HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments(*Or"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning d'Deve&pment Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
April 10, 2012
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via email: rabon(rilrmengineer.com
FROM: Erika Bridges
SUBJECT: Engineering Document Comments for Creek Meadows Sec. 3 Ph. 1
Staff reviewed the above -mentioned engineering documents as requested. The following page
is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the
comments and submit the following information on any Monday by 10:00 a.m. for further staff
review and approval of the plans:
7 One (1) set of revised construction documents.
Please note that the Development Permit Balance (Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection
Fee), will be calculated and requested once the construction documents and engineer's
estimates have been reviewed and approved.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Erika Bridges at
979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC: Creek Meadow Partners, via email: chris(a)oldhamgoodwin.com
r`--- Ml_ t l- 4n cnnnnn
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 3
1. (Repeat) FYI... Additional Development Permit Fee in the amount of 1 % of the total public
infrastructure cost will be required. Based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate, the current
balance is $3,346.95. Based on the most recent cost estimate, the DP Fee Balance is
$3,391.17. Understood.
2. (Repeat) ST-02 — The proposed series of 30" pipes will need to be at least 36" pipes since
to accommodate flow from the larger pipes upstream. Please provide a 0.1-ft drop across
the invert. Not required per our phone conversation (4/10112).
3. (Repeat) W-01 — It looks like that needs to be some sort of bend added near Sta.0+00 for
the sharp deflection. The proposed deflection needs to meet our minimum radius and
be labeled like the other deflections. Revised accordingly.
4. (Repeat) W-02 — It looks like there will be a conflict between the storm sewer and the fire
hydrant & some of the water service leads. The proposed bend is not ideal. Could the
hydrant be located between Lots 5 & 6 so it doesn't have to cross the storm? Revised
accordingly.
5. (Repeat) S-01 — Label the lead flowlines at MH #104. The difference between the
flowlines needs to be less than 24" in order to avoid installing a drop manhole. 1.95'
drop already provided per our phone conversation (4110/12).
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: 4/9/12
April 10, 2012
km
FROM
(*//qqt*4
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION -
PlanningdDe IeprnentSmires
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
Rabon Metcalf, via email: rabonCcDrmenaineer.comv/,
Erika Bridges
SUBJECT: Engineering Document Comments for Creek Meadows Sec. 3 Ph. 1
Staff reviewed the above -mentioned engineering documents as requested. The following page
is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the
comments and submit the following information on any Monday by 10:00 a.m. for further staff
review and approval of the plans:
One (1) set of revised construction documents.
Please note that the Development Permit Balance (Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection
Fee), will be calculated and requested once the construction documents and engineer's
estimates have been reviewed and approved.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Erika Bridges at
979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC: Creek Meadow. Partners, via email: chris a)oldhamgoodwin.com
Case File No. 12-500009
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 3
1. (Repeat) FYI... Additional Development Permit Fee in the amount of 1 % of the total public
infrastructure cost will be required. Based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate, the current
balance is $3,346.95. Based on the most recent cost estimate, the DP Fee Balance is
$3,391.17.
2. (Repeat) ST-02 — The proposed series of 30" pipes will need to be at least 36" pipes since
to accommodate flow from the larger pipes upstream. Please provide a 0.1-ft drop across
the invert.
3. (Repeat) W-01 — It looks like that needs to be some sort of bend added near Sta.0+00 for
the sharp deflection. The proposed deflection needs to meet our minimum radius and
be labeled like the other deflections.
4. (Repeat) W-02 — It looks like there will be a conflict between the storm sewer and the fire
hydrant & some of the water service leads. The proposed bend is not ideal. Could the
hydrant be located between Lots 5 & 6 so it doesn't have to cross the storm?
5. (Repeat) S-01 — Label the lead flowlines at MH #104. The difference between the
flowlines needs to be less than 24" in order to avoid installing a drop manhole.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: 4/9/12
(*hra`�
CITY OF COI FUz STATION <.
Home of Texas A&M University" _
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
January 13, 2012
TO: RME Consulting Engineers, via email: rabonPrmengineer.com
FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP
Principal Planner
SUBJECT: CREEK MEADOWS SEC 3 PH 1 (FP)
Thank you for the submittal of your FINAL PLAT - RESIDENTIAL application. This project will
be distributed to staff next week for their review.
cc: Creek Meadows Partners, Randy Lowry, via email: chris(a)oldhamgoodwin.com
Case file no. 12-00500009
tl"" Planning & Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
_ College Station, Texas 77842
CITY OF COT1,W]! STATION Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979,764.3496
Horne ofTexnsAdM Uuioenity'
MEMORANDUM
January 24, 2012
TO: Rabon Metcalf; via email: rabon@rmeengineer.comt,/
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CREEK MEADOWS SEC 3 PH 1 (FP) - Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above -mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been
addressed and the following information submitted by Monday, January 30, 2012, 10:00 a.m.,
your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
scheduled for, February 16, 2012, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas
Avenue.
One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised final plat;
Thirteen (13) 11"x17" copies of the revised final plat;
One (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat (required after P&Z approval); and
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to:
P&DS—Digital_Submittal@cstx.gov.
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that this application will
expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response
comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review
comments contained herein. If all comments have not been addressed your project will not be
scheduled for a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a
future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your
item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at
the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting.
http://www.cstx.qov/pz
Please note that a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and
prior to the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call
me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments /
cc: Creek Meadows Partners, Randy Lowry; via email: chris@oldhamgoodwin.comi/
Case file #12-00500009
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 1 of 3
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: CREEK MEADOWS SEC 3 PH 1 (FP) - 12-00500009
PLANNING
1. A significant amount of Common Area has been removed from what was proposed for this
phase on the Preliminary Plat. Please revise.
2. Please label the adjoining lots to show where the ownership is found. Based on our GIS
files, the only adjacent property owners are Creek Meadows Partners, LP.
3. Long Brook Court is already an existing street name in College Station. Please revert to
what was approved with the Preliminary Plat, or seek approval with Mandi Alford for a new
street name.
4. Please show that the 50' lot width is met at the setback.
5. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City
of College Station, must be explained. in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your
plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will
constitute a completely new review.
Reviewed by: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner Date: January 23, 2012
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Per the Fire Code, two remote points of access are required when there are more than 30
lots in an area. With the proposed development, more than 50 lots will only be accessible
from one point of access, so a secondary remote access point will be needed.
2. Please note that the construction plans and documents are still under review and may affect
the plat.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges
FIRE COMMENTS NO 1
Date: January 23, 2012
1. A second means of entry/exit from Brookwood to Greens Prairie needs to be added. If this
is not an open street, it at least needs to be a fire access gate with a lock.
Reviewed by: Eric Dotson, Deputy Fire Marshal
Date: January 24, 2012
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. Project location is outside the CSU certification area. CSU will not provide electric service for
this project.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979.764.6255.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez
Date: January 23, 2012
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3
SANITATION
1. Sanitation is ok with this project.
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: January 19, 2012
GREENWAYS
1. No comments
Reviewed by: Venessa Garza, Greenways Program Manager
Date: January 17, 2012
TxDOT Comments
1. No Comment (off state system, no anticipated impact)
Reviewed by: Chad Bonne Date: January 19, 2012
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3