEE BELOW **W End o f r~x Cert lf lcatc NN f ~ppl ica hl c, t h a abov e d escr i.b e d p r or e rty i s rece lvl n g 3 peci~l v~luotlo n ·~s e d un Jts u se . Ad dit i o n ~J.. r ollb ~ck t~xes wh i ch m~y become du e b ~sed o n : h P. p r o v l s \. 0 n s 1) f t; h ~"} ~ p e c l ·"< l v .:: l u d t i.. o n .:1 r e n o t .i n d i. c .-.1 t e d i. n t; h i :-:; d o c um e n t . his ce r t if5 c~te does no t c l e a r &bu se of g r~nt e d exe mp tio n s ~s de fin e d i n . .::; c t i. o n l l . 4 ::~ , : > .'1 r -':: g , ... ci p h ( i. ) 0 f t h =~ r ::: x .-'; ~-f> r o p (~ r 1'; y T .:i >< C r> d ::: . Date of Issu e : 0 1 /25/01 ~queste d by GRE E NS PRAlR i f ··• f8e co ll ect8 d . .. • (f ~ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 02-100054 Project: Castlegate COLllGl STATION FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, PHASE 2 DATE OF ISSUE: 8/21/02 OWNER: GREENS PRAIRIE INVESTORS, LTD. 5010 AUGUSTA CIRCLE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 SITE ADDRESS: 2270 GREENS PRAIRIE RD . W DRAINAGE BASIN: Spring Creek VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees must be barricaded, as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area inside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Date Date General Contractors Div. of CDS Enterprises, Inc. · 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 979-690-7711 • Fax: 979-690-9797 August 12, 2002 Brett McCully, P.E. Asst. City Engineer City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Castlegate Subdivision -Section 3, Phase 2 -College Station, Texas Dear Mr. McCully: The final plat for Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2, was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission on September 6, 2001. The construction drawings for the infrastructure were approved on August 8, 2001 and the Development Permit, (Permit No. 100054), was issued on September 7, 2001. Due to the number of lots still available for sale, 9 of 25, in Phase 1 of this Section, the Developer, Greens Prairie Investors, LTD., requests a 12-month extension to the Development Permit. Construction of the infrastructure for this Phase will be started prior to the end of the 12-month time extension and the project will be constructed in accordance with previously approved Final Plat and construction drawings. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give •--- ---" L ("""{)\ £("\/) 7"711 1.-.l\;; a '-'uu G.l :;,, 1 -' J V /v-; 1 • Sincerely Yours, Jo Schultz, P.E. Engineering Manager cc: Wallace Phillips • ((~ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 100054 DP-CASTLEGATE SUB SEC 3 PH 2 COLLEGE STATION FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, PHASE 2 DATE OF ISSUE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2001 OWNER: GREENS PRAIRIE INVESTORS, LTD. 5010 AUGUSTA CIRCLE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77845 SITE ADDRESS: 2270 GREENS PRAIRIE RD W DRAINAGE BASIN: SPRING CREEK VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: FULL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees must be barricaded , as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition , placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area inside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Administrator/Representative Date Owner/Agent/Contractor Date (('1 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 100054 DP-CASTLEGATE SUB SEC 3 PH 2 COlllGl STATION FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, PHASE 2 DATE OF ISSUE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2001 OWNER: GREENS PRAIRIE INVESTORS, LTD. 5010 AUGUSTA CIRCLE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77845 SITE ADDRESS: 2270 GREENS PRAIRIE RD W DRAINAGE BASIN: SPRING CREEK VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: FULL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees must be barricaded, as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not count towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite, it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area inside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. 9--07-o I Date 9-/s-aj Owner/Agent/Contractor Date Item No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 TEXCON GENERAL CONTRACTORS CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS SECTION 3, PHASE 2 -23 LOTS Description Sitework Mobilization/Layout Erosion Control/Seeding Site Preparation Topsoil Stripping & Replacement Excavation /Grading Lime Stabilized Subgrade Concrete Laydown Curb Base Material -6" depth Asphalt Paving -1 1/2" depth Storm Drainage Drainage Pipe -18" RCP -structural Drainage Pipe -27" RCP -structural Drainage Pipe -27" RCP -non-structural Drainage Pipe -30" RCP -structural Drainage Pipe -36" RCP -non-structural Drainage Pipe -42" RCP -structural Drainage Pipe -42" RCP -non-structural Drainage Pipe -48" RCP -non-structural Drainage Pipe -54" RCP -non-structural Drainage Pipe -60" RCP -structural Drainage Pipe -60" RCP -non-structural Junction boxes Inlets 1 O' wide Inlets 15' wide Headwalls -60" RCP Channel excavation Rock riprap Water Lines 6" Water PVC CL200 (C900) non-structural 8" Water PVC CL200 (C900) structural 8" Water PVC CL200 (C900) non-structural Gate Valves -6" Gate Valves -8" M.J . Tees -6" x 6" M.J . Bends -8" M.J. Tees -8" x 6" Water Services Water Tie-in at existing stub out 2" Blow off Assembly Fire Hydrant Assembly Estimated Quantity 1.0 LS 1 LS 3.0 AC 750 CY 2,000 CY 6,070 SY 3,850 LF 4,800 SY 4,800 SY 28 LF 57 LF 344 LF 70 LF 226 LF 127 LF 35 LF 40 LF 85 LF 131 LF 485 LF 5 EA 7 EA EA 1 EA 250 CY 75 TNS 326 LF 55 LF 1,314 LF 1 EA 2 EA EA 10 EA 4 EA 14 EA 2 EA 0 EA 4 EA Page 1 of 2 REVIEWED FOF~ 06-Au~-Q cn~JP~.J ' !CF AUG 0 8 2001 COLLEG r: c, ··: . I Unit EN Mfa ING ~#} Price Cost ~-'/' / $10,000.00 $12,000.00 $3,000.00 $4.00 $3.75 $3.25 $7.50 $6.00 $4.50 Subtotal $38.00 $48.00 $36.00 $52.00 $52.00 $88.00 $72.00 $86.00 $106.00 $150.00 $130.00 $2,400.00 $3,200.00 $3,600.00 $5,000.00 $5.00 $50.00 Subtotal $18.00 $30.00 $20.00 $500.00 $600.00 $275.00 $300.00 $300.00 $750.00 $200.00 $450.00 $2 ,200.00 Subtotal $10,000 $12,000 $9,000 $3,000 $7,500 $19,728 $28,875 $28,800 $21,600 $140,503 $1,064 $2,736 $12,384 $3,640 $11 ,752 $11, 176 $2,520 $3,440 $9,010 $19,650 $63,050 $12,000 $22,400 $3,600 $5,000 $1,250 $3.750 $188,422 $5,868 $1 ,650 $26,280 $500 $1,200 $275 $3,000 $1,200 $10,500 $400 $0 $8.800 $59,673 ·f ... Sanitary Sewer Lines 39 6" ASTM 2261 pressure pipe -structural 40 6" SOR 26 Pipe -structural 41 6" SOR 26 Pipe -non-structural 42 Sewer Services 43 Sewer Services -Finish to exist. line 44 Manholes -average depth 10'-12' 45 Sewer Tie-in at existing line/manhole 46 Modify existing manhole 20 185 268 5 7 2 LF LF LF EA EA EA EA EA $30.00 $28.00 $20.00 $750.00 $500.00 $2,400.00 $400.00 $350.00 Subtotal $600 $5, 180 $5,360 $3,750 $3,500 $4,800 $400 $350 $23,940 Total Sitework $140,503 Total Storm Drainage $188,422 Total Water $59,673 Total Sanitary Sewer ~ _ _,.$;;;;2~3,!,;;,9.;,40;;., TOTAL CONSTRUCTION! $412,5381 Engineering and Survey@ 5% $20,627 Page 2 of 2 Contingency@ 5% $20,627 ~--'----'--TOT AL l $453,791 I REVIEWED FOR COf\~PLI . 'CE AUG 0 8 2001 COLLEGC: SI;: 1 .v1\I ENGINEERIN ~ Drainage Report for Castlegate Subdivision Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas July 2001 Developer: Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd. By Greens Prairie Associates, LLC 5010 Augusta College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 693-7830 Prepared By: TEXCON General Contractors 1707 Graham Road College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 690-7711 REV1E\/VED FOR cn~,,101 ! f\ :\ICE JUL 3 0 2001 COLLEl:;h:: v {A I 1Ul'1 ENGINEERING /1 CERTIFICATION I, Joseph P. Schultz, Licensed Professional Engineer No. 65889, State of Texas, certify that this report for the drainage design for the Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2 was prepared by me in accordance with the provisions of the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards for the owners hereof. _,,,,,,, --'\€. OF l' \\ ;'"'-.'Ir'-••••••••••• t::-r: ,, , 0 •• •• -</.(\ •• """' • • v· ,,. • • a , * .. •• * , .. ~k: ... ~ ~··································~ ~ ... ~Qgr.~ .. ~~ .. ~9.~.YH~ ... J l~.. 6 IC:--,_ ..,,~··.-9~ 5889 Qllt} f ~···.<;'I S TE~~···~.-. ' Ss •••••••• ...,.~ *' \ 10 NAL ~--­,~., I ~ i 1--fJ' REVIEWED FOR . CO~llDI II). JCE JU L 3 0 2001 COLLEGE s -1 A flOl\J ENGINEERING TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAINAGE REPORT CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, PHASE 2 CERTIFICATION .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. .4 FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................... 4 DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PATTERNS ....................................................................................................................... 4 DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................................ 5 STORM WATER RUNOFF DETERMINATION ............................................................................................................... 5 DETENTION FACILITY DESIGN ...................................................................................................................................... 7 STORM SEWER DESIGN .................................................................................................................................................... 7 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 8 APPENDIX A .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Storm Sewer llllet Desigll Calculatiolls APPENDIX B ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Storm Sewer Pipe Desigll Calculatiolls APPENDIX C ........................................................................................................................................................................ 30 Draillage Chall/lei Nos. 4A & 4 Calculatiolls EXHIBIT A ............................................................................................................................................................................ 34 Of/site lllfrastructure Plall for Castlegate Subdivisioll EXHIBIT B ............................................................................................................................................................................ 36 Post-Developmellt Draillage Area Map 2 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 -Rainfall Intensity & Time of Concentration Calculations .............................................. 6 TABLE 2 -Post-Development Runoff Information ............................................................................ 6 3 DRAINAGE REPORT CASTLEGATE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3, PHASE 2 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide the hydrological effects of the construction of the Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2, and to verify that the proposed storm drainage system meets the requirements set forth by the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The project is located on a 162 acre tract located west of State Highway 6 along the north side of Greens Prairie Road in College Station, Texas. This report addresses Section 3, Phase 2 of this subdivision, which consists of 15 .20 acres. The site is wooded with the vegetation primarily consisting of oak trees and yaupons. The existing ground elevations range from elevation 291 to elevation 314. The general location of the project site is shown on the vicinity map in Exhibit B. FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION The project site is located in the Spring Creek branch of the Lick Creek Drainage Basin. The site is located in a Zone X Area according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for Brazos County, Texas and incorporated areas dated July 2, 1992, panel number 48041C0205-C. Zone X Areas are determined to be outside of the 500-year floodplain. However, LJA Engineering & Surveying, Inc. submitted a Request for Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) to FEMA to outline a proposed 100-year floodplain area. This CLOMR No. 00-06-844R was approved by FEMA on 9/8/2000. The proposed floodplain area affects the western and northwestern edges of Section 3, Phase 2. Refer to Exhibit B for the location of the 100-year floodplain area. DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PATTERNS The storm water runoff from the site prior to development flows in one general direction. For Section 3, Phase 2, the acreage flows toward the west-northwest boundary of the tract and into existing drainage channels and Spring Creek and ultimately flows north to the proposed regional detention facility. Refer to the Offsite Infrastructure Plan in Exhibit A for the location of this proposed detention facility. 4 DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA The design parameters for the storm sewer are as follows: • The Rational Method is utilized to determine peak storm water runoff rates for the storm sewer design. • Design Storm Frequency Storm Sewer system • Runoff Coefficients Pre-development 10 and 100-year storm events Post-development (single family residential) c = 0.30 c = 0.55 • Rainfall Intensity values for Brazos County for a minimum time of concentration of 10 minutes can be found in Table 1. Where a longer time of concentration was necessary, it is noted in the respective table, and the intensities are calculated with the higher values where required. • Time of Concentration, tc -Due to the small sizes of the drainage areas, the calculated times of concentration, tc, are less than 10 minutes. Therefore, a minimum tc of 10 minutes is used in most cases to determine the rainfall intensity values. Where a longer time of concentration was necessary, it is noted and used accordingly. Refer to Table 1 for calculations. STORM WATER RUNOFF DETERMINATION The peak runoff values were determined in accordance with the criteria presented in the previous section for the 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100-year storm events. The runoff coefficients are based on the future development of this tract. Also, a majority of Section 4 drains into Section 3, so the Section 4 runoff is taken into consideration during analysis of the storm water runoff. The drainage areas for post-development are shown in Exhibit B. Post-development runoff conditions are summarized in Table 2. 5 TABLE 1 -Rainfall Intensity & Time of Concentration Calculations The Rational Method: Q =CIA Q =Flow (cfs) A= Area (acres) C = Runoff Coeff. I = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr) Rainfall Intensity Values (in/hr) Storm tc = Event 10 min l5 7.693 110 8.635 125 9.861 150 11 .148 1100 11 .639 Brazos County: I = b I (tc+d)° I = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr) t0 = L/(V*60) t0 =Time of concentration (min) L = Length (ft) V =Velocity (tusec) 5 1-:ear storm 10 1-:ear storm 25 1-:ear storm 50 1-:ear storm 100 1-:ear storm b = 76 b = 80 b = 89 b = 98 b = 96 d = 8.5 d = 8.5 d = 8.5 d = 8.5 d = 8.0 e = 0.785 e = 0.763 e = 0.754 e = 0.745 e = 0.730 (Data taken from State Department of Hiqhwa1-:s and Public Transportation H1-:draulic Manual , page 2-16) TABLE 2-Post-Development Runoff Information A c tc Os 010 02s Oso 0100 Area# (acres) (min) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 89 0.80 0.55 10 3.38 3.80 4.34 4.91 5.12 90 1.32 0.55 10 5.59 6.27 7.16 8.09 8.45 91 1.50 0.55 10 6.35 7.12 8.14 9.20 9.60 92 1.62 0.55 10 6.85 7.69 8.79 9.93 10.37 93 1.50 0.55 10 6.35 7.12 8.14 9.20 9.60 94 1.50 0.55 10 6.35 7.12 8.14 9.20 9.60 95 1.34 0.55 10 5.67 6.36 7.27 8.22 8.58 96 1.82 0.55 10 7.70 8.64 9.87 11.16 11 .65 97 1.96 0.55 10 8.29 9.31 10.63 12.02 12.55 98 0.48 0.55 10 2.03 2.28 2.60 2.94 3.07 98A 0.29 0.55 10 1.23 1.38 1.57 1.78 1.86 99 0.84 0.55 10 3.55 3.99 4.56 5.15 5.38 100 0.41 0.55 10 1.73 1.95 2.22 2.51 2.62 101 1.24 0.55 10 5.25 5.89 6.73 7.60 7.94 102 1.28 0.55 10 5.42 6.08 6.94 7.85 8.19 103 1.59 0.55 10 6.73 7.55 8.62 9.75 10.18 104 0.91 0.55 10 3.85 4.32 4.94 5.58 5.83 105 1.36 0.55 10 5.75 6.46 7.38 8.34 8.71 106 1.65 0.55 10 6.98 7.84 8.95 10.12 10.56 107 1.84 0.55 10 7.79 8.74 9.98 11.28 11 .78 6 DETENTION FACILITY DESIGN The detention facility handling the runoff from this site will be a regional facility designed by LJA Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Refer to the Offsite Infrastructure Plan in Exhibit A for the location of this proposed detention facility. The runoff from this project flows into existing drainages and then into Spring Creek. The detention facility is located adjacent to Spring Creek prior to Spring Creek entering the State Highway 6 right-of-way. STORM SEWER DESIGN The storm sewer piping for this project has been selected to be Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) meeting the requirements of ASTM C-76, Class III pipe. The curb inlets and junction boxes will be cast-in-place concrete. Appendix A presents a summary of the storm sewer inlet design parameters and calculations. Since the storm sewer design of Section 4 and Section 3, Phase 1 directly affects the design of Section 3, Phase 2, these previously calculated runoff values are included. For Section 4 information specifically, refer to the drainage reports for Section 4, Phases 1 & 2, dated November 2000 & January 2001, respectively. For Section 3, Phase 1 information, refer to the drainage report dated December 2000. The inlets were designed based on a 10-year design storm. As per College Station guidelines, the capacities of inlets in sump were reduced by 10% to allow for clogging. Inlets were located to maintain a gutter flow depth of 5" or less, which will prevent the spread of water from reaching the crown of the road for the 10-year storm event. The runoff intercepted by the proposed storm sewer inlets was calculated using the following equations. The depth of flow in the gutter was determined by using the Straight Crown Flow equation. The flow intercepted by Inlets 307, 308 & 309 was calculated by using the Capacity of Inlets On Grade equation. The capacities for the inlets in sumps (Inlets 310-314) were calculated using the Inlets in Sumps, Weir Flow equation with a maximum allowable depth of 7" (5" gutter flow plus 2" gutter depression). These equations and the resulting data are summarized in Appendix A. Appendix B presents a summary of the storm sewer pipe design parameters and calculations. All pipes are 18" in diameter or larger. For pipes with 18" and 24" diameters, the cross- sectional area is reduced by 25%, as per College Station requirements. A summary of how this was achieved is shown in Appendix B as well. The pipes for the storm sewer system were designed based on the 10-year storm event; however, all but Pipe 313 will also pass the 100- year storm event without any headwater. A drainage channel (Channel No. 4A) is proposed to take the overflow from Pipe 313 into Channel No. 4, which drains into the existing creek. More information on these channels is given later in this paragraph. As required by College Station, the velocity of flow in the storm sewer pipe system is not lower than 2.5 feet per second, and it does not exceed 15 feet per second. As the data shows, even during low flow conditions, the velocity in the pipes will exceed 2.5 feet per second and prevent sediment build- up in the pipes. The maximum flow in the storm sewer pipe system will occur in Pipe No. 313. Appendix B contains a summary of the Manning pipe calculations as well as flow diagrams mapping the flows through the storm sewer system for the 10 and 100-year events. The maximum velocity for the pipe system in Section 3, Phase 2 will be 14.7 feet per second and will occur in Pipe 312. The velocity in Channel No. 4A is 4.4 feet per second for the 100-year 7 event. This velocity is within the requirements for a seeded grass channel outlined on page 60 of the City of College Station Drainage Policy & Design Standards manual. The velocity in Channel No. 4 is 5.5 feet per second for the 100-year event. As per the channel requirements for the City of College Station, this channel will be lined with Bermuda grass sod. Rock riprap will be placed at the beginning of Channel No. 4 at the end of the headwall attached to Pipe 313 to prevent erosion from the flow exiting this pipe. Refer to Appendix C for details on Channels 4A&4. CONCLUSIONS The construction of this project will significantly increase the storm water runoff from this site. The proposed storm sewer system should adequately control the runoff and release it into existing drainages. Also, the regional detention facility should adequately reduce the peak post-development runoff to less than the pre-development runoff for the design storm event. This will prevent any impact on the properties downstream of this project. 8 APPENDIX A Storm Sewer Inlet Design Calculations 9 Castlegate Subdivision Section 3 -Phases 2 Inlet Length Calculations Inlets In Sump 10 year storm Inlet# Length & Type Flow from A c o,. O,,ny~w QTotal Orot.1•1o'JI. Y10..aua1 Area# (acres) (els) (els) from 1ni.t# (els) (els) (ft) Section 3/Phase 1 ·PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW; INCLUDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY 301 15' Recessed 3 1.73 0.55 8.22 0.00 8.22 9.04 0.341 87 1.78 0.55 8.45 8.45 9.30 0.344 Section 3/Phase 2 310 1 O' Recessed 91 1.5 0.55 7.12 0.00 308 7.12 7.84 0.323 99 0.84 0.55 3.99 3.99 4.39 0.260 311 1 O' Recessed 98A 0.29 0.55 1.38 0.72 309 2.09 2.30 0.204 97 1.96 0.55 9.31 9.31 10.24 0.357 312 1 O' Recessed 96 1.82 0.55 8.64 8.64 9.51 0.347 98 0.48 0.55 2.28 2.28 2.51 0.211 313 15' Recessed 103 1.59 0.55 7.55 0.00 315 7.55 8.31 0.330 1--102 1.28 0.55 6.08 6.08 6.69 0.304 314 10' Recessed 101 1.24 0.55 5.89 0.43 316 6.32 6.95 0.309 100 0.41 0.55 1.95 1.95 2.14 0.199 Inlets On Grade 10 year storm FlowfTom y,, a,.,,_. Oc.pKlty QbypllH 0..,.",..1 Oc•nyov..-Inlet# Length & Type Area# I (ft) I (In) (ft) (els) (els) (els) I (els) I from 1ni.t# Section 3/Phase 1 • PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW; INCLUDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY 302 10' Recessed 4 0.310 3.71 0.60 6.04 303 1CJRecessed 88 0.270 3.24 0.57 5.66 304 10' Recessed 93 0.403 4.84 0.69 6.92 305 10' Recessed 95 0.383 4.60 0.68 6.76 306 10' Recessed 94 0.399 4.79 0.69 6.92 315 10' Recessed 104 0.332 3.98 ---o:63 6:25 316 10' Recessed 105 0.402 4.83 0.68 6.79 317 10' Recessed 106 D.4i5 ~ 0.71 7.08 318 15' Recessed 107 0.342 4.10 0.63 9.52 Section 3/Phase 2 307 308 309 10' Recessed 89 0.289 3.46 0.57 5.73 10' Recessed 90 0.305 3.66 0.60 6.00 10' Recessed 92 0.405 4.86 0.70 6.98 Transverse (Crown) slope (tuft)= 0.038 Straight Crown Flow !Solved to find actual depth of flow, y): Q = 0.56' (z/n) 'S112 • y113 «> y ={QI [0.56' (z/n) 'S112]}318 n =Roughness Coefficient= 0.018 z = Reciprocal of crown slope = 26 S = StreeUGutter Slope (fUft) y = Depth of now at inlet (ft) Capacity of Inlets on grade: Qc = 0.7 '[1/(H1 • H2)] '[H1~2-H,~2] Q0 = Flow capacity of inlet (cfs) H1 =a+ y H2 =a =gutter depression (2" Standard; 4" Recessed) y = Depth of flow in approach gutter (ft) -1.71 4.32 0.00 -2.67 2.99 0.00 0.21 6.92 0.21 306 -0.35 6.41 0.00 0.21 6.92 0.00 -1 .93 4.32 0.00 -0.33 6.46 0.76 317, 318 0.76 7.08 0.00 -0.78 8.74 0.00 -1 .93 3.80 0.41 303,304,305 -1 .10 4.89 0.00 302 0.72 6.98 0.00 307 (In) 4.09 4.13 3.88 3:12 2.45 4.28 4.17 2.53 3.96 'J.65 3.70 2.38 Qbyp-lot .. (els) 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.43 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 100 year storm L10~,.q·d· L10..ctu•I o,,. O,,ny~w Orot•I Orotal+1D'll. y,,. (ft) (ft) (els) (els) 13.73 15 11.07 0.00 11.39 9.60 0.25 9.15 10 '5:38 --- 9.39 10 1.86 7.79 12.55 9.00 10 11.65 3.07 11.23 15 10.18 0.00 8.19 6.81 10 7.94 6.08 2.62 \1Pig r-• r • o.583' Cc.p1-1otl Q10·Tot.I y,,. (els) (els) (ft) (In) 4.32 4.32 0.346 4.15 2.99 2.99 0.302 3.62 6.92 7.33 0.482 5.78 6.41 6.41 0.429 5.14 6.92 7.12 0.446 5.35 '---o2 4.32 0.371 ·--us 6.79 7.21 Q.506 ·~ 7.08 7.84 0.464 5.57 8.74 8.74 0.382 4.59 4.21 4.21 0.413 4.95 4.89 4.89 0.341 4.10 6.98 7.69 0.523 6.28 Inlets In sumps, Weir Flow: L = Q I (3 ' y31') «> y = (Q I 3L)213 L = Length of inlet opening (ft) Q =Flow at inlet (els) y =total depth of now on inlet (ft) max y for inlet in sump= 7" = 0.583' from inlet# (els) (els) (ft) 11.07 12.18 0.671 """'11.39 12.53 308 9.85 10.83 0.678 -5.38 5.91 309 9.65 10.61 0.872 12.55 13.80 11.65 12.82 0.663 3.07 3.38 315 10.18 11.20 0.586 8.19 9.01 316 14.02 15.42 0.719 2.62 2.89 100 year storm o,... .... Oc•PKlty Co,,... Oc•pturM (ft) (els) (els) (els) 0.64 6.39 -0.57 5.83 0.60 5.96 -1.93 4.03 0.74 7.40 2.20 7.40 0.72 7.22 1.42 7.22 0.74 7.40 2.20 7.40 0.66 6.64 -0.82 5.83 0.73 7.25 1.45 7.25 0.76 7.59 2.97 7.59 0.68 10.13 1.65 10.13 0.60 6.05 -0.93 5.12 ---0.63 6.35 0.25 6.35 ---0.75 7.47 2.90 7.47 (In) 8.05 8.14 10.46 7.96 7.04 8.63 O,,ny~w 0.,.p-lot•I Ccapl-totl 0100-Total s L,....., (els) from Inlet# (els) (els) (els) (ft/ft) (ft) 0.00 0.00 5.83 5.83 0.0145 10 0.00 0.00 4.03 4.03 0.0145 10 2.20 306 4.40 7.40 11.80 0.0102 10 0.00 1.42 7.22 8.64 0.0102 10 0.00 2.20 7.40 9.60 0.0102 10 0.00 0.00 5.83 5.83 0.0100 10 4.63 317, 318 6.08 7.25 13.33 0.0100 10 0.00 2.97 7.59 10.56 0.0100 10 0.00 1.85 10.13 11.78 0.0350 15 5.82 303,304,305 4.89 6.05 10.94 0.0200 10 0.00 302 0.25 6.35 6.59 0.0200 10 4.89 307 7.79 7.47 15.26 0.0110 10 APPENDIXB Storm Sewer Pipe Design Calculations 11 I I I ~ I I Castlegate Subdivision Section 3, Phase 2 Size Inlet Pipe# Length Slope Invert Elev (in) (ft) (%) (ft) 308A 54 85.0 1.30 303.38 310 60 134.0 1.10 301.41 311 60 174.1 1.10 299.84 ---312 60 125.0 1.10 297.71 313 60 180.0 0.95 296.24 309 18 28.1 0.96 305.27 321 27 201.6 1.00 304.42 320 27 141 .2 1.00 302.36 318 36 224.6 0.98 300.16 317 42 161 .6 0.43 297.57 314 48 39.9 1.10 296.78 319 27 28.3 1.43 301 .56 316 27 28.0 0.54 298.74 315 30 69.1 0.84 298.36 Outlet Invert Elev •Actual FIO¥ Design Flow (ft) (cfs) (cfs) 302.28 153.41 299.94 162.51 297.92 162.51 296.34 169.49 294.53 251.42 305.00 4.89 7.90 302.40 26.60 300.95 26.60 297.96 48.50 296.88 48.50 296.34 70.82 301 .16 8.27 298.59 11.40 297.78 22.32 10 year storm 100 year storm !>Actual FIO¥ V100 Travel Time, tr1oo V10 Travel Time, h11 Design Flow %Full %Full (fps) (sec) (min) (cfs) (cfs) (fps) (sec) (min) 14.3 63.8 6 0.10 214.14 14.9 84.8 6 0.10 13.7 58.2 10 0.16 226.54 14.6 73.7 9 0.15 13.7 58.2 13 0.21 226.54 14.6 73.7 12 0.20 13.8 59.8 9 0.15 234.01 14.7 75.8 9 0.14 13.5 90.2 13 0.22 351.97 13.2 100.0 14 0.23 ---------6.0 69.3 5 0.08 6.35 10.26 6.0 92.1 5 0.08 8.2 75.9 25 0.41 30.80 8.1 91 .2 25 0.41 8.2 75.9 17 0.29 30.80 8.1 91 .2 17 0.29 9.6 67.1 23 0.39 65.81 9.7 92.0 23 0.39 ---7.1 67.1 23 0.38 65.81 7.1 92.4 23 0.38 ---11 .2 50.4 4 0.06 102.73 12.2 63.7 3 0.05 ~ ------7.1 33.4 4 0.07 16.64 8.6 49.0 3 0.05 5.4 52.3 5 0.09 22.20 6.0 87.5 5 0.08 7.5 58.1 9 0.15 36.92 8.0 88.5 9 0.14 City of College Station requirement to Reduce Cross-Sectional Area of 18" & 24" Pipes by 25% Using Mannings Equation from page 48 of the College Station Drainage Policy & Design Standards Manual: Q = 1.49/n *A* R213 * S112 Q =Flow Capacity (cfs) 18" Pipe: Pipe size (inches)= 18 Wetted Perimeter WP, (ft)= 4.71 Cross-Sectional Area A, (ff) = 1. 766 Reduced Area AR, (ft2) = 1.325 Hydraulic Radius R =A/WP, (ft)= 0.375 Reduced Hydr Radius RR= AR/Wp, (ft)= 0.281 Roughness Coefficient n = 0.014 Friction Slope of Conduit Sr. (ft/ft) = 0.01 Example Calculation: Slope Flow Capacity Reduced Flow Capacity % Difference s Q Oreduced Oreduced/Q 0.005 6.91 4.28 0.619 0.006 7.57 4.69 0.619 0.007 8.18 5.06 0.619 24" Pipe: Pipe size (inches) = 24 Wetted Perimeter WP, (ft)= 6.28 Cross-Sectional Area A, (ff) = 3.14 Reduced Area AR, (ff)= 2.355 Hydraulic Radius R =A/WP, (ft)= 0.5 Reduced Hydr Radius RR= AR/Wp, (ft)= 0.375 Roughness Coefficient n = 0.014 Friction Slope of Conduit Sr. (ft/ft) = 0.01 Example Calculation: Slope Flow Capacity Reduced Flow Capacity % Difference s Q Oreduced Oreduced/Q 0.005 14.89 9.22 0.619 0.006 16.31 10.1 0.619 0.007 17.61 10.9 0.619 Conclusion: Multiply actual Q in 18" & 24" pipes by 1.615 to reflect a 25% reduction in the cross-sectional area called for on page 47, paragraph 5 of the College Station Drainage Policy & Design Standards manual. (From Phase 1) June Box 303A J, Pipe 308A I 153 .41 J, Inlet 3071 4.21 J, Pipe 3101 162.51 J, June Box 303 J, Pipe311l 162.51 J, Inlet 3091 6.98 J, Pipe 3121 169.49 J, lnlet310I 11 .11 ~ J, llPipe 3131 251 .42 II Castlegate Subdivision Section 3, Phase 2 -Pipe Flow Diagram 010 (cfs) Inlet 314 1 8.27 J, Inlet 3081 4.89 Pipe 3191 8.27 J, J, Pipe 3091 4.89 lnlet311 l 11.40 J, Pipe 3161 11.40 Inlet 313 1 13.63 J, J, Inlet 312 1 10.92 Pipe 3181 48.50 J, J, Pipe 3151 22.32 June Box 305 J, J, J, Pipe 3171 48.50 J, ~ June Box 304 J, ~ ~ ~ ~ Pipe 3141 70 .82 (From Phase 1) Pipe 321 I 26.60 J, June Box 306 Pipe 3201 26.60 (From Phase 1) June Box 303A J, Pipe 308AI 214 .14 J, Inlet 3071 6.05 J, Pipe 3101 226 .54 J, June Box 303 J, Pipe311 l 226.54 J, Inlet 3091 7.47 J, Pipe 3121 234.01 J, Inlet 3101 15.23 J, llPipe 3131 351.97 II Castlegate Subdivision Section 3, Phase 2 -Pipe Flow Diagram Q100 (cfs) Inlet 308 1 6.35 J, Pipe 3091 6.35 Inlet 311 I 22.20 J, Pipe 3161 22.20 J, Inlet 312 1 14.72 J, Pipe 3151 36.92 June Box 304 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Pipe 3141 102.73 Inlet 3141 16.64 J, Pipe 3191 16.64 J, J, J, Inlet 313 1 18.37 J, Pipe 3181 65.81 J, June Box 305 J, Pipe 3171 65.81 (From Phase 1) Pipe 321 I 30.80 J, June Box 306 Pipe 3201 30.80 Pipe 308A -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Giv en Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ....................... · · · · · Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of.Flow/ 54 .0000 in v' /" 153. 4100 cfs ~ 0. 0130 ft/ft 0. 0140 34.4673 in 15 .9043 ft2 10 .7163 ft2 99.9549 in 169 .6460 in 14.3156 fps 15 .4384 in ./ 63 .8283 % 208 .1992 cfs 13 .0907 fps Pipe 308A -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solv ing for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning' s n .................... . Computed Resul ts: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Rad ius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 54.0000 in 214.1400 cfs 0. 0130 ft/ft 0 . 0140 45.7870 in 15.9043 ft2 14.3780 ft2 126.3789 in 169.6460 in 14.8936 fps 16 .3827 in / 84.7907 % 208.1992 cfs 13 .0907 fps Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 309 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ................... · ·. · · · · · · Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 18.0000 in 7.9000 cfs 0. 0096 ft/ft ,,,. 0.0140 12.4784 in 1 .7671 ft2 1 .3073 ft2 35.4172 in 56.5487 in 6.0430 fps 5.3152 in 69.3246 % 9.5570 cfs 5.4081 fps Pipe 309 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 18.0000 in 10.2600 cfs 0.0096 ft/ft 0. 0140 16.5806 in 1.7671 ft2 1.7023 ft2 46.3017 in 56.5487 in 6 .0271 fps 5.2943 in 92.1145 % 9 .5570 cfs 5.4081 fps Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3 , Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 310 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Circular Depth of Flow 60.0000 in 162 .5100 cfs 0 .0110 ft/ft Manning's n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0140 Computed Results: Depth ........................... 34.9129 in Area ............................ · Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . 19.6350 ft2 11. 8553 ft2 104. 1180 in 188.4956 in 13. 7078 fps / 16.3965 in 58.1882 % ./ 253.6435 cfs 12.9180 fps Pipe 310 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hy draulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 60.0000 in 226.5400 cfs 0 . 0110 ft/ft 0. 0140 44.2170 in 19.6350 ft2 15.5113 ft2 123 .8706 in 188.4956 in 14 .6048 fps 18 .0320 in 73 .6949 % 253.6435 cfs 12.9180 fps Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 311 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circul ar Depth of Flow 60.0000 in 162.5100 cfs O.OllO ft/ft 0. 0140 34.9129 in 19.6350 ft2 ll.8553 ft2 104. ll80 in 188.4956 in 13.7078 fps 16.3965 in "' 58. 1882 % ,,, 253.6435 cfs 12 .9180 fps Pipe 311 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Circular Depth of Flow 60 .0000 in 226.5400 cfs O.OllO ft/ft 0 .0140 Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 . 2170 in Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hy draulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . 19.6350 ft2 15.5113 ft2 123.8706 in 188.4956 in 14.6048 fps 18. 0320 in / 73 .6949 % 253.6435 cfs 12.9180 fps Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 312 -10 Year Storm Manni ng Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solv ing for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrat e ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Result s: Circular Depth of Flow 60 .0000 in ./ 169.4 900 cfs / 0 . OllO ft/ft,/ 0 . 0140 Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 . 873 4 i n Ar ea ........................... . We tted Ar ea .................... . Wetted Per imeter ............... . Per imeter ...................... . Ve l ocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Fl owrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . 19 .6350 ft2 1 2 .2 490 ft2 106 .0709 in 188 .4956 in 13 . 8371 fps 16 .6290 in 59.7889 % 253.6435 cfs 12 .9180 fps Pipe 312 -100 Year Stor m Manni ng Pipe Calculator Giv en Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning' s n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Ar ea ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Per imeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 60.0000 in 2 34 .0100 cfs 0 . OllO ft/ft 0 . 0140 45 .4597 in 19 .6350 ft2 15.961 3 ft 2 126 .7309 in 188 .4956 in 14 .6611 fps 18 .1363 in / 75.7662 % 253 .6435 cfs 12 .9180 fps Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3 , Phase 2 College Station, Tex as Given Input Data: Pipe 313 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Circular Depth of Flow 60.0000 in 251 .4200 cfs 0. 0095 ft/ft ~ 0.0140 Computed Results: Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54. 1043 in Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19. 6350 ft2 Wetted Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.6391 ft2 Wetted Perimeter ................ 150.2346 in Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . 188.4956 in 13.4889 fps 17.8655 in 90.1739 % 235 .7160 cfs 12.0049 fps Pipe 313 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: / Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Circular Depth of Flow 60.0000 in 253 .5600 cfs 0.0095 ft/ft 0. 0140 Computed Results: Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56. 2430 in Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19. 6350 ft2 Wetted Area ..................... 19.1226 ft2 Wetted Perimeter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 .1452 in Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . 188.4956 in 13.2597 fps 17.4122 in 93.7384 % 235.7160 cfs 12.0049 fps Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3 , Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 314 -10 Year Storm Manni ng Pipe Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solv ing for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 48. 0000 in / 70.8200 cfs 0.0110 ft/ft 0 . 0140 24.1763 in 12.5664 ft2 6.3420 ft2 75 .7509 in 150.7964 in 11. 1669 fps 12.0559 in 50.3674 % / 139.8933 cfs 11.1324 fps Pipe 314 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 48.0000 in 102.7300 cfs 0.0110 ft/ft 0.0140 30 .5662 in 12.5664 ft2 8.4443 ft2 88.7002 in 150.7964 in 12.1656 fps 13.7089 in / 63.6796 % 139.8933 cfs 11.1324 fps Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 315 -10 Year Storm ~ Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Ar ea ..................... · · · · · · · Wetted Ar ea .................... . Wetted Per imeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 30 .0000 in 22.3200 cfs 0 .0084 ft/ft 0.0140 17.4338 in 4 .9087 ft2 2.9592 ft2 52.0131 in 94 .2478 in 7.5426 fps 8.1926 in 58.1127 % 34.9076 cfs 7. 1113 fps Pipe 315 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solv ing for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Ar ea .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hy draulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 30 .0000 in 36 .9200 cfs 0.0084 ft/ft 0. 0140 26.5598 in 4.9087 ft2 4.5965 ft2 73.5200 in 94.2478 in 8.0322 fps 9.0030 in 88 .5328 % 34 .9076 cfs 7. 1113 fps Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 316 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................ · · · · Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Ve locity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 27.0000 in 11 .4000 cfs 0.0054 ft /ft 0 . 0140 14.1240 in 3.9761 ft2 2.1050 ft2 43.6599 in 84.8230 in 5 .4157 fps 6.9427 in 52 .3111 % 21 .1328 cfs 5.3150 fps - Pipe 316 -100 Year Storm Manni ng Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wett ed Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 27.0000 in 22.2000 cfs 0 .0054 ft/ft 0. 0140 23 .6162 in 3.9761 ft2 3.6881 ft2 65.2826 in 84.8230 in 6.0193 fps 8 .1352 in 87.4674 % 21.1328 cfs 5.3150 fps Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 317 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 42 .0000 in ,/ 48.5000 cfs 0.0043 ft/ft 0. 0140 28 . 2011 in 9. 6211 ft2 6.8690 ft2 80.6739 in 131.9469 in 7 .0608 fps 12.2608 in 67.1454 % 61.2618 cfs 6.3674 fps Pipe 317 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Giv en Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Ar ea .................... . Wetted Peri meter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full f l ow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 42.0000 in 65.8100 cfs 0.0043 ft/ft 0. 0140 38 .8161 in 9 . 6211 ft2 9 .2881 ft2 108 .5163 in 131.9469 in 7 .0854 fps 12.3252 in ,,.,,.,...,. 92.4192 % 61 .2618 cfs 6.3674 fps Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 318 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manni ng's n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Area ........................ · · · · Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hy draulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 36 .0000 in 48 .5000 cfs 0 .0098 ft/ft 0.0140 24.1581 in 7.0686 ft2 5.0432 ft2 69. 1187 in 113 .0973 in 9.6169 fps 10.5069 in 67.1057 % 61.3117 cfs 8 .6738 fps Pipe 318 -100 Ye ar Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 36.0000 in 65.8100 cfs 0.0098 ft/ft 0.0140 33.1326 in 7.0686 ft2 6.8054 ft2 92.4974 in 113.0973 in 9.6703 fps 10.5946 in 92.0350 % 61.3117 cfs 8.6738 fps Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 319 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results : Circular Depth of Flow 27 .0000 in 8.2700 cfs 0 .0143 ft/ft 0. 0140 Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. 0147 in Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. 9761 ft2 Wetted Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1628 ft2 Wetted Perimeter ................ 33.2672 in Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . 84.8230 in 7.1122 fps 5 .0333 in 33.3879 % 34.3897 cfs 8.6492 fps - Pipe 319 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................ · · · · Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow v elocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 27 .0000 in 16.6400 cfs 0.0143 ft/ft 0. 0140 13.2427 in 3 .9761 ft2 1.9398 ft2 41.8969 in 84.8230 in 8.5782 fps 6 .6671 in 49.0471 % 34 .3897 cfs 8 .6492 fps Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 320 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning's n .................... . Comput ed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................ · · · · Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimet er ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 27.0000 in 26.6000 cfs 0.0100 ft/ft 0. 0140 20.5030 in 3.9761 ft2 3.2396 ft2 57.1368 in 84.8230 i n 8.2109 fps 8.1646 in 75.9372 % 28 .7581 cfs 7.2328 fps Pipe 320 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocity ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 27.0000 in 30.8000 cfs 0.0100 ft/ft 0.0140 24.6371 in 3.9761 ft2 3 .8060 ft2 68.6054 in 84.8230 in 8.0925 fps 7 .9886 in 91.2484 % 28 .7581 cfs 7.2328 fps Castlegate Subdivision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas Pipe 321 -10 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solv ing for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocit y ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 27.0000 in 26.6000 cfs 0. 0100 ft/ft / 0. 0140 20.5030 in 3.9761 ft2 3.2396 ft2 57.1368 in 84.8230 in 8.2109 fps 8.1646 in 75.9372 % 28.7581 cfs 7 .2328 fps Pipe 321 -100 Year Storm Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Diameter ....................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Area ........................... . Wetted Area .................... . Wetted Perimeter ............... . Perimeter ...................... . Velocit y ....................... . Hydraulic Radius ............... . Percent Full ................... . Full flow Flowrate ............. . Full flow velocity ............. . Circular Depth of Flow 27.0000 in 30.8000 cfs 0 .0100 ft/ft 0.0140 24.6371 in 3.9761 ft2 3.8060 ft2 68.6054 in 84.8230 in 8 .0925 fps 7 .9886 in 91.2484 % 28.7581 cfs 7.2328 fps Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas APPENDIXC Drainage Channel Nos. 4A & No. 4 Calculations 30 Castlegate Subdivision Drainage Channel 4A Calculations -Section 3, Phase 2 Area Flow into Pipe 313: Max flow contained by Pipe 313: Total Flow to Drainage Channel 4A: The Rational Method: Q=CIA Q = Flow (cfs) A= Area (acres) C = Runoff Coeff. I = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr} • a 10 a100 (cfs) (cfs) 251.42 351.97 I 253.56 253.56 \ / / 0.00 98.41 v / Drainage Channel No. 4A -10 Year Storm Channel receives no flow for 10-year storm. Drainage Channel No . 4A -100 Year Storm /' Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Height ......................... . Bottom width ................... . Left slope ..................... . Right slope .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Velocity ....................... . Full Flowrate .................. . Flow area ...................... . Flow perimeter ................. . Hydraulic radius ............... . Top width ...................... . Area ........................ · · ·. Perimeter ...................... . Percent full ................... . Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 98.4100 cfs 0.0095 ft/ft 0 .0350 24.0000 in 120.0000 in 0 .3300 ft/ft (V/H) 0.3300 ft/ft (V/H) 18.1333 in 4.4669 fps 167.2238 cfs 22.0307 ft2 235.7285 in 13. 4579 in 229.8991 in 32.1212 ft2 273.1699 in 75.5556 % Castlegate Subdivision, Secti on 3 , Phase 2 College Station, Tex as Drainage Channel No. 4 -10 Year Storm Channel Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Flowrat e ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Height ......................... . Bottom width ................... . Left slope ..................... . Right slope .................... . Computed Results: Depth .......................... . Velocity ....................... . Full Flowrate .................. . Flow area ...................... . Flow perimeter ................. . Hydraulic radius ............... . Top width ...................... . Area ........................... . Perimeter ...................... . Percent full ................... . Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 251.4200 cfs 0.0060 ft/ft 0.0350 60 .0000 in 60.0000 in 0 .3300 ft/ft (V/H) 0.3300 ft/ft (V/H) 39.7233 in 5.0529 fps 647 .2272 cfs 49. 7572 ft2 313.5174 in 22.8537 in 300.7474 in 100.7576 ft2 442.9248 in 66.2055 % Drainage Channel No. 4 -100 Year Storm Channel Calculator Given Input Data : Shape .......................... . Solving for .................... . Flowrate ....................... . Slope .......................... . Manning ' s n .................... . Height ......................... . Bottom width ................... . Left slope ..................... . Right slope .................... . Computed Results : Depth .......................... . Velocity ....................... . Full Flowrate .................. . Flow area ...................... . Flow perimeter ................. . Hydraulic radius ............... . Top width ...................... . Area ........................... . Perimeter ...................... . Percent full ................... . Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 351.9700 cfs 0.0060 ft/ft 0.0350 60 .0000 in 60 .0000 in 0.3300 ft/ft (V/H) 0 .3300 ft/ft (V/H) 46.1009 in 5 .5053 fps 647.2272 cfs 63.9328 ft2 354.2195 in 25.9905 in 339.3993 in 100 .7576 ft2 442.9248 in 76.8348 % Castlegate Subdiv ision, Section 3, Phase 2 College Station, Texas EXHIBIT A Offsite Infrastructure Plan for Castlegate Subdivision 34 EXHIBIT B Post-Development Drainage Area Map 36