The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondenceTeresa Rogers From: Teresa Rogers Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 9:36 AM To: 'Fred Paine' Cc: Jason Kinnard; Erika Bridges; executiveofficer@bcsrealtor.com; 'brad@corrier.net'; Jason Schubert Subject: Re: Resubmission documents for BCS Reg Assoc of Realtors Fred, The requested revisions have been addressed. You may submit your final documents for stamping Thank you, Teresa Teresa Rogers Staff Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 From: Erika Bridges Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 9:03 AM To: Teresa Rogers Subject: RE: FW: Resubmission documents for BCS Reg Assoc of Realtors Looks like they addressed all my comments! From: Fred Paine [mailto:fred@klingeng.com] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 5:08 PM To: Teresa Rogers Cc: Jason Kinnard; Erika Bridges; executiveofficer@bcsrealtor.com; brad@corrier.net Subject: Re: FW: Resubmission documents for BCS Reg Assoc of Realtors Dear Teresa & Erika, Attached are the revised sheets of the plans for your review (The Erosion Control Plan and Detail Sheets did not change so I did not include in this email). Upon your approval, we'll have the required amount of plans sent in for stamping (7 sets as well as the extra Site, Landscape, & 11"x17' Grading & Erosion Control Plans). We'll also have additional sets for stamping and return to JSA & KES. Please let me know your final review status at your earliest convenience. Additionally attached is the revised cost estimate for the Class IV pipe. Below is my response to the Round 2 Comments: Planning: 1.The minimum parking setback distance from the R.O.W. to the curb of the parking lot is ten feet. Revise the Site Plan to show this requirement has been met. Site Plans Revised as well as site elements affected. 2.Please note that we are still waiting for a response to NRA comments pertaining to this project. Clarified by Jason Kinnard via prior email 3.Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. N/A Engineering: 1.Since minimum cover is not being provided over storm sewer pipe, Class IV RCP will be required. Please revise C3.1 and cost estimate to reflect this change. Acknowledged - Revised Fred Paine, P.E., CFM KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Bryan, Texas 77802 Telephone 979/846-6212 Fax 979/846-8252 On 5/2/2012 11:08 AM, Teresa Rogers wrote: Jason, You may submit the documents electronically. Please note that Erika needs one additional document as part of that submission. Her request can be found in the forwarded message below. The additional $932 fee will not be applicable since the documents never reached a fourth round of reviews. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks, Teresa Rogers Teresa Rogers Staff Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 From: Erika Bridges Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 10:43 AM To: Teresa Rogers Subject: RE: Resubmission documents for BCS Reg Assoc of Realtors Teresa, An electronic submittal will be fine. I can just write in the changes on the copies for stamping. I do, however, still need a revised cost estimate reflecting the pipe material change. This may also be submitted electronically for expediency. Thanks, Erika Erika Bridges, EIT, CFM Graduate Civil Engineer Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77842 (979)764-3570 City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University From: Jason Kinnard rmailto:Jasonr?a isarchitects.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 5:06 PM To: Teresa Rogers Cc: fred(ftlinoeng.com Subject: Resubmission documents for BCS Reg Assoc of Realtors Teresa — We plan to revise the parking to comply with 7.9 B.6. rather than complying with 7.2. Due to the time and expense already undertaken, and not wishing to delay the project even further, we feel it is not in the best interest of our client to pursue a variance through ZBA. When we discussed this originally on the phone today, I stated that this was item regarding the setback was not previously noted on Staff Review Comments No. 1. You asserted that it was, and that Fred Paine had responded. I did not have the comments directly in front of me at the time, but I have since reviewed them. Comment 3, to which we were referring said, "Label parking setback distance from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot." In that statement, there is no indication that we were required to meet 7.9 B.6 and not 7.2. Therefore, Fred Paine responded directly to the comment by pointing out the areas where the dimension was already labeled. The Staff Review Comments No. 2 were the first time it was made known that the setback should be greater than those found in Article 7.2. With the possibility of the owner needing to pay another $932 processing fee if this next review is still not accepted, I would like to request that these comments not constitute an official 3rd submission, but just a clarification to the last submission. Also, since all we are changing is a single dimension by 1' and changing a note for Class III RCP to Class IV, can we submit this electronically, in .pdf form? Thank you for your consideration, Jason Kinnard, AIA LEED AP JSA 1711 Cavitt Avenue Bryan, TX 77801 o: 979.779.5757 c: 979.492.4908 www. isa rch itects.com City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University Teresa Rogers From: Teresa Rogers Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:19 AM To: 'Fred Paine' Cc: Jason Kinnard; executiveofficer@bcsrealtor.com Subject: RE: BCS Regional Association of Realtors - Site Plan Comment Fred, I apologize for not citing the LIDO section in my comments. Please refer to Section 7.9 Non - Residential Architectural Standards, Section B.6 Parking Lots "These requirements are in addition to and not in lieu of the requirements established in Section 7.2 Off Street Parking Standards. Where parking or drive aisles are located between the building and the public right-of-way, there shall be a minimum ten -foot setback from the public right-of-way line to the parking area or drive aisle." Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Teresa Rogers Teresa Rogers Staff Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 -----Original Message ----- From: Fred Paine fmailto:fred(@klinaeng.coml Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 9:38 AM To: Teresa Rogers Cc: Jason Kinnard; executiveofficerobcsrealtor.com Subject: BCS Regional Association of Realtors - Site Plan Comment Hello Teresa, I just received a copy of your final comments for the BCS Regional Association of Realtors site plan and offer the following in response to comment 1-Parking Setback: UDO Section 7.2 Off Street Parking Standards, Section C.7 "Parking lots located within fifteen (15) feet of a public right-of-way shall have a maximum of seven (7) contiguous spaces separated by an eighteen- by twenty -foot landscaped island. All parking lots and drive aisles shall be setback a minimum of six (6) feet from any public right-of-way." Please clarify your comment requiring a 10' parking setback at your earliest convenience. Best Regards, Fred 1 Fred Paine, P.E., CFM KLING ENGINEERING& SURVEYING Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Bryan, Texas 77802 Telephone 979/846-6212 Fax 979/846-8252